Skip to main content
Jon Christensen
All meetings

Committee of Management for the Elliott

June 06, 2023 · 3 recorded decisions · 2,597 words of debate

Decisions

Routine business (1)adopting minutes, adjourning and similar

The whole meeting, as text

Transcribed automatically from the City’s recording. Times run from the start of the recording, which begins before the meeting is called to order.

Read the full transcript (2,597 words)

7:27Good afternoon. I'm going to bring to order the meeting of the committee of management for the

7:33Elliot today and we have our committee members here and I understand Michelle Karker is here

7:44from the CEO from the Elliot as well as some of her staff as well. So is there any disclosure

7:51of pecuniary interest and general nature thereof? Okay seeing none I need confirmation of the

8:00minutes for the March 7th meeting of this year. Councillor Richardson and Councillor Cousin,

8:07first and seconded. Any comments, questions? Is anyone opposed? So we have the consent agenda

8:24and we have two items on it so the Elliot long-term care residents quarterly report

8:32and the long-term care bed expansion project update report. So I'm going to invite the CAO

8:39Karker to see if she has any comments she wants to add to the report that we have before us.

8:49Actually no I'm going to defer to Lilabeth Medina our administrator to see if she has any other

8:54comments this time. Lilabeth. Thank you Michelle. Just a few highlights from the report

9:07for the following key areas. The submission of our quality improvement plan, the complaints and

9:13mandatory reporting of the critical incidents as well as our key process improvements initiatives

9:19and projects. Our QFP submission the narrative and work plan submitted to Ontario Health

9:27as per timeline and we have implemented the chains of ideas and are monitoring our indicators to

9:34ensure that this changes support our QIP targets and metrics as you can see in the report. We're

9:40halfway in our Q2 and we're already meeting our targets. For the complaints we received two complaints

9:49in January. They were resolved in the satisfaction of the complainants and happy to report that in

9:56the months of February and March we did not receive any complaints. And just a highlight

10:03for our critical incident report. There's no major issues aside from our ongoing

10:11follow with our COVID-19 outbreak. We reported three outbreaks at this quarter and we continue

10:22to follow all directives and mandates on the reopening received from the public health as we

10:28ease the restriction both in a long-term care and retirement. And I would also like to provide an

10:35update for our current outbreak of COVID-19 in one of our resident home areas that as of yesterday

10:43the outbreak has been declared over and there's only two residents that has been reported

10:52to this outbreak. This concludes my comments and I'm happy to take any questions from this report.

11:01Hey thank you. Are there any questions from the committee of management

11:06members that are here? Councillor O'Rourke.

11:14Through you Chair Downer to I think Mr. Wolfe so a little bit as Medina thank you very much for

11:20the report. That's very helpful. I'm just wondering if you wanted to add with respect to the financial

11:26section was there anything in the provincial budget that is helpful or beneficial or concerning for

11:32the operations of the long-term care portion at the Elliott. So yes thank you through you

11:46Madam Chair in response to Councillor O'Rourke's question I can say that overall

11:54when the government announced on March 23rd the government

12:0020-23 budget and title building a strong Ontario. Overall I can we can say that in our sector the

12:08government put a significant amount of new money into the long-term care. However with the new budget

12:14there is no additional IPAC funding to help the homes to help combat infectious diseases

12:22including COVID-19 beyond the funding for training and the designated leads.

12:30As well as our association so we belong to Advantage Ontario for not-for-profit

12:36has advocated for the 5% increase across all the level of care envelopes. However

12:43we can only see in the budget that there's only two percent increase.

12:47But we know that the 9.7 increase in the food envelope is a significant help in our operation.

12:58So to highlight a few in the budget documents we can see that

13:10although the budget document itself does not contain many details related to long-term care

13:15however it was reported in our sector and highlighted that the continued supporting

13:23professional growth fund that is allocated to support to build the capacity of the staff in

13:31long-term care is really a significant help to assist us in building that capacity and skills

13:41for our staff. We're the new funding for the IPAC professionals to support the hiring of infection

13:49control leads because prior to pandemic IPAC lead is just embedded in one of the portfolio of the

13:59leadership clinical leadership team. So it's not there's no designated lead at this time the

14:06government had announced that there's a funding now to hire a full-time I think it's a 0.75

14:15full-time equivalent for the IPAC lead and IPAC personnel. As well as they continue to fund the

14:23education as well because that's we recognize that that's continued needs for our staff to make

14:31sure that our new hires our new staff onboarding receive that education and training. As well as

14:39in the funding announcement there was an increase in funding and the behavioral support Ontario

14:45the program will additional additional funding will enhance the program by investing in the

14:52specialized staff and equipments to support the conflict needs of our residents so

14:56it's a big impact for our for our sector as well although the Elliott community doesn't

15:04specialize into that behavior but with this funding we're benefiting as this as well because we have a

15:12full-time RP and BSO lead as well as the BSO on this funding. As well as the local priorities funds

15:21which is needs-based so this is access through Ontario Health so for example depending on the

15:29needs in the community if say for example there's a bariatric residence who needs to come in in

15:35a long-term care and we don't have the equipment so we can access this fund to support that way we

15:41can take that residence as well. So and investment of the government to put on 1.2 million to the

15:49Ontario personal support workers association to help with the recruitment and build that capacity

15:55and promote that PSW profession in long-term care would be a significant impact to our sector as well.

16:03Thank you. Thank you very much yeah we're all aware of sort of inflationary pressure so that's

16:10really helpful there's lots of moving parts but it's helpful to know that that some of those

16:14announcements were beneficial thanks very much. So are there any other questions or comments?

16:22Okay I'm gonna um oh Councillor Feit. Just a follow-up to the answer about the lack of

16:35IPAC funding for COVID is there any other funds that we can apply to for accessibility like for

16:44example air purifiers that would help with COVID that would come through a separate fund like an

16:51accessibility fund? Thank you through Madam Chair in response to Councillor's question.

17:04I can say that with that in 2022 we already have that IPAC capital funding that it's there but to

17:13where we're hoping that it's going to be um there's more additional funding but if if that's

17:20needed there's still some sort of funding that we can access through the IPAC capital funding.

17:30Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you I'm going to call for a motion to

17:38for the recommendation to be received but I just want to note that Councillor Kerron and Council

17:42Gibson you're not on the committee so might be helpful if you just turned off your cameras for

17:46this while we're in this session. Thanks thank you so uh Councillor Chew you're gonna move it seconded?

17:55Oh you have a question? Okay Councillor Chew thank you. Thank you Chair. Just a quick question for my

18:01own personal curiosity. I'm looking at the project status report for the long-term bed expansion and

18:09we're not at that point. We're not there yet. Okay sorry stepping ahead there. All right I'll go to

18:13you first. Are there um anybody who could move this? The Council Lucetail come for a work?

18:22No questions and no more comments? Is anyone opposed? Okay that carries. Okay now we're going

18:29to go on to the um long-term care bed expansion and first I'll just ask uh Michelle if she has

18:37any comments or if uh any of your staff before on the report before we put it on the floor.

18:44I don't know if Norm has any comments Norm do you have any comments you'd like to make?

18:50Thank you Michelle for your Chair Downer. Some very quick high-level comments on the report. We

18:56provided our monthly project update report. We are in status yellow and that's due to the fact

19:03that we have missed a deadline with our latest submission for our working drawing so it was

19:08over a month past two. The good thing is is that it doesn't put our main deadline which is August

19:1411th where we submit to the Ministry of Long-Term Care for an approval to construct. That is the

19:21critical document where the Ministry will tell us whether we are permitted to carry on with the project

19:28and begin construction. So even with this late submission of our working drawings based on

19:35our current project plan we still have enough time that we can go through back and forth with the

19:42Ministry once more to fine tune these drawings and still be in a comfortable position to make that

19:49August 11th submission to the Ministry. In the meantime while the Ministry considers our working

19:56drawings that were submitted on the 22nd of May we continue to move forward with our tendering process.

20:03We have recently approved five construction managers for the the purpose of working on our

20:11project. We also have provided tender documentation and received tender responses from those five

20:19pretty approved groups and we are now in the process of evaluating those those tender responses.

20:27So again we continue to move forward and at the same time we are waiting for the Ministry to get

20:33back with comments on our working drawings. Again I want to be sure that everyone understands that

20:38at this time we don't believe that there's a significant risk to our August 11th date

20:44and for the purposes of initiating construction with the Ministry's approval.

20:50I'll stop there and respond to questions. All right thank you that was helpful. Okay

20:55Councillor Chew what would you like to know? Thank you Chair I think you already answered my question

21:01but I guess just for clarification to the public the construction manager has been awarded.

21:06No the construction manager has not been awarded as yet. We are in the process

21:13of evaluating the tender responses received from the five construction manager proponents

21:19involved in the tendering process. Okay thank you. Are there any other questions? Councillor O'Rourke?

21:31Thank you Chair Downer through you to the Elliot staff. I'm just wondering if you want to explain

21:35what the what part of the the timing difference was right so the intent to

21:42have a certain model within the designated beds and then having to to readdress that and just some

21:49quirks along the way it would help us to understand. Okay through you Chair Downer to

21:55Councillor O'Rourke. The reason for our delay was at the beginning or at the outset of our project

22:02it was our intent to implement the butterfly model of care in this new construction area.

22:07We were very excited about it. We had already reached out to the the company that that assists

22:13long-term care homes with implementing that that model of care and our preliminary plan

22:19submissions to the ministry included many elements in fact all the elements that we believe were

22:25appropriate for the implementation of that model of care. The ministry however is not as

22:35engaged in that that specific model of care as we had hoped and as a result we took likely an extra

22:45submission time which is 20 days according to the ministry 20 business days which is four weeks

22:51and we we ended up having to go back and forth and making an additional submission to the ministry

22:56by the time that we received approval of our preliminary plans so that is why we are in a

23:03delayed status however we believe that the ministry would adopt and embrace the model of care

23:10and I don't think they embraced it quite as much as we had hoped. Thanks Chair Downer. Yeah I just

23:17found it interesting that you could you could retrofit existing places now for the butterfly

23:23model. You were trying to be proactive and just sort of do it right the first time but that's not

23:29that's not how this goes so I just thought it'd be helpful we talked about the butterfly model of

23:33care before and we've asked about you know progress on that so I just wanted kind of an update on

23:39both at the same time thanks. Thank you. Thank you. Are there any more questions? Councillor Chew.

23:53Thank you Chair just for myself and members of public what what is the butterfly model of care?

24:00Sure I'm not the one wondering. So the real expert on that is Lullaby but I

24:05Lullaby if you'd be so kind just to respond to that question. I would be more than happy. So the

24:14butterfly model of care approach is a person-centered care approach. We're in it does involve

24:25the principle of care so do we have a neutral care controlling care all those aspects that

24:33we're going to be training the staff on how we care for our residents. So at this point

24:37Iliad provides a high standard of level of care to our residents but it's more on

24:42clinically approach and task approach but we want to move away from being task or clinical

24:49approach being an institution but provide a person-centered approach we're in it's all about

24:56our residents so it involves altering the environment so that's why it kind of impact our

25:06our project at this point because we're incorporating it with the new build instead of

25:11out making our renovation later on because as you can probably know that when you talk about

25:20dementia dementia carol Alzheimer's it affects the level of wayfinding it affects the cognitive

25:32it affects the environment it's a big factor in caring for those our seniors when they're into

25:42the late states of dementia. So it's basically it's a model principle care approach we're in

25:50we're moving away from being institutional but being so when you when you look at that

25:55butterfly model it's it's actually there's a slogan is free to be me so we're just allowing them to

26:02kind of look into their expression so it's the responsive behavior and kind of looking into

26:09other other ways of caring for them. That's that is why good okay thanks any other questions today?

26:23Okay could I have um thanks so if I could have a motion to receive this report

26:31councillor crossin is that good by councillor Richardson is there anyone opposed? Okay that passes

26:40right thank you um are there any announcements from the the LA community staff? Michelle?

26:52Through you. To your daughter no there's no other announcements at this time thank you.

26:56Thank you so then that's our business is done thank you a lot of good questions today to

27:03create some clarity around issues. Could I have a motion for adjournment then? Councillor

27:09Bousichail seconded by councillor work anyone opposed? Seeing none we're adjourned thank you.