Skip to main content
Jon Christensen
Guelph Council Record

City Council as Shareholder of GJR · June 24, 2025 · Item 4.

Staff report dated June 24, 2025 entitled Guelph Junction Railway Limited – Governance Update be received. That the Amended and Restated Shareholder Declaration of The Corporation…

Main motion under the agenda item Guelph Junction Railway Limited – Governance Update, 2025-301

Carried (11 to 0)

11 in favour, 0 against — unanimous

What was voted on

The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.

That the staff report dated June 24, 2025 entitled Guelph Junction Railway Limited – Governance Update be received. That the Amended and Restated Shareholder Declaration of The Corporation of the City of Guelph, as the sole shareholder of Guelph Junction Railway Limited, included as Attachment-1, be approved by resolution of the shareholder. That the Amended and Restated By-law Number 1 of Guelph Junction Railway Limited, included as Attachment-2, be approved by resolution of the shareholder. That the resignation of Tara Baker from the position of Chief Executive Officer of Guelph Junction Railway Limited be accepted and take effect at 11:59pm June 24, 2025. That the appointment of Jayne Holmes as Chief Executive Officer of Guelph Junction Railway Limited, as recommended by the Board of Directors, be approved, to take effect as of 12:00am June 25, 2025 and to hold office for the length of time to be determined by the directors, at their discretion, subject to earlier resignation or removal. That Gene Matthews be elected as a director of Guelph Junction Railway Limited to hold office for a term of up to three (3) years, subject to earlier resignation, removal, or election of his successor. That the appointment of Gene Matthews as Chief Financial Officer of Guelph Junction Railway Limited, as recommended by the Board of Directors, be approved, to hold office for the length of time to be determined by the directors, at their discretion, subject to earlier resignation or removal. That the appointment of James Goodram as Chief Operations Officer of Guelph Junction Railway Limited, as recommended by the Board of Directors, be approved, to hold office for the length of time to be determined by the directors, at their discretion, subject to earlier resignation or removal.

Moved by Councillor Caron, seconded by Councillor Allt.

How the room voted

In favour (11)

  • Allt
  • Billings
  • Busuttil
  • Caron
  • Caton
  • Chew
  • Downer
  • Gibson
  • Goller
  • Guthrie
  • Klassen

What council was given

The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item. The summaries are written automatically, so you can tell what a document is without opening a ninety-page PDF.

A summary is this site’s description of a document, not the City’s. Open the document before relying on one.

What was said

1,104 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.

Read the debate(click to open)

2:18:59and I am now looking now under the governance there are eight different motions I'll have them

2:19:06come up on the screen please again the first one to be receiving then there is some amended and

2:19:13restated sharehold declarations under number two again also for number three there's the

2:19:21resignation of Tara Baker from the position of Chief Executive Officer as well number five is

2:19:27the appointment of Jane Holmes as the Chief Executive Officer number six Gene Matthews

2:19:34to be on there as well and the appointment number seven of Gene Matthews as CFO of Guelph Junction

2:19:41Railway as recommended by the board and the first the last one is the appointment of Jane's Goodrum

2:19:46as Chief Operations Officer of Guelph Junction Railway Limited as recommended by the board as well

2:19:53can I have with with Perron and Alt be willing to to move and second those I'm just kind of

2:20:00throwing some things up thank you guys appreciate it and is there anything further on those eight

2:20:05go ahead Councillor Still question thank you sorry and this is a question it comes on page four of

2:20:12six it is one two third bullet down it says the board is required to adopt a written mandate

2:20:18acknowledging responsibility for stewardship of GJR and its management it's and its management

2:20:25affairs so when I read the financial statements and so on it's very clear GJR is here as an

2:20:32economic as a business activity and you know the discussion the delegations I I'm very concerned

2:20:41about the overlap and the lack of clarity in governance and responsibility having city

2:20:48representatives on GJR that are bringing you know city mandate our strategic plan and so on and and

2:20:55so you know maybe you know clerks one day if they're doing their spare time a governance review

2:21:01it would be great to take a look at this because I'm feeling that there's this mixing there we need

2:21:07to clarify the governance of GJR and its mandate as it stated in the financial statements under

2:21:14the regulations versus being a partner at the table when the city talks about trails and so on

2:21:20invited that way so I do not support extending or asking the board of GJR to include in their

2:21:28mandate or in their statement trails and so on because that is a city funded responsibility

2:21:34in our strategic plan so if you can just speak to this you know a written mandate

2:21:41a little bit that would be great certainly through your mayor Guthrie to councillor Busuttil

2:21:46so this is a in the prior governance documents there were references to a board mandate and it is

2:21:51a good governance practice that boards do this that they have a mandate that guides their their

2:21:57duties their responsibilities and helps them understand how they should execute those and

2:22:02to what standard they are held and and so this is not a change in the concept so the previous

2:22:09governance documents anticipated that there may be a board mandate what we're doing now is bringing

2:22:14that clarity that I think you're referring to in terms of let's require the board to develop a

2:22:18written mandate and so that is a new thing that we don't have a written mandate today

2:22:24what council would be approving is the amended and restated shareholder declaration that includes

2:22:30that requirement and that board mandate would be developed by the board but approved by the

2:22:34shareholder so that would be the shareholder opportunity to clarify some of those priorities so

2:22:40gjr is a separate entity its main business is rail operations and economic development

2:22:47and what you see is that it also has a requirement to adhere to the city of golf strategic priorities

2:22:53and 90 of the time those priorities are aligned as jane said the board and the operational team of

2:22:58gjr you can make that happen and achieve both of those values at the same time to the extent there

2:23:04are conflicts in those values that is raised to the governance level at the board where they would

2:23:09look at a project and say well here we have competing priorities on the one hand we're here to do

2:23:14business and drive economic development on the other we're a community partner and we're a wholly

2:23:19owned subsidiary of the city and so the board mandate might help flesh out some of those how

2:23:25the board is directed by the shareholder to deal with those conflicts so that is what I'm proposing

2:23:30as as a good governance measure in the new documents thank you very much for that and you know when I

2:23:35referred earlier to the earlier item the description of business in the financial statement clearly

2:23:41speaks to the rail and the economic business it you know gjr is in the business of providing rail

2:23:48service um and so can you just expand a little bit more around the timeline so will we see this

2:23:54coming to us at the next shareholder meeting or is there a step in between before like a workshop

2:24:00or something before it comes to us thank you I don't we haven't fully fleshed out a timeline

2:24:05for that but I would expect that the board would work on it and it would be presented for approval

2:24:09at the next AGM um shareholder meetings can be called so to the extent the board developed a

2:24:14board mandate earlier um and you know wish to ask for a special shareholder meeting they can

2:24:19absolutely do that but I do think that the board mandate is not intended just to be like here's

2:24:24let's whip something up and and say that we have it I do think it needs to be a really

2:24:28intentional document and there will need to be time put into that to understand the history of

2:24:33what gjr has been doing as a board mandate where it's going and and making sure that the current

2:24:38board um have the benefit of full board orientation that is something that I will lead so I do think

2:24:45it will take a little bit of time and if council would like further clarity on that timeline we

2:24:49can take it away as a board and then there is a mechanism for reporting back to the shareholder

2:24:54and we could communicate that timing to you no thank you I trust you and I really appreciate

2:24:59the attention that will be given to governance thanks councillor Busuttil with that then I'll call

2:25:06the vote on those motions is there anyone against those okay that's unanimous thank you

Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.

Check this against the City’s official minutes

The motion, the vote and the debate come from the City of Guelph’s published record, reproduced rather than interpreted. The document summaries above are the exception: those words were written for this site.

See the rest of this meeting