Skip to main content
Jon Christensen
Guelph Council Record

Committee of Management for the Elliott · June 06, 2023 · Item 3.2

Long-Term Care Bed Expansion Project Update Report, be received.

Main motion under the agenda item Long-Term Care Bed Expansion Project Update Report

Carried (7 to 0)

7 in favour, 0 against — unanimous

What was voted on

The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.

1. That the Long-Term Care Bed Expansion Project Update Report, be received.

Moved by Councillor Klassen, seconded by Councillor Richardson.

How the room voted

In favour (7)

  • Busuttil
  • Caton
  • Chew
  • Downer
  • Klassen
  • O'Rourke
  • Richardson

Who spoke to it

Norman Wolff provided comments on the long-term care bed expansion project.

What council was given

The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item.

What was said

1,161 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.

Read the debate(click to open)

18:29to go on to the um long-term care bed expansion and first I'll just ask uh Michelle if she has

18:37any comments or if uh any of your staff before on the report before we put it on the floor.

18:44I don't know if Norm has any comments Norm do you have any comments you'd like to make?

18:50Thank you Michelle for your Chair Downer. Some very quick high-level comments on the report. We

18:56provided our monthly project update report. We are in status yellow and that's due to the fact

19:03that we have missed a deadline with our latest submission for our working drawing so it was

19:08over a month past two. The good thing is is that it doesn't put our main deadline which is August

19:1411th where we submit to the Ministry of Long-Term Care for an approval to construct. That is the

19:21critical document where the Ministry will tell us whether we are permitted to carry on with the project

19:28and begin construction. So even with this late submission of our working drawings based on

19:35our current project plan we still have enough time that we can go through back and forth with the

19:42Ministry once more to fine tune these drawings and still be in a comfortable position to make that

19:49August 11th submission to the Ministry. In the meantime while the Ministry considers our working

19:56drawings that were submitted on the 22nd of May we continue to move forward with our tendering process.

20:03We have recently approved five construction managers for the the purpose of working on our

20:11project. We also have provided tender documentation and received tender responses from those five

20:19pretty approved groups and we are now in the process of evaluating those those tender responses.

20:27So again we continue to move forward and at the same time we are waiting for the Ministry to get

20:33back with comments on our working drawings. Again I want to be sure that everyone understands that

20:38at this time we don't believe that there's a significant risk to our August 11th date

20:44and for the purposes of initiating construction with the Ministry's approval.

20:50I'll stop there and respond to questions. All right thank you that was helpful. Okay

20:55Councillor Chew what would you like to know? Thank you Chair I think you already answered my question

21:01but I guess just for clarification to the public the construction manager has been awarded.

21:06No the construction manager has not been awarded as yet. We are in the process

21:13of evaluating the tender responses received from the five construction manager proponents

21:19involved in the tendering process. Okay thank you. Are there any other questions? Councillor O'Rourke?

21:31Thank you Chair Downer through you to the Elliot staff. I'm just wondering if you want to explain

21:35what the what part of the the timing difference was right so the intent to

21:42have a certain model within the designated beds and then having to to readdress that and just some

21:49quirks along the way it would help us to understand. Okay through you Chair Downer to

21:55Councillor O'Rourke. The reason for our delay was at the beginning or at the outset of our project

22:02it was our intent to implement the butterfly model of care in this new construction area.

22:07We were very excited about it. We had already reached out to the the company that that assists

22:13long-term care homes with implementing that that model of care and our preliminary plan

22:19submissions to the ministry included many elements in fact all the elements that we believe were

22:25appropriate for the implementation of that model of care. The ministry however is not as

22:35engaged in that that specific model of care as we had hoped and as a result we took likely an extra

22:45submission time which is 20 days according to the ministry 20 business days which is four weeks

22:51and we we ended up having to go back and forth and making an additional submission to the ministry

22:56by the time that we received approval of our preliminary plans so that is why we are in a

23:03delayed status however we believe that the ministry would adopt and embrace the model of care

23:10and I don't think they embraced it quite as much as we had hoped. Thanks Chair Downer. Yeah I just

23:17found it interesting that you could you could retrofit existing places now for the butterfly

23:23model. You were trying to be proactive and just sort of do it right the first time but that's not

23:29that's not how this goes so I just thought it'd be helpful we talked about the butterfly model of

23:33care before and we've asked about you know progress on that so I just wanted kind of an update on

23:39both at the same time thanks. Thank you. Thank you. Are there any more questions? Councillor Chew.

23:53Thank you Chair just for myself and members of public what what is the butterfly model of care?

24:00Sure I'm not the one wondering. So the real expert on that is Lullaby but I

24:05Lullaby if you'd be so kind just to respond to that question. I would be more than happy. So the

24:14butterfly model of care approach is a person-centered care approach. We're in it does involve

24:25the principle of care so do we have a neutral care controlling care all those aspects that

24:33we're going to be training the staff on how we care for our residents. So at this point

24:37Iliad provides a high standard of level of care to our residents but it's more on

24:42clinically approach and task approach but we want to move away from being task or clinical

24:49approach being an institution but provide a person-centered approach we're in it's all about

24:56our residents so it involves altering the environment so that's why it kind of impact our

25:06our project at this point because we're incorporating it with the new build instead of

25:11out making our renovation later on because as you can probably know that when you talk about

25:20dementia dementia carol Alzheimer's it affects the level of wayfinding it affects the cognitive

25:32it affects the environment it's a big factor in caring for those our seniors when they're into

25:42the late states of dementia. So it's basically it's a model principle care approach we're in

25:50we're moving away from being institutional but being so when you when you look at that

25:55butterfly model it's it's actually there's a slogan is free to be me so we're just allowing them to

26:02kind of look into their expression so it's the responsive behavior and kind of looking into

26:09other other ways of caring for them. That's that is why good okay thanks any other questions today?

26:23Okay could I have um thanks so if I could have a motion to receive this report

26:31councillor crossin is that good by councillor Richardson is there anyone opposed? Okay that passes

Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.

Check this against the City’s official minutes

Everything on this page comes from the City of Guelph’s published record. Nothing here is a summary or an interpretation.

See the rest of this meeting