Skip to main content
Jon Christensen
Guelph Council Record

City Council · June 25, 2024 · Item 8.2

Staff to conduct additional engagement and research with respect to the use of re-useable containers and report back to Council.

Main motion under the agenda item Single-Use Items Strategy Phase 2, 2024-245, 2024-303

Carried (12 to 0)

12 in favour, 0 against — unanimous

This was one of 7 motions on the same item

In the order council took them. A vote makes sense next to the ones around it.

  1. 1/7Vote on the amended motionPhase 2 recommendations for the Single-Use Items Reduction Strategy, as included in report 2024-245, dated June 4, 2024… be approvedno recorded vote
  2. 2/7Main motionPhase 2 recommendations for the Single-Use Items Reduction Strategy, as included in report 2024-245, dated June 4, 2024, be approved.Carried (12 to 0)
  3. 3/7AmendmentSingle-Use Items By-law (2024)-20938 be amended to remove sleeves from the “Accessory Foodware Item” definition and that clause 5.1 be amended to state “5.1 A Business…Carried (12 to 0)
  4. 4/7Vote on the amended motionSingle-Use Items By-law (2024) – 20938, as amended, be approved.Carried (12 to 0)
  5. 5/7Main motionStaff to conduct additional engagement and research with respect to the inclusion of re-useable containers as part of the Single-Use Items By-law (2024)-20938…no recorded vote
  6. 6/7Main motionStaff to conduct additional engagement and research with respect to the use of re-useable containers and report back to Council.Word for word the same as another motion on this item.Carried (12 to 0)
  7. 7/7Main motionStaff to conduct additional engagement and research with respect to the use of re-useable containers and report back to Council.you are hereWord for word the same as another motion on this item.Carried (12 to 0)

What was voted on

The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.

3. That staff be directed to conduct additional engagement and research with respect to the use of re-useable containers and report back to Council.

Moved by Councillor Klassen, seconded by Councillor Goller.

How the room voted

In favour (12)

  • Allt
  • Billings
  • Busuttil
  • Caron
  • Caton
  • Chew
  • Downer
  • Gibson
  • Goller
  • Guthrie
  • Klassen
  • O'Rourke

Who spoke to it

Jayne Holmes, Acting Chief Administrative Officer, provided an update on the engagement on the use of reusable containers.

What council was given

The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item. The summaries are written automatically, so you can tell what a document is without opening a ninety-page PDF.

A summary is this site’s description of a document, not the City’s. Open the document before relying on one.

What was said

6,231 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.

Read the debate(click to open)

1:29:40Revert back to the original

1:29:42Recommendations from council and then add a third amendment that talked to the

1:29:49To going out and doing some engagement

1:29:51So the concern from staff at the time was that we had not had a chance to go and do any

1:29:56Engagement with the restaurant community

1:29:59And we had already already been receiving some calls of concern

1:30:05After that memo

1:30:08Mr. Mayor you

1:30:10Myself staff council class and did have a meeting with some representatives from the the restaurant community

1:30:18Just looking at my notes. They had numerous concerns associated with

1:30:22Allergens

1:30:25Washing hands contamination front of house back of house

1:30:30No standard sizing they were concerned with operational times associated with

1:30:36Dealing with containers that are being brought from the outside which hit their bottom line and and of course they already have a labor shortage

1:30:43So that was a concern for them as well. So

1:30:46Anyway in the end I think where we landed as we were discussing that

1:30:51If we did do engagement it sounded like we were going to end up there anyway and

1:30:57What we would recommend now is reverting back to the original the original recommendations from staff

1:31:03Okay, thank you. How about we just at least get

1:31:11Motions put on the floor to kick things off

1:31:14Councillor Klassen you're willing to move the motions just to put them on the floor. Thank you and

1:31:20Or work. Thank you and

1:31:24I know that there might be a couple amendments going here. So just to kind of help us filter and stay focused as amendments come our way

1:31:31It looks like Councillor

1:31:34Gowler had just sent something around

1:31:38and

1:31:40Maybe I could ask Councillor Goller to maybe just ask our staff some questions maybe just

1:31:45Prior to putting it up but before before I go to you Councillor Goller the clerk just want to speak for a moment

1:31:51Go ahead through you mr. Marin. Thank you

1:31:53I just want to clarify what was just put on the floor if it was the staff recommendations that Miss home miss homes

1:31:57Reference or if it's the committee of the whole recommendations as included on the agenda

1:32:04Well, I

1:32:12Think we better go with the ones from committee

1:32:15It's probably the best way to do it

1:32:18Until a few minutes ago. We weren't going to do that but now that there's a potential amendment

1:32:22I think that's the best way of going about it. So

1:32:26Do you want to say something back to you mr. Marin? That's no problem. It's obviously council's decision

1:32:31It may be easier to build up from the original staff recommendations to make additions

1:32:37Then it will be to amend the committee of the whole ones procedure. Yeah, of course a good idea. Yeah councils discretion

1:32:42Yep, that's a good idea

1:32:45Why don't we do that everybody? So why don't we just go one at a time point of order mega three sure I seconded

1:32:51And I actually thought we were seconding the original staff recommendation from that memo

1:32:57So I'm happy to withdraw

1:33:00Yeah, I was just about to get there

1:33:03I was just go go through the process of having to do what I got to do which is

1:33:07Councillor

1:33:08Claussen, are you willing to withdraw?

1:33:10Just for now

1:33:13We're going back. Sorry. Just so I'm clear to the committee recommendation. So not

1:33:19What's today before us on the agenda just to be absolutely clear? So I

1:33:25Can go back and look at what those are now and I'll withdraw. Thanks. Yeah, perfect

1:33:31I'm just good. I'm basically gonna build the motions one at a time. Okay, so I'm not leaving anything out or anything like that

1:33:37It's just an easier way of going about it. So if you're willing to remove and Dominique

1:33:40I'm sorry councillor O'Rourke has already said willing to remove. I have to officially ask does any member of council against removal?

1:33:48Okay, that's nobody. Thank you very much everybody

1:33:50so now I'm good to ask for tabling of I think the first one which is

1:33:57If you could put up on the screen sir, I'm just pausing for dramatic effect

1:34:01Through you, mr. Mayor

1:34:02So we'll display the approval for clerk staff is a slide 12 that we're looking at these are the original two recommendations put forward by staff at

1:34:09Committee of the whole earlier this month

1:34:14Yes, and so I'm just going to go one at a time just to make it easy. Okay, so

1:34:20With some of the willing to move number one councillor Downer. Okay. Thank you

1:34:26seconded

1:34:28Councillor Claussen, okay

1:34:31so

1:34:32Remember this is this is just the one that flew from from committee. Okay, so I'll call the vote on that as anyone against

1:34:42Nobody okay, we now have two extra. I'm going to call them topics right now

1:34:47We have an amendment that I know councillor or work wants to bring forward on like sleeves and such

1:34:52I'm going to go to that

1:34:54Then the second item I know is like containers. I'll go to that after that and then we're done. Okay

1:35:00So let's let me just turn the floor over to councillor work

1:35:03She can maybe just give us a little bit of a preamble as to why she's tabling something and then we'll table that okay

1:35:09Go ahead. Thank you. Mayor Guthrie. I just want to confirm that the second clause of that initial staff report is also on the floor, right?

1:35:16That the single-use items bylaw 2024 as

1:35:20amended be approved that one is on the floor

1:35:23I

1:35:25Thought we tabled one. I wasn't sure we tabled two through you mr. Murder counselor work. That's correct

1:35:32So only one was tabled. Okay number two is not the table

1:35:35I know there is an amendment coming forward number two should be tabled prior to that correct

1:35:39Yes, I'm sorry

1:35:40I paused because I wanted to stop at number two to give councillor work the opportunity, but yes, you're everyone's right

1:35:45I am wrong. We need to table number two for you to continue with your conversation

1:35:49So would you at least table number two for us? Yeah, I counseler downer. Would you second that? Okay?

1:35:53That's been tabled, but now I am sending it over to council or work for a potential amendment great

1:35:58Thank you, Mayor Guthrie. So over the course of the last couple of weeks

1:36:01We received correspondence from the retail council of Canada and they expressed some concern around

1:36:08Requiring someone to ask for something like a sleeve that goes around a coffee cup

1:36:14Because that sleeve actually makes it easier to hold the cup because the contents are hot and

1:36:20So I I think that's fair

1:36:23I think they have processes and they have reasons why they're putting that sleeve around the coffee cup to protect someone and in fact

1:36:29We shouldn't we shouldn't require someone ordering a cup coffee to ask for that sleeve if they're not aware of that

1:36:36So the first part of my motion is to remove the word

1:36:41Sleeves from the accessory food wear item definition

1:36:46Yeah, and then the second piece of the motion

1:36:51Section 5.1 was not terribly clear

1:36:55with respect to

1:36:57Whether those orders needed to be made in-house or like inside the building or whether the

1:37:04beverage was made inside the building so

1:37:08Staff have proposed some language to make it clear that a business must accept a customer's reusable drink cup for beverage orders made

1:37:17insor for beverages consumed on or off a business premise unless

1:37:21Serve through a window to a customer at a drive-through or purchase for delivery

1:37:26And the reason for that is both the staff and a driver in a vehicle if a hot beverage is being passed through that vehicle and

1:37:34And you know may or may not have a lid on it, etc

1:37:37I think there's a safety component there for both the person serving and the person receiving and so

1:37:45So I am moving the amendment

1:37:48To remove sleeves from the accessory food wear item definition and that clause 5.1 be amended to state a

1:37:55Business must accept a customer's reusable drink cup for beverage orders made in store for beverages consumed on or off a business's premises

1:38:04Unless served through a window to a customer at a drive-through or purchased for delivery

1:38:08Okay, thank you. And Councillor Caron has agreed to second that

1:38:12So can I call the vote on this then pretty straightforward? No Councillor Downer first?

1:38:16Could I just ask for a response from staff on that?

1:38:22Like are we okay with those changes through the mayor

1:38:26Yes, it didn't specifically come up as we were having our engagement

1:38:30And looking at some of the correspondence that has come up. It seems to make sense to us so we're in support

1:38:36Okay, okay, I'll call the vote then on that is anyone against that amendment

1:38:48Nobody that's unanimous. Thank you. So now I'll call the vote on number two as amended. Okay is

1:38:54Anyone against that?

1:38:55No one that's great. Okay, so that passes unanimously too and so then the third and last sort of topic was what was flown from

1:39:04Committee what was around reusable containers?

1:39:08and so

1:39:10I'm good to turn over to Councillor Goller and to quasen in a second, but you know just to give a little bit of

1:39:17preamble

1:39:18There was actually I believe it was unanimous support at committee

1:39:22To look to actually implement this in the bylaw as our acting CAO mentioned a lot has kind of transpired between then and now

1:39:31with a lot of concerns which

1:39:33You know my own opinion my own opinion only was they were quite valid

1:39:37And they were from you know known restaurant owners

1:39:42in our city that

1:39:45Actually are probably some of the best environmental restaurant owners calling

1:39:49And they really explained quite well a lot of the concerns that they had

1:39:54Unfortunately in a way like because you know, I think we're all trying to do the right thing on it

1:39:58So as our deputy

1:40:01Sorry as our acting CAO mentioned

1:40:03You know, there's kind of an option

1:40:05I think this is where Councillor Goller and quasen might want to have a discussion on is

1:40:09You know, is there validity in actually doing engagement between now and next year?

1:40:15around this issue to see if maybe something could happen or

1:40:19Do you think we might end up in the same kind of place that we're at right now?

1:40:24So which is in other words go do an engagement, but you probably won't change anything

1:40:30And then so that's the debate that may be in discussion that we could have

1:40:33Councillor Goller, I'm gonna turn it over to you on this theme and and so why don't you go ahead?

1:40:39With dearest factor worship my fellow councillor had her hand up first. I

1:40:45Could allow her to to say her piece. I have questions stemming mainly from the staff report

1:40:50Which spoke favorably in the support of of the recommendation

1:40:58Okay, well, let me just ask either one of you are you actually wanting to table a motion to try to actually have

1:41:05Formal engagement on containers between now and next year because if you are I'd rather just get to the debate in the discussion

1:41:11By actually formally having it tabled so one of you table it

1:41:18Okay, let's have it up on the screen then

1:41:21That's not be directed to conduct additional

1:41:24Engagement and research with respect to the inclusion of reusable containers as part of the single-use items by-law and

1:41:31Report back to council prior to the effective date of the single-use items phase two timeline of March 1st 2025

1:41:38Okay, so it's been tabled

1:41:41And so is there is there any questions on that from anyone can't also now go to you first

1:41:49Yes, thank you through you mr. Merritt to staff. I just had a question, you know looking through the memo with regard to

1:41:57There's there's some feedback that was collected from the town of Banff

1:42:04And it said that anecdotal feedback from Banff

1:42:06States are

1:42:08Includes the requirement to accept reusable cups and containers and it's been well received by businesses red and residents and they're continued

1:42:17To be encouraged to remember there to bring their reusable container

1:42:20I'm just curious if we've had the opportunity to connect with any of the staff

1:42:25At the town of Banff to talk to them about some of the challenges that they might have been having so far with with the program

1:42:32Other than the anecdotal feedback that seems to be positive

1:42:37So maybe I'll start through the Merida to council class and

1:42:42Again, we we have not had a chance to do any

1:42:45Fulsome engagement on that yet. I don't know if

1:42:50My colleagues here have had a chance to reach out to to Banff in between when we had committee of the whole and and now

1:42:58If and they have so I will let them I will let them comment on that because we had written the memo before we had a chance to do that

1:43:04So I'll turn it over to

1:43:08Through the mayor so we have contacted

1:43:11Staff from the town of Banff and that is their anecdotal feedback since we were here earlier this month

1:43:17So it has been well received

1:43:20However, I think there's still an opportunity for further engagement within our own community

1:43:24As they did extensive engagement with their community as well

1:43:30Okay, and so just to clarify that and there is an opportunity still to do some engagement here with the community

1:43:36I mean not to you know, we did meet with restaurants Canada

1:43:39and we definitely met with some some local restaurants and I

1:43:44Completely respect their opinions and I think there there's some really valid ones here

1:43:48But I'm I guess my question is you know, there's is there still an opportunity to do engagement and

1:43:56Is there potentially an opportunity? This is a second question to create a program

1:44:01That's not necessarily mandatory because in some cases it might not make sense for some businesses to

1:44:07participate in a program like this

1:44:10So maybe maybe I'll start so through the mayor to council class and again

1:44:14There's always an opportunity to do engagement and when we wrote the memo right after the committee of the whole meeting

1:44:21we had heard the the the concerns and

1:44:25That was that was our recommendation is to go out and do into to do engagement because we hadn't done it

1:44:33After that memo had been written

1:44:36We like I said, you were in that meeting council class and with us and we did hear some

1:44:41valid concerns from some of the the restaurant

1:44:44representatives and

1:44:47And so we were starting to think that even if we did do engagement is

1:44:52You know, are we gonna end up in the same place and what we were trying to do is also be you know

1:44:57Cognizant of staff capacity as well because this was not on anybody's work plan

1:45:01So if it's the will of council for us to go and do engagement we had committed to do that

1:45:07Prior to March 1st 2025. That was when the the by-law was to be in place. So you won't lose any time

1:45:15But we're happy to do that. The other the other part of it is to mr.

1:45:19Mayor I forgot to mention was that we also said that we could do an educational component as part of our website as well for those

1:45:27To provide some sort of guidance for those who do want to participate

1:45:31Rather than making a by-law where everybody has to participate

1:45:34So that gives the restaurant some choice on whether they want to continue with a program like that or not

1:45:42Okay, thank you. Yeah, I certainly appreciate that component of it because yeah the mandatory piece

1:45:48I know for some businesses and what we heard from

1:45:51Some of the restaurants is that there are certain components from an operational perspective that could be quite challenging

1:45:58But but the educational piece is something certainly that I think we can take advantage of I

1:46:04Still am I and you know, I'm happy to hear from my my fellow counselors on this as well

1:46:09I still think there's an opportunity here for engagement and for learning from the community

1:46:15I think WALF has always been a leader in sustainability and I think that

1:46:21We're not gonna lower our waste by not looking at programs like this and not promoting these types of behaviors

1:46:29If we had looked at programs like this 25 years ago

1:46:34You know, I think that you know with the use of styrofoam and other

1:46:39Non-recyclable materials, you know, we would have been having a totally different conversation

1:46:42so the conversation needs to continue and I think this is a piece that can help continue the conversation and of course I don't want to

1:46:49Add unnecessary burden to a lot of these businesses who I know are already struggling a lot in the current economic situation

1:46:57however, we do have a very real issue with single-use items and landfills and I think that looking at all

1:47:04opportunities to reduce

1:47:06What's in our landfills and what we're going to have to deal with?

1:47:09For years to come is is something worth exploring but definitely open to hearing from my fellow counselors as well

1:47:19Thank you before I continue I'd like to just ask the movers is your intention to is your motion and intention to engage

1:47:28to encourage or

1:47:30to engage to create a bylaw

1:47:34Like there's a big difference here. I think I'd like to just go back to what the original

1:47:41You know, what's in the agenda for today and I think that

1:47:45in the

1:47:47Memo it was to do engage do the engagement before we approve the budget or approve the bylaw rather, sorry

1:47:59Before we continue, please put the motion back up if we're going to have a discussion and we just need clarity

1:48:07That's all it's okay. Just trying to make sure we're all focused on the right thing

1:48:11Because your motion says to direct them to do additional engagement and research with respect to the inclusion of reusable containers as part of

1:48:20a bylaw

1:48:22But what I'm hearing a lot of and seeing a lot of nodding of heads about is

1:48:27engagement to encourage

1:48:29engagement to see

1:48:31Just to see if there's the ability for some to maybe buy in on this and so

1:48:35I think I just want to make sure that the movers are moving and item moving emotion here

1:48:42That's really what they want to do

1:48:45Do you want an actual bylaw at the end of the day to put to come forward?

1:48:50Because we've heard from our staff that that might be very very difficult if you want an engagement process that includes

1:48:58Communication encouragement website that that is a different thing and I just that wouldn't be

1:49:06Aligned with what you've tabled

1:49:08So it's kind of an it's kind of it's either an either or or it's both

1:49:12Like I'm just trying to help us make sure you're getting what you want

1:49:17So I'll go to the movers one more time cancer quas and then goer. Yes if you go into the

1:49:22I think that perhaps what the appropriate motion would be is the staff recommended motion that is in

1:49:31the motion amendment memo and

1:49:34It says three that staff be directed to conduct additional engagement and research with respect to the inclusion of reusable containers as

1:49:42part of the single use items bylaw and

1:49:45Report back to council prior to the effective date of the single use items phase two timeline of March 1st 2025 and

1:49:56That was the motion that I was referring to I'm not sure how the other one. I think that one was just in the agenda. So

1:50:03Hope that clarifies. I think our clerks are trying to determine that

1:50:09We think that you just read out something that is exactly what you guys tabled

1:50:13Which is fine. I just I just want to make sure if I may

1:50:18Come you are trying just just one second councillor Goller

1:50:20Yeah, so how I think the best way to answer this question right now is how is staff interpreting this motion if it passes

1:50:30Yeah, we would in 3d to the mayor

1:50:38So interpretation of this is that we would engage for the purpose of implementing a bylaw change with respect to reuse containers depending on the feedback received

1:50:47Yeah, and I would agree an education

1:50:50Component for encouraging the use just be a public education campaign. It wouldn't be for the intent of a bylaw amendment

1:50:58Okay, so we have clarity

1:51:00Which is fine. That's what we need here. Okay, what's tabled is to try to actually implement a bylaw

1:51:08Compared to if you want to do something different it would be

1:51:12More education communication encouragement campaign, okay, so I'll go to go to councillor Goller

1:51:19Your worship. We also heard as well as representatives from from food services and from the the food industry

1:51:27Represents from businesses that have reusable container services in our community. There are a couple of different reusable food

1:51:36Container services. So I think this is not necessarily

1:51:39Looking at everyone bringing their own Tupperware, but actually if the takeaway container is

1:51:46Returnable and then through through a third-party service. I think that would be an excellent alternative

1:51:52So if I could ask from staff when when you look at the the motion, would it be exclusively?

1:52:00Takeaway containers that you know that I bring my own Tupperware because that's that's not what I read. I read that it would actually be

1:52:07Any type of reusable containers as takeout

1:52:12Through the mayor to councillor goller, we would consider this motion including all options for reusable containers

1:52:20Thank you. Thank you. And with that in mind your worship

1:52:23I would love to explore the possibility of having this become the bylaw is it possible to and it may very well be that it's not

1:52:31Possible for certain types of businesses, maybe fast food places

1:52:35But it may be a requirement that other businesses

1:52:39Are required to use subservice that provides reusable containers

1:52:45therefore

1:52:46significantly

1:52:47limiting the amount of containers that end up in landfill

1:52:52Okay, I got a few more hands up here in the room

1:52:54So I'd like to try to focus us on getting to a conclusion here

1:52:58So I'm going to go to councillor Allt and then council or work. Thank you mayor Guthrie

1:53:04As the discussion the worthwhile discussion on on

1:53:08Reusable containers goes on I'm getting a bit confused about exactly what it is that we're trying to do here

1:53:14And the question I believe I have to have for clerks is can you have a bylaw that is?

1:53:21Voluntary for certain businesses through through you mr. Mayor

1:53:31I'll do my best to answer that that question you could I suppose put a clause in a bylaw that said

1:53:37Voluntary but then there is no it's a it's a suggestion not a bylaw at that point

1:53:42Of course many of our bylaws have no specific enforcement provisions

1:53:46But that doesn't make them voluntary or non mandatory that lack of enforcement. So generally speaking I think that would be unusual at the very least

1:53:54And thank you very much. I appreciate that clarity actually I

1:53:58Completely support the intent of this but I cannot support the motion as it is presented

1:54:04It strikes me that we're being incredibly ambiguous about it is what about what it is we want to do and we're leaving

1:54:12People with the very peculiar notion that you are subject to a bylaw if you want to be but aren't necessarily subject to the bylaw

1:54:20Thank You councillor arourke

1:54:23Thank You margoth three through you to staff

1:54:26I'm just wondering how this fits with all of the blue box transition that starts

1:54:32January 2025 I believe

1:54:34so

1:54:36Yes, we want to reduce the number of containers that are are used initially right definitely

1:54:43But won't the people who are using or issuing those containers have to find some mechanism to

1:54:49Bring those back and recycle them. So

1:54:52a how does it work with the blue box transition and

1:54:56B

1:54:58Does it become a moot point if the

1:55:02Emitter has to has to take it back sometime right? So I'm just wondering how those things fit

1:55:09So through the marriage counselor arourke the blue box transition

1:55:13The regulation only applies to the residential sector

1:55:16So if a resident brought it home and put it in their blue box

1:55:20it would go through the recycling program if the and

1:55:3040% of the waste generated in Ontario is residential 60% is commercial

1:55:37Okay, I was trying to think is there a way to do this education

1:55:42Through that ICI it's through that blue box transition

1:55:47communication

1:55:48But it doesn't sound like it aligns

1:55:51So another question in that vein. So through you Marga three to staff

1:55:55This is a big change. It's coming to 12

1:55:58What kind of capacity would you have to go and and consult with restaurants on this sort of very specific?

1:56:05Item that's laudable and I'd love to see it in place

1:56:08But do you have capacity to do this in this current context?

1:56:12Throw through the mayor to councillor mark

1:56:14We do have students that were onboarding for the fall for the purpose of the education campaign related to this bylaw

1:56:21If it's to pass and at that time that would be when we be doing the engagement

1:56:26So it's the same stack going out. They're already at the business. They can ask these questions. Okay

1:56:31So three America three have a question for the movers

1:56:34Rather than put it into a bylaw where I think you would have to specify these types of business but not those types of business

1:56:42Why not just leave the education component and make it a competitive advantage for businesses that want to offer this

1:56:49So there's a grocery store near me. They have the friendlier containers

1:56:52I think that's fantastic or I go to bulk barn and I you know bring my spice containers and stuff like that

1:57:00so rather than

1:57:02impose a bylaw that creates a patchwork for businesses across the the province really and

1:57:09It's especially difficult for like franchisees who have very very specific

1:57:15Processes and rules and and they time all their stuff, right?

1:57:20Why not

1:57:21Incent and appeal to the better angels than

1:57:25regulate

1:57:31Yeah, to the mover you can respond. I think from my perspective

1:57:38I was you know just to you know look at what staff provided in the report

1:57:44They did refer to Banff who does have a bylaw that talks about reusable food wear

1:57:50and I did start looking into their bylaw and some of the language that they were using and

1:57:58There's a lot of language around having a policy about reusable containers

1:58:03And having a written policy so in that case

1:58:06I mean, I'm sure I didn't go and look at individual restaurants and and what their

1:58:11Individual policies are and what they can and can't accept

1:58:15but I I personally was curious about how they

1:58:20Implemented it since they were the only example provided

1:58:24From a bylaw perspective. So there there is some precedent with regard to it being a bylaw

1:58:29so that was you know my first line of thought and and and my second line of thought on this is that yeah, I do believe that there is an

1:58:38educational component to this and

1:58:40If it comes to you know, we look into the engagement and we're saying like no, it shouldn't be a bylaw

1:58:46It really should be yes. It's a competitive advantage

1:58:50And I know that there's already a number of people who do use reusable container programs

1:58:56We have a popular

1:58:58Provider here in Guelph a friendlier company and I know that they provide a great service to many of the businesses in Guelph and and people like to use it

1:59:05So I do know that that that's something that that can exist. I think that I just didn't want to

1:59:13Proclude the idea that a bylaw

1:59:17Might be possible. I didn't want to leave that off the table

1:59:21But I'm I'm also happy for the staff to recommend that it not be

1:59:26I don't know necessarily if this is the right moment for it to be mandatory

1:59:30But I definitely think that it is worth exploring and that there might be language that does reflect our intention here

1:59:43Yeah, so just a comment mega three if I may I'm uncomfortable with the language of the motion because it does assume

1:59:51That it would be put into a bylaw

1:59:55For for companies even that would really want to do this like it does create additional work for them to create new policies

2:00:02And all of those things that that a lot of small restaurants couldn't necessarily do

2:00:08So I would I'd like to hear from

2:00:12Staff on how we could appeal to people's better angels through their

2:00:17Their their conversations in the fall I fully support that but I can't support the the amendment that's tabled

2:00:28Okay, look I can I can I can call the vote on this

2:00:34but I know some heads are nodding

2:00:38But

2:00:41I'm trying to actually build consensus a little bit here in compromise

2:00:47I'm wondering if potentially an amendment might be worthwhile to remove the portion in the middle of your motion

2:00:54That talks about the actual crafting of a bylaw

2:00:58Remove that out and let our staff go and just do engagement and then come back with a report with what they find and

2:01:07that's it then

2:01:09Then we take a next step after that

2:01:12I think we I think we'll accomplish what we're looking for kind of kill two birds with one stone here

2:01:17Like you're good to get the engagement you want with the details while the engagement happens

2:01:21You're also getting the education. So that's kind of good. You're getting both of those things over this time frame

2:01:27But there we're not sending staff away to actually, you know draft an actual bylaw

2:01:32So let's get the results back and then have another full some discussion about it and focus just on engagement right now

2:01:37I'm wondering if there was a a counselor that would be willing to move an amendment counselor Boussatil and then and then counselor

2:01:43Oh, now I'm really sorry. I I can't move stuff and I you're gonna need to write

2:01:49You're gonna need to write

2:01:51Write something to the clerks to do that

2:01:53but there's just a just like a basically a line in the middle there that could be removed by clerks and

2:01:59and then I think that amendment might help us get to a

2:02:04Unanimous potential vote here where we just are sending away for engagement only if that if that helps

2:02:10I'm just trying to help us land on something. I'm seeing some

2:02:13Some nods. Can we just get the motion put up on the screen?

2:02:19So basically it would be the remove

2:02:22removal of as

2:02:25part of the single-use items bylaw and

2:02:30And then just say and to report back to council period

2:02:34So once once it's done just report so it doesn't have to be yes our staff for those online

2:02:38Our staff are all nodding their head in the room to see you're aware

2:02:42So it's moved by counselor

2:02:46Boussatil seconded by counselor alt to remove those pieces there and and then we're I think we're landing on a place

2:02:53That's a bit more conducive to what we're trying to trying to accomplish

2:02:57If I could

2:02:59Counselor Gibson, did you want to speak to that amendment?

2:03:03Yeah, just a quick question to staff. That's okay

2:03:06Yes, go ahead. Yeah. Thank you through you. Mr. Mayor question to staff

2:03:10I just want to hear staff say that this is not a redundant

2:03:15Motion that this has not already taken place

2:03:19And that the engagement that's being asked to be done wasn't already part of the previous engagements on this on this item

2:03:25I don't want I don't want this to become out. We didn't get the answer we want so go back and go back and engage some more. Thank you

2:03:32So through the mayor to counselor Gibson, we did not explore single

2:03:38Re-sorry reusable containers

2:03:41With businesses it was mostly focused on beverage containers

2:03:45Thank you

2:03:48Okay, great. I'm very sorry staff out to clerks it. Are we good with that amendment? I know that

2:03:54Through you, mr. Mayor, I'm not sure we've got it in writing, but we will display what we think is

2:03:59Councillor Bush is sending it, but I think if you've captured it we could just ask counselor Bush until she's okay with the

2:04:06The removal there so that stop be directed to can

2:04:08Dr. Additional engagement and research with respect to the use of reusable containers and report back to council. Okay

2:04:15Yeah

2:04:17Does staff need a date in that would you prefer a date at the end?

2:04:26Through the mayor to you mr. Mayor. We our original plan was to do that for March the 1st anyway

2:04:32So you could put a date if you'd like

2:04:35Because if it is going to become part of a bylaw then we'd want to all do it at the same time

2:04:39Okay, but you're not going to do that part the bylaw part, but yeah

2:04:46So again speaking to the amendment go ahead

2:04:49So I think because we've taken out that they're not actually preparing the bylaw this time that it should probably come back

2:04:56In good time so that if we approve it that then they can prepare the bylaw before

2:05:03March right so then it's all done at once right so do we want to see the report back at I

2:05:10Don't know if if you're having students do it this fall then as soon after as possible

2:05:15I guess I don't is there a date that you think you can get the report back to council by so that we can then

2:05:21and I'm thinking of all the report writing issue because

2:05:26You know it may be that how difficult will it be to prepare that amendment to the bylaw once it's once the reports

2:05:33Then I guess is my question

2:05:37Sure, I guess I was throwing James some vague options

2:05:40So typically once we finish the engagement, I think we'd be in a place to know whether or not we had to draft a bylaw

2:05:47You know due to all the work back schedules

2:05:50We would be drafting the report at the same time as drafting a bylaw so

2:05:55In all reality, you know if I have something to do for February I pretty much have to start at beginning of January, right?

2:06:00So but that point in point in time we would already be able to draft the bylaw so so you would probably if you were recommending it

2:06:07You would have a draft in place anyway

2:06:11So yeah, so coming back to be coming back with a bylaw anyway, so this doesn't really change much actually

2:06:18Okay, get it though. Okay, but we're making a decision. We're gonna get a report before we approve it and the bylaw will come as

2:06:26Something we can add on. Okay. Great. Thanks

2:06:30Okay, I'm gonna call I'm gonna call the vote then on this amendment from Councillor Boussatill so

2:06:38Councillor all seconded it. Yeah, so is anyone against that amendment?

2:06:43No, that's great. That's unanimous. That's perfect. And then so now we'll just do it

2:06:48Do it as amended the main motion as amended. I'll call the vote on that. Is anyone against that?

2:06:55No, okay, perfect. That's unanimous and we landed at the right place there. So thank you very much for the discussion and

2:07:01We are I believe we are done that

2:07:06Yes

2:07:08Okay, I don't want to reuse or single use or anything about that ever again. All right, perfect

2:07:14we are at

2:07:16the drill hall and

2:07:18You know what? I know that there's some people that are been waiting

2:07:21But it just is it's worthwhile for us to move around for five minutes. Let's just take a five minute break and

2:07:29And move around a bit go to the bathroom get a drink come on back. So we'll be back here at just before

2:07:37You know between seven forty and seven forty five please five minute break. Thank you

2:07:42Okay, just a bit of one minute warning one to two minute warning. Okay?

2:17:33Okay, everyone. I'll call the meeting back to order

2:17:36Thanks for the little break there

2:17:41Drill hall responses to expression of interest and plan future use

2:17:48We have three delegations. I believe they are all in person

2:17:54Welcome to Stephanie Brinton

2:17:59Michelle peak and Norma Mendoza and so thank you

Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.

Check this against the City’s official minutes

The motion, the vote and the debate come from the City of Guelph’s published record, reproduced rather than interpreted. The document summaries above are the exception: those words were written for this site.

See the rest of this meeting