Committee of the Whole
March 04, 2026 · 8 recorded decisions · 20,713 words of debate
Decisions
- 8.1 Lobbyist Registry One Year Review report, dated March 4, 2026, be received.Carried (11 to 0)
- 11.1 2026 Development Charges Update Study dated January 30, 2026, included as Attachment-1 to report 2026-76 - 2026 Administrative Development Charge By-law Update…Carried (11 to 0)
- 11.2 That, with the continued extension by the province of the 2017-2020 assessment cycle… be approvedCarried (11 to 0)
- 16.1 Recreation Facilities Allocation Process be approved.Carried (10 to 0)
- 16.2 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer of Public Services, or designate…Carried (10 to 0)
- 16.2 Following motion be referred to the March 31, 2026 City Council meeting: That the Youth Facility Discount no longer be applicable for rentals at Sleeman Centre…Defeated (4 to 6)
- 16.2 Youth Facility Discount no longer be applicable for rentals at Sleeman Centre, as of September 1, 2026.Carried (6 to 4)
Routine business (1)adopting minutes, adjourning and similar
The whole meeting, as text
Transcribed automatically from the City’s recording. Times run from the start of the recording, which begins before the meeting is called to order.
Read the full transcript (20,713 words)
27:33Okay, I'm gonna call the committee the whole meeting to order for March the 4th.
27:39The mayor is absent today, so I'm filling in at the time being.
27:46First on our agenda will be going into encamera in a while. So is there any disclosure pecuniary interest from anyone?
27:53Okay seeing none. I know I need an authority to move into a closed meeting a motion
28:01to
28:03go into camera under section 239 of the Municipal Act
28:09regarding advice that is subject to solicitor client privilege including communications necessary for that purpose and a
28:16position plan procedure
28:18criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by
28:24or on behalf the municipality or the local board and
28:28And we'll be going in under the Guelph
28:323.3 the Gulf storm hockey club operating agreement and corporate
28:37cybersecurity briefing
28:40Councillor
28:41Quran moves that we can move into closed council do so tail second edge
28:46So any opposition? Okay that
28:50Passes
28:51We'll see everybody in a while. Thank you
28:54Well, thank you everyone for being here and our my apologies for being a little bit late on the start
1:13:57We've just come
1:13:59From a closed meeting where we discussed two items the Gulf storm hockey club operating agreement and the corporate
1:14:07cybersecurity briefing for 2026 and
1:14:10Council gave direction to staff on both of those items. I
1:14:15will
1:14:16start the
1:14:18Open portion of the meeting. I did receive regrets from Mayor Guthrie and Councillor Gibson
1:14:23If I could ask everyone to please stand up for the national anthem
1:14:28And please do sing along if you're in the room and you'd like to I would like to take a moment now for silent reflection
1:16:04I will now read the indigenous territorial acknowledgement
1:16:50As we gather
1:16:52Let's take time to reflect on our privilege to live and work in Guelph a
1:16:56City built over rich indigenous histories
1:16:59We are guests here and we should reflect upon the responsibility to care for this land the people who live here today and
1:17:07Generations to come if our actions today can move us towards reconciliation
1:17:12We should take pause and make those decisions with intention and gratitude
1:17:17This place we call Guelph has served as traditional lands and a place of refuge for many people over time
1:17:24But more specifically the Ati Wanderak and the Hadrona Shawnee
1:17:30This land is held as the treaty lands and territory of the Mississauga's of the Credit First Nation
1:17:36Well flies directly adjacent to the Haldeman tract and is part of a long-established traditional hunting ground for the six nations of the Grand River
1:17:46many first nations Inui and
1:17:49Meti peoples who have come from across Turtle Island called Guelph home today to
1:17:59Move on to item six in our agenda. I'm going to turn things over
1:18:04to Councillor Caron for some recognitions of staff accomplishments
1:18:11Great. Thank you chair Goller. We have a lot of recognitions today
1:18:15And we're really proud as a council to be able to
1:18:18applaud all of our staff who do work above and beyond their their daily duties. So today we are
1:18:26On behalf of council it is our pleasure to recognize
1:18:31Adelene
1:18:32Ishimwe who has successfully earned her project management professional PMP certification from the project management Institute
1:18:40This certification is a testament to Adelene's
1:18:44dedication, expertise and commitment to excellence in project management. The PMP certification is recognized globally and
1:18:52signifies that she has met rigorous standards and possesses the skills necessary to lead and direct projects
1:18:59effectively and that benefits not only our
1:19:02City Hall as a corporation, but our community as a whole so congratulations Adelene
1:19:07And the next item is our leadership Academy cohort number five
1:19:17Wow, there's there's a lot of names here
1:19:20Which means that this leadership Academy is and striving for excellence has become part of our corporate culture
1:19:26So today it's my pleasure to recognize the City of Guelph's fifth cohort to complete the city's leadership Academy a
1:19:32Program that builds leadership through skills through a combination of classroom and practical hands-on learning
1:19:38Being recognized today are 17 employees. I think this is our biggest cohort yet
1:19:44Who have participated in this leadership development program each person dedicating more than 40 hours to improve their skills and knowledge
1:19:51to benefit their leadership practices and
1:19:54Contribute to an innovative service oriented and high performing high performing work culture in the city
1:20:01Program participants complete 13 courses and a capstone project that benefits the city's work to deliver responsible and responsive
1:20:10Public service to Guelph's growing and diverse community
1:20:13Participants deliver their capstone project presentation to the executive team. That's not nerve-wracking at all. I'm sure
1:20:19This work is done in addition to their regular work and demonstrates both the commitment of participants to the corporate value of learning
1:20:26With that said, I would like to recognize the following city employees for their participation their hard work and their continued dedication
1:20:34Today we are honoring Abbey Spielmacher
1:20:38Adam Wilczek Bill Bond Diane Inkster
1:20:43Eleanor Gillan Eric Lucko
1:20:46Jane Gurney Ken Piper
1:20:50Kim Krocek
1:20:52Michael Bartholomew
1:20:54Monica Silva Rebecca Thaler
1:20:57Savan Harsh
1:20:59Sheena Switzer
1:21:00Stacy Lachlan Stephanie Guy and Susan O'Toole
1:21:05So on behalf of my fellow council colleagues
1:21:08Congratulations on your success and thank you for the work you do on behalf of the city of Guelph
1:21:13So for those who are here today who participated in the Leadership Academy cohort five
1:21:18Since there's so many of you. I'd like to take the opportunity to invite you to gather for a group photo
1:21:23And we are going to the Galleria. I believe for that photo
1:21:28Because our little backdrop here doesn't quite have enough room for all of you. So
1:21:32And maybe a round of applause
1:21:37We'll take a couple of minutes to step up to the Galleria take a couple photos and then we'll continue the meeting. Well, thank you
1:24:44Thank you everyone
1:24:46That moves us on to the next agenda item
1:24:50We have the consent agenda for governance and I'll turn things over to chair Busuttil
1:24:58Thank you
1:24:59Chair Goller, this is a consent item. You have the report and the recommendation in front of you
1:25:07If someone is willing to place the motion of receipt Councillor Caron
1:25:12seconded by
1:25:13Councillor Richardson and
1:25:17Just if if there is anyone opposed or have any questions
1:25:22Okay seeing none. I think that carries them. Thank you
1:25:30Thank you so much chair Busuttil
1:25:33So we've recorded that as a unanimous vote
1:25:35To approve the report for the law is registry year one
1:25:40Then we're moving along on our agenda. We're going over to chair
1:25:45Tehran for item 11 the administrative development charge by lab. I'll turn things over to you
1:25:52Okay, thank you chair Goller got two fairly major items today and that is the administrative development charge by law
1:25:59And the property tax policy, so I'm going to turn it over. We have a presentation for the first item
1:26:05Shana O'Dwyer and Justin way in our
1:26:09Finance department over to you for our presentation
1:26:13Good morning members of council. My name is Justin way and I'm the manager of financial strategy and reporting
1:26:25I'm pleased to be before you today to present an overview of the administrative updates to the DC by-law that are recommended in the staff reports
1:26:35I'll then turn it over to Shana to provide an update on what other municipalities are doing with DC incentives
1:26:41So over the past 20 months or so there have been three major pieces of legislation that have impacted the DC act
1:26:51There are bills 185 bill 17 bill 60
1:26:54If you recall our DC by-law was last updated in November 2024 for some of the changes made through bill 185
1:27:01That had a special transitional pathway in timeline
1:27:04The remaining change related to updating the rate freeze provisions is being made through this update as it was not included in that previous
1:27:11special process
1:27:12The second item is bill 17 which received real assent in June 2025
1:27:16This was followed by an order in council on October 23 for changes in effect as of November 3rd and
1:27:23The impact of this was a deferral DC payment timing from building permit issuance to occupancy
1:27:29Then lastly bill 60 which received real assent in November November 2025
1:27:33While while there are a few administrative updates that go into effect right away most of those changes
1:27:39And impacts require some future work ahead
1:27:42So the DC by-law update before council for approval today is administrative in nature
1:27:50It primarily includes changes that align our DC by-law with legislation
1:27:55Some minor housekeeping items to clarify definitions and it does not alter growth forecast capital requirements or any DC rates
1:28:02The first change is related to bill 185 which limits the timeline for a DC rate freeze to 18 months
1:28:08Prior to this DC rates were frozen at the time of a complete site plan application
1:28:12We're zoning by-law amendments and they're frozen from two years from that date of application approval
1:28:18Going forward. They'll be frozen for 18 months interest continues to accrue on the frozen DC rates from the time of the planning application
1:28:24And that has not changed and really the objective of this change is to speed up development once planning approvals are in place
1:28:31The second and biggest change was from bill 17 which has updated the timing of payments from building permit issuance to occupancy
1:28:37And this will have a substantial impact on the timing of our DC collections and we'll look into that estimate of this impact on the next slide
1:28:45It's also important to note as interest is no longer to be charged from the DC's owing from building permit dates to occupancy
1:28:52We see the time value of money also erode from this change
1:28:55Nevertheless the building community strongly advocated for this change as it will reduce the carrying charges
1:29:00They have on a development's ultimately improving the proformers
1:29:03So looking at the financial impact at payment at occupancy. There's several items to note
1:29:11The delayed payment timing will result in cash flow pressures for the city
1:29:16Decrease present value of our DC revenues loss interest earnings or greater interest costs from increased requirements debt finance and greater uncertainty in time
1:29:24your receipt
1:29:25For this analysis the finance team were closely with the building team to pull data on the average number of months between building permit issuance and occupancy
1:29:33For residential development at the city by type
1:29:36So the first table on left shows that the average range is for from nine nine months
1:29:4117 months and 14 months for low medium and high density respectively
1:29:44We then apply this data to the forecast DC collections, which was prepared previously when collection was at building permit issuance
1:29:52So with the chart you see what they tried on the right you'll see that this estimated impact
1:29:56Will be in the range of 10 to 20 million over the next three years
1:30:00Staff will continue to track and report on this impact through a quarterly budget monitoring reports
1:30:05But it's very likely that additional capital deferrals will be required through future capital budget updates in order to manage these impacts
1:30:11And then lastly we'll look at bill 60
1:30:17So there's two changes
1:30:19Effective immediate immediately upon royal assent and these are primarily related to reporting an oversight
1:30:24So firstly there's a new requirements have the annual DC statements go to council by June 30th and submitted to the minister by July 15th
1:30:31Secondly the minister may request copies are DC bylaws and background studies at any time
1:30:36Overall happy to report these changes are not a concern as we're already producing these documents within those required timelines
1:30:42So we have no problem submitting them to the province through the required deadlines
1:30:45And then there's two major changes or sorry two main changes that require some future work ahead for the city
1:30:51First local service policy or LSPs
1:30:54So bill 60 introduced a requirement to include LSP as part of the DC background study
1:30:59While some municipalities don't have LSP in place
1:31:02Well, DC background study does and only a minor only minor updates would be needed to bring it fully into compliance with the new requirements
1:31:09However, the city's last major review and update of the LSP occurred with the 2018 DC background study
1:31:15So staff I recommend a more fulsome review and update to be completed and brought back to council for approval by May
1:31:212027 and that timelines in alignment with the transition timelines provided for in the legislation and
1:31:26Really this review would help identify any opportunities to improve clarity and predictability around the LSP and ultimately support the next
1:31:33comprehensive DC background study update, which is currently planned to begin in 2027 for council approval in 2029
1:31:40Secondly it's an is a new land acquisition class
1:31:43So bill 60 and introduced a requirement to separate land costs
1:31:46Into a separate class of service in DC bylaws and as part of this to remove land values from the historic service level standards for each individual service
1:31:55And the transition timelines require this work to be done as part of the next comprehensive DC background study update
1:32:00Which as mentioned slated to begin in 2027 and coming to council in 2029
1:32:06And with that I'll hand it over to Shannon for the last few slides
1:32:14Thank You Justin and good morning council
1:32:17So these days there is always a lot going on with development charges and that includes legislative changes
1:32:24Lobbying by the building community
1:32:26Analysis being undertaken by think tanks and initiatives being undertaken by municipalities
1:32:31So while we're in front of you on this topic. We wanted to take the opportunity to update you on what we're seeing out there from other municipalities
1:32:47So last year we brought you information in the March housing and wealth semi-annual update
1:32:52About what some municipalities had done with respect to providing discounts or exemptions from DC's
1:32:58Since then some of those discounts have been expanded and others have begun to explore incentives
1:33:04For example last year we reported to you that Mississauga had partially discounted their DC rates
1:33:09And since then they have expanded that to a full grant in lieu for some types of residential building
1:33:15Peel region has matched this initiative with both set to expire at the end of this council term
1:33:20The city of London is currently in the process of exploring a community improvement plan to provide support for first-time home buyers and
1:33:27Last fall the city of Burlington directed
1:33:30Their staff to bring back options for DC incentives
1:33:34These approaches vary in scope duration and fiscal exposure
1:33:38Some have funding commitments from other levels of government to support their changes and others do not
1:33:44We are providing this update to let you know that we are monitoring what others are doing and why we do not recommend going down this path in Guelph
1:33:57As a reminder DC rates are set to recover the capital costs of infrastructure that support growth within
1:34:03Legislated constraints
1:34:05The rates are a mathematical calculation that spreads the eligible capital costs across forecasted growth
1:34:12Providing an exemption from paying DCs creates a gap because it does not make the infrastructure cost less
1:34:18It simply provides less funds to pay for it
1:34:22The exemption gap must be filled and municipalities have very limited options for how to do that
1:34:27namely property taxes and utility rates
1:34:31Guelph has highly prioritized growth enabling capital works in our capital budget and forecast
1:34:36Even in the face of low DC collections using debt financing and inter-reserve fund borrowing
1:34:43This means that the city is committed to DC debt payments that non-eligible capital work has been deferred to accommodate
1:34:50Inter-reserve fund borrowing this puts pressure on older infrastructure and increases the risk of service disruption
1:34:56And that is a trade-off for moving infrastructure that supports growth forward in the face of limited capital funds
1:35:03There are also significant statutory discounts and exemptions already required
1:35:09Targeted at development that the province has prioritized
1:35:12Rental housing affordable and nonprofit housing and additional dwelling units
1:35:17Making up for these exemptions is already diverting a significant amount of property tax and utility utility rates supported capital funding
1:35:25to help pay for growth
1:35:27The development community has been very
1:35:30Active in advocating for DC related changes and reductions and have become very effective at it
1:35:36They recently successfully advocated for moving payment of residential DCs from building permit to occupancy as you just heard from Justin
1:35:44This has been in place since November 3rd, but so far we have not seen this result in increased building permits
1:35:51We are hopeful that will change
1:35:59Zeroing in on Burlington for a moment this slide shows what services are included in Guelph single-tier DC
1:36:06Versus Burlington's lower tier and Halton's upper tier DCs
1:36:10Burlington has not finalized their direct direction forward at this time
1:36:14But one option that was moved forward at a vote of their committee of the whole in February was a broad-based residential DC exemption
1:36:22Earlier this week they voted instead to direct their staff to pursue a potential CIP option
1:36:28With funding from another source aside from property taxes
1:36:32While Burlington's ultimate decision on this matter is uncertain
1:36:35We wanted to show you some of the differences between Guelph and Burlington a
1:36:40Burlington exemption would only apply to the lower tier portion of the DC
1:36:45The Halton region DC would still be applicable to development in Burlington and even with a full lower tier exemption
1:36:51The cost of building a single detached residential unit in Burlington would be just under
1:36:57$7,000 less than the undiscounted rate in Guelph
1:37:00The other thing to point out is that some of the core enabling services like water wastewater and storm water
1:37:06Would not be impacted as those services are provided at the regional level
1:37:11So what if Guelph did that?
1:37:14Based on planning application status there are 654 units ready and fairly likely to move ahead to building permit in
1:37:212026 and
1:37:23171 more units with the potential to do so if
1:37:27Guelph implemented a blanket residential DC exemption similar to that which Burlington was considering at one point
1:37:34That would require municipal tax and ratepayers to make up for over 46 million dollars in DC exemptions a
1:37:40Property tax impact of 8.85 percent
1:37:44plus increases to water rates and that would be in addition to the nearly 18 million of
1:37:49statutory DC exemptions and discounts that would already need to be funded
1:37:54For the rental and affordable or nonprofit units included in those estimates
1:37:59So this is a chart that you've seen before and this version was updated for us last August by Watson and Associates
1:38:11The green arrow shows you where Guelph's residential DCs are in comparison with other municipalities all in including the school board DCs
1:38:19We felt it was important to show this given recent inaccurate reports that Guelph's DCs are at the higher end
1:38:26That is simply not true
1:38:33The reality is that limited municipal revenue tools combined with high a high level of responsibility for infrastructure is
1:38:41creating an untenable financial situation if
1:38:44DCs are reduced the city's options are to defer growth
1:38:49Infrastructure investment indefinitely
1:38:51constraining growth and working against our responsibility to build infrastructure to enable
1:38:56legislative growth targets to be met or
1:38:59To remove amenity based infrastructure from our DCs and only deliver core infrastructure
1:39:04Which puts pressure on the municipal infrastructure that makes a community or?
1:39:09Shift additional cost to the property tax and rate base
1:39:13Over the past several years the province has made dozens of changes to DC and planning legislation
1:39:20Every time it requires analysis
1:39:23Quantification of impacts reporting communication adjustments to financial strategies
1:39:29adjustments to administrative processes and systems and bylaw updates
1:39:33Every time there's an announcement from any level of government about an intent to look into or do something related to reduce DCs or
1:39:41Other changes to make development conditions more favorable
1:39:45The effect is to freeze up development plans until that policy is either implemented or determined not to be moving forward a
1:39:53New approach is needed
1:39:55Attempting to incentivize development through constant legislative changes has not had the desired effect
1:40:01We need an approach that is administratively efficient and does not place all the risk and financial burden on municipalities
1:40:09We need new
1:40:11Stable predictable funding for growth infrastructure from other upper levels of government
1:40:16I have emphasized or underlined the word new on the slide
1:40:20Because I don't mean the repurposing of existing infrastructure funding such as federal gas tax
1:40:25Which we already rely on for capital infrastructure renewal work
1:40:30Stable and predictable means a long-term commitment to annual allocations that we do not have to submit applications for
1:40:37With uncertain outcomes and unknown approval timelines
1:40:41Upfront means that upper levels of government do not require municipalities to take on risky decisions to provide
1:40:48time limited exemptions
1:40:50Underwritten by property tax and ratepayers and hope for that money to come
1:40:56It means new dedicated funding for growth infrastructure that municipalities can count on
1:41:02With that kind of commitment we could update our DC study
1:41:05Reduce DC rates without jeopardizing our capital plans and without pushing the cost on to property taxpayers
1:41:13so that's
1:41:14everything I have to
1:41:16Share and we're happy to take any questions from council
1:41:22Thank you so much for that presentation and that call to action for for legislative stability was really really hit
1:41:28It was I'm glad you added that to your slide as
1:41:32a call to action at the end
1:41:34Before we go to council questions, I recognize councillor Allt as the first question
1:41:40We are under a public meeting under section 12 of the development charges act
1:41:45So I do need to call for anyone in the audience
1:41:48If you are here to delegate and there will be a number going up on the screen if there's anyone watching from home
1:41:54Who would like to delegate on this matter now is the time to call in so we'll take a
1:42:00few minutes to pause and wait for any
1:42:04Calls to come in is there anyone in the gallery who wishes to delegate on this item?
1:42:09Seeing none, we'll just wait one moment
1:42:12We've had no incoming call. So we're going to move to discussion
1:42:50Councillor Allt you have the floor
1:42:52Thank you very much chair Caron
1:42:55through you to to our staff and in particular to
1:43:00Mizzow Dwyer with first of all a shout out
1:43:03I want to compliment our staff and particularly Mizzow Dwyer on perhaps the most blatantly
1:43:11Political financial report that I have ever seen at City Council and one that is both direct and forthright and founded in fact
1:43:21Mizzow Dwyer, I think you might be my first financial being counter hero
1:43:26It's something that we need to hear and it's something that every municipality in Ontario needs to state
1:43:33Because Doug Ford does it again with that I'd like to go to some of the particulars
1:43:38I originally only had one question
1:43:40But as the as the report went on more grew first of all, I'd like to focus on bill 17 and interest versus carrying
1:43:48Charges some comments were made about capital deferrals and this strikes me as a vicious cycle that we're now entering into
1:43:56Could we please comment on what kind of capital deferrals we might have to address?
1:44:02Will these be infrastructure and will these interestingly enough therefore lead to fewer building permits possibly being
1:44:13Approved because we just don't have the infrastructure. I don't know whether that's to our
1:44:18Financial staff or whether our planning staff needs to address it
1:44:24through the chair, I'll start
1:44:26and so I think
1:44:28the level of deferrals of
1:44:32Capital works through the next budget cycle and future budget cycles will really be dependent on how those estimates bear out in reality
1:44:40in terms of the
1:44:42Delayed collections and how that impacts what we had projected
1:44:47And so we will take you know the usual methodical approach that we take to updating the capital forecast
1:44:54We'll update those projections. We will
1:44:58make other changes if we get any
1:45:01Grants or if we end up closing out capital projects at under budget and are able to return money to the reserve funds
1:45:09So all of that will factor into that next update
1:45:12And then we will rely on our capital prioritization framework
1:45:16to figure out which
1:45:19projects to
1:45:20push out
1:45:22Thank you. I wanted to comment on what I consider to be the incredible irony that this could actually
1:45:29lead to a
1:45:32Hesitation of builders to actually consider large-scale developments because the infrastructure or
1:45:39Other amenities just aren't there. Is that a correct assumption and is the the promise of the three million homes actually
1:45:48That we've heard
1:45:50Really just dust in the wind
1:45:55Thank you through the chair. I'll start and then others to my left may have thoughts on that
1:46:00I think that absolutely that there's a cycle there to look at with infrastructure
1:46:08We need to build enabling infrastructure to allow development to happen and we're doing our best to move that forward
1:46:14In the face of all of these changes recognizing the need for that development
1:46:19But there is a time that will come that that high priority items
1:46:24We are we have we've deferred all the medium priority
1:46:28We started to defer some of the
1:46:31Medium-high priority last year and so there's not that much further to go in the future
1:46:37Besides high priority deferrals. I think so there there's absolutely a circular effect that will will happen now
1:46:44We do have our
1:46:46Municipal service and financing agreements policy in place so that if we've deferred
1:46:52Infrastructure out in our capital budget, but a developer is ready to move something forward
1:46:57ahead of that timeline there is a pathway for them to do that and so
1:47:02So we've we've tried to balance that impact
1:47:05Are there comments from the other side? I don't know I can't see
1:47:13Through through the chair, I think I just say that
1:47:17In terms of the prioritization already done we were prioritizing city-wide projects that would
1:47:24advance city-wide growth
1:47:27Rather than site specific and so
1:47:30I think that that would be the first place that you would that we would see a bit of a change is that we would
1:47:38We would
1:47:40Potentially be impacting specific developments if we had to go any further than we are right now. So hopefully that that helps
1:47:48Kind of round out the the question
1:47:51If I might carry that on then
1:47:54Quite often there are
1:47:58I'm chair quarterbacks, I guess I'll say who are constantly talking about libraries and rec centers
1:48:05We're not talking libraries and rec centers here. Are we we're talking about the very foundations of building it? Are we not?
1:48:15Through the mayor or sorry rather the chair
1:48:18we are talking about all of the
1:48:22Infrastructure that supports growth and so there's different priority levels for different types of infrastructure and that enabling infrastructure as
1:48:31CAO Baker mentioned that serves the whole city
1:48:35such as water
1:48:36stations
1:48:37Waste water facilities that are needed that would constrain growth across the whole city if they weren't moved forward is what we've prioritized
1:48:46Thank you. I think that's very important for people to hear
1:48:49I want to go to bill 60 land acquisition
1:48:53Class the new class system
1:48:56There's a
1:48:57It's implied and I think that you stated it that there is a reduction of the cost to the actual
1:49:03Builders and developers and that this is going to be passed on to the to the taxpayers
1:49:09Do we have any idea because this is a huge issue?
1:49:13We have a you know an 8% or more tax increase this year
1:49:18What you're telling me is that the new normal is 8% and beyond and I was wondering if you could comment on that please
1:49:27Through the chair, I might have to help you might have to help me parse that question apart a little bit counselor alt
1:49:33So the land acquisition class
1:49:36So that is that essentially will take land costs for growth and separate them out of the existing
1:49:44Services like services for a highway or recreation and parks take those out and put them in their own class
1:49:50And so the impact of that overall is we don't know what that is at this time
1:49:56We don't expect it to be a very significant impact actually because we still will be able to
1:50:02Collect DCs for land
1:50:04But we have to do that analysis and that will happen through the next development charge background study update
1:50:11And thank you essentially you answered the question
1:50:14I'm a little relieved by your answer to be perfectly honest because I'd expected it to be greater
1:50:21So again, thank you very much to our financial staff for this and I I cannot
1:50:28Say anything more than
1:50:30Residents concerned about taxes need to remember Doug Ford does it again
1:50:36Thank you counselor out for your questions. I have on the speaker's list counselor busatil and goller
1:50:43That's a busatil. Thank you through the chair
1:50:45I have most of my questions have been asked by a counselor alt
1:50:49But I do also want to say ditto in terms of appreciation
1:50:53For the staff this report was excellent in in fact really making the connection between
1:50:58The centralized provincial kind of regulations and the impact locally
1:51:03Tax base and our capital planning
1:51:06As well. I did have a question and it's a clarification
1:51:10I wasn't clear in the report for mr. Way when when we talk around bill 60 and the reporting cycle
1:51:17I know we do the reports here at city council, but I'm curious about whether or not or not
1:51:22This is a new centralized requirement to report to the province
1:51:28Because I don't recall that
1:51:30Yes through the care. I believe it is a new centralized
1:51:34Report and requirement to the province that being said there's been no
1:51:39Details fully released yet as to how we submit our reports
1:51:44But we are confident that you know within those timeframes we already generate those reports
1:51:48So as soon as we know when and where we need to submit it, we'll do a no problem
1:51:53Thank you. And if the chair will allow me a comment, I you know
1:51:57Uh
1:51:58Just from other areas
1:52:00In the in the province. I guess for me this is where is this trend line going in terms of centralization and planning in the g
1:52:08RCA environmental protection and so on this reporting and I and I come from a highly regulated
1:52:14ministry of education where
1:52:16Everything is centralized and improved from capital to everything else and as we see the
1:52:22Infrastructure pilot project happening next door with brampton. I'm concerned about the centralization
1:52:28And the increasing control and monitoring
1:52:31Not only downwards in terms of the regulation in the acts but upwards in terms of who determines
1:52:37What are the priorities here in guelph? What are the capital priorities as we heard and so on?
1:52:41So just a little bit of concern about where is this trend line going? Thank you
1:52:46Thanks, councillor Busuttil. Uh, councillor Goller over to you. We don't have the recommendations on the floor yet
1:52:50Would you be willing to place us on the floor seconded by
1:52:53councillor hauser
1:52:56Floor service. Uh, thank you and through you chair Caron
1:52:59Um, I really appreciate this report and the explanation you gave that it is very clear to me
1:53:05I do have one outstanding question from some of the the
1:53:09One letter from the the constitution that wrote in and some of the messages I've received from the home builders
1:53:16Um, you sort of debunked the idea that if we lower these things we would actually see more builds
1:53:22But just so that I fully understand if we were to reduce or eliminate
1:53:28Development charges for residential and if they were to be those those buildings that are built
1:53:34um, I understand that
1:53:36The argument that they're making is we're losing that potential
1:53:40Additional tax revenue from those buildings if they're delayed for a few years
1:53:45How many years would it take for for a bill to sort of make up the development charges?
1:53:51And just at a high level and then also if we were to
1:53:56You know based on on the approvals of this year if we were to have no development charges for next year
1:54:02What would that require of the tax impact?
1:54:05To to the taxpayer so that I can understand that that level of impact
1:54:10Through the chair, so I'll start with the first part
1:54:14That's a complicated question
1:54:17and so the the
1:54:19Assessment growth revenue is what they'd be talking about and there's there's that side of the equation
1:54:24Absolutely, but the other side of that equation is that growth comes with new expenses
1:54:29That have to let new services expanded services to serve additional residents. And so it's not just a net
1:54:37New impact the other thing is that that assessment growth revenue also builds the capacity to renew
1:54:44the growth the infrastructure that is built with development charges
1:54:48Upfront down the road as those that infrastructure ages that contributes to the renewal dollars
1:54:54So that is why there is a separate revenue stream for building that growth enabling infrastructure
1:55:00So to to suggest that assessment growth revenue should be used for growth enabling infrastructure
1:55:06I think is is not quite correct
1:55:09Um, and then can you repeat the second part of your question for me?
1:55:12If we were to have no development charges say in 2026
1:55:17What would be the impact to the taxpayer because as I understand that we would still have to put in the infrastructure
1:55:22We would be spending the money to to
1:55:25To build that infrastructure
1:55:27What might that impact be to the taxpayer?
1:55:29Next year if we were to do that just so that I understand that a high level, you know, what level of impact this would make
1:55:36Sure, so we tried to quantify that by looking at the planning applications that are in progress and what the status of those are
1:55:45And so I had mentioned on one of my slides that um, I think there's over 600 that are
1:55:51ready like ready to move forward and then there's 800 and some more that are
1:55:57Potential in 2026 and so we quantified the impact of if there were no residential if they were exempted
1:56:05Not deferred but exempted then that would be about 46 million dollars
1:56:10Which is over 8 percent and I don't have that slide right in front of me right now, but oh 8.85 percent tax levy impact
1:56:19Plus an impact to water wastewater and storm water rates
1:56:24Okay, okay. So so if if next year tax levy were to be like five percent on top of this it would end up being like 13 percent
1:56:31Is that roughly correct?
1:56:33That's roughly correct. If that that development all moved forward. Yes. Okay. Thank you very much. That really helps me understand the
1:56:41Um, how much we're being asked to to put up uh from the taxpayers. Thank you. Thank you councillor uh chair karana
1:56:48Thanks, councillor councillor hauser
1:56:51Thank you and through the chair um
1:56:54Following up I had a very similar question but to follow up on that
1:56:57Are these conversations? I know that it the province changed from permit to occupancy for the dc charges
1:57:02Are these conversations helping or?
1:57:06like
1:57:07Causing a greater destabilization because we're now waiting now builders may be waiting for are they going to do waivers now instead?
1:57:14Are they going to waive them completely or eliminate dc charges?
1:57:17Or do you think could that be contributing to the fact that there hasn't been an uptake?
1:57:23Through the chair, I do think so. I do think that every time there's a policy that's announced
1:57:29Or a potential consideration of of a policy by upper levels of government or any level of government
1:57:36That that potentially has a freezing impact on development because there's the potential to have a more favorable condition in the future
1:57:45If you wait for that thing to materialize and so I do think that that has to be a part of what's contributing to this
1:57:55Thank you
1:57:57Councillor Chew
1:58:00Thank you through you, madam chair
1:58:02Um, I'm just looking at that letter as well that was sent out by the constitution and they mentioned barry
1:58:08as an example of the dc waivers
1:58:13Being as a correlation to the housing starts that they had in that municipality
1:58:17And uh, I'm just wondering based on your knowledge. Um, if not, it's okay as well
1:58:22What are kind of the conditions that kind of allowed them to kind of take that gamble?
1:58:28um in barry and what are the constraints that we may have in doing something
1:58:35similar or modest
1:58:39Uh through the chair, so I don't actually have specifics of the barry situation to
1:58:44Explain what they've done or or how they're paying for it. Um, but
1:58:49There's different arrangements. There's different grants that
1:58:53Have been provided to various municipalities from upper levels of government that they're using for some of these initiatives
1:58:59And some are not doing that and I'm not sure there there some are taking on a risk
1:59:05And so that's why we tried to quantify that risk for you to show you what that could look like based on realistic
1:59:13planning like development that could move forward
1:59:17If you were to consider such a
1:59:20Policy
1:59:24Thank you
1:59:26Any more questions or comments on this item from members of council?
1:59:30Um, I have a quick question. Um, you know when in the development industry
1:59:34You know, they have a pro forma that they work with and and
1:59:38ROI return on their investment as part of that pro forma and rightfully so any developer or home builder
1:59:44They've got land acquisition carrying costs
1:59:47There's lots of reasons, uh, you know that their costs are escalating and they they want to return on investment and deserve that as well
1:59:55In the current, uh legislation and in any of our policies, however
2:00:01When a waiver is embedded in the cost, uh of dc's for any form of building, there's no
2:00:08Condition that we can impose that forces a builder to pass that savings on to the purchaser
2:00:16Um, is that is that correct in other words?
2:00:20You know if they're a market housing builder, they're selling their product at market
2:00:25We don't see that dc waiver embedded in that because we don't have a condition that requires it
2:00:32Uh to the chair, that's correct. We have no way of of um
2:00:37Ensuring that any discount is passed on to the end purchaser
2:00:41Thank you. And um your final slide again
2:00:44I applaud you for adding that because advocacy is certainly part of something we as a team along with staff and city council want to do
2:00:51Um, although it's not one of the recommendations, um, would it be helpful for council to be able to
2:00:57pass either this this today or at council, uh at the end of the month?
2:01:04a motion
2:01:06that
2:01:07We write a letter to the province asking for a legislative moratorium on on
2:01:12Planning changes and dc changes because we we want to let the dust settle and see how our building starts
2:01:19Pan out in the next 12 18 months if we have a period of legislative stability
2:01:25Would that be helpful to staff?
2:01:28Us I certainly don't think it could hurt. We do take the opportunity to um provide that
2:01:34Um recommendation whenever we respond to an ero
2:01:37When when draft legislation is um provided to comment on so
2:01:43I I think that would be fine. Thank you
2:01:46Great. Thank you. I know your ero responses on the info sheet seem to be
2:01:51More and more and more it's almost a you know five or six per info sheet
2:01:54You're you're responding to legislative changes. So I appreciate the staff time that goes into that
2:01:59So we have six recommendations on the floor unless anyone wants them separated
2:02:03I'll I'll call the vote on this item. Is there anyone opposed to the six recommendations on this item?
2:02:10I don't see anyone opposed so that is carried. Thanks again to you and your team
2:02:14Moving on to the next item. It's our property tax policy. It's that time of year. I think it's every march
2:02:19So this is a standard annual item. We do have a presentation from james krauters. So we'll uh
2:02:26open the
2:02:27podium for that presentation
2:02:30And I'll pass the floor over to staff
2:02:55Good morning
2:02:56Good morning. Thank you chair krump
2:02:59Uh, good morning everyone. I'm james krautter deputy treasurer manager of treasury and revenue for the city of guelph
2:03:07I'm here to talk about tax policy
2:03:09We do it on an annual basis
2:03:11And this is the purpose of the report is to
2:03:16We'll just wait for the
2:03:18I'm in charge here. Sorry
2:03:21purpose of the report
2:03:23Is to provide information and recommendations on tax ratios
2:03:28And rates this is a combination of decisions that have already been made by council
2:03:32From a perspective of overall tax policy at the last reassessment budget, etc
2:03:39um
2:03:40approvals required to
2:03:42Set in place the billing for the final tax bill
2:03:47First installment the end of june
2:03:50And it reflects the updated
2:03:532026 assessment by empac. So some key highlights
2:04:00Overall budget was just over
2:04:03383 million dollars
2:04:05And i'll refer to that sort of as the size of the pie later on in the presentation
2:04:10Uh hospital levy of three hundred and seventy five thousand will be collected as a small additional levy on every tax bill
2:04:19We have assessment growth of three hundred and thirty five million dollars in
2:04:242025 which resulted in just approximately
2:04:28four point seven million dollars in additional
2:04:31um taxation
2:04:33And while I mentioned that we're using 2026 assessment values from empac
2:04:39It's still based upon the provincial
2:04:432016 current value assessment and that's set through legislation
2:04:48As the reassessment remains on pause
2:04:55If we go back to september of last year, uh council approved the affordable rental housing subclass
2:05:02So that was a step that was made
2:05:04By council here and a handful of other municipalities across the province
2:05:09um
2:05:10The eligible criteria ensures that there has to be agreements for affordability with government entities
2:05:17empacs responsible for
2:05:19Defining those properties and putting them on the assessment rule. There were none that were on the assessment rule for
2:05:262026 empac is still in the process of gathering that information
2:05:31They've actually now created new tax codes for that development
2:05:36And in the fall of 2026, they will do
2:05:41Mid-year assessment notice changes. So if there's anything that's eligible with engulf, that will be the time that we know that
2:05:54So I talked about sort of the size of the pie that
2:05:56383 million dollars
2:05:59Um, well, this doesn't look like a circle. It provides you some clarity about how we slice that pie through tax policy
2:06:07So the black bars are what is included or the darker bars or what's included on the assessment rule
2:06:14So for instance, if we were to split that pie strictly by assessment
2:06:1874 of that pie would be split on the residential side
2:06:22multi residential 5 11
2:06:25On the commercial four in the industrial and the exempt portion would have 6 of that overall pie
2:06:31As we know the exempt portion
2:06:33Of the assessment doesn't pay any taxes and then with tax ratios
2:06:38everything shifts
2:06:40So the lighter slides then the lighter bars represent how we will be slicing the overall pie
2:06:54We talk about the residential sector and the median single family detached dwelling
2:07:00Is assessed at 411,000 in the city of guelph. That is up
2:07:06$1,000 from last year
2:07:08Just as new properties get built the and improved over the city that average while we're still looking at the 2016
2:07:17Sorry median that median value while we're still looking at the 2016
2:07:22CVA has been increasing slightly over time
2:07:26So when we look at the overall impact to the that median residential property
2:07:31We see a slight change
2:07:33$12 and 45 cents on an annual basis just related to assessment role impact
2:07:39The budget impact is
2:07:41392
2:07:43$5 and 7 cents that hospital levy that we talked about of the 375,000 that impact the resident median residential property
2:07:51Is $5 and 39 cents for an overall impact of
2:07:56$409 and 91 cents
2:07:59That's assuming the same tax ratios as utilized in
2:08:042025
2:08:08and similarly across all tax classes that
2:08:12increase would be the same
2:08:14For the budget impact and the hospital impact to total 7.7
2:08:197%
2:08:25The other thing that we need to be cognizant of is in 1998 the city of guelph council passed
2:08:33And adopted an optional tax class
2:08:36Of new multi-residential was one of the few municipalities in 98 that did that was progressive and it was done to
2:08:44Incent overall
2:08:46um the development of multi-residential dwellings
2:08:51Um, and at that time the ratio was set at one. So when we talk about ratios, that's the
2:08:57relative impact between the residential rate and then the individual class
2:09:03So the residential
2:09:05rate for residential and new multi-residential are the same in guelph and that has been since 1998
2:09:12For the new multi-residential sector
2:09:16um
2:09:17It puts that building into that class for 35 years
2:09:21So from the date that it enters to 35 years later
2:09:25It will jump out of new multi-residential and legislatively go to multi-residential
2:09:31So right now we have ratios of one for new multi-res
2:09:35And we have 1.786 for multi-res
2:09:39We need to be cognizant of what happens at that 35 year mark. So 98 35 years was a long time. I started in the municipal sector in 99
2:09:512033 was a long time away. We're approaching that very quickly
2:09:56So we need to be cognizant of what happens at that point in time
2:10:00We have one property that will flip in guelph in
2:10:052033
2:10:06We have three more properties that will flip between 2033 and 2037
2:10:13And then the majority of the properties are in that 2014 time frame. So if we do quick math, that's like 20
2:10:2348 time frame
2:10:25but something that we need to be cognizant of because that impact will be
2:10:30significant to those individual
2:10:32multi-residential units
2:10:34Probably about a thousand dollars per unit increase if nothing is done with the current tax ratios
2:10:41So what are our options? So our options are to
2:10:45start looking at
2:10:49Amalgamating those
2:10:52Ratios and bringing the multi-res down to the new multi-res ratio of one
2:10:58The other options are and which we're suggesting is we wait till the reassessment
2:11:04Whenever that occurs the provincial wide reassessment and look at tax shifts at that time and make a strategic plan from that perspective
2:11:12and we also continue to
2:11:15Lobby the provincial government for some changes in
2:11:20legislation to extend that new multi-residential tax class
2:11:26What would it look like though if we were to begin that sort of strategy of phasing in
2:11:32and reducing the multi-res
2:11:34Ratio now it would be additional increase to that residential property
2:11:40Of 14 dollars and 53 cents across the board for all
2:11:45current
2:11:48Residential properties
2:11:51That looks if you look at the bottom of the slide
2:11:54It increases that we talked about that 7.77 percent earlier without the reassessment or assessment rule impact
2:12:02It increases it to 8.05 percent
2:12:06Um for residential and new multi-residential, but it decreases the multi-residential change down to 2.83 percent
2:12:15So some math and changing of
2:12:20Overall impacts there
2:12:23So if we look at those two options option one
2:12:27Leave it status quo
2:12:29utilize the
2:12:31Rating ratios that we have for 2025
2:12:35We align a review with the new reassessment whenever that may occur
2:12:40We wait for provincial direction to potentially extend the new multi-residential tax class
2:12:46um
2:12:47Or we take an option approach where we start reducing the multi-residential ratio now
2:12:53um and that impact
2:12:56Over an eight year period
2:12:58For the first year is 14 dollars and 53 cents additional to the residential sector
2:13:03So you think of a tax policy as a balloon and when you take that balloon and you push it in one place
2:13:09It's going to expand other places. That's an easy way to talk about it
2:13:13So we're pushing in that multi-residential sector slightly
2:13:17It's going to increase the residential sector, which is the biggest tax class overall
2:13:21If we go back to that other slide, it's like close to 70 percent. So
2:13:26um proposed
2:13:30Tax ratios for 2026 with no changes from 2025 are in front of you here
2:13:38And if there's any other questions
2:13:41We're glad to take them
2:13:42Thanks, we'll open it to uh questions from members of council
2:13:47Anyone on screen with questions anyone in the horseshoe counselor galler questions
2:13:52Um, thank you and to you check around to staff. Thank you, uh, mr. Crowder for that presentation. It's very helpful
2:14:01um
2:14:02So that I can contextualize the
2:14:04The impact the presentation mentioned that if we were to reduce the multi-residential
2:14:10rate from 1.78 to 1.7
2:14:13Uh, it would have an impact of about 14 dollars to multi-residential
2:14:18What what i'm not clear on is the the volume of multi-residential versus
2:14:22um
2:14:23low density residential would it be a proportional increase to
2:14:29to the number of of
2:14:31um single family and duplex homes that are
2:14:34Uh, or would it, you know be diluted more? So what proportion of the city is multi-residential versus low densities?
2:14:44residential
2:14:59Through the chair to councillor Goller
2:15:02So very good question from an overall numbers perspective
2:15:06If we look at page five of nine on the report
2:15:11We have approximately
2:15:13Just under 29 000 single family homes within the city
2:15:20Uh 11 000 just over 11 000 residential condos
2:15:25Um, and we sit with 184
2:15:29apartment buildings
2:15:31I don't know the number of units currently in those 184 apartment buildings, but that gives you sort of the context from that side
2:15:40um overall
2:15:44so
2:15:45so it
2:15:47By looking at these numbers, it wouldn't be that that 14 dollars would be transferred directly. It would be
2:15:53Would it be diluted or concentrated what i'm not understanding is when I see the the property said 11 000 123 for
2:15:59residential condominium units is that the number of individual apartments within that?
2:16:07No, the 11 123
2:16:10Residential condominium units are actually condominiums versus apartments. So single ownership
2:16:17Units within a condominium complex
2:16:20Okay, okay. Okay. Thank you. Thank you for that. I appreciate that and I I understand the recommendation
2:16:26And I I think it makes sense to wait for the province to to give some direction on how to proceed with this. Thank you
2:16:34Any further questions?
2:16:36I oh, we haven't had the recommendations put on the floor of councillor goller and a seconder councillor richardson. Thanks
2:16:42Uh quick question. Um, you mentioned the 35 reduction for affordable housing that we put into our affordable housing policy
2:16:48And I of course I fully support that that direction of council and hope that it's making a difference
2:16:54My question is that under the residential tenancies act the rta requires a landlord to reduce the rent
2:17:03If it exceeds a 2.49 or 2.5
2:17:09Reduction in their taxes. How do we monitor that?
2:17:14So on an annual basis the city looks at
2:17:18The changes in property taxes for multi residential properties if there is a reduction of 2.49
2:17:26Then legislatively the city is required to do two things one notify the landlord initially
2:17:32That that has occurred and then subsequently notify all of the unit
2:17:38That that has occurred and that there may be an appropriate reduction coming in the rent
2:17:45Okay, and then if the landlord does not reduce the rent accordingly
2:17:49It's really up to a tenant to take it to the the ltb. Is that uh up to the up to the tenant to do?
2:17:57Correct. Okay. The motions on the floor then given no other questions. I'll call the vote. Is there anyone opposed to the two motions?
2:18:07Seeing none that motion is carried
2:18:10Thanks so much. I'll look to uh dcao o brian. Uh, are there any service area announcements?
2:18:17To you chair know there isn't and I don't know if miss baker has any
2:18:20Okay, great seeing none
2:18:22Uh, we'll conclude this portion of committee of the whole and I'll pass the chair over to councillor
2:18:27Downer, okay, we'll be doing the public services part of the agenda now
2:19:20And we have one item on the uh the consent agenda
2:19:25And I believe there's a presentation by dana evidence, right regarding the uh,
2:19:30The facilities and allocation process
2:19:34Uh, councillor downer. We have a service profile for you presentation. Okay. Okay. Oh, right. Okay. I see that just before this, right? Okay, great
2:19:42That's good
2:19:43Good. Uh, good morning, uh
2:19:46To council and staff and certainly community as well
2:19:49My name is dana evans and I am the general manager of culture and recreation and we're here to uh, share just a few tips
2:19:57And information about the department as a whole
2:20:03Culture and recreation is growing and caring for community places and spaces by actively providing a diverse range of enriching cultural recreation
2:20:12and heritage programs services and events
2:20:15We provide opportunities for participation in order to attract more people to our facilities while enriching the lives of community and promoting healthy living
2:20:26Culture and recreation welcomes community across 10 main facilities divided among the four divisions seen here museums and culture
2:20:34Sleam and center river and center and our recreation services
2:20:38Managers leading this work are in council chambers live today along with our
2:20:43In administration and support staff and so I would ask them to wave
2:20:47Uh beyond a few team members and other team members that are here today
2:20:51We are 90 full-time staff
2:20:54Over 640 part-time staff or casual staff and over 500 active volunteers
2:21:01We are committed to public service and culture and recreation
2:21:05And this is shown through our over 40 or 45 of the department's full-time staff having worked with the city for over 10 years
2:21:15Our commitment and
2:21:17Service to community is primarily linked to city building of the city's strategic plan
2:21:22Where we are aiding in the growing and caring for community places and spaces
2:21:27Our everyday operations and programming offers and attracts people to our facilities
2:21:32So we can aim to make them easier to access and enjoy
2:21:37Culture and recreation ensures public spaces are available to everyone through our programs services and events
2:21:44Beyond these programs and events. We support rentals in our through our regular facility operations event logistics
2:21:51technical supports audience services and our food and beverage departments
2:21:55We continue to respond to community need and adjust programs and events to fill gaps in the community
2:22:03While still offering stability in our regular programming
2:22:06We develop new programs and partnerships on a regular basis to attract more people into our facilities and places
2:22:13For us these participation numbers shown here totaling over 300,000
2:22:20Participations and our facilities is impressive and yet it still does not quite tell the whole full story
2:22:27These indicators do not include people that are attending our facilities through rental events
2:22:32at the museum recreation or Sleeman Center as examples
2:22:38Continuing through into 2026 there are main projects that will continue to support the strategic plan and growth of our city
2:22:45As we build the south end community center to open this fall
2:22:49We are creating a community hub with a strong focus on placemaking and programming at this new facility
2:22:55We will connect strongly with the outdoors create social spaces drop-in areas and more
2:23:01The parks and rec master plan and our culture plan are the strong guiding documents that advance culture and recreation needs
2:23:08and desires for all in gulf
2:23:11Planning is underway for gulf's 200 bicentennial to celebrate reflect commemorate of the past 200 years and beyond of history
2:23:22Our core service objectives include managing operations across this expansive list of culture and recreation facilities
2:23:31Our facilities are run by qualified staff each experienced in their field providing excellent programs events and customer service
2:23:39Making us part of the reason why gulf is an employer of choice
2:23:43Our core services are also supported in the caos objectives by developing operational performance
2:23:50optimizing
2:23:52Programming at the Sleeman Center's operating review and at the heart of our city programming a community offerings
2:23:58We are also maintaining relationship
2:24:00partnerships and reimagining our facility allocation
2:24:04Our core service is also to design deliver these cultural and recreation programs
2:24:11This includes river rent center presenting performances in school programming
2:24:16museum creating exhibits special events and school programming
2:24:19recreation designing and delivering programs in the area of swimming art fitness sport and more
2:24:26and for all ages among our community and
2:24:29Sleeman Center will begin partnering on events and programming
2:24:33uh concerts
2:24:36Beyond our programs
2:24:38We also lead events in the community and we support community special event planning and other placemaking
2:24:44Through public art collection. We are playing an important role in building a vibrant communities and contributing to our cultural identity
2:24:52Our civic events are bringing community together through events like cinema in the city
2:24:56national indiges peoples day and activations at market square
2:25:00Our booking team books parks and spaces as well as our indoor facilities and offers support for community special events on city property
2:25:10This includes supporting all events from weekly outdoor sporting rentals through major tournaments and multi-day festivals
2:25:17And all the while we are still ensuring excellent customer service and good service standards
2:25:24For all the things we do
2:25:26We still all do more
2:25:29We offer breakfasts and lunch. We sell takeout meals at evergreen senior center bistro
2:25:35683 five days a week we liaise on with the
2:25:38Elliott community and long-term care and we offer inclusion support services and programs
2:25:44and some more
2:25:46While we are uh, while we are inspired on a daily basis
2:25:50There are still challenges along the way and we do find inspiration on our creative side for innovation and new programs and opportunities
2:25:57We rely heavily on our over 640 part-time staff to support operation of facilities
2:26:03Up to 16 hours a day seven days a week in most cases
2:26:07I'm proud to give a shout out to these amazing dedicated staff who lead programs sell tickets deliver food clean facilities and more
2:26:15We continue to also see the pressures of prime time rental hours and facilities
2:26:21If you could help us find a way to have more early evening hours of ice time
2:26:25An additional friday and saturday nights in a week for theater events. We would be grateful
2:26:30There are opportunities to grow and expand with city innovation and funding from other sources
2:26:36And we continue to align and support to sports tourism development and wealth
2:26:40Offering events that draw visitors as well as benefit our local community
2:26:47As we move into some budget highlights
2:26:50For the department, I'd like to share that almost 35 of our revenue is earned from user fees and service charges
2:26:57This includes rental rates tickets registration and admissions
2:27:01product sales continue to grow of primarily from revenue from food and beverage and the remaining
2:27:08Revenue is for staff charge backs equipment rentals grants and sponsorships
2:27:14Although we generate over 11 million in revenue
2:27:17The budget is still supported by the property tax base at just over 50 of the overall department budget
2:27:24With revenue does come some expenses to offer programs events and maintain our facilities
2:27:30Our main expense is for staff wages and benefits. This covers the 90 full-time staff and the almost 650 active part-time staff
2:27:39While other expenses do include our artist fees event fees marketing and production repairs and maintenance and utilities
2:27:47The work to mitigate expense lines and balance rates thresholds for users is an ongoing project
2:27:54In recent years, we have seen budget pressure with increasing costs for food and pool chemicals as example
2:28:01But plus the increased need for repairs and maintenance in our aging facilities
2:28:07Culture and recreation budget does also include or capital budget
2:28:11Shall I say it does also include our facility renewal for updates for building infrastructure major equipment that has come to the end of its life
2:28:19I wanted to a flag a spike in the 2029 budget forecast that is shown on the screen
2:28:25Here in chambers that is a result of a facility renewal projects being adjusted forward to support ongoing budget pressures
2:28:33Condition assessments are being completed now to help plan and adjust future budgets to even out the spike
2:28:41Beyond facility upgrades and renovations. This budget also supports programming
2:28:45specific capital needs like updates to technical theater equipment at river end center and new sport and recreation equipment
2:28:52Along with repairs to filters pumps ice plants and general pool functioning
2:28:58new capital
2:29:00Equipment includes advancement in technology to offer efficiencies and service while still delivering exceptional products
2:29:08Culture and recreation connects with the community through individual websites and portals
2:29:13And there's a lot of information on our programs services events rentals buying tickets how to volunteer
2:29:19Or even how to work with us across all of these contact points
2:29:23Through though all of our facilities are still linked from gulf.ca
2:29:28Thank you for the opportunity to share the vast amount of work of the culture and rec
2:29:33Programs services and events across all of our places and spaces
2:29:37We are hope that we will see you and the community very soon. Thank you
2:29:44Thank you, mr. Evans. That was very good
2:29:46It was a great backgrounder for the discussions that are coming up in the next two items after this
2:29:52Are there any questions for staff?
2:29:56On the presentation
2:30:00Okay, seeing none. Thank you
2:30:03Um, there is no motion for that item. Uh, so we'll move on to the consent agenda
2:30:10where we are going to further talk about
2:30:13About public services and their recreation facilities
2:30:17So there is no presentation on this one, but uh, miss Evans. Did you have any comments you wanted to make before we go into it?
2:30:28Uh chair dana. Yes. Thank you. Um, I would just take a moment
2:30:32To say good afternoon again, and uh, I guess for anybody just jumping in remind you that i'm still dana
2:30:38The general manager of culture and recreation. Um, we're here to um speak to the Sleeman centers operating model
2:30:44Sleeman center is positioned to be an anchor sports and entertainment facility of the downtown by offering events year round
2:30:51Working with promoters and presenting arts and entertainment season
2:30:55Our researchers showed opportunities for new programming and events to increase access exposure and entertainment usage to the Sleeman center
2:31:03We've heard great things about opportunities for music and country
2:31:07alternative rock sports tourism film and television and even virtual and gaming shows and competitions
2:31:15By booking our own events creating partnerships and building relationships with commercial and community partners
2:31:21Sleeman center can grow and decrease dependency on the tax base
2:31:25With experience in programming
2:31:28Shows and events across the department. We can book artists and choose events
2:31:32But also have the having the knowledge to understand the potential risks associated with increased size
2:31:38Scale and scope of the Sleeman center
2:31:41Timing for this change does align to the opening of the south end community center later this fall
2:31:47Creating more ice time across these two new ice pads
2:31:50Currently Sleeman center books season long contracts with community users from september to march
2:31:57Essentially locking us in to ice time over a six five or six month period
2:32:01We are not removing rental opportunities for sports groups. The proposed change looks to reduce how far in advance groups can book
2:32:09This would normally just limit the timing of seasonal long contracts
2:32:14Consistently weekly games and practices could be best fitted in other arenas with no risk of signal or sorry schedule changes
2:32:22For other events at the Sleeman center. There is greater flexibility for organization on other types of uses
2:32:28We want organizations to continue to book ice time for camps training and practices
2:32:34We hope groups will continue to book for larger events such as tournaments and championships and these can be booked farther in advance
2:32:41Regular changes are very disruptive to users, especially across the youth sports organizations
2:32:47We acknowledge the changes can be less disruptive to an all adult league play and we'll continue this programming as well
2:32:54We are aligned to the timing of the recreation facility allocation process update
2:32:58One of these items is to in the implement
2:33:02Implementation strategy of this report speaks to optimizing our scheduling
2:33:07Along with updates on how much time is changed or canceled and the standardization of blocks of times
2:33:13We can increase overall availability
2:33:15Small adjustments can utilize or eliminate unused blocks in the middle of an evening expanding our prime time ice usage
2:33:23Next we will engage with community groups to optimize these prime time hours and align
2:33:29Timing and fit for all facilities
2:33:32Both initiatives will increase available time across the whole system reducing the impact of changes at Sleeman center
2:33:39Though currently on average there is 30 hours a week of youth ice time booked at the Sleeman center when there isn't storm games or practices
2:33:46Or other events happening
2:33:48After the city schedule programming, we've identified there will be just over 130 additional prime time ice hours at the south end community center's double ice pad
2:33:58We have heard there is a greater need for more ice time and wealth
2:34:02The needs assessment accompanying the development of the south end community center calls for one more additional ice pad by
2:34:092033 so based on the current usage and predictive targets of per capita numbers
2:34:15This accounts for the current five recreation rinks and the two more rinks that will come along online this fall at the south end
2:34:22And then calls for an eighth ice pad
2:34:25These needs assessments did not take into account any ice at the Sleeman center nor the two pads at the university of wealth
2:34:33Once the south end community center opens and we settle in we will engage with community on
2:34:38Arenas usage reviewing availability standalone arenas and time at the university of wealth
2:34:44It is anticipated that upgrades or renovations to centennial and exhibition arenas may be
2:34:50Recommended and these optimizations along with ice time at the university could carry us beyond the 2033 target
2:34:58We do not have data at the moment or funding
2:35:01In the forecast we can't speak to the current participation numbers of the growth or projections of any one organization
2:35:08And we aren't involved in how they manage their current ice time
2:35:13This year we will do some further work at Sleeman center including creating an event plan
2:35:19Developing marketing strategy and designing allocation and booking timelines
2:35:24We also will be expanding the budget
2:35:26With expensive for artist fees production and marketing does come new costs
2:35:31But with this new programming and larger scale events does also come revenue an updated budget will be submitted
2:35:38With the 2027 confirmation budget later this year into early 27
2:35:43Sleeman center has relied on a tax supported funding of up to 1.6 million annually
2:35:50New changes and updates to the budget and event planning will not
2:35:53Exceed this tax support and in fact in the coming years. We are committed to reducing the tax need or the burden
2:36:01The motions before you are to request to allow staff to negotiate rates and fees or events at Sleeman center
2:36:07Where we can hope to recover a greater profit from a successful event
2:36:12We've proposed a strategy to increase the capital reserve fund to up to three dollars a ticket to support facility
2:36:19infrastructure enhance customer experiences and create revenue generating opportunities
2:36:25And the motion proposed is also to remove the youth facility discount on rentals at Sleeman center and only Sleeman center
2:36:33This reduction or a discount on rent currently at
2:36:3742 and a half percent will continue to be offered at other recreation and park facilities
2:36:43Youth groups that book tournaments or training at Sleeman center would then still be charged the full amount or the normal rental amount
2:36:51We will ensure that organizations have time to plan and budget for these special events
2:36:56I am joined and would ask
2:36:59Sleeman manager, uh, ryan giles, um to join me if there's any further questions and conversation
2:37:05Thank you
2:37:06Thank you. Ms. Evans. Can we go back first to the the recommendation from the
2:37:13For the recreation facilities allocation process update
2:37:18And and you've given one a presentation that sort of covers both of these but we hadn't voted on that one first
2:37:23So are there any questions on the first?
2:37:27report on that first report
2:37:30Council coran. Yeah for item 15.1. Yes. Yeah, okay. Um, thank you and thank you as
2:37:36Chair downer said the
2:37:39Presentation really encompass both of these correlated items. So I'm glad to have the whole context in answering my questions
2:37:47Regarding specifically 15.1
2:37:50So one of the things that we've been hearing from the community in the last couple of days is
2:37:55Just allocation of time
2:37:58And that many of them are going outside of the city to be able to get ice time
2:38:03That um, and I recognize that actually in your report, you said there's a perception of exclusion from certain sports and
2:38:12Preference for one sport over the other in the allocation
2:38:14So I do recognize that one of the purposes the goals behind this new policy is
2:38:21greater predictability
2:38:23greater equity
2:38:25And greater efficiency in how
2:38:27Facility allocation is done
2:38:30So my question has to do with with the engagement piece because
2:38:34This recommendation is just to go out and do that engagement. Is this can you just give an overview of?
2:38:41For those who are watching because I know there's a lot of interest in the community in how that engagement
2:38:45What is going to look like when it's going to happen? What are the timelines?
2:38:50and
2:38:51Everything that you said in your presentation is predicated on the opening of the south end
2:38:55community center
2:38:57How that engagement is going to align with the opening of that facility and and and the allocation of
2:39:03ice time specifically in those twin pads
2:39:07Through the chair to cancer crown. I feel like we're mushing these reports a little bit
2:39:12I will we can answer as the system as a whole for sure
2:39:16I would ask
2:39:18Miss pizziola to come down and join us. She may have a little bit more. We have done a robust
2:39:23Engagement with our community users as it relates to facility allocation. We worked
2:39:30We worked with a consultant a point of privilege
2:39:35We don't tolerate inappropriate behavior within the chambers
2:39:38So what I would ask that anybody here be respectful of staff
2:39:42And anybody speaking just as you would expect that if you were up at the podium speaking
2:39:50Thank you back through the chair counselor cron
2:39:53There has been engagement with community users not with the community as a whole
2:39:57around
2:39:59That piece around where they would like to see what they think might be fair
2:40:04And patty's learning sort of specific more questions that you could answer
2:40:11Who yeah, maybe a couple examples of who we engaged with on the facility allocation report would be helpful
2:40:17Thank you
2:40:20We did
2:40:21consult
2:40:22Through a survey link in the fall. We also conducted we had worked with our consultants and we conducted a number of interviews
2:40:32specifically with
2:40:33existing user groups as well as
2:40:36Potential user groups and we did some engagement through the have your say
2:40:44Okay, so moving forward then I know that we have we have user groups and we have
2:40:50Associations like the gulf youth sports
2:40:53Like a larger organization that represents all the different
2:40:57Associations from soccer to hockey the gymnastics all the different groups
2:41:00so
2:41:02When you say user groups
2:41:03It's every single facility every single user group was sent an invitation or was it through their through their representative association?
2:41:11Through the chair we worked with our main contacts and tried to address
2:41:17representatives of boards so of our current users
2:41:20And then a general survey so there was some one-on-one sort of more in-depth conversations with direct with a consultant
2:41:27So folks wouldn't feel like they needed to not say or do say something
2:41:31So we're looking for that open response
2:41:33And then some general surveys that then the organization who utilizes our program and so they were asked questions as well
2:41:40About how easy is it is it cumbersome? What's involved in returning time?
2:41:44And so we were really looking at the
2:41:47The administrative side
2:41:49From an allocation point of view not how folks are using our facilities
2:41:54Okay, thanks
2:41:56And as a council we're always looking for when we change a policy or a practice we're looking for a measurable outcome
2:42:04If our goals are predictability equity and efficiency, how will we measure that when we have the new facility?
2:42:13Allocation policy in place
2:42:15Uh through the council unless there's anything to add I'll start
2:42:19definitely looking
2:42:21At facility optimization and we'll be able to report about how much sort of new time that we found not just in the growth of
2:42:29The development of the south end community center, which we're looking at certainly from an ice prime time
2:42:34We know it's going to be over 130 more hours a week into the system
2:42:38But where is their optimization?
2:42:40So we have prime time hours now and is there adjustments that can be made into more consistent blocks of time?
2:42:47So we don't what we call burn or lose
2:42:50A half hour in the middle
2:42:52And can groups move to facilities that then next give them a better fit
2:42:57To open up fit otherwise there are some
2:43:00Organizations who now are spread thin on either coaches administration or even referees in the ice world
2:43:07Because they're working out of two facilities
2:43:08So can they come to a double ice pad and now find those efficiencies for themselves and thus giving more opportunity for their youth in this example?
2:43:17But there's definitely other sort of pieces related to that
2:43:20We haven't defined all of those pieces yet and we will certainly continue those conversations with our user groups as well
2:43:30One last question and it's kind of a future forward. There are always emerging
2:43:35Sports recreation
2:43:38organizations
2:43:39You know over the last 10 years we've seen higher increased
2:43:44Requests for everything from pickleball to cricket. Are there any other emerging?
2:43:49Sports not just youth but adult as well that
2:43:53Council should be aware of as we move forward in our
2:43:56change in facility allocation
2:44:00Uh through the chair, I would imagine that there is lots of amazing sports if we google new sport
2:44:07There's definitely
2:44:09mash-ups
2:44:10Happening between soccer and ping pong taking place on a larger court. I forgot the name at the moment
2:44:16And then certainly more locally. We're seeing some greater uptake
2:44:20In different accessibility sports some interest of wheelchair basketball in our community as well as sledge hockey
2:44:27the
2:44:28South End community center has some different features to support sledge hockey with some plexi
2:44:35Boards so that you can still stay in your sledge and be able to see when you're in your team bench for instance
2:44:41Thanks
2:44:44Thank you
2:44:47Thank you. I just wanted to kind of add to what councillor Caron has talked about around the community engagement
2:44:54um, I volunteer with the poverty group and I I
2:44:58participated in the survey on behalf of that west end ward 4 kind of community group and just
2:45:04Really want to thank the staff because it's a one-time booking for a free skate with santa that has a huge
2:45:11Impact for the kids that don't get to see santa. Don't know how to skate
2:45:15We've got donated skates and so on and just want to thank the staff for extending the survey and really working with the
2:45:22group
2:45:23The group to make an impact for these kids
2:45:26And so one is for the engagement. Thank you for that
2:45:29But also to stress from my perspective more of an arts music kind of cultural that this is more than sports
2:45:36And and I appreciate this report because it creates that space for other not skating on ice
2:45:43You know ice capades in my old days kind of thing but but that opportunity for that to happen
2:45:49So I really want to just say thank you for that and I really appreciate all this work
2:45:55Thank you. Are there any other questions on 15.1?
2:45:59Good to put somebody put the motion on the floor councillor lucid tails sector by councillor Goller
2:46:05Is there anyone opposed to that motion?
2:46:08And that's the recreational
2:46:10recreation facilities allocation process be approved
2:46:14Okay, that passes. Thank you
2:46:16Okay, we're going to go on to the next that next item that we've had the presentation that covered both of these now
2:46:23And it was the Sleeman center operating model
2:46:27and
2:46:28That's so I think we so do we have any more questions of
2:46:33Staff for that so councillor
2:46:40Yes, thank you through you chair
2:46:43Downer to staff
2:46:45Thanks for the presentation. I I really like where the report is going
2:46:49I I like the idea of the goal to increase revenue by 1.8 million and to create
2:46:56a new
2:46:57and that neutral
2:46:59operating model with the Sleeman center
2:47:02I I have I have some questions around the transition
2:47:07And this is this is to do with some of the
2:47:11Correspondence that we have received
2:47:14so my first question is around
2:47:17Um the transition year of 2026 2027 from my perspective right now
2:47:22I'm not entirely sure when the south end rec center is is going to open
2:47:28um and given that the um the contracts for recreational and youth ice
2:47:35Time are from september until
2:47:38March and that is typically how organizations plan their their their schedules for the year
2:47:45I'm curious if there is some thought in place around how we're going to transition those groups that
2:47:53potentially could see with this transition from the Sleeman center over into
2:47:58The new facility, which I I appreciate we're seeing a net increase of 130 hours a week in the system
2:48:05But I'm curious about that transition time and what the potential
2:48:09loss could be in the 2026 2027 season
2:48:14Through the chair to the counselor
2:48:16If I'm undersharing correctly, there would be no loss to current ice standards
2:48:22The facility allocation process that's just been approved
2:48:25Certainly also includes a sort of priority of how we take in bookings and events
2:48:31For one time we will slide in a little asterisk ahead of everything else that ensures that
2:48:38The current users at the south end community center will be maintained at those ice times
2:48:43We know now in our system that sometimes there's some movement year over year
2:48:47And organizations look for efficiencies
2:48:49So an organization may want to go from the single ice pad and move to south end or to west end to be able to run programming
2:48:57Both at the same time across both rinks
2:49:00So they won't lose anymore the facility allocation process as I now I'm entangling both of them together
2:49:07also
2:49:09Definitely will look to organizations for an expression of interest
2:49:14Where they might see growth and opportunity and what more they are looking for and as well as how they continue to serve community and
2:49:22address some equity and maybe potential barriers that exist
2:49:26So through the chair if I can also just jump in here and and just help to provide that reassurance
2:49:31The south end opens September 1st of this year. So 2026 that is the date that we are aiming for for opening
2:49:38So the reason the report before you and I know the two kind of have gotten mucked together
2:49:41But there's a reason why they're here before you this month
2:49:44We need to start allocating the new all the new ice time at the south end
2:49:49And we need to do that in time to get everybody moved there
2:49:53So nobody as as miss evans has said
2:49:55Nobody will lose ice time all of the ice time that will be
2:49:59Shuffled out of sleam and center to accommodate this new business model will be accommodated within the system
2:50:04And in fact, we're growing our ice time
2:50:05But the timing of this report is very very key for us because we need to get those forms out to our user groups
2:50:12So we can make sure we're allocating everybody
2:50:15And also using the allocation policy figure out who's going to get the extra ice time because we're adding ice time into the system
2:50:21So it really is two parts moving the the the hours out of the sleam and center for those long bookings
2:50:28And accommodating them
2:50:30Figuring out who is going to get the additional ice time using the allocation policy
2:50:34And do all of that timely enough so that we can let groups know where they're going to be for September 1st
2:50:40When the south end opens and all of our rinks have ice in so in short nobody's losing ice time
2:50:46We will accommodate all of the existing ice users, but we need to do that
2:50:51We need that approval this month so that we don't leave groups hanging until august and not know where they're going
2:50:57So if we can get this approval this month, then we will be on track to do our normal ice allocation policy
2:51:05And I think to councillor boost till's point all of the other spaces that this covers because this this isn't just simply about ice
2:51:13Thank you. I really appreciate both of those
2:51:16explanations
2:51:18I think that makes a lot of sense and
2:51:20hearing that the
2:51:22south end rec center is going to be opening on september 1st is exciting and
2:51:27And hearing how that course that complements this this plan. I think makes a lot of sense
2:51:35I think that there's a lot of benefit to the public to see to seeing the
2:51:41The sleam and center used more robustly in in sports and in in entertainment
2:51:47It is the I think it's the sports and entertainment center. So
2:51:51I I am really excited about this and I I also want to just recognize that building this capacity takes time
2:51:57I the report really clarifies that
2:52:01So building that that institutional capacity to both build build the infrastructure to support new new types of events, but then also to
2:52:10Get the get the
2:52:13The programming will also take time. So maybe actually my question could you elaborate a little bit on that?
2:52:18Could you talk about the timing and when we hope to see that goal of of increasing revenue by 1.8 million when we might hope to see that?
2:52:29Through the chair to the councillor
2:52:32That's certainly a bigger part of our work as we present a budget
2:52:36adjustment for the 2027
2:52:38budget
2:52:39We hope to present a few opportunities later this fall in that revenue neutral environment
2:52:47But there definitely is a transition involved because we haven't been as flexible or open
2:52:53Mr. Giles
2:52:55Has certainly turned down some opportunities in the last sort of six or eight months because we've had existing
2:53:01Contracts in place. So we'll certainly go back to them and say hey, we've got some time available
2:53:06And and find out where that is a new cheerleading event
2:53:11opportunity for a film and a large sort of sports
2:53:15trade show sale
2:53:16environment just as a couple of examples of the diversity
2:53:20of events or or space larger space that folks are looking for where the Sleeman Center
2:53:25Both with the large floor space and then additional seating can accommodate these events
2:53:33Thank you
2:53:35Okay, good councillor gore and then councillor kate
2:53:38Thank you and three chair downer to staff
2:53:42Thank you so much for the for the clear report. I really appreciate and I really appreciate the direction that this is going
2:53:48I did want to follow up
2:53:50something that you said miss evans is that
2:53:53Youth groups would still be able to book the event that would just pay the the full fee. Is that is that correct?
2:54:00And through the councillor to councillor Goller. Yes, we are proposing that the subsidy rate would not apply
2:54:07So then any rent would not be given the 40 for youth groups would not receive currently
2:54:12They receive the 42 and a half percent discount if the hourly rental rate is in the 300 dollar range
2:54:18They receive that discount where even if they're doing tournaments and
2:54:22Championships, they would not receive that it would pay the full rate
2:54:26We believe that we're offering more of an experience and a premier facility
2:54:32Where we shouldn't then be applying the youth
2:54:34Discount where groups then still have access to the subsidy at other recreation facilities
2:54:40Okay, okay. I I understand the logic and I appreciate that
2:54:43Could you help me understand? What is the impact of of that subsidy?
2:54:48I mean if if say all of the youth groups that currently booked the space this year still say well
2:54:56You know, we still want to have this this premium experience is this larger
2:55:00Space what would be the the impact to you know to us or to them so that I understand how much more
2:55:07We would be asking or we would be getting from those groups
2:55:12Uh through the chair to the councillor
2:55:14Really the difference on the 42 and a half percent but currently to give you some perspective all of our
2:55:21ice rentals so specifically to ice is about 300 000 right now
2:55:26So the difference on the discount doesn't come from another source. It is just purely waived
2:55:32So not all of our ice rentals are youth
2:55:35But on the high high extreme if it's 50 percent dollars there might be another 150 000
2:55:42In revenue that assumes the current
2:55:46About 30 hours a week of youth time that exists
2:55:50So I would say that's a bit inflated but from a reference point of view for for Sleiman on a on a
2:55:58Revenue of 2.4 million. This is the small portion for us. So it is easily or more available mitigated in
2:56:06Other events and programming. Okay. Okay. Thank you for all please through the chair. I just also wanted to um
2:56:12Remind council that this is consistent with what we do at riverrun center. We don't offer the youth discount at riverrun center as well
2:56:19It is about that premier facilities and making sure that we're utilizing them
2:56:24For the best the best purpose
2:56:27So we want to make sure we're accommodating those groups and finding
2:56:31The ice time for them in all of our other facilities at that discounted rate
2:56:35And so I just wanted to keep reiterating that because we've had some feedback that there's a concern that this is
2:56:40impacting groups
2:56:42They will be able to transfer and take that youth discount with them to the other facilities
2:56:47Okay, thank you. Thank you very much for that and something else that that was said in the presentation
2:56:52um, you mentioned not having disruptions to groups so so that I understand if a youth
2:56:59You know learned to skate or or a
2:57:03League books in ice time, but then there's a big event like you know
2:57:07A circus comes to town and they needed for for the week. Would we then cancel cancel the reservations for those?
2:57:14um
2:57:15Leagues in preference for the big events that come
2:57:19Uh through the chair to the counselor. Um, currently we are doing some of that now and making every effort to move
2:57:27organizations to other places
2:57:30Except the demand um, it's certainly on ice timeless on summer floor time
2:57:35Is that there's nowhere else to move folks? We recognize with youth, um ice sport
2:57:41Specifically that they get you you still have a consistent time
2:57:46My granddaughter plays uh every saturday at three and practices every tuesday at five
2:57:52And so that reliance is much more heavy on youth and the expectation we have to youth
2:57:58We feel adults are a little more flexible and can understand what is happening
2:58:03And so continuing with some of those adult programming
2:58:06Will move or push out. Um, but also then in youth sport is tied to competition and
2:58:13Championship schedules so you can't just push out inevitably as well
2:58:17But we also recognize that when there's nowhere to move folks we may have to turn down
2:58:22The large circus event
2:58:24For instance because we're locked into those longer term contracts
2:58:28Okay, so so so that I understand you only push people out if you can find a replacement
2:58:34But you do not say sorry folks this week. There's no ice time because we have another event
2:58:39Uh through the chair. Yeah, that's correct. Yeah
2:58:42Okay, okay
2:58:45And if if I understand if council were to
2:58:48To to support recommendations uh here
2:58:53one and two
2:58:55But if we were to not support recommendation number three the impact
2:59:01Would be about 150 000 dollars in terms of revenue to the city is that ballpark
2:59:08Go ahead
2:59:09So through the chair, I think we can come back to you and try to quantify that before the end of the month
2:59:15And so if it was simply about the differential on the youth discount
2:59:19We can come to you with a firm number because I think miss evans is trying to calculate that on the fly
2:59:23So in fairness, we'll come back to you. Um, but I do still want to emphasize that that the relocation of the groups to the other
2:59:31locations is really what is the important
2:59:34What is the important piece and so
2:59:38It it's almost like one doesn't happen without the other because we are looking to relocate those groups out and take their youth facility
2:59:44Discount somewhere else and apply it. So it's going to be difficult math for us to do
2:59:49Unless you're asking us to assume nobody is being moved out of the Sleeman center and is retaining all of their current rental subsidy
2:59:56What what I would ask is
2:59:59Could we change the booking policy so that if a big event comes the
3:00:04I stand for that week has canceled
3:00:07And we don't have to find them a replacement
3:00:09Which you know given, um, you know in a six month period we might have maybe three or four events
3:00:16Which means that most of the time those sports leagues or groups can still use the ice on a week to week basis
3:00:23And it could be that
3:00:25A few practices have to be missed and and maybe that's just a risk of booking
3:00:29At the Sleeman center versus booking in the south end where you know that you're not going to be cancelled. Is that possible?
3:00:36So we certainly through the chair
3:00:38We certainly would not recommend that the time to accommodate the groups is now when we have available ice time at the south end
3:00:44So the time to move the groups and make sure we get guaranteed ice for those groups within our system
3:00:50Is is now we will still continue to take one-off bookings and we will still continue to look for
3:00:57Opportunities to do those special events
3:00:59But no we are recommending that we not take those long term
3:01:04September to March bookings at Sleeman center
3:01:06Because it's very very difficult both for for miss evans and mr. Giles to be out
3:01:11Trying to attract
3:01:12film shoots and large-scale events and concerts if every time they get an inquiry they then have to go and try to bump
3:01:20Groups to another arena where we may no longer have ice available
3:01:24If we do it now before we allocate for the whole season
3:01:28We can make sure we're getting those groups the ice time
3:01:31So we we certainly would not recommend that that would be an approach that we beneficial either to the user groups
3:01:37Or to our staff's ability to try to sell the Sleeman center to larger events
3:01:42We think that the best thing to do is to accommodate those long terms
3:01:45September to March bookings within our existing ice time now when we're bringing this out then online
3:01:51And so we certainly wouldn't recommend that you change that policy because I think it would be difficult both for us
3:01:57And it would be very hard on those groups because a lot of times they'd end up getting bumped and we'd have nowhere to put them
3:02:02If I could I understand that the subsidies been removed, but they could still book in September to March
3:02:09They would just have to pay the full fee
3:02:12Through the chair to the counselor part of this operating model changes that currently we wouldn't book those longer
3:02:19Sessions that far in advance
3:02:21So right now we issue dates and availability to organizations in may time frame and we get back to them with final
3:02:29Contracts sort of middle of June beginning of July for September to March
3:02:34So if somebody wanted to book today at the arena, they would we would have signed a contract with them last July
3:02:41Thus blocking us in or locking us in
3:02:43Where we're suggesting is we will change the timeline on some of those bookings for our sort of our
3:02:49Individual practices or even for games on rentals so that we would sign those contracts in
3:02:55January or even December for March the third so still opportunities
3:03:00I recognize that there is also then tournaments or larger championships
3:03:04Which would be really fun to play at Sleeman Center with potential more people
3:03:08Those require
3:03:10timelines and bookings that need to go farther out and those are weekend bookings not just one-off hours
3:03:16And so we can do those on longer contracts because they help both the community and the Sleeman Center
3:03:25through your chair, um, I think
3:03:27My question is could we
3:03:30Adjust the policy so that the leagues can still book
3:03:34With the discount, but then they get bumped and actually there's no replacement ice time
3:03:39I'm just thinking unless you're expecting that once this model comes in are we going to have bookings consistently?
3:03:45most weekends
3:03:47Or are we going to expect a couple a season that I think that's what I'm trying to conceptualize
3:03:52Is it possible for the youth leagues to still book the ice time at the discount?
3:03:57And a couple times a month it might be that because you booked this this particular
3:04:02Ice pad you actually don't have a space this week
3:04:06So through the chair anything is of course possible and we will take your direction
3:04:09We're bringing you this operating model because we have heard loud and clear that we need to use Sleeman Center differently and use the space to be more
3:04:16productive
3:04:17Help the businesses downtown reduce the burden on the on the tax base. Of course, we will take your direction
3:04:23We don't recommend that because our time to accommodate these groups is now when we're adding the south end and we're adding inventory in
3:04:30So we don't think it would be beneficial for the groups to do that
3:04:34um, and so
3:04:35We would actually be hurting ourselves on both sides
3:04:38We would be
3:04:39Making it a little bit more difficult for us to use Sleeman Center in this new model and to access additional events
3:04:45And we'd be burdening the groups by bumping them and having nowhere else to put them
3:04:48It's much better for us to do this now and this is a once in a I don't know
3:04:53I don't
3:04:54Decade opportunity where we're bringing two pads of available ice time on
3:04:59Now is the time to do it when we can absolutely
3:05:02Accommodate all of those hours and give the groups their locked in time that they have now and give them that assurance at the youth discount rate
3:05:10If we don't and we say okay
3:05:12We're going to let you keep booking at Sleeman Center
3:05:15You know regardless regardless of what rent has paid because that actually is a little bit secondary to this
3:05:20But we'll bump you if we can get bookings
3:05:23I I still feel that it's probably going to slow Ms. Evans and mr. Giles down and their ability to market Sleeman Center
3:05:28But more importantly now we're going to be going to those groups and bumping them and having nowhere to and canceling their ice time
3:05:34So for me
3:05:36We're bringing an amount of ice time to the Jigwood State
3:05:38Let's do it now. Well, we're bringing two pads of wide open ice time into our inventory get everybody accommodated
3:05:46Everyone's going to have exactly the amount of ice time now and people are going to have more either existing clients
3:05:51Are going to have more ice time or new clients are going to be able to come into our system
3:05:53But this is our window of opportunity to do it
3:05:58Okay. Thank you. I appreciate it. I do understand where you're coming from
3:06:02Chair Downer, when the vote comes,
3:06:05I would like one and two separate from the number three please.
3:06:10Okay. So we had Councillor Ciaran,
3:06:13Councillor Hauser, Councillor,
3:06:18there's somebody else but I'll get,
3:06:20so I'll boost the tail and two and then we have Councillor Catalan at the end.
3:06:28Okay. Councillor, oh, was she?
3:06:30Okay. Councillor Keaton.
3:06:32Thank you. I don't have questions.
3:06:37I only have comments. Can I do those now?
3:06:40Can we save the comments till the end?
3:06:42Can I come back to you?
3:06:43Sure.
3:06:44Thank you.
3:06:45Councillor Ciaran. Great.
3:06:50I'm following up on
3:06:52Councillor Goller's line of questioning just about the youth subsidy because
3:06:56I recognize that we're making a change here and I recognize we have a window of opportunity,
3:07:02but we haven't opened the new facility,
3:07:04the dust hasn't settled and a lot of
3:07:05these youth sports associations have already set their fees and their rates for
3:07:102026. So I'm wondering if you could help me understand the impact,
3:07:14this is a two-part question,
3:07:15the impact of just deferring that clause or amending it to January 2027,
3:07:24whether that youth subsidy would allow a time for the dust to settle and
3:07:29other user groups to then plan not only their regular league play and
3:07:33their budgets and their sign-up process,
3:07:36but also we're talking a lot about ice time here,
3:07:40but the Sleeman Center in the summer months has,
3:07:43if I remember correctly,
3:07:45we've been the site for youth double Dutch skipping championships or dance competition.
3:07:53There have been other non-ice related Sleeman Center bookings where it's youth tournaments,
3:07:59youth practices and training,
3:08:01youth conferences, youth skills camps.
3:08:05I don't want to cut the youth subsidy for ice time when it may impact a lot of
3:08:10other different youth sports and activities.
3:08:12So could you comment on those two items?
3:08:14So through the chair, I think that's work that we can go away and look to see how
3:08:18often were those one-off type events accessing the youth subsidy and
3:08:22if Council chooses to leave the youth subsidy in place for those types of events,
3:08:26we can get you that information in a memo form.
3:08:29I think, yes, Dana is nodding. So good.
3:08:31I think to the broader question though of the groups having already set their rates,
3:08:35if we move their ice time out of Sleeman Center into the other arenas,
3:08:38there will be no impact on their rates because they will be accessing the youth subsidy.
3:08:42So that is really why it's important for us.
3:08:44Again, I'm sure I'm sounding like I'm repeating myself,
3:08:47but to move those groups who booked September to March ice time,
3:08:50we need to do that now to exactly address your concerns.
3:08:53So their rates aren't impacted if they've already set their fees,
3:08:56because by moving them to another arena,
3:08:59they'll be getting the youth subsidy.
3:09:01So I think looking at the youth subsidy for those one-offs,
3:09:05we can do that and get you a memo.
3:09:07Looking at the youth subsidy across,
3:09:10we want the groups to move out of Sleeman Center be accommodated elsewhere,
3:09:15and they will then have the youth subsidy still applied to their fees.
3:09:18Okay. Thanks. So this is more of a process question than for you, Madam Chair,
3:09:22is I don't want to vote for or against item three without that additional information.
3:09:27Can we just defer item number three to the end of the month until we have
3:09:30more information to be able to make an appropriate decision?
3:09:34Would that be a motion of deferral or we just have to pass or fail it?
3:09:37Can we do that?
3:09:39Through you, Madam Chair.
3:09:40I think we've done it before.
3:09:42It really depends what council's intention is.
3:09:44I mean, if you pass it tonight,
3:09:45it's going to come to council at the end of the month and it can be voted on and amended as normal.
3:09:49If you defer it, it's still just going to appear a council at the end of the month.
3:09:52Okay. I think deferral is probably the way to go to the end of the month,
3:09:56because if I were to vote on it today,
3:09:59I would vote against, but I don't want the motion to fail because if it fails,
3:10:02then it doesn't show up at the end of the month.
3:10:04Okay. So we'll take them separately.
3:10:05So deferral.
3:10:06We can do that at that time.
3:10:08Okay. So now I have
3:10:11Councillor Hauser and then Councillor Bousetail and Councillor Chew.
3:10:15Thank you through the chair.
3:10:17We've heard a lot about families that are going out of the city.
3:10:21I know we touched on this briefly,
3:10:23but I'm going out of the city and using ice time in other areas and there are
3:10:26wait lists, the 30 hours that we're using,
3:10:31and now we have 130 hours opening up,
3:10:33was there any accommodation or factoring in those wait lists and
3:10:36those people that have been going elsewhere?
3:10:39Because they're all going to be supposedly coming now to the new booking.
3:10:43So how quickly is that 130 hours going to be taken up?
3:10:49Through the chair to the Councillor,
3:10:51I don't have data on other organizations wait lists.
3:10:55We certainly have heard from one larger organization or
3:10:58a loud voice recently in the community,
3:11:02but I haven't been able to validate or work with them on that.
3:11:06We will knowing that we're adding more ice specifically,
3:11:10but more time both in the pool and in the gyms.
3:11:14When we open the South End Community Center,
3:11:15we will ask organizations what they're hoping for,
3:11:19what would be their dream now and in the future with more time.
3:11:24I'm trust we'll hear from Pickleball that they're looking for more gym time.
3:11:27And so what does that mean and what does that look like to them?
3:11:29Is it truly only one more hour a week for one organization or is it 12?
3:11:34And so getting some real pieces, there is lots of growth in sport and
3:11:39recreation happening across not just Guelph, Ontario and Canada and
3:11:44both indoors and out.
3:11:46And so it's just where and how we can as municipality accommodate,
3:11:50we'll do our very best to work and include growth.
3:11:54And it also include folks that don't currently have any access to our facilities as well.
3:12:00Thank you.
3:12:03Okay, thank you.
3:12:03Councillor Boussa-Till, is that your question?
3:12:05Yes, just so I am clear, I've heard it a number of times.
3:12:13When a user of the Sleeman Center is a youth organization,
3:12:17they will carry that discount to one of the other recreation centers.
3:12:22I just want to be very clear, that is what I'm taking away from here.
3:12:26What I see, and if staff can just tell me I'm on the right path here,
3:12:31is the process of disentangling the youth facility discount
3:12:36isn't just about the Sleeman Center, it's also to make it consistent around
3:12:41River Run Center and through Suzuki String School that book, The River Run Center.
3:12:46The Sleeman Center, the Arts and so on, that don't get that discount in a municipal facility.
3:12:52So what I'm seeing is that, and thank you for this report,
3:12:56because the Sleeman Center for me is an underutilized asset.
3:12:59I want rock concerts and you know, circuses and all sorts of things,
3:13:03and I understand the scheduling and planning, but it's also an underutilized asset
3:13:07where we can be generating some revenue and culturally and sports-wise and so on.
3:13:14So for me, the separation of the youth facility discount
3:13:19makes it consistent with how other youth groups are treated in the city of Guelph
3:13:24around municipal facilities, but also says you're not losing it,
3:13:27we're just moving you here to a different kind of facility and opening it up,
3:13:32opening up the Sleeman Center so that we can create some better revenue opportunities.
3:13:39And from my experience with just the planning and scheduling and bookings,
3:13:44not just at the city, but overall, is the city's going to know two years from now
3:13:48that the circus is coming up the state and it's blocked out.
3:13:52So can you just say yes, I'm on the right path because for me,
3:13:56I am absolutely fine with item number three, the way that it is,
3:14:00because it creates that equity across the system.
3:14:06Through the Councillor to the Chair, yes.
3:14:08And we are also very excited to bring some new opportunities,
3:14:12concerts and events for the community into Guelph as well.
3:14:16Thank you.
3:14:18Thank you, Councillor Chew.
3:14:20Yeah, through you, Madam Chair.
3:14:25I guess there are three buckets that I'm really considering here.
3:14:28I think first of the financial model, there's no question that,
3:14:33that 1.6 million dollar shortfall should continue.
3:14:38It's very unsustainable.
3:14:39I think we're all in agreement here and we appreciate your work as well to kind
3:14:43of bring us up to speed on that deficiency.
3:14:48And the second bucket is the vision for the Sleam and Centre.
3:14:51And I think, of course, we could be utilizing it much better than it is.
3:14:57However, I think to the folks that have young families in the city,
3:15:03like, not only is it like a cultural disposition to have ice time at the Sleam and Centre,
3:15:12but this is a necessity as well.
3:15:15Like, I understand where people are coming from when they say that ice time
3:15:21inevitably will be reduced because the booking is really difficult.
3:15:25So I empathize with people that reached out to me on that point.
3:15:32And then the third is also the transition with the additional capacity
3:15:36at the South End Community Centre.
3:15:39So three buckets there.
3:15:43I guess I'm just going to ask, we don't, we're not in a position yet to really look
3:15:49at the monitoring of the South End Community Centre and just, and the booking system
3:15:53because it's not yet online.
3:15:55But like, have staff considered some kind of a phase transition where, you know,
3:16:02Council could observe the system demand for the, after the pads are open before kind
3:16:08of making a permanent change to the Sleam and Booking model.
3:16:11And maybe you can kind of help me with that piece there because I think some monitoring
3:16:19of the Twin Pads and the Rec Centre I think will help us ascertain as well as whether
3:16:27we would want to keep some kind of exclusive booking at the Sleam and Centre for ice time
3:16:32because that's really what it comes down to for people.
3:16:35It's not about the youth subsidy.
3:16:37In my opinion, it's about the ice time, right?
3:16:40So can you kind of help anchor my thinking a little bit?
3:16:44Through the chair to the Councillor, I think in some of the correspondence
3:16:49that Council's received this week is about some changes to Sleam and Centre,
3:16:55but more about is there enough ice capacity across the City of Guelph?
3:17:00And we're relying on the needs assessment that was attached
3:17:05to the South End Community Centre growth that is looking for that eighth pad,
3:17:10which we haven't budgeted for or even validated whether that's still an accurate number.
3:17:16And in the coming years, and when South End does come online, we will do that work.
3:17:22Those new emerging sports could come along that need more ice or floor or gym space as well,
3:17:28and so we need to be responsible to adapt to all of those needs and uses.
3:17:34We will continue to review annually.
3:17:39We do work with community organisations to help them optimise and find efficiencies
3:17:45in how they use our places and spaces.
3:17:47And so that is maybe that monitoring specifically to South End that you're looking for,
3:17:54and that is happening.
3:17:55We support regular rental clients with some version of sort of legacy,
3:18:00where if they've had a certain amount of time in our facilities, we hope to honour that.
3:18:07It's not necessarily the same like for like place and space as we look to adjust these pieces as well.
3:18:15So think that we are set up to do that support and monitoring for you,
3:18:21and know that future work is and will be ongoing once we get in and settled to South End as well,
3:18:28to look at all of our arena spaces.
3:18:32Okay, and like you're more familiar than I am, but can you just walk me through like how we liaise
3:18:41with dedicated user groups like the Agwalf Linerhockey Association, the Ringette Group and the Women's Group,
3:18:47and like how that legacy component can be carried forward because there are a number of user groups,
3:18:56and I think the concern is that we're inevitably picking as well as to how we go about dedicating time,
3:19:06and I think that's a hard position for you to be put in as I can imagine.
3:19:12So how do we kind of create a system where we don't have to be cherry picking with lack of better words?
3:19:21Through the chair, to the councillor, we're going to rely heavily on the facility allocation policy
3:19:28that will continue to review who isn't and who is getting access to space.
3:19:34And so there has been adjustments.
3:19:36An outdoor sports user has seen a reduction or an adult sports user has seen a reduction of hours in the last couple of years
3:19:44to prioritise youth groups, for instance, outside on a sports field.
3:19:49So you're seeing that almost the list of what order we choose groups in, and so focusing on Guelph,
3:19:56focusing on youth first, doesn't also exclusively mean that we won't take or work with the other ages.
3:20:04If you will, because we need to find a balance across our community, and it is a balance and it is a certain fine line.
3:20:13We don't want to be cherry-poking.
3:20:14We're not taking the largest group just because they're the largest group, but there are large groups that have more time over others for sure.
3:20:22Thank you, and I'm just reminded of that recreation facility allocation process that we just passed.
3:20:27But I think I'm going to follow up with you before the end of the month on just the monitoring period
3:20:33and the transition to the South End Community Centre as we're framing it.
3:20:37And then, yeah, like, so like I understand where all the youth groups are coming from in terms of ice time,
3:20:47inevitably kind of being pushed, shuffled around.
3:20:52So I think if we can be a bit more, we can be intentional about that monitoring period.
3:20:59For me, like, that would give me some peace of mind.
3:21:02But yeah, I'll have some questions for them in the month for you.
3:21:04And I think some of the youth groups and people in the audience here today feel free to engage with us as well.
3:21:10We would highly encourage that.
3:21:11That's what community of the whole is for.
3:21:14So that's all I have.
3:21:16Thank you.
3:21:19Okay, thank you.
3:21:20I'm going to, are there any more questions before I move to comments?
3:21:24Councillor Katelyn, you had a comment.
3:21:26Yes, thank you very much.
3:21:30I think that staff did exactly what we asked them to do.
3:21:33We just passed an 8% property tax increase and we were looking at cost savings,
3:21:40where can we make the most use of our commercial grade facilities?
3:21:46And this report delivers on all of that.
3:21:52Personally, I think that if we don't pass the use family discount,
3:21:57then we're making a decision based on perception rather than the reality.
3:22:03We've got two new ranks coming online.
3:22:06We're waiting until that happens.
3:22:10And we know that there's going to be expanded time.
3:22:13You're not going to be in competition with commercial events.
3:22:18There's free parking.
3:22:19It's going to be easier.
3:22:21It's going to be easier to be in these other facilities.
3:22:25And it's not going to reduce any amount of the time.
3:22:28You're actually getting an increase.
3:22:31We're trying to make a responsible decision here that will lower the future needs
3:22:38for increases on property taxes.
3:22:40And we are increasing value to our families.
3:22:45So I think that this is a great report.
3:22:47And I'm going to be supporting all through motions.
3:22:50Thanks.
3:22:54Are there any additional comments?
3:22:57Councillor Bousta.
3:22:59Thank you, Ditto to Councillor Caton.
3:23:01And perhaps the economic opportunities is the lens that I use to look at this.
3:23:07There are the sponsorship opportunities.
3:23:09And in addition to the emails we've received about having to go to Cambridge
3:23:14to look for ICE, I'm aware of cultural groups that have had to go elsewhere.
3:23:19So there's the economic loss, again, to the arts and culture.
3:23:23And City Council's commitment to the cultural plan, our arts and cultural community.
3:23:28So I see this as an opportunity.
3:23:30It is a different facility.
3:23:31We have a south end recreation opportunity with a youth subsidy that's going to continue
3:23:37for ICE rinks.
3:23:39So I see this as an economic opportunity.
3:23:42Thank you.
3:23:44Councillor Goller.
3:23:46Thank you, Andrea, Chair Downer.
3:23:48I really appreciate that, as my council colleagues have said, staff did what council
3:23:54asked to do to find better use of this facility.
3:23:58I support the changes in the booking.
3:24:00I understand that.
3:24:02I will be voting to defer item number three so that we can understand the impact, the
3:24:09actual impact, so that those youth groups that would come and use the space.
3:24:14And I think that if it is a smaller impact, we should still be affording them the discount,
3:24:19understanding that leagues will not be given the opportunity to book that far in advance.
3:24:23But if it comes to, you know, the end of August and we still don't have something booked for
3:24:29the fall, there may still be an opportunity for them to book in and have those youth programs
3:24:34available at the Justine Munn Centre.
3:24:37Thank you.
3:24:38Are there any other comments?
3:24:43I did want to ask Deputy CEO Crack Butch, if she had any comments before we went to vote
3:24:47and then I have something to say too.
3:24:51Certainly thank you for the opportunity.
3:24:52So certainly I just want to emphasize that we have heard, so we will get a supplemental
3:24:56memo to you that breaks down the difference in how many of those events at Sleeman Centre
3:25:01that would be moved elsewhere are currently receiving the subsidy versus how many are
3:25:05those sort of one-off type events.
3:25:07So we will get you that memo on the agenda for the end of the month and certainly want
3:25:13to continue.
3:25:14Mr. Giles and Ms. Evans are and I are all available to talk to any user groups to help assure
3:25:21how we are going to accommodate that ice time that's moving out of the Sleeman Centre
3:25:25and how we will make sure that we are maintaining the current ice time.
3:25:29And then maybe just the only other comment is we're not the only city that struggles
3:25:33with available ice.
3:25:34That is common.
3:25:35I think there's a recent report coming out of Centre Wellington that they are struggling
3:25:38with having enough ice surfaces.
3:25:41This is a moment in time where we are gaining, let's call it one and a half pads in the south
3:25:46end if we're talking about moving some of the Sleeman ice to there.
3:25:49So it is still exciting.
3:25:51I don't want to lose track of the fact that we are adding ice inventory and thank you
3:25:55to Council for committing to the south end community centre because it is important.
3:25:59We also recognize that it doesn't completely solve the problem and that lots of other
3:26:04municipalities struggle with this.
3:26:06And so I think the commitment from the team is once south end is open and again speaking
3:26:10specifically to ice time, we'll continue to do that evaluation so that we can look and
3:26:15come back to Council about what future needs are going to look like for arenas and if there
3:26:19is additional growth needed and at what point in the future we need to do that because we
3:26:25do recognize that across south western Ontario ice time is a challenge.
3:26:29Okay, thank you.
3:26:31Thank you.
3:26:32Councillor Keaton.
3:26:33So it comes to Coran.
3:26:34Thanks, Chair Downer.
3:26:35I just had one quick question that sparked.
3:26:38Do we have a new ice pad in the capital budget for 2023?
3:26:43Is that in our 10 year capital plan?
3:26:45Through the chair.
3:26:46No, we don't have any additional ice surfaces.
3:26:51And so the intention was that once south end was online and we're looking at capacity and
3:26:56evaluating that needs assessment, we would then come back and determine.
3:27:01We also have a couple of our arenas that are aging infrastructure and so I think more than
3:27:04likely what you're going to see is capital needs related to maintaining our existing
3:27:09arenas that are aging.
3:27:11But we will come back to the future term of Council once we have sort of evaluated that
3:27:16after the south end is open and then start to project out the future needs.
3:27:20Okay, so the comment, so what I would say is having been around I think with Councillor
3:27:27Billings when we opened this, the Sleeman Centre 100 years ago, but it was intended
3:27:34to be a spectator facility.
3:27:37That's why we built it.
3:27:38It was, you know, the storm was looking for a new home, but it was a spectator facility,
3:27:44a premier one that had seating for spectator, not just sports, events and concerts and everything.
3:27:52We haven't been able to achieve that one part of that on the entertainment, on the strictly
3:27:57entertainment and on the side of that, but you know it still is a great facility.
3:28:03And so I think, you know, and Councils all through those years, all through these last
3:28:0725 years have been looking for a way to better utilize the Sleeman Centre to its full potential
3:28:13and we've never really been there.
3:28:15This is actually the first time and thank you to staff that we've actually seen a plan
3:28:20that can bring us there.
3:28:21And part of it's been that we, you know, the delay of the South End Rec Centre and these
3:28:25delays, you know, you don't think about it at the time.
3:28:28You think, oh, we're delaying, you know, that, but you're also, you're also creating other
3:28:33backup problems like we've had at the Sleeman Centre that have not allowed us to meet that
3:28:38potential and has cost us in other ways.
3:28:41So delays cost in many ways, not only in the actual construction process, but then the
3:28:47other, the opportunities lost as well.
3:28:50So I did want to add that and so this is, I think this is a great opportunity.
3:28:54I think it's going to be a transition time and I do want to see some monitoring of how
3:28:59we go through this and I think it's, like I said, I think it's a great opportunity and
3:29:07I'd like to thank staff for bringing forward this work now and hopefully we can work with
3:29:14the groups to work out the issues with the South End Rec Centre booking and how, you
3:29:22know, we can utilize the Sleeman Centre too if there's no bookings and at the beginning
3:29:27of the month and they want to book extra practices in there, that can be done.
3:29:31So I think that allows that kind of flexibility within there too.
3:29:36So I will separate the motions.
3:29:39So I need a mover for 1 and 2.
3:29:44Okay, Councillor Hauser and Councillor Richardson.
3:29:48Seconds that, is there anyone opposed to 1 and 2?
3:29:53Okay, seeing none.
3:29:56Then number three is that the youth is about the youth facility discount.
3:30:01So I know someone to entertain the idea of referral.
3:30:06Councillor Goller and Councillor Caron wanted to put the motion of a deferral.
3:30:11Is it a referral or deferral?
3:30:12Would you prefer?
3:30:13I would ask the clerk.
3:30:15Through you, Madam Chair, typically a motion would be put on the floor and then deferred.
3:30:19So typically you'd have a mover and seconder for number three and then the idea is to add
3:30:22debate and discuss it at the end of the month.
3:30:25Can we ask you to do, no, okay, who would put number three on the floor?
3:30:29So the booster tail, seconded by Councillor Billings.
3:30:32Then Councillor Goller now, Councillor Caron have a referral.
3:30:36Okay, so can we vote on the referral?
3:30:40Is there anyone opposed?
3:30:43Through you, Madam Chair, do we have a seconder on the deferral?
3:30:45I just want to make sure I have that noted.
3:30:46Yes, Councillor Caron.
3:30:47Thank you.
3:30:48Is there anyone opposed to the referral of this?
3:30:50We're going to be voting on this at the end of the month.
3:30:52So 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
3:30:57So that passes.
3:30:59Sorry, that fails.
3:31:02That motion, the referral fails and we'll go back to the main number three.
3:31:09And then still at the end of the month, we will still be debating this regardless.
3:31:14So anyone opposed to number three?
3:31:17So there's 1, 2, 3, 3, Councillor, as opposed to that.
3:31:22Through you, Madam Chair, I just need you to verbalize the votes against as the Chair.
3:31:27For vote results, please.
3:31:28So if you can say the name of the members.
3:31:30Okay, Councillor Goller, Councillor Hauser, Councillor Chew and Councillor Caron against.
3:31:40So that passes.
3:31:43Do we need to put the whole all three motions on the floor again?
3:31:46Three, Madam Chair, no, all three motions will appear at council at the end of the month.
3:31:50Okay, I think we're we've completed that.
3:31:54Thank you to city staff for bringing that forward.
3:31:58And then I think we, you know what, I don't have the last page at the agenda in front of me.
3:32:05Do you have it?
3:32:13So there are no votes.
3:32:14Okay.
3:32:15So are there any service area announcements for public services?
3:32:20No.
3:32:21I just need a motion to adjourn then.
3:32:23Councillor Bousetail, seconded by Councillor Richardson.
3:32:27Is anyone opposed?
3:32:29That passes.
3:32:31See you next week.
3:32:32Thank you.
3:32:35I wasn't sure whether there was anything like any other bylaws or anything.
3:32:40By the way, we don't do those, do we?