City Council · May 31, 2023 · Item 7.2
Funding adjustments as detailed in Table 5 of Attachment-2 of the 2022 Year-end Capital Budget Monitoring Report dated May 2, 2023…
Main motion under the agenda item 2022 Year-end Capital Budget Monitoring Report - 2023-154
Carried (12 to 0)
12 in favour, 0 against — unanimous
This was one of 2 motions on the same item
In the order council took them. A vote makes sense next to the ones around it.
- 1/2Main motionFunding adjustments as detailed in Table 5 of Attachment-2 of the 2022 Year-end Capital Budget Monitoring Report dated May 2, 2023…you are hereCarried (12 to 0)
- 2/2Main motion$500,000 be approved for PL0076 Heritage Initiatives and be funded from the Growth Reserve Fund (#156) to expedite the timing of the Ward West Cultural Heritage…Carried (12 to 0)
What was voted on
The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.
That the funding adjustments as detailed in Table 5 of Attachment-2 of the 2022 Year-end Capital Budget Monitoring Report dated May 2, 2023, be approved. That $375,000 be approved for RD0449 Wildlife Crossing – Maltby Road and be funded from the Infrastructure Renewal Reserve Fund (#150) to install permanent wildlife crossing and fencing on Maltby Road between Gordon Street and Victoria Road South.
Moved by Councillor Downer, seconded by Councillor Caron.
How the room voted
In favour (12)
- Allt
- Billings
- Busuttil
- Caron
- Caton
- Chew
- Downer
- Goller
- Guthrie
- Klassen
- O'Rourke
- Richardson
What council was given
The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item. The summaries are written automatically, so you can tell what a document is without opening a ninety-page PDF.
- 2022 Year-end Capital Budget Monitoring Report - 2023-154.pdf
A year-end look at how the City spent its 2022 construction and equipment budget, asking Council to approve listed funding adjustments plus $375,000 for a permanent wildlife crossing and fencing on Maltby Road between Gordon Street and Victoria Road South. Capital spending totalled $110.3 million, up $32.5 million or 41.7 per cent from 2021. Closing out 86 completed projects returned $6.4 million of unspent budget to reserve funds.
- Attachment-1 Q4 2022 Capital Spending.pdf
- Attachment-2 Q4 2022 Capital Budget Adjustments.pdf
- Attachment-3 Capital prioritization 2022 adjustments.pdf
A summary is this site’s description of a document, not the City’s. Open the document before relying on one.
What was said
1,177 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.
Read the debate(click to open)
59:59on the 2022 year end capital budget monitoring report
1:00:03with something further for us to consider. Go ahead. Yeah. So I think we can,
1:00:08this is a third one, like you have one and two. So I don't know if everybody wants to vote on that
1:00:13first or and then I'll do nine member three. Yep. Great. So you're willing to move the first?
1:00:18Yeah. Yeah.
1:00:20Cron willing. Thank you. Cron, your award meet is seconding that.
1:00:24So is there anything on those two before I call the vote only on those two?
1:00:28Doesn't look like it. Okay. I'll call the vote on that. So is anyone not in favour of those recommendations?
1:00:35Again, no one's not in favour. So that's unanimous as well. I'll go to you for the third motion you're
1:00:39presenting. Okay. So I would ask if the clerks could put up the motion and this is the heritage
1:00:46motion that I had been talking about a few times to that I was going to bring forward
1:00:52from the surplus. So it's not necessarily from the surplus. It's gone in and now it's coming out.
1:00:57So the 500,000 be approved for PL 076 heritage initiatives and be funded from the Grocery
1:01:05Reserve Fund number 156 to expedite the timing of the Ward West Cultural Heritage Study and assist
1:01:12with heritage initiatives tied to the changes to the Heritage Act and associated deadlines
1:01:17contained in Bill 23. I think Councillor Caron wanted to second it. Okay. So I'm going to start out by
1:01:27saying something positive about the provincial government. You might be surprised.
1:01:35Have a heart. But I think they actually recognise that heritage is significant, is important in
1:01:43Ontario and it's important to this council. I mean, one of the things that when we brought
1:01:48forward the OR, we wanted to do the whole cultural heritage action plan, they said yes. Okay. Go ahead
1:01:54and do that. And they asked us what did we think was a good heritage asset? When we got the changes
1:02:01back from OP 80, they maintained sight lines to the Basilica of Our Lady. They didn't just take
1:02:08those out. And I would say too that in Bill 23, like a number of other things, they could have just
1:02:14implemented the elimination of the register completely immediately. And they did. They said,
1:02:22okay, councils, you have two years to get your Heritage Act in order. Pun intended. So I would
1:02:31say that's positive. They're recognising that heritage is something important for us to preserve
1:02:38and to consider as we look to build out. So many have been asking me, many in the public and on
1:02:45council actually, now that I'm on Heritage 12, what can we do with this two-year deadline? How can
1:02:51we deal with that deadline of the individual designations and to expedite that? Because in
1:03:00reality, we're probably only going to be able to get with the current capacity about 10 to 15
1:03:05designations done before that deadline's done. And that leaves a lot of heritage assets in the
1:03:11city vulnerable. But doing cultural heritage landscapes sort of covers off doing more than
1:03:17that. You get more done. So we have the OR, the downtown, old part of the downtown being done. And
1:03:23we had paused Ward West to do the Ontario Reformatory because the province asked us
1:03:30what was important there. So this motion reinitiates that process and moves it forward from
1:03:36the original 2024 time that we were looking at doing that. We had paused it. And
1:03:46that way we'll be able to cover off more properties rather than looking at things
1:03:51one by one. Also, I want to point out that these are done in phases. The study is done first to
1:03:56determine what would be heritage assets in Ward West. Not everything probably will be. And then
1:04:03there's guidelines around how to create some predictability in there for development.
1:04:10That doesn't mean there can't be demolition, can't be infill. I live in a heritage district.
1:04:14We've had infill houses. We've got tiny houses in backyards going in. Lots is happening in our
1:04:19neighbourhood. And recently the town of Erin has used their 2022 surplus to do heritage work
1:04:26due to Bill 23. So I think this is probably, and that's all I've read about, I think this is
1:04:31probably happening across the province. People trying to, councils trying to find innovative
1:04:35ways to sort of deal with that two year deadline. So the Ward West is a priority in the downtown
1:04:42secondary plan. That did not change with the amendments to Bill 80, OP80. The Ward West is
1:04:50a priority in the cultural heritage action plan. The 400,000 would be up to 400,000 to do the
1:04:57heritage study. And then the $100,000 to have a contract staff person. And the contract person,
1:05:08my understanding from in discussions with staff would be used to do the public engagements,
1:05:14actually for all three projects, for the downtown, for the Ward West, and then for the plan for the
1:05:19OR, because we already did the study. That frees up our planning, our heritage staff's expertise to
1:05:25deal with the designations that need to be done. Because if they have to do the public engagement
1:05:31parts for all of those, they don't have time to do designations. So that sort of frees that up.
1:05:36So it's sort of a bigger bang for our buck. And moving it all forward, after our deadlines,
1:05:41then I'm not quite sure what we're going to be able to do with heritage, but you know, probably
1:05:46more heritage districts, but what that's down the road to consider. So I did want to say that I
1:05:53couldn't bring it to heritage wealth, because our meeting in May was, was council, there wasn't
1:05:59anything completed to put on the agenda. But I have, I did email the, the chair and the rest of
1:06:06the, the committee members, and I had a very positive response for this motion to move forward.
1:06:13There already is a motion on the books from heritage wealth when we pause the Ontario
1:06:19Reformatory, when we pause the Ward West before to do the Ontario Reformatory that they would
1:06:26actually have liked us to have done the Ward West concurrently with the Reformatory. So basically
1:06:32heritage wealth has already sort of approved this before, and they also approved the, the work that's
1:06:38been done. So those are my comments. And yeah, so that's that's it. So I'm looking at any questions
1:06:49and I think staff would ever be here to answer anything else about my rollout.
1:06:54Hey, thank you. I, I think you've explained it quite well. So thank you. Is there any questions?
1:07:00Do we need any questions from staff? Doesn't look like it. Okay. Any comments needed here? Or can I
1:07:07just call the vote? Go to, go to call the vote. All those not in favour raise your hand. It's
1:07:18unanimous. Easy peasy. Thank you very much. We're going to move on to the Councillor Goller,
Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.
The motion, the vote and the debate come from the City of Guelph’s published record, reproduced rather than interpreted. The document summaries above are the exception: those words were written for this site.