Skip to main content
Jon Christensen

A running list

Saw a problem. Built the fix.

Most campaigns tell you what they'd do. Here is what has already been done — before a single vote is cast.

Every one of these started the same way. Somebody in Guelph said something was broken, or buried, or impossible to find out. None of them needed a seat on council to fix. They needed somebody to sit down and build the thing.

Three so far. They are free, they are public, and not one of them only works for Ward 5. The list grows between now and October 26.

The ward lookupShipped

Type your address, find your ward

A lookup covering all six Guelph wards, free for anyone to use and free for any website to install — including rival campaigns.

What people said

I don't even know what ward I'm in.

Said at the door, over and over, across a summer of canvassing Ward 5.

What got built

The information existed. It was just spread across a City map, a boundary file and a candidate list that never spoke to each other. So Jon pulled all 53,796 Guelph civic addresses from the City's own published data, matched every one of them against the official ward boundaries, and put the answer behind a single search box.

Type a street name and it tells you your ward — and then who is running to represent you there in 2026, with links to every candidate's own site. Twenty-six Guelph streets cross a ward boundary (Gordon Street runs through four), so for those it asks for a house number and gets it exactly right.

It is also free to embed. Paste one line of code and the whole lookup appears on any website — neighbourhood associations, community groups, other campaigns, anyone at all. Helping people find their ward is not a partisan act, and a tool that only works for one candidate isn't much of a tool.

Guelph addresses covered
53,796Guelph addresses covered
wards, not just Ward 5
All 6wards, not just Ward 5
for any website to install
Freefor any website to install

Try it

Find your ward

Or grab the embed code for your own site.

The Rail Corridor Safety FundShipped

A way to pay for safe trail crossings that costs you nothing

Guelph's city-owned railway closed a crossing people use every day. The proposal — and the exact motion to make it happen — is written and sourced.

What people said

A well-worn crossing on the Radial Line Trail was closed off with new signage. So we packed a council meeting.

Members of the Guelph Hiking Trail Club and the Guelph Off-Road Bicycling Association, at City Council.

What got built

Rather than take a side, Jon read the books. Guelph Junction Railway is owned outright by the City and has been since 1910, so its audited financial statements are public. In 2025 it posted $2.4 million in profit and spent nothing at all on crossing equipment or bridge work — the same year it closed one.

The fix is a Rail Corridor Safety Fund: the railway sets aside a second payment, on top of the dividend it already sends the City, that can only be spent on safe, legal crossings along its own line. The dividend doesn't move. No line is added to anyone's tax bill. A share of the railway's own profit gets reinvested in the one corridor it is responsible for.

It is published as a full piece, with the exact motion to bring it to council, alongside every source document it rests on — five years of audited statements, the dividend policy, the shareholder declaration. Read it and check the work.

railway profit in 2025
$2.4Mrailway profit in 2025
it spent on crossings that year
$0it spent on crossings that year
cost to Guelph taxpayers
$0cost to Guelph taxpayers
The survey explainerShipped

The City's own survey, out of the PDF and into plain English

Guelph asks residents what they think, then reports it in a document almost nobody reads. Here it is, translated, with a source for every number.

What people said

87% of residents want to know how their tax dollars are invested. Only 54% feel the City explains it well.

Not an opinion — two findings from the City of Guelph's own satisfaction survey.

What got built

A 33-point gap between what people want to know and what they feel they're told is a problem the City could see in its own data. The report was public. It was just a long PDF written for council, reported out days before the summer.

So the whole thing got read — this year's and the previous years' — and rebuilt as a page anyone can follow in ten minutes: what residents actually said, what the City actually controls, and charts you can read at a glance. Every figure names the page of the report it came from, so nothing has to be taken on trust.

Two findings stand out. Roads and infrastructure went from 7% to 16% of residents naming it Guelph's most important issue, now tied with housing for first. And the share of residents who feel they get good value for their tax dollars is the lowest this survey has on record.

residents naming roads the #1 issue
7% → 16%residents naming roads the #1 issue
feel they get value for taxes — a record low
68%feel they get value for taxes — a record low
satisfied with snow removal — lowest service
51%satisfied with snow removal — lowest service

What's next

The next one hasn't been found yet. It probably belongs to you.

None of these came out of a policy binder. Each one came from a conversation — at a door, at a council meeting, in a report nobody had time to read. If something in Guelph is broken, or buried, or takes three phone calls to find out, that is exactly the kind of thing worth hearing about.

Tell us what it is. Some of it needs a council seat. A surprising amount of it just needs someone to do the work.

Tell Jon what needs fixing

Know someone who should see this? Pass it along.

Stay in the loop

Get the next fix first

A few emails a month: what's just been built, plain-English breakdowns of what's happening at City Hall, and campaign updates. Unsubscribe any time.

We'll never share your information. Unsubscribe any time.

Read more: Jon's full priorities for Ward 5 · why he's running · how to vote on October 26