Council Planning · February 11, 2025 · Item 2.1
Notice of Objection to the intention to designate 22 James Street East dated December 16… be approved
Main motion under the agenda item 22 James Street East – Objection to Notice of Intention to Designate, 2025-41
Carried (12 to 0)
12 in favour, 0 against — unanimous
What was voted on
The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.
That the Notice of Objection to the intention to designate 22 James Street East dated December 16, 2024 from Ajay Sharma of Elevate Law on behalf of the property owner, Hudson Lee Smith, be received. That the designation by-law for 22 James Street East be approved.
Moved by Councillor Caron, seconded by Councillor Busuttil.
How the room voted
In favour (12)
- Allt
- Billings
- Busuttil
- Caron
- Caton
- Chew
- Downer
- Gibson
- Goller
- Guthrie
- O'Rourke
- Richardson
What council was given
The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item. The summaries are written automatically, so you can tell what a document is without opening a ninety-page PDF.
- 22 James Street East - Objection to Notice of Intention to Designate - 2025-41.pdf
Council is asked to receive an objection filed December 16, 2024 by a lawyer for the owner of 22 James Street East and to pass the by-law designating the former Toronto Suburban Railway substation as a heritage property. Staff found it meets four of the nine provincial criteria. Designation lets Council review alterations, enforce maintenance standards and refuse demolition; the deadline to decide is March 20, 2025.
- Attachment-1 Notice of Intention to Designate (November 21, 2024).pdf
- Attachment-2 Objection to Notice of Intention to Designate (December 16, 2024).pdf
- Attachment-3 Proposed By-law Number (2025) 21035.pdf
A summary is this site’s description of a document, not the City’s. Open the document before relying on one.
What was said
90 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.
Read the debate(click to open)
16:18I'm wondering is there anyone that wants that pulled or may I look to a member of Council to move and and second that
16:28Thank you moved by moved. I'm assuming it's moved by Koran. Yep
16:32Anyone willing to second. I think you boosted till anything further on that item
16:39No, okay. I'll call the votes anyone against
16:43It's nobody that's unanimous. Thank you
16:45Hitting us up right away with an item for discussion. We're gonna have just a presentation
16:52In regards to the Cambridge to Union passenger rail connection
Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.
The motion, the vote and the debate come from the City of Guelph’s published record, reproduced rather than interpreted. The document summaries above are the exception: those words were written for this site.