City Council · July 22, 2025 · Item 11.4
Section 1.5.1.3, Eligibility and Qualifications, of the Public Appointment Policy, approved by Council at the March 25, 2025 City Council meeting…
Main motion under the agenda item Public Appointment Policy Update
Carried (12 to 0)
12 in favour, 0 against — unanimous
What was voted on
The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.
That Section 1.5.1.3, Eligibility and Qualifications, of the Public Appointment Policy, approved by Council at the March 25, 2025 City Council meeting, be suspended. That staff be directed to review the Eligibility and Qualifications section of the Public Appointment Policy and report back to Council with updates regarding residency eligibility that are reflective of the Advisory Committee of Council Governance Framework and individual Terms of Reference.
Moved by Councillor Caron, seconded by Councillor Allt.
How the room voted
In favour (12)
- Allt
- Billings
- Busuttil
- Caron
- Caton
- Chew
- Downer
- Gibson
- Goller
- Guthrie
- Klassen
- Richardson
What was said
311 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.
Read the debate(click to open)
3:04:38yes councillor Kerrion over to you you're going to speak to this quick item for us on public
3:04:44appointment policy update it's going to be very quick this is a housekeeping uh clauses um I went
3:04:52in fact there shouldn't be any mystery to it even our local press Richard called and asked me all
3:04:58the details and I gave him some background and he called me back and said there's no story here so
3:05:04nothing got in the local press but basically um our terms of our advisory committees of council
3:05:11we've created some terms of reference to brand new we reappointed committees I had some questions of
3:05:16staff about definitions specifically a definition of resident because there's a lot of
3:05:22acts in the provincial and municipal field that define a resident as a property owner or a
3:05:29tenant of property and there's lots of staff have a broader interpretation that could include
3:05:36occupants of a tenancy a spouse or a child of a tenant over 18 people who physically reside in
3:05:43Guelph but may be unhoused and so if we are going to define some of our terms within our policy
3:05:51broadly I think that council should have that broad interpretation in its policy so that we
3:05:57can be very clear about the definition of resident so I there's no identifiable individuals uh that
3:06:06I'm bringing forward uh but uh the motions on the agenda are that we suspend the terms of reference
3:06:14in their current form um specifically related to eligibility and qualifications
3:06:19and then staff return back to council with some further definition for that particular
3:06:28eligibility criteria great thank you as easy as that is who wants to second this one
3:06:38okay uh alt will thank you any questions
3:06:42vote no I'll call the vote is anyone against that unanimous and we're done thank you councillor
Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.
Everything on this page comes from the City of Guelph’s published record. Nothing here is a summary or an interpretation.