Council Planning · April 18, 2023 · Item 4.2
Sustainable Development Checklist included as Attachment 1 to this report be approved. That the Sustainable Development Checklist be applied by staff through the Site Plan Approval…
Main motion under the agenda item Sustainable Development Checklist - 2023-111
Carried (13 to 0)
13 in favour, 0 against — unanimous
What was voted on
The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.
That the Sustainable Development Checklist included as Attachment 1 to this report be approved. That the Sustainable Development Checklist be applied by staff through the Site Plan Approval process as required.
Moved by Councillor Caron, seconded by Councillor Allt.
How the room voted
In favour (13)
- Allt
- Billings
- Busuttil
- Caron
- Caton
- Chew
- Downer
- Gibson
- Goller
- Guthrie
- Klassen
- O'Rourke
- Richardson
Who spoke to it
David de Groot, Senior Urban Designer presented the Sustainable Development Checklist.
What council was given
The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item. The summaries are written automatically, so you can tell what a document is without opening a ninety-page PDF.
- Sustainable Development Checklist - 2023-111.pdf
Planning staff ask Council to approve a Sustainable Development Checklist and apply it to site plan applications from May 1, 2023. Provincial Bill 23 limited what municipalities can require about building design, leaving only matters such as health, safety, accessibility and sustainable design. The checklist writes down the City's existing sustainability expectations so they remain clear and enforceable through the site plan approval process.
- Attachment-1 Proposed Sustainable Development Checklist.pdf
- Attachment 2 Letter from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.pdf
- Attachment-3 Sustainable Development Checklist Presentation.pdf
A summary is this site’s description of a document, not the City’s. Open the document before relying on one.
What was said
5,939 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.
Read the debate(click to open)
39:04development checklist.
39:06So we'll move it over to you.
39:32Hey, good morning, mayor and members of council.
39:36There's a presentation.
39:37My name is David DeGroote.
39:38I'm a senior urban designer with the city of wealth, and I'm here today with
39:42Rory Templeton.
39:43He's a landscape planner with the city as well as well as other staff.
39:48And we're happy today to present the sustainable development checklist.
39:55So the purpose of this report and presentation is to provide council with
39:59a recommended sustainable development checklist for new site plan approval
40:03applications. And staff are recommending this report in response to a couple of
40:08things, including bill 23 that was recently passed by the province and the
40:14Ministry of Municipal Affairs letter dated February 28th, 2023, which is
40:19attached to the staff report.
40:22The sustainable development checklist will ensure that the city of wealth can
40:25maintain its existing requirements related to sustainable development through
40:29the site plan approval process and establishing the checklist creates
40:33clarity regarding the city's sustainable development expectations for develop
40:37for the development community through the site plan process while allowing for
40:41appropriate flexibility.
40:44It is a placeholder document given the changing regulatory environment for
40:48planning. And I'll talk a little bit about next steps later in the presentation.
40:55So moving on to sort of where this is coming from, the planning act identifies
40:59the promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support
41:04public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians as a matter of provincial
41:08interest that councils shall have regard to.
41:11And that's in section two of the planning act.
41:14The province has through bill 23 made a number of changes to the site plan
41:18approval process. In general, they narrow the scope and generally remove
41:24regulation of exterior design from site plan approval process with some
41:27exceptions by notable exception that we're here to talk about today is
41:33exterior elements related to sustainable design.
41:37And that's also confirmed in the, in the letter that's attached from the
41:40municipal affairs and housing.
41:42The city of wealth at our level has already acknowledged the need to develop
41:46a sustainable development checklist through the natural heritage action plan,
41:50which was approved by council in 2018.
41:53And it was also referenced in the urban design action plan, which was also
41:56approved by council a little bit earlier.
41:59This checklist is an important first step to implement the direction and to
42:03respond to bill 23.
42:07It also is an implementation tool for the urban design, sustainable development
42:10and urban forest policy policies of the official plan.
42:14And I would also note that there are many municipalities with similar
42:17standards or sustainable development programs throughout the province.
42:24The sustainable development checklist before you works in tandem with the
42:27comprehensive zoning bylaw and supports key objectives related to sustainability,
42:33especially in regards to tree planting, to bird friendly design, to walk ability,
42:38et cetera, which given their nature are less suited for regulation through the
42:41comprehensive zoning bylaw.
42:44Other items such as bicycle parking and EV parking are being proposed to be
42:48addressed through the comprehensive zoning bylaw, which she'll be talking
42:50about a little bit later today.
42:55So again, turning to the checklist overview, the performance measures of the
43:00checklist are consistent with current site plan pro site plan requirements
43:05related to sustainable development prior to bill 23 coming into force and effect.
43:09So really what we're doing here is we're writing down this, the, the items that
43:14we typically ask for through the site plan process related to sustainable
43:18development that we have been asking for.
43:21Applicants will be required to conform where applicable to the sustainable
43:24development checklist as they move through the site plan process.
43:27Our flexibility has been implemented into the checklist as well.
43:34And if approved by council, the, we would start applying this as of May 1st of this
43:38year. The sustainable development checklist contains a total of 16 performance
43:45measures that are divided up into five categories, which are listed there on the
43:49slide. These sustainable development categories and performance measures were
43:54selected again, as I said, based on the current existing site plan technical
43:58requirements and no new technical requirements have been added as part of
44:02this checklist. However, it's important to note that there are some placeholders
44:06in there. There, there, there's at least one category that doesn't have anything
44:10other than a description under it. And really this is a placeholder as, as we
44:15develop a more wholesome checklist through the sustainable city master plan,
44:19which is, which is part of the strategic plan. And staff expect that through that
44:24process, this checklist may be expanded or identify other technical requirements
44:29and other optional items. So moving forward, again, this is a bit of a
44:36placeholder as we, as the city moves forward with the sustainable city master
44:42plan, which is an action item under the strategic plan. The checklist will, will
44:50allow us to get a sort of a baseline data of how things are working to test the
44:55checklist and allow for a more wholesome and informed engagement as we move
45:01forward with a sustainable city master plan. And comprehensive community
45:05engagement will be undertaken through that master plan. So with that, there are
45:12two recommendations, one to approve it and one to direct staff to implement the
45:18checklist through the site plan approval process. And that's the end of my
45:22presentation. Happy to answer any questions you may have.
45:26Thank you so much. Let's see if there are any questions. Okay, Karan and then
45:32Guller, please.
45:34No questions. Just, I'm so glad to see this coming before council. As most of you
45:39know, at a lot of planning applications, I am regularly lamenting the energy
45:45letters that come in and the fact that not enough of a checklist is available
45:53about what our expectation expectations are as a council and as a community. And
45:57so thank you staff for bringing this forward and I'm happy to put it on the
46:01floor.
46:02Yeah, and councillor Allt will second it. Councillor Goller questions. Yes,
46:08through your worship. Thank you for, for putting this checklist together. I'm
46:13really excited in particular the ecology and biodiversity section now so that I
46:18understand the teeth that this have. For example, EB one asks that three
46:23planting areas and soil volumes are in conformance with the city's three
46:26technical manual. What happens if we get a checklist back and and it says that
46:32they're not able to to meet this? What what are the teeth in this to compel
46:35people to actually comply with items in the checklist?
46:39Through you, your worship. The it's a bit of a it's a bit of a moving ground with
46:48some of the changes of bill 23. So acknowledge that at the beginning of my
46:52answer, but the province, if you read the changes to bill 23 and including
46:57sustainable development, still an element for the city to comment on and and
47:03taken together with that letter from from the ministry, you know, having
47:08trees that work and and that are going to grow and be successful is something
47:13that we can review and and comment on as part of the site plan approval process.
47:17So there is some flexibility to have that debate a little bit with the
47:22developer in there, but we have now clear standards and a way forward to move
47:27forward. So I mean, it comes down to the site plan approval process and taken
47:31together that application process. OK, OK, no, thank you for that. But to be
47:36clear, does that give you grounds to deny application that is not conforming or
47:42is it more about this is what we would really like to see in wealth? We hope
47:46that you do it out of the goodness of your your heart.
47:52Premier Guthrie to count sir Gowler. If it's the way the changes to the
47:58Planning Act work for sure on municipal boulevards, we can require it. We can
48:02deny an application if they don't provide it there on their internal site. If
48:05they don't provide the trees, the landscaping, we're not in a position to
48:10do that to deny it at this time. OK, OK, thank you for that clarification.
48:14I'm still very excited that at least these are here in an accessible way so
48:19that the expectations from the city are clear to developers. Thank you.
48:25Councillor Chew and then boost it all.
48:28Through you, Mr. Mayor, nice to finally meet you. It's nice to have another
48:32urban designer come on board on the Council chambers. I just want to say
48:37this is really great work and this isn't as rigorous as the Toronto Green
48:41Standards, but I do think this is an important step in helping applicants set
48:45expectations for what our city standards are. It also helps us build
48:49a social relationships with applicants to set expectations and provide an
48:54educational component throughout the process. I know a lot of landscape
48:57architects and design practitioners, they already have built in standards that
49:01they use within their firms. And I think having this additional piece as
49:06part of their toolkit could be very helpful. And then I would encourage
49:11staff as well to consider any opportunities to do similar work in
49:16house as well for future urban design excellence.
49:23And boost it till please. Thank you. And through the mayor, can you remind me
49:28in a development application process? I know there's the public process.
49:33Is the site plan information publicly accessible? What I'm wondering is just
49:38that accountability if there's a development happening in my area that I
49:43am able to see the site plan, the sustainability checklist and is there
49:47public information to this development meets meets doesn't meet? Is that
49:53publicly available as they go through the process?
50:01Through the mayor to Council, who's a tell. So the site plan process is not a
50:04public process. So it's an internal process through staff. As David DeGroote
50:10mentioned that we are going to be monitoring this as we come up with the
50:12city sustainability plan and we'll be keeping our own metrics on this to see
50:16where we're conforming and where we're not. And then that'll help us inform a
50:19future city sustainability plan as well. So we'll be keeping our internal
50:23metrics on the conformance rate. Just a supplemental. Does it come? Does it come
50:29to Council at some point as well around development and meeting the
50:36sustainability checklist kind of objectives? So at this point, we haven't
50:41actually even talked that far, but it will be included in information as we do
50:45the city sustainability plan. So it will be available in some format. As of
50:51April 6th, we have additional reporting requirements that we will be bringing
50:54to Council quarterly through information reports on site plan approval
50:58timelines. And then we're taking a look at if there's any other information we
51:02provide to the province on some of those timelines as well. But we that just came
51:06out on the 6th and we're not through that review yet. Just finally, just around
51:11that accountability process and in site plan. I know it's a staff process, but
51:17it would be great in developing community and that, you know, obligation and,
51:21you know, commitment to align with the city sustainability goals to have
51:28access, public access to that information. I'm thinking about, you know, the
51:32development application process. I can look at things just to consideration that
51:37as a resident, it would be great to advocate for a development that meets
51:42those criteria. Thank you. Okay, I just have a few questions then and then I'll
51:50look to call the vote. So my first question is actually just dovetailing
51:54into a little bit further where Councillor Boosentill just brought up and it was
51:58just asking how is this going to, is this going to, we know how we have our
52:08energy, I'm sorry, applicants for applications that come forward. There's
52:13usually like an energy sort of checklist that's usually attached to
52:17applications, whereas this is not. So is this something that could be considered
52:27through staff when you're working with developers before the application comes
52:31forward, that something like this could be included at the application stage?
52:41Through Mayor Guthrie. So the checklist will be part of the site plan
52:48requirements. We focused it solely on site plan. So as part of their pre
52:51consultation when they come in for site plan, it'll be identified as an item
52:54that they're to complete and provide back to us. You know, we do have a 60 day
53:00turnaround as mandated by the province and it was mandated that that process for
53:05site plan just maybe follow up on Councillor Boosentill's question that it be
53:08direct, it be run by staff and not Council. So but yes, we will provide the
53:14information at the precon stage, but not at the zoning stage. That level of
53:19details is not required at zoning. Okay. And then the letter from the ministry
53:24also indicated that they are looking to work with municipalities in coming into
53:30the summer of this year to potentially find ways of moving things from sort of a
53:36checklist stage into maybe changing the Ontario building code to make it have
53:42more teeth that has to be adhered to. Has our staff reached out at all or have we
53:48considered as a city of Guelph to officially ask to partner in that review
53:53stage? So we have a place at the table with our views.
53:58Mayor Guthrie, we have we have not reached out since we received the letter of
54:02February 28th. Okay. Are you thinking of is Guelph thinking of putting up its hand
54:11to say we would love to give input on that in a more formal partnership type of
54:17style or and I know there's staffing capacity. So I acknowledge that right
54:21off the bat. Or is it something that maybe when the ERO opens up that would be
54:26more of a commenting option for us?
54:31Mayor Guthrie, certainly for when the ERO comes out, we definitely would if it's
54:35through that process. But we can take it back and maybe take it back to some of
54:39our other bodies that we interact with and have some further conversations as
54:45well. Okay, great. And I guess if anyone's my last kind of a last comment slash
54:51question, if anyone at all was concerned about this, even within the development
54:56community, it's like, oh, you know, here's another checklist or something like
54:59that. I mean, it's really a mute point because you still have to be adhering to
55:07the accountability of the timelines that are imposed on municipalities.
55:11Anyways, regardless of this checklist or any other items that are required for
55:15site plan, there's now timelines embedded that have to be met. Is that
55:20something that you would agree with that you've heard from developers or others
55:25that might have been concerned with this being added?
55:30Mayor Guthrie, so that that is correct. And as Mr. DeGroote mentioned, that
55:34it's really a summary of existing policies and practices that we already have.
55:38We haven't gone above and beyond our standard practices. So it's a summary of
55:41here's our bird friendly design guidelines. Here's our tree planting
55:45manual. Here's our lighting policies. So it's a combination of everything handy
55:49in one place. So the hope for us is that it actually makes it easier.
55:53Yeah, thank you for highlighting that. I appreciate it. Okay, that was that was
55:57it for me. And I was about to call the vote. But do you have something more to
56:00say, Councillor Chew?
56:03Through you, Mr. Mayor, just very quickly, I think the whole point of this
56:07checklist is to set an expectation. I know a lot of municipalities, especially
56:11in the GTA, they already have stuff like this in place. And I don't think it's
56:15cumbersome to have it as an additional piece in the conversation during site
56:21plan. I think planning staff, it's really about building relationships and
56:25rapport and also setting expectations so that when things come forward,
56:29like it's already agreed upon, there's consensus. So it doesn't have to be
56:33contentious like it is traditionally here. And we're really just moving forward
56:38to the 21st century of planning here in Guelph. And I'm really excited to have
56:43this put forward. And I hope everyone can consider it from that viewpoint as well
56:46from educational piece that staff are able to provide with their knowledge and
56:50expertise.
56:53Great, thank you. Totally agree. Well said. Thank you. Okay, I'll call the vote then.
56:58Is anyone against the sustainability checklist? Seeing no hands go up. So
57:03that's unanimous as well. Thank you to staff for also thank you for staff for
57:09bringing us forward when you did as well. Nice to get that done. So thank you
57:12very much. Okay, we are going into this itty bitty report called the
57:20comprehensive zoning bylaw and companion official plan amendment. We're going to
57:25have. See here.
57:30Well, what I'll do everyone just want to give everyone sort of a heads up. Let's
57:34let's move ourselves through. Actually, let me just get off the mic for one
57:37second. Got to confer with the clerks. I was just conferring just to try to
58:05manage time as we go with the presentation and with the delegations
58:11just to give everyone enough of a heads up about break time or things like that
58:15to consider. So may I just ask, do you have an idea how long the staff
58:20presentation is in its entirety? For years of work? Should I give you five
58:26minutes? Can we can we ask for 25 please? Oh yeah, you could use whatever you
58:31want. Yeah, I just wanted to know what it what it what it is. Okay, so I think
58:35what we'll do folks, I just want to give everyone a heads up. I'm trying to make
58:38sure things work out well here. So let's let's do the presentation and and then
58:44right away into our delegations and get those out of the way. And then
58:49depending on the time right there, it may be a natural time and maybe though,
58:52okay, we've heard everything take a break. People can grab a lunch or a little
58:56bite to eat or whatever. I mean, come back and just kick right into it. Or if
59:00there's a little bit of time, we could do a little bit of some questions before
59:02we take a break. But I would say around sort of 1145 range as a sort of a
59:09heads up to everybody. That's when we'll start to really look at having a hard
59:13break. So we can all just take a moment. Okay, so I just wanted to say that out
59:17loud so everyone knew in advance. So with that, I'll call upon our staff to
59:22kick us off with this this great report.
59:27All right. Thank you, Mayor Guthrie and good morning, everyone. So we're
59:31definitely excited to be here today to bring forward the comprehensive review
59:35of the zoning bylaw as well as the companion official plan amendment for
59:38decision. As I start, I want to thank staff, Abby, Watte in particular, and
59:44you'll see a Pethro staff throughout the audience today, including a chunk of
59:48them in row three who've all been working hard to bring this forward. Based on
59:53the number of pages, you know, it took a whole team to bring this forward and it
59:56was not just a few people sitting up here. So we'll walk through some of the
1:00:01changes that were raised at the public meeting in July. And we have done a lot
1:00:06of further consideration of those. In some cases, we were able to add additional
1:00:10changes. And in some cases, it was our professional opinion not to make those
1:00:14changes. And in some cases, the changes were in alignment with previous
1:00:19decisions and recommendations of staff. We do recognize that there was a lot to
1:00:24read. And we tried to make it easy as possible by including a red line revision
1:00:29of changes made that hopefully was a quick reference guide to what was what
1:00:34was changed. Attachment five is a summary of council and community concerns,
1:00:39along with staff comment on those individual items that were raised.
1:00:43Attachment six to 13 are individual reviews, some of the topics that were
1:00:48raised at the July public meeting. And we have completed a thorough review on
1:00:53those topics that were raised in July. For example, attachment six driveway with
1:00:58review and recommendations summary is 25 pages. It includes comparisons with
1:01:05other municipalities, comments from our advisory committees, images, photos and
1:01:10other policies that help form our recommendation, including our policies on
1:01:14stormwater, urban forest, tree canopy, transportation and our council's
1:01:20commitment to the race to zero, all of which help inform our recommendation that
1:01:25we put forward to council. We have previously shared that the current bylaw
1:01:32is from 1995. And in 1995, our population was 95,000. The current bylaw as is in
1:01:40front of you today, I think is progressive. It shows a lot of insight and
1:01:44foresight, and will help us grow our community to 2051 and 208,000 people. So
1:01:51go from 95,000 to 208,000. The parameters are set out within this bylaw.
1:01:57Abby and our team have researched zoning trends, have reviewed council approved
1:02:02policies and master plans and have produced a very friendly user friendly
1:02:07document. I know we're going to get fixated on a few issues and that's okay.
1:02:11But there's some really good regulations in the bylaw and you know some of the
1:02:16councils have asked us what we're particularly proud of. And some of those
1:02:20items are EV chargers, bike parking, urban agriculture, additional housing
1:02:25permissions on individual lots. We put in zoning for stacked townhouses and back
1:02:30to backs that come to council regularly. We have permissions for supportive housing
1:02:38and we've provided three unit demonstration plans to show what those can
1:02:41actually look like to make it easier for the reader and the community. Through
1:02:47this document, we've also pre zoned a lot of land. This should result in fewer
1:02:51site specific applications, but we've made it very clear what our design
1:02:55expectations are as part of that pre zoning. And there has been some pushback
1:03:00on the design expectations that are in there. But we do want to make it clear
1:03:05that if you're pre zoned, these are our expectations because you can go right to
1:03:08site plan if you choose. And that's a time saving option that we've given the
1:03:13development community through this. The end of exclusionary zoning was
1:03:18introduced in July. We were ahead of the province on that on that forefront. And
1:03:24we're looking at ways to see how we can gently increase our housing choice,
1:03:27supply and options in all parts of the city without fundamentally changing the
1:03:32way those neighborhoods look and feel. While the end of exclusionary zoning is
1:03:38not the silver bullet to resolve the housing crisis, it does help along the
1:03:43continuum of housing. Part of wealth's vision is that we are leaders who shape
1:03:48tomorrow. We tackle local and global challenges through innovation, art and
1:03:52action. And we're committed to inclusive prosperity because together we're
1:03:56stronger. We have used these words in our review of the comprehensive zoning by
1:04:01law and the draft by law reflects this vision. Leveraging smart zoning reforms
1:04:09and pre zoning can unleash housing supply to help meet the needs of current and
1:04:14future residents. We are at a unique crossroads in time today. We have the
1:04:20opportunity collectively to reimagine how we want to experience her city and
1:04:26how the city's form can help enhance her relationship with each other. Council has
1:04:31made purposeful decisions to ensure we become a healthy urban climate resilient
1:04:36city of 208,000 in 2051. I'm fully aware we're about to have some conversations
1:04:50on parking and we will we will go through those. We have provided our staff
1:04:54recommendations and our supports for those. So we are hoping that we can move
1:04:58through them quickly. You have staff's recommendations and documentation in
1:05:02front of you. So with that, I will turn it over to Abby Watts and to go through
1:05:11the zoning by law. And thank you, Abby.
1:05:16Great. Thank you, Krista. Good morning, Mayor Guthrie and members of council. We
1:05:20are pleased to be here today to present the comprehensive zoning by law and
1:05:24companion official plan for amendment for decision today. The zoning by law review
1:05:32was initiated in 2019 and has been a multi year project involving multiple
1:05:37touch points with council stakeholders and the community. The zoning by law
1:05:41consists of five phases and a decision today on the proposed zoning by law
1:05:45completes phase four of the project. Phase five is implementation of the new
1:05:50by law, including updating the city's website, finalizing the interactive
1:05:54components of the by law and staff training. The project was initiated in
1:06:01January of 2019. Some background on the project. We released two discussion
1:06:06papers in October of 2019. That was the comprehensive zoning by law review
1:06:11discussion paper and the Gwell parking standards discussion paper prepared by
1:06:15IBI group. Staff also worked with IBI group to provide an additional council
1:06:20parking workshop in April of 2021. The additional residential unit review was
1:06:26brought forward to council and approved in December of 2020 in 2020 to in order
1:06:31to comply with provincial legislation and changes made under bill 108. The first
1:06:37draft of the new zoning by law was released in November of 2021 and
1:06:41included community consultation. The second draft of the by law was released
1:06:47in July of 2022 with the public open house and statutory public
1:06:52meeting at council. Since the public meeting, staff have been conducting
1:06:56additional community engagement, meeting with stakeholders, conducting
1:07:00additional studies to ensure we have up to date information and finalizing the
1:07:04zoning by law text and mapping. The existing zoning by law is from 1995 as
1:07:11mentioned a couple times, which means it's been 28 years since it's been
1:07:16comprehensively reviewed. The zoning by law is required to be consistent with
1:07:20provincial policy and conform to the official plan. Since the zoning by law
1:07:25was last comprehensively reviewed, the official plan has been reviewed a number
1:07:30of times. It was updated in 2001 through the through OPA 14, 2009 through OPA 39,
1:07:392010 through OPA 42 and 2012 through OPA 48. Substantial policy reviews for the
1:07:48official plan were completed in the 2006 commercial policy review and the 2018
1:07:53commercial policy review update. The St. Patrick's Ward land use study was
1:07:59completed in 2004 and the Guelph Innovation District secondary plan in 2014.
1:08:06The zoning by law has not been updated to conform with any of these updates to the
1:08:10official plan. So the proposed zoning by law is catching up on a lot of previously
1:08:15approved policy and direction and it implements regulations that support these
1:08:19directions, policies and land use designations. The proposed zoning by law is
1:08:24also a key document that will support the achievement of housing targets for the
1:08:292031 housing pledge. Since the notice of decision meeting was circulated to the
1:08:34community on March 23rd and the release of the final zoning by law on March 29th,
1:08:39the city has also received a decision on official plan amendment 80 from the
1:08:45province. OPA 80 updates the official plan to conform with provincial plans and
1:08:49policies and conform to a place to grow. The province's decision on OPA 80 was
1:08:55received a week ago today. The proposed zoning by law does implement a
1:09:00substantial amount of the official plan with the exception of the recent OPA 80
1:09:04changes and staff continue to recommend approval of the zoning by law, which is a
1:09:09large body of work that has taken a number of years to complete. OPA 80
1:09:13implementation is on the city's work plan and a future update to the zoning by law
1:09:18will implement these changes. The new zoning by law will repeal and replace the
1:09:22existing 1995 zoning by law in its entirety. Since the statutory public
1:09:29meeting in July of last year, the province also released bill 23 and changes to
1:09:34the planning act. Changes made to section 41 of the planning act now limit the
1:09:39review of exterior design through the site plan process and changes also exempt
1:09:44developments of 10 units and less from the site plan process. However, provincial
1:09:49policy or provincial interest under section two of the planning act and the
1:09:53provincial policy statements still apply and section 34 of the planning act
1:09:58allows us to continue to regulate the construction of buildings and structures
1:10:02through the zoning by law. This includes the type of construction and the height,
1:10:07bulk, location, size, floor area, spacing, character and use of buildings or
1:10:12structures, the minimum lot, frontage and depth and building coverage. This also
1:10:18includes regulating the minimum elevation of doors, windows and openings and
1:10:21buildings or structures, parking and loading, the minimum size of land,
1:10:27density and height of buildings. Go ahead too quickly. Additional regulations
1:10:35have been added to the zoning by law, including regulations for drive aisle
1:10:38width, screening and location of rooftop mechanicals, active frontage
1:10:42requirements, principal entrance requirements, maximum building setbacks
1:10:47and all these elements were previously reviewed through the site plan process.
1:10:52Adding these regulations to the zoning by law ensures that staff continue to be
1:10:55able to address these aspects through the development process. And the zoning
1:11:00by law has also undergone an outside peer and legal review through this project.
1:11:06So some key highlights to the new zoning by law include conformity, substantial
1:11:11conformity with the official plan. And it conformed with the official plan on the
1:11:16date the notice was provided to the community. The proposed zoning by law
1:11:20also aligns with other city plans such as the transportation master plan,
1:11:24urban forest management plan, store, modern master plan, energy and climate
1:11:28change initiatives and the race to zero. This by law is one of the first
1:11:33hybrid form based by laws in Ontario and we're very proud of the overall look
1:11:37and usability of this by law. It includes charts, illustrations and notes
1:11:42to add clarity to the regulations and make the document as user friendly as
1:11:45possible for the public. With a zoning by law that's 28 years old, there are
1:11:54a number of outdated regulations and uses included in our by law. The proposed
1:11:59zoning by law modernizes regulations and ensures alignment with other
1:12:03municipal practices. A number of uses have been updated and simplified.
1:12:08Vehicle parking regulations have been reviewed and updated. Bicycle and
1:12:12electric vehicle standards have been included as well as adding flexibility
1:12:16for home occupation regulations. We've also reviewed committee of
1:12:21committee of adjustment decisions and made changes where continuous issues
1:12:26were arising. The proposed zoning by law carries forward recent approved
1:12:31development applications. And in addition, the by law includes transition
1:12:35provisions to ensure existing applications will continue through their
1:12:40process without needing to meet the requirements of the new by law. These
1:12:43transition provisions give applicants two years to complete their application
1:12:48and in some cases five years where it's a multi-phased development. In addition,
1:12:56the proposed zoning by law zones the city's natural heritage system for the
1:13:00first time and ensures no new development is permitted within these areas. It
1:13:05adds bicycle parking requirements citywide and introduces electric vehicle
1:13:09parking. It eliminates exclusionary zoning, permitting a variety of housing
1:13:13types within residential areas and opens up infill opportunities, encouraging
1:13:18a range and mix of housing types. New mixed use zones permit a significant
1:13:25amount of residential within the city's nodes and intensification corridors,
1:13:28encouraging walkable mixed use neighborhoods. The by law includes minimum
1:13:33landscaped open space and buffer strip. Requirements to ensure green space and
1:13:38provide opportunities to plant trees. And the by law has also been updated to
1:13:43meet provincial accessibility standards. And in the case of accessible
1:13:47driveways, the permissions go above and beyond what AODA requires and allows
1:13:52more flexibility than most municipalities do. Community engagement was a large
1:13:59component of this project undertaken with each phase. Feedback has been taken
1:14:04into consideration to inform changes as we've moved throughout this project.
1:14:09Community engagement has included information sessions, workshops,
1:14:13open house, staff, staff office hours, consultation with council advisory
1:14:20committees, including the planning advisory committee, the accessibility
1:14:23advisory committee on multiple occasions, stakeholder meetings, including
1:14:28attending the city's liaison meeting with wealth home builders and developers,
1:14:32ward meetings and other special interest group presentations. We've mailed a
1:14:39postcard to every property within the city to advise them of the project. And
1:14:43we have over 250 people who have requested to stay informed of this
1:14:46project to date. We've received over 660 comments from the public and there's
1:14:52been over 3,900 visits to our project website. So we heard from council at the
1:15:00statutory public meeting that we need to review and consider a number of key
1:15:04aspects of the zoning bylaw before bringing it back to council for a
1:15:07decision. This included consideration for formalizing the current driveway with
1:15:12exemption criteria for semi-detached and on-street townhouses, reviewing the
1:15:17shipping container regulations with the community and considering removing the
1:15:20maximum number of containers permitted on a lot, permit supportive housing as of
1:15:26right within the city. We heard encouragement for the gentle density
1:15:32within residential neighborhoods and support for removing exclusionary
1:15:37zoning, but an interesting guidelines for three unit buildings that demonstrate
1:15:41how they would fit within the context of existing neighborhoods. Council
1:15:45requested an update to the 2019 off-street parking study for multiple
1:15:49residential buildings. We were asked to consider removing the parking
1:15:56adjustment area from the Gordon Street Intensive Occasion Area and to
1:15:59consider increasing visitor parking in the parking adjustment area for
1:16:03apartment buildings and mixed use buildings. And finally, we were asked to
1:16:06review home occupation provisions. So staff have gone back and a paper has been
1:16:12written on each of these topics to provide a thorough background review of
1:16:17each issue and additional rationale for staff's final recommendations. These
1:16:22papers have been included in the staff report as attachments for your
1:16:28consideration. So staff have updated the bylaw to allow supportive housing as of
1:16:34right in any zone that permits residential uses in the city, as well as the
1:16:38neighborhood institutional zones. We've also reviewed and updated home
1:16:42occupations to simplify the regulations and allow them within accessory
1:16:46structures and additional residential dwelling units. So for driveway with
1:16:54recommendations, staff conducted a cross departmental review of the driveway with
1:16:59issue and have included a paper that outlines the background information,
1:17:03existing policy, other municipal practices and highlights the goals and
1:17:07objectives of approved city plans. And this is attachment six of the staff
1:17:11report materials. The driveway with review has included staff from a number
1:17:16of different departments, including engineering and traffic, forestry,
1:17:21planning and urban design, zoning, corporate energy and climate change,
1:17:25operations and accessibility. Based on this review, staff continue to
1:17:30recommend that the zoning bylaw maintain the 50% landscaped open space
1:17:35requirement in the in the front yard. This is to ensure adequate area to
1:17:39park in a driveway while maintaining landscape space to provide for storm
1:17:43water management, allow for street trees and provide opportunities for on
1:17:47street parking. Staff are also recommending that the existing permission for a
Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.
The motion, the vote and the debate come from the City of Guelph’s published record, reproduced rather than interpreted. The document summaries above are the exception: those words were written for this site.