Council Planning · October 08, 2024 · Item 2.1
302 and 306 Edinburgh Road South be removed from the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Properties after the successful installation of the stone markers to their…
Amendment under the agenda item 302 and 306 Edinburgh Rd S - Application to remove properties from the Municipal Heritage Register - 2024-408
Carried (12 to 0)
12 in favour, 0 against — unanimous
What was voted on
The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.
That 302 and 306 Edinburgh Road South be removed from the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Properties after the successful installation of the stone markers to their original location at 99 Woolwich Street.
Moved by Councillor Allt, seconded by Councillor Caron.
How the room voted
In favour (12)
- Allt
- Billings
- Busuttil
- Caron
- Caton
- Downer
- Gibson
- Goller
- Guthrie
- Klassen
- O'Rourke
- Richardson
What council was given
The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item. The summaries are written automatically, so you can tell what a document is without opening a ninety-page PDF.
- 302 and 306 Edinburgh Rd S - Application to remove properties from the Municipal Heritage Register - 2024-408.pdf
Staff recommend removing 302 and 306 Edinburgh Road South from the city's heritage register, but only after the historic stone markers listed on those properties are safely moved back to where they came from at St. George's Church, 99 Woolwich Street. The houses themselves were never listed as heritage features. Staff say returning the markers follows accepted conservation practice about respecting original location. No financial impact.
- Attachment-1 Current and Historical Photographs.pdf
- Attachment-2 Plan and Drawing.pdf
A summary is this site’s description of a document, not the City’s. Open the document before relying on one.
What was said
53 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.
Read the debate(click to open)
10:39All right, Alt and Koran. And I'll call the vote on that. Is there anyone against that removal?
10:49Seeing none, so that passes. May I just ask Councillor Caton, is this something I need to
10:58put at the very end of the agenda because I have some delegations or is it something quick?
Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.
The motion, the vote and the debate come from the City of Guelph’s published record, reproduced rather than interpreted. The document summaries above are the exception: those words were written for this site.