Council Planning · April 18, 2023 · Item 3.1
City Clerk be authorized to publish and serve notice of intention to designate 65 Delhi Street pursuant to Part IV…
Main motion under the agenda item 65 Delhi Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2023-105
Carried (13 to 0)
13 in favour, 0 against — unanimous
What was voted on
The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.
That the City Clerk be authorized to publish and serve notice of intention to designate 65 Delhi Street pursuant to Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. That the designation bylaw be brought before Council for approval if no objections are received within the thirty (30) day objection period.
Moved by Councillor Downer, seconded by Councillor Klassen.
How the room voted
In favour (13)
- Allt
- Billings
- Busuttil
- Caron
- Caton
- Chew
- Downer
- Gibson
- Goller
- Guthrie
- Klassen
- O'Rourke
- Richardson
What council was given
The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item. The summaries are written automatically, so you can tell what a document is without opening a ninety-page PDF.
- 65 Delhi Street - Notice of Intention to Designate - 2023-105.pdf
Heritage staff are asking Council to give public notice that it intends to designate 65 Delhi Street, the former Isolation Hospital, as a heritage property under the Ontario Heritage Act. Staff, working with Heritage Guelph, found the property meets five of the provincial criteria for heritage value; only two are needed. If no one objects within 30 days, a designation by-law would come back to Council.
- Attachment-1 Location of Property.pdf
- Attachment-2 Historical Images.pdf
- Attachment-3 Current Photos.pdf
- Attachment-4 Ontario Regulation 569-22 Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.pdf
- Correspondence - Andy Lennox.pdf
A summary is this site’s description of a document, not the City’s. Open the document before relying on one.
What was said
74 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.
Read the debate(click to open)
15:47Claussen was willing to second that. Anything further on that?
15:53Alright, I'll call the vote. Is anyone against the designation for 65 Delhi Street?
15:59Hearing and seeing none. So that's unanimous. Thank you so much. That's considered passed.
16:05And we're jumping right into the items for discussion and the first one is a sign variance report for 245 Handling Creek Boulevard. So this is a staff position of this sign variance to be refused.
Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.
The motion, the vote and the debate come from the City of Guelph’s published record, reproduced rather than interpreted. The document summaries above are the exception: those words were written for this site.