Skip to main content
Jon Christensen
Guelph Council Record

City Council · September 26, 2023 · Item 9.1

City Council requests that Infrastructure Ontario repair the damaged stone wall at the Ontario Reformatory.

Main motion under the agenda item Heritage Guelph Resolution Regarding Ontario Reformatory Stone Wall - 2023-368

Carried (13 to 0)

13 in favour, 0 against — unanimous

What was voted on

The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.

That City Council requests that Infrastructure Ontario repair the damaged stone wall at the Ontario Reformatory.

Moved by Councillor Downer, seconded by Councillor Caron.

How the room voted

In favour (13)

  • Allt
  • Billings
  • Busuttil
  • Caron
  • Caton
  • Chew
  • Downer
  • Gibson
  • Goller
  • Guthrie
  • Klassen
  • O'Rourke
  • Richardson

Who spoke to it

Councillor Downer introduced the topic. The following delegates spoke: Susan Ratcliffe Lynn Bestari John Fisher

What council was given

The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item.

What was said

2,613 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.

Read the debate(click to open)

54:44and then after the delegations, I'll turn to Councillor Downer to ask you to place the recommendation

54:50if you could do that. So go ahead, Councillor Downer. Thanks, Chair Grisichel.

54:55So at the Heritage Guelph meeting earlier this month, this motion came forward to request the

55:05Council, request that infrastructure Ontario to restore the wall that was recently damaged.

55:15There's some question. A lot of people do not believe that it was done by,

55:25was done through natural erosion, but was done actually through the, through vandalism. So,

55:36but I mean, you know, that's, so to be determined, but you know, I think that can be determined. And

55:42we can ask them to restore the wall to the way it was. Thank you. So we have three delegations on

55:51this item. If you're here in person, I'm going to call up Susan Ratcliffe, please, first, if you

55:57would like to come up to the front. You have five minutes for your presentation. There will be a chime

56:04signal at the 32nd mark and a chime to signal the end of your delegation time. Susan, if you can

56:10then just remain there in case any Councillors have any questions of clarifying nature to your

56:17presentation. So as soon as you start the clerks will start the clock.

56:26Mr. Mayor, far away, Ms. Acting Mayor and members of City Council, the poet Robert Frost has

56:34important words to consider in his poem, Mending Wall. Something there is that doesn't love a wall,

56:43that sends the frozen groundswell under it and spills the upper boulders in the sun

56:49and makes gaps even to compass. The gaps, I mean, no one has seen them made or heard them made.

56:58Something there is that doesn't love a wall that wants it down. I could say elves to my neighbor,

57:05but it's not elves exactly. And I'd rather he said it for himself.

57:10Infrastructure Ontario would have us believe that if not elves, then Mother Nature has suddenly

57:17decided that she does not love that particular four metres of stone wall that has stood in its

57:23place for at least 103 years. Perhaps a freak storm struck those four metres. Perhaps it was the

57:31finger of God that pushed it over. Robert's Frost's suggestions of elves wanting to wall

57:39down may be the best one after all. We have seen this pattern before from infrastructure Ontario.

57:47The large stone chimney has to come down because it has some damage. The trestle bridge has to come

57:53down because it has a broken bit. And now a solid stone wall has fallen over by itself

57:59and scattered itself all over the ground. Oh, and too bad about those Indigenous paintings left

58:06to rot for 21 years. They are probably only graffiti after all, and so we don't need to save them either.

58:13It is interesting that the infrastructure Ontario spokesperson who rejected the Indigenous

58:20paintings as unsalvageable graffiti is the same spokesperson who called the damage to the wall

58:28natural erosion. I support Councillor Downer's resolution because at some point we have to call

58:39the provincial government on their 22-year neglect of this amazing property and ask them to make it

58:46right. All of these elements have been identified by the HCD study as worthy of designation and

58:53preservation because they are outstanding features of a landscape that is unique in Canada.

59:00I lead the walks for the stone structures on the York, on behalf of the York lands. I'm a member

59:07of the York lands board and visitors are always amazed and love to take selfies at those walls.

59:14And I believe that you as City Council must urge the provincial government to do their part to

59:20preserve and restore this landscape. The walls were built by young men who were doing the job

59:27to train and prepare themselves for a better future. We honour their legacy by preserving their hard

59:34work. We benefit our city present and future by keeping this landscape in its structure in good

59:41shape. Because of their unique features they will provide our citizens with a beautiful landscape

59:47for recreation. And again because of these unique features visitors will bring tourism dollars to

59:54our city. As Robert said, something there is, Robert Frost said, something there is that does not love

1:00:01a wall and wants it down. Let's show that the City of Guelph wants this wall and wants it up again.

1:00:10Thank you. Thank you. Are there any questions from Council for Ms. Ratcliffe?

1:00:19Seeing none, thank you very much. Next I have Lynn Vestari. Same thing, if you would like to come

1:00:29down you have five minutes for your presentation. There will be a chime at the 32nd mark and a chime

1:00:35to signal the end of your delegation time. And if you could just remain at the end for any questions

1:00:42from Council. Welcome. Thank you. Mr. Mayor and City Councilors, I'm here today to talk about the

1:00:55collapse walls at the former Correctional Centre Ontario Formatory Lands. I am the current Chair

1:01:02of York Lands Green Hub and come as a representative to speak with you all. At this point in time is

1:01:08there is no conclusive evidence that it was an occurrence of vandalism or if it was a natural

1:01:14event. There are different opinions on that. To our knowledge no formal assessments of the

1:01:21damages have occurred to determine the cause. However, given that these field stone walls have

1:01:27stood there for most of the last 100 years or over 103 years actually, there are a very unique

1:01:34heritage feature that exists within the city limits. From my understanding the longest known

1:01:40field stone wall in Ontario. The other significant stone wall site is on Amherst Island near Kingston.

1:01:49The island won the Lieutenant General Award for Heritage Conservation in 2015 with the drystone

1:01:56festivals that helped to preserve the walls and also received a significant tourism

1:02:01dollars from the Ontario Tourism Development Fund, exactly $73,000 to make the island a heritage

1:02:11tourist destination. If the City of Guel formally asks Infrastructure Ontario as part of their duty

1:02:19of care for the property to secure funds for the reparations of the wall, it could become an

1:02:25opportunity for the City in partnership with York Lands Green Hub and Infrastructure Ontario

1:02:30to hold a drystone building festival in collaboration with Drystone Canada who organizes them.

1:02:38This would present a great opportunity for a large tourist attraction for Guelph over several days.

1:02:47I am in support of Councillor Downey's motion. Please. Thank you. Thank you very much. If you

1:02:56could just remain. Are there any questions of a clarifying nature of the presentation for the

1:03:02delegation? Seeing none, thank you very much. Thank you. Next I'm going to call on John Fisher,

1:03:13not that you don't know the instructions just in case. Five minutes for your presentation.

1:03:18There'll be a chime at the 32nd mark and then a chime to signal the end. And John,

1:03:23if you can please just stay at the end. Okay, thank you.

1:03:32To the Mayor, the Acting Mayor, Councillors and City staff,

1:03:34my name is John Fisher. I'm the President of the Guelph Hiking Trail Club.

1:03:40The club has license agreements with Infrastructure Ontario and Fusion Homes

1:03:45to manage and maintain trails on land that they own on both sides of the Aramosa River.

1:03:54We want to thank Councillor Downey for continued support of heritage properties in the City.

1:04:00We also thank past and present members of the Heritage Committee for their work,

1:04:05particularly on the OR file. The Guelph Hiking Club supports this resolution,

1:04:11but feels it may need to go further. We thought it might be helpful to share the club's bridge

1:04:17experience in considering this resolution, which requests IO repair the damaged stone wall.

1:04:24The club worked actively with IO to reach an agreement to repair and repurpose the historic

1:04:30Woodin-Tressel Railway Bridge as a pedestrian cyclist connection to link the OR and GID properties.

1:04:38In 2022, the club applied for federal active transportation and tourism relief grounds

1:04:45to repair the bridge. We secured letters of support for our applications from the Mayor,

1:04:52Property Owners Fusion Chamber of Commerce. One of those letters was from Mike Shreiner,

1:04:59MPP for Guelph, who wrote directly to the President and CEO of Infrastructure Ontario, Mike Lindsay.

1:05:09On April 6, 2022, Mike Shreiner received a reply from President Lindsay, which included this paragraph.

1:05:19There is no Ministry Program requirement or need for the decommissioned bridge,

1:05:28and therefore no available provincial funding for restoration or future maintenance.

1:05:34However, IO does appreciate the community's interest in the Woodin-Tressel Bridge,

1:05:41and if the GHTC's funding application is successful, we'll continue to work closely

1:05:47with the GHCC in support of their efforts. This reply is entirely consistent with the IO mandate

1:05:56to mitigate liability on behalf of the province. They don't restore. But CEO and President Lindsay

1:06:03also said, show me the money and we will work with you. One positive thing you can say about IO

1:06:12is they don't send out mixed messages about the fate of iconic features on their property.

1:06:19Their position is clear and transparent. Things may have changed over the last 18 months

1:06:25between IO and the city. In March 2023, Council unanimously passed this motion.

1:06:34The staff continued discussions with Infrastructure Ontario regarding options for conservation of the

1:06:41Tressel Bridge on the reformatory property and report back to Council. At this point,

1:06:49I don't know what conservation options have been presented for Council to consider.

1:06:56I do know a decision to include restoring the wall and the bridge in the upcoming multi-year

1:07:03budget would have huge community and organizational support, and I urge Council to make sure they

1:07:10are included. Thank you. Are there any questions for Mr. Fisher? Seeing none, thank you very much.

1:07:21Now I'd like to call on Councillor Downer to place the recommendation and then I'll look for a

1:07:26seconder. Okay, I would ask staff to put up the motion that City Council request the Infrastructure

1:07:32Ontario repair the damaged dome wall at the Ontario reformatory. Of course, making this work

1:07:38request will initiate some discussions as well as has done with the Tressel Bridge and my

1:07:47understanding that's ongoing. So I appreciate what Mr. Fisher has said and that's something for us to

1:07:56consider a budget time or one screen from Infrastructure Ontario. Thank you. I saw

1:08:04Councillor Caron. I wasn't sure. Are you seconding the motion? Yes, thank you. Councillor, did you

1:08:09want to speak to that at all? I treat Infrastructure Ontario as a property owner as we would treat

1:08:19any property owner and if we have an identified heritage feature, a cultural asset, on any property

1:08:25in the City of Guelph, we would expect a duty of care and stewardship and in the event that

1:08:32a cultural heritage asset was destroyed in any way or compromised in any way,

1:08:37we would ask for it to be repaired. So this treats everyone equally and IO has a responsibility

1:08:45to the people of Ontario to protect our assets. That's a bad example if they don't, so happy to

1:08:50support the motion. Thank you. Councillor Caton, I saw your hand. I wasn't sure if that's for

1:08:55comments or seconding. It was for seconding, but if you're going for comments then I can do that.

1:09:01Thank you. It's through you, Chair. I definitely support this. This is a very important heritage

1:09:09piece in Ward 1. If you've ever walked through, it's like going through Hobbit land with all of the

1:09:16walls and the stone. It's really quite gorgeous, so if you've not been yet, then I highly recommend

1:09:21it because this is something that we should definitely get them to preserve and potentially,

1:09:27if they don't want to, they can always give us the property and then we can maintain it.

1:09:31That would be great too. Thank you. Thank you. I know I'm mixing comments and questions.

1:09:38Councillor Allt. Thank you very much, Chair Busuttil. I think I will second Councillor Caton's

1:09:44motion to require the province to give us that land. I think that's a great motion.

1:09:51With regards to this particular motion though, and quite a serious vein, I think that it's very

1:09:56important that we do show that this land matters to Guelph residents. Historically, this land, no

1:10:03joke, has been land upon which many people have got their wedding pictures taken. I always thought

1:10:10that it was somewhat ironic that people were getting them done in front of a reformatory,

1:10:14but nonetheless they were the most beautiful lands in Guelph. Similarly, there have been many people

1:10:19that have been working very strongly on behalf of preserving the York lands. I think that this

1:10:25requires council to stand behind the community of Guelph and show that not just the buildings,

1:10:32but every blade of grass and every stone and every stone post matters.

1:10:39Thank you. Is there anything further on this item? Mayor Guthrie?

1:10:49I just had a question. It looks like this is the direction here in the recommendation

1:10:59it doesn't specifically state like the mayor to write the letter and it doesn't specifically state

1:11:05that the administration write the letter. I was just wondering what the mover wanted to do.

1:11:14There is is it fully left with like intergovernmental to send a letter or would you like me to do it?

1:11:23Councillor Downer? I would actually ask staff. Thank you. Good question. What is the better protocol

1:11:38for this, whether it would be from the mayor and the administration or just through the

1:11:44intergovernmental? Through the chair to Councillor Downer, intergovernmental staff will likely

1:11:52reach out personally to make a connection to the folks at IO before we send the letter and get

1:11:57some guidance from them about who it is most appropriately best directed to and based on that

1:12:02we will make a decision on whether or not it is best to come from staff or from the mayor.

1:12:07So if you leave that with us, we are happy to navigate that with IO.

1:12:11Thank you. Is that okay? Councillor? Mayor Guthrie?

1:12:17That is fine. I personally would like to write the letter because it has a little bit more

1:12:25oomph to it that it is coming from council and I am the head of council. It might be an opportunity

1:12:31for me if there is advocacy work in the future, like if I run by somebody at the province about

1:12:38the issue, then it is an easier door open for me to say like, hey, I sent you a letter.

1:12:45So I just would mind that but I will leave it up to intergovernmental to decide.

1:12:51But my second question and my last question is, do you think that there is some validity in

1:12:56including the part about the dry stone tourism sort of opportunity? Because I think that is a

1:13:04great idea and maybe could that please be embedded into the letter? Yeah, through the

1:13:14chair to the mayor, we are happy to take that direction and include it in the letter. No problem.

1:13:19All right. I am not suggesting we have to do a motion about it but I think it is a good idea.

1:13:23So I thought I would just throw it out there. Okay. That is all my comments. I am supportive.

1:13:27Thank you. Thank you. Any further comments or discussion? Seeing none, I am going to call the

1:13:35vote. Is anyone opposed to the recommendation? That carries unanimously. Thank you. The next

1:13:43item is the downtown parking master plan. I would like to acknowledge that the staff prepared a

Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.

Check this against the City’s official minutes

Everything on this page comes from the City of Guelph’s published record. Nothing here is a summary or an interpretation.

See the rest of this meeting