Skip to main content
Jon Christensen
Guelph Council Record

Committee of the Whole · June 02, 2026 · Item 15.3

Receive the Guelph Energy Equity Action Plan. That Council direct staff, through the multi-year budget process…

Main motion under the agenda item Advancing Energy Equity in Guelph - 2026-239

Carried (12 to 0)

12 in favour, 0 against — unanimous

This was one of 3 motions on the same item

In the order council took them. A vote makes sense next to the ones around it.

  1. 1/3Main motionReceive the Guelph Energy Equity Action Plan. That Council direct staff, through the multi-year budget process…you are hereCarried (12 to 0)
  2. 2/3Main motionThat, through the Request for Proposal to evaluate the City’s role in Affordable Housing…Carried (12 to 0)
  3. 3/3Main motionJune 2, 2026 Committee of the Whole meeting be extended beyond the automatic adjournment time of 8:00 p.m.…Carried (12 to 0)

What was voted on

The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.

That Council receive the Guelph Energy Equity Action Plan. That Council direct staff, through the multi-year budget process, to determine the resourcing requirements and financial impacts of implementing the Energy Equity Action Plan for initiatives that directly involve the City of Guelph.

Moved by Mayor Guthrie, seconded by Councillor Busuttil.

How the room voted

In favour (12)

  • Allt
  • Billings
  • Busuttil
  • Caron
  • Caton
  • Downer
  • Gibson
  • Goller
  • Guthrie
  • Hauser
  • Klassen
  • Richardson

Who spoke to it

Bryan Ho-Yan, Manager, Energy and Climate Change, Derya Tarhan, Guelph Lab, and Laura Tozer, Guelph Lab, presented on Advancing Energy Equity in Guelph. The following delegates spoke: Evan Ferrari

What council was given

The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item. The summaries are written automatically, so you can tell what a document is without opening a ninety-page PDF.

A summary is this site’s description of a document, not the City’s. Open the document before relying on one.

What was said

10,788 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.

Read the debate(click to open)

6:02:19All right, we're going to move on to the next item

6:02:22on the IDE agenda.

6:02:24Thank you to staff.

6:02:25We'll just talk while everyone moves over.

6:02:29We have the advancing energy equity in Guelph report.

6:02:34We have staff Brian Hohen, Tio Joseph,

6:02:39and then members of Guelph Lab, Laura Tozer, Sam Laban,

6:02:44Daria Taran who will be presenting to us this evening.

6:02:49Before we get started, I just want to thank everyone

6:02:51who has contributed to this work,

6:02:53the Guelph Energy Equity Coalition,

6:02:56the Guelph Energy Equity Community Working Group

6:02:59and the full project team from Guelph Labs

6:03:02and all the staff who are involved

6:03:04with the Guelph Labs work.

6:03:06I had a meeting a few months ago to learn a little bit more

6:03:09about Guelph Labs and the work that you were doing

6:03:11and this was still in progress.

6:03:13So I'm really looking forward to the presentation

6:03:15this evening and the discussion that will follow.

6:03:17So I'll hand things over to you, Brian.

6:03:27Okay, good afternoon.

6:03:30My name is Brian Hohen and I manage the city

6:03:32of Guelph's energy and climate change team.

6:03:36I'm happy to share the floor with my colleague, Tio Joseph.

6:03:40Dr. Laura Tozer from the University of Toronto,

6:03:43Dr. Daria Tarhan from the University of Guelph

6:03:46and Sam Laban from the Guelph Lab.

6:03:50They will be presenting further

6:03:51on the advancing energy equity and Guelph initiative.

6:03:57Last year, we presented the community call

6:04:00to climate action, which is the guiding document

6:04:03for collective action to reduce community emissions in Guelph

6:04:07from buildings, households, workplaces,

6:04:11waste and transportation and to work together

6:04:15to move towards our community race zero targets.

6:04:20That said, equity must always be considered

6:04:24as we work towards our energy and climate goals.

6:04:29As we developed the Guelph Greener Homes Program,

6:04:32this thinking was employed.

6:04:34In parallel to the zero interest loan stream,

6:04:37we were one of the first municipalities

6:04:39to develop a dedicated low income household grant program

6:04:43that covers the cost of heat pumps for those that qualify.

6:04:48This way, more community members could overcome

6:04:52financial barriers and take action to reduce emissions.

6:04:58Guelph is also part of the global covenant of mayors

6:05:01for climate and energy.

6:05:03As part of the membership, cities are to report

6:05:06on reducing local emissions and adapting

6:05:09to climate change.

6:05:11In 2023, the global covenant of mayors added

6:05:15the energy access and poverty pillar to the framework.

6:05:19This addition helped frame the investigation

6:05:22into energy inequity and led to this engagement

6:05:25with Guelph lab and the research team.

6:05:28And with that, I'll pass it over to Dr. Tozer.

6:05:34Oh, sorry.

6:05:35Dr. Tarran.

6:05:40Hello members of council.

6:05:42Thank you so much, Brian.

6:05:44Dear members of council,

6:05:46we're in the midst of a transition as a society

6:05:50in terms of our climate, our energy systems,

6:05:53and how we relate to them as communities and policymakers.

6:05:58And some groups are impacted more disproportionately

6:06:01than others by climate change and our energy systems.

6:06:04And here's where the need for justice comes in.

6:06:07So the city of Guelph is the, for the slides.

6:06:13Sorry, first time.

6:06:22And the city of Guelph is already working

6:06:25on advancing just energy transitions.

6:06:28And this action plan on advancing energy equity specifically

6:06:32is part of these broader efforts.

6:06:35Guelph, in fact, is amongst the early adopters

6:06:38of addressing energy inequity.

6:06:40Another example of such a city is the city of Calgary,

6:06:43who enacted a energy equity action plan as well.

6:06:47At its core, energy equity isn't only about the cost of energy

6:06:52or everyone being able to adequately heat

6:06:55and cool their homes, which it is.

6:06:59But it's also about health.

6:07:01For example, people with respiratory illnesses

6:07:03who are disproportionately impacted by heat waves.

6:07:07It's about dignity and belonging,

6:07:09things like being able to host others at their home

6:07:13and feeling safe and comfortable at home.

6:07:18Climate change, unfortunately,

6:07:19is increasing the challenge of meeting energy equity.

6:07:24Hotter summers and longer heat waves are already here.

6:07:28By 2050, the number of days over 30 degrees Celsius

6:07:32is expected to quadruple.

6:07:36This action plan addresses energy inequity

6:07:38in two key ways.

6:07:39First, it identifies which communities and households

6:07:43in Guelph are most affected.

6:07:45And second, it outlines practical steps

6:07:49the city and community partners can take to support them.

6:07:53And as you can see, as you could have seen,

6:07:55I think I passed a slide there,

6:08:00but the primary focus of it is those Guelph residents

6:08:04with high energy burden,

6:08:06which means they spend a lot on energy costs

6:08:08relative to income.

6:08:11So now I want to talk to you about the participatory process

6:08:14through which we collectively developed

6:08:16this energy equity action plan.

6:08:20So we developed this plan through

6:08:21community and community engaged scholarship approach,

6:08:26where key community members and actors

6:08:28help identify and frame the issues,

6:08:31as well as collectively develop solutions to these issues.

6:08:35And this approach aims at increasing responsiveness

6:08:38to community needs and visions and the success of uptake.

6:08:44So on our end, the project team comprised of city staff,

6:08:49researchers, including myself,

6:08:50from the University of Guelph,

6:08:52and Dr. Laura Tozer from University of Toronto,

6:08:56as well as support from the Guelph Lab.

6:09:01Meanwhile, while this is the project team,

6:09:03there was also, as mentioned,

6:09:04through the community engaged scholarship approach,

6:09:06there was very important roles for community members in Guelph,

6:09:10through two key groups of community engagement.

6:09:16The first of them is what we call

6:09:19the Guelph Energy Equity Coalition,

6:09:22which brought together representatives

6:09:25from 11 local organizations concerned by energy and equity.

6:09:29This included utilities, governments,

6:09:32and community organizations working in poverty alleviation,

6:09:35frontline community service delivery, and sustainability.

6:09:39This group met four times in total.

6:09:43The second key group is the Guelph Energy Equity

6:09:47Community Working Group.

6:09:49And this group was made up of nine Guelph residents

6:09:52with lived expertise relevant to energy equity.

6:09:59Importantly, the community working group,

6:10:02so the expertise of people who are day-to-day

6:10:05dealing with energy and equities

6:10:06and trying to advance energy equity,

6:10:09bookended the entire project.

6:10:10The first meeting was of the community group,

6:10:12so they were able to set the priorities and principles

6:10:16that is going to guide this research.

6:10:19And the last meeting of the final energy equity action plan

6:10:22was reviewed by these members.

6:10:25Glad to report that nine out of nine

6:10:27of the community working group members

6:10:29supported this action plan that's in front of you today.

6:10:33And we also did engaged in public engagement

6:10:37at four community spaces, including community voices,

6:10:41food uniting neighbors, a Hope House Market,

6:10:44and the North End Harvest Market.

6:10:47I will now pass it to my colleague, Dr. Laura Tozer,

6:10:50who will speak about how we come to understand energy

6:10:53and equity in general and in the specific context of it.

6:10:56Thank you.

6:11:11Okay, thank you, Council Members.

6:11:13So there's a few different ways that we can think

6:11:15about understanding energy equity.

6:11:18And this is an area of research for me.

6:11:19I research energy equity, retrofit programs

6:11:24for homes here in Canada and local climate action.

6:11:27Well, so we can think about energy equity here in Guelph

6:11:30in a few different ways.

6:11:31We can think about it through stories,

6:11:33through definitions, and through statistics.

6:11:35So I'm gonna go through the action plan itself

6:11:37in a minute, but first I want to share a little bit

6:11:41about what we learned together in this process

6:11:43about the picture of energy inequity

6:11:44as it exists here in Guelph now.

6:11:47So when we think about the energy stories that we have,

6:11:56here in Guelph, our working group residents

6:11:58with lived experience of energy inequity edited

6:12:01a series of research backed qualitative stories

6:12:03to make sure that they reflected life in Guelph.

6:12:06They felt strongly that these stories included in the plan

6:12:09help everyone to understand who needs these actions

6:12:13and what their challenges are.

6:12:15The stories show experiences of people with lived experience

6:12:18whether that's low parents, seniors, folks with disabilities,

6:12:21racialized people, newcomers, renters, folks

6:12:25who disproportionately experience

6:12:26energy and equity impacts.

6:12:30Energy inequity is often defined as not being able

6:12:32to afford or access the energy needed to support well-being

6:12:36or staying healthy at home.

6:12:38It exists here in Guelph, exists all across Canada.

6:12:40Research shows that.

6:12:42People carefully ration their energy use

6:12:45in ways that means that they're living

6:12:47in unsafe temperatures at home.

6:12:49So we know that people keep the heat low

6:12:53or stay in one room or can't stay at home when it's warm.

6:12:57And the impacts of this are not just about the cost

6:13:02but it's also a health impact and a social connection impact.

6:13:05Research shows that it can make cardiovascular diseases

6:13:08worse, for example, these coping mechanisms

6:13:10and not having adequate temperatures at home.

6:13:13And it drives isolation, not wanting to have friends

6:13:16and families to your home as you heard.

6:13:18So this is what we mean when we're saying energy

6:13:20and equity as part of this plan.

6:13:23We can also look at the statistics

6:13:24for energy and equity in Guelph.

6:13:26We calculated that 4,550 households struggled

6:13:31with high energy costs.

6:13:33So that works out to about one in 10 households

6:13:35across the city, but it's concentrated

6:13:37in particular neighborhoods.

6:13:38In some neighborhoods, four out of 10 households

6:13:42were experiencing energy and equity.

6:13:45Another thing I want to note is that we got the data

6:13:47to do this calculation from the census

6:13:49where people put in their energy costs.

6:13:52But many people have their energy costs included

6:13:55in their rent and their housing so they can't separate it out,

6:13:59which means they're not captured in this number

6:14:00of 4,550 households.

6:14:03So we calculated just over 12,000 renter households

6:14:08that are also unable to access and attain material needs

6:14:11related to housing, food, clothing, and education

6:14:14using some different sources of data.

6:14:16And these are also households who are vulnerable

6:14:18to energy poverty who aren't included in that first number.

6:14:21So let me talk a little bit now about the action plan itself,

6:14:24what we came to collectively through this process

6:14:27of working with all these folks.

6:14:29The overarching goal of the plan is to help households

6:14:34that are struggling because of energy and equity,

6:14:37including people with the lowest incomes

6:14:38and the highest energy burdens.

6:14:42This is, as you remember, that was related

6:14:43to the energy costs and the other impacts that they're facing.

6:14:46So there's four large areas, categories of actions

6:14:49that are in the plan.

6:14:51The first two relate to the underlying housing conditions.

6:14:54So this is about addressing things like leaky windows

6:14:57and doors, inadequate insulation,

6:14:59or an inefficient heating and cooling system

6:15:02because these are one of the main drivers

6:15:04of energy and equity experiences.

6:15:07We need home energy upgrades to advance energy equity

6:15:11and better serve most marginalized residents

6:15:14to address some of these drivers.

6:15:16And what we heard, what you'll see in some of these

6:15:18action areas is both more home upgrade programs,

6:15:22additional ones, serving more purposes,

6:15:24reaching more households.

6:15:25But you'll also see that we talked a lot about

6:15:27and we have actions in there about better support

6:15:32so that people can better access existing programs

6:15:35because there are a couple of offered as well.

6:15:37Because the uptake is low even for the existing programs,

6:15:40they're difficult to navigate.

6:15:42People don't know that they're eligible.

6:15:45So the first two program areas are about navigation

6:15:48and about expansion.

6:15:51The under strengthening navigation and outreach,

6:15:54the first major action was to develop

6:15:56what we're calling an energy coaching program.

6:15:59And this is a recommendation for the city of Guelph

6:16:02to convene and collaborate with community partners,

6:16:04other levels of government and utilities

6:16:06to develop the program that works directly

6:16:09with households in Guelph, helping them to navigate

6:16:12existing home energy retrofit programs

6:16:14offered by many different players.

6:16:16There's also a lot of opportunity to improve outreach,

6:16:18things like in more languages, targeted outreach efforts

6:16:24to particular neighborhoods and communities,

6:16:25that kind of thing.

6:16:27There are also actions about expanding

6:16:30home energy retrofit programs.

6:16:32So this is about offering more programs

6:16:34or reaching more households.

6:16:35And there are recommendations for both city led

6:16:39home energy retrofit programs, applying to funding

6:16:42to expand city of Guelph led home energy retrofit programs,

6:16:46as well as for programs that are led by utilities,

6:16:50city of Guelph can advocate for program designs

6:16:52that serve these households in Guelph

6:16:54that are experiencing energy and equity.

6:16:58The other two areas in the program

6:17:00are about addressing energy and equity for renters

6:17:03and monitoring and reporting.

6:17:05So for renters, as I mentioned,

6:17:07renters were a particular area of focus

6:17:10that came up during the creation of the action plan.

6:17:13Renters are disproportionately affected

6:17:16by energy and equity.

6:17:17We know this from research we've done,

6:17:20not here in Guelph, but much more broadly.

6:17:22And renters are poorly served

6:17:24by many of the existing energy equity programs.

6:17:27A lot of them are focused on homeowners

6:17:29living in their home.

6:17:31And so that's the reason that there's this particular

6:17:34emphasis in the action plan to highlight

6:17:37the opportunities to make sure that renters

6:17:39are benefiting from energy interventions as well.

6:17:42And so the two main actions here are to support

6:17:45the adoption of the rental renovation by-law

6:17:48that's currently under development

6:17:49to protect tenants from displacement

6:17:51and unintended consequences of building upgrades

6:17:54when they're taking place.

6:17:56And also for the city of Guelph to explore

6:17:59how to adopt a maximum temperature by-law

6:18:01to protect rental tenants from dangerous indoor heating,

6:18:05much the way they're protected in the winter

6:18:08from having to have heat provided in the winter as well.

6:18:11And the final action area is on expanding monitoring

6:18:14and reporting so that this can become

6:18:15an ongoing part of operations for the city of Guelph.

6:18:18Both external reporting to the community and beyond,

6:18:23but also increasing the internal decision-making

6:18:26mechanisms for staff and policymakers

6:18:29to help to understand local energy use

6:18:31and equity challenges.

6:18:32So for example, the energy costs

6:18:34faced by different neighborhoods.

6:18:36And with that, I'll hand it back over to Brian

6:18:38to take us into the next steps.

6:18:46Great, thank you.

6:18:47Oh, excited there.

6:18:55Okay, so having a seat at the table

6:18:57and taking part in the discussions

6:18:58with community organizations and Guelph residents,

6:19:01a lot was gained from the different perspectives.

6:19:05The Energy Equity Action Plan identified

6:19:07that the city of Guelph has a member of the community,

6:19:10has a key role to play in advancing items

6:19:13of the action plan.

6:19:15However, it shouldn't do things in isolation

6:19:18and should work with community organizations

6:19:20by leveraging the expertise and trust they have established.

6:19:26There is shared interest from all groups

6:19:28in addressing this issue.

6:19:30Moving from defining energy and equity in Guelph

6:19:33and identifying actions,

6:19:35we'll move to implementation planning and design

6:19:38where this knowledge is to be incorporated.

6:19:41And finally, and what was previously stated,

6:19:44as we move forward, progress on the actions

6:19:47should be tracked and reported.

6:19:50And so with that, I'm gonna close the presentation

6:19:53and open it up for questions.

6:19:56Thank you for the presentation.

6:19:59We have one delegate before we go to questions.

6:20:02We have Evan Ferrari of Emerge Guelph.

6:20:05I saw you come in, hi Evan.

6:20:08And Evan was also, I hope this isn't in your delegation,

6:20:12but Evan, you were also one of the members

6:20:15of the Guelph Energy Equity Coalition.

6:20:18So thank you for your participation in that group.

6:20:22And whenever you're ready, the floor is yours.

6:20:27Thank you, thank you, Madam Chair.

6:20:30I'm gonna go off script here for a second

6:20:32and just say that I've never been involved

6:20:35with a planning process that the city has gone through

6:20:40in the 35 or more than 40 years that I've been in the city

6:20:44that was done so unbelievably well as this.

6:20:46I'm honestly in awe of, I played a very small role in this

6:20:51and I considered that really privileged.

6:20:55I'm speaking today in strong support

6:20:57of the Guelph Energy Equity Action Plan.

6:21:00First, I would like to thank Laura Tozers, Sam Laban,

6:21:03Darian Turan, and Craig Johnson for their excellent work.

6:21:06They produced a plan that is thoughtful, practical,

6:21:08evidence-based, and rooted in the realities of our community.

6:21:12What makes this report especially valuable

6:21:15is the process through which it was developed.

6:21:18The authors brought together the Guelph Energy Equity Group,

6:21:22and I'm afraid I'm repeating some of what Laura said here,

6:21:25and those are the individuals with lived experience.

6:21:29And also the project team, obviously,

6:21:32the project team of staff

6:21:34and the Guelph Energy Equity Coalition

6:21:37frontline organizations of which we were proud to be members.

6:21:41Too often policies are developed about people

6:21:43rather than with people.

6:21:46The project took a different approach.

6:21:47Residents facing high costs, housing challenges,

6:21:50disability, poverty, and other barriers

6:21:53helped shape the solutions.

6:21:55The report reminds us that energy inequity

6:21:57is not an abstract concept.

6:22:00It is the senior deciding whether they can afford

6:22:02to heat their home.

6:22:04The person with a disability who depends on electricity

6:22:07to power essential medical equipment,

6:22:09the newcomer family struggling to balance housing costs,

6:22:12employment challenges, and energy bills,

6:22:15and the single parent trying to keep their children safe

6:22:18and comfortable in a poorly insulated apartment.

6:22:22Climate change is making these challenges worse.

6:22:24More frequent heat waves, extreme weather,

6:22:26and rising energy costs will place additional pressure

6:22:30on households that are already struggling.

6:22:35Those least responsible for climate change

6:22:38are the most vulnerable to its impact.

6:22:42This is why this action plan matters.

6:22:44Its recommendations are practical and achievable.

6:22:47The proposed energy coaching program

6:22:49would help residents navigate existing programs in supports.

6:22:53This has been a consistent hurdle in the past.

6:22:57When you're worrying about putting food on the table,

6:23:00how on earth do you make sense of your energy bills

6:23:03at the same time and whether you can pay them or not?

6:23:06Expanded retrofit programs would improve the comfort,

6:23:09efficiency, and affordability of homes.

6:23:12Measures to protect renters would help ensure

6:23:16vulnerable residents are not left behind

6:23:18during energy transition.

6:23:20However, a plan alone will not reduce energy inequity.

6:23:25A report sitting on a shelf will not lower utility bills,

6:23:30protect a senior during a heat wave,

6:23:32help a family living in an inefficient home.

6:23:35Implementation requires commitment, resources, and funding.

6:23:41We can't wait.

6:23:44Council has also the opportunity to create

6:23:46a sustainable long-term funding source when the city,

6:23:51and I'm being extremely hopeful here,

6:23:53when the city is successful in changing,

6:23:56charging Enbridge for the use of publicly owned rights of way,

6:23:59Guelph could receive an estimated four to $8 million annually.

6:24:03Those revenues could help energy and secure households

6:24:06for their utility bills, while also expanding grants

6:24:10and financing programs that reduce energy costs

6:24:13through energy efficiency, electrification, renewables,

6:24:17and energy storage improvements.

6:24:20I urge council to not only endorse this plan,

6:24:24but to fully fund it, fund its implementation,

6:24:27and begin identifying long-term revenue sources

6:24:30that can sustain this work.

6:24:32Investing in energy equity is an investment

6:24:34in public health, climate resilience,

6:24:38housing affordability, and dignity, above all dignity.

6:24:43Residents have told us what they need.

6:24:45Front-line organizations have identified the barriers.

6:24:48The researchers have provided the evidence.

6:24:51The question before council

6:24:53is no longer whether energy inequity exists,

6:24:56or whether action is needed.

6:24:58The question is whether we're prepared to act

6:25:01on what we know now.

6:25:02Thank you, Madam Chair.

6:25:05Thank you very much for your delegation.

6:25:07And thank you for giving our staff

6:25:13and Guelph Lab their flowers on this.

6:25:15I absolutely agree with you.

6:25:17I think it's a very well-done report.

6:25:19So sometimes we need to hear that from the public too.

6:25:22So I just wanna say thank you for that.

6:25:24With that, I'm going to ask my colleagues

6:25:26if there are questions.

6:25:26Councillor Bruce, you're up.

6:25:30Thank you very much.

6:25:31I too was very excited with this report.

6:25:33I sent a message to Caitlin at our office

6:25:37and said, do I have any hard copies

6:25:38that I can share with some other people?

6:25:41Thank you for this.

6:25:42When I think about the action plan,

6:25:44there's two parts to this.

6:25:46One is the technical side,

6:25:47the knowledge of if you did this, it would reduce this.

6:25:51And the other is the connection to the community,

6:25:54the invitation to those pockets

6:25:56where you can make the greater impact.

6:25:58When you think of how this might roll out,

6:26:01for me, I'm thinking local,

6:26:05connected some of the people that I know

6:26:06that were on the advisory committee

6:26:08that have that into the community

6:26:10and can have that conversation with them,

6:26:13build that trust and so on.

6:26:15How do you see something like this happening?

6:26:16Is it funding for an outside organization

6:26:19that's doing like project porch light,

6:26:21knocking on doors and handing out,

6:26:23you remember porch lights kind of thing?

6:26:26Or is it more of a community development model?

6:26:30I think there are an awful lot of not-for-profit groups

6:26:33that are servicing those that are suffering

6:26:38from energy and equity that know how to work

6:26:41with them directly.

6:26:42What's missing from that component,

6:26:44this is my opinion and obviously you're gonna ask

6:26:47the others about it as well,

6:26:48but what's missing from that is that technical expertise.

6:26:53In the work that we do at Emerge,

6:26:54we deal with a lot of people

6:26:56that can afford to do this type of work.

6:26:58And they're lost at trying to do some of this stuff.

6:27:01So when you're dealing with other challenges in your life

6:27:05and you don't have a trusted technical support

6:27:09that works in conjunction with those social services groups,

6:27:16I think that's a piece that's really needed

6:27:19and in the report, the reference to energy coaching,

6:27:24and specifically in the report,

6:27:26it states that that should be someone

6:27:27that has training as a certified energy advisor

6:27:33through NRCan, Natural Resources Canada.

6:27:35So you want that technical expertise,

6:27:37but you've also got that technical expertise,

6:27:40isn't necessarily, I'm not criticizing them,

6:27:44but they're not necessarily the best people

6:27:46at communicating sometimes,

6:27:47that they're quite passionate about what they're doing.

6:27:49And I think having that liaison with social services groups

6:27:53is critical to be able to make this as successful as possible.

6:27:59Thank you.

6:28:02Thank you for your delegation.

6:28:04Thank you, Evan.

6:28:05Thank you for being here this evening.

6:28:07I'm going to bring things back to us on the council side.

6:28:10So I know that Mayor Guthrie had asked

6:28:14to put the recommendation on the floor.

6:28:17And I saw Councillor Bousetel's hand go up first.

6:28:21I'm sorry, Councillor Caron, I saw you too.

6:28:23But thank you for everyone for putting their hands up

6:28:26to put these on the floor, because I think it's merited.

6:28:28Councillor, oh gosh, I'm so sorry.

6:28:32Mayor Guthrie.

6:28:34I don't care.

6:28:36You were first on my speaking list,

6:28:37and who else?

6:28:39Councillor Caron and Councillor Caiten as well.

6:28:42I see Caiten as well there, yeah.

6:28:43I just wasn't, I didn't get there yet.

6:28:45So thank you.

6:28:46And Councillor Bousetel.

6:28:48Okay, thank you and through you, Madam Chair.

6:28:52So I just wanted to quickly ask a few questions,

6:28:54maybe through you to Brian,

6:28:56and it is around the Guelph-Greener Homes Initiative.

6:29:00I was wondering if you could give an update.

6:29:02I know that we had a certain amount of money

6:29:05that was going to be going to these retrofits,

6:29:07and then we created that secondary sort of program,

6:29:10which you discussed at the microphone here for us,

6:29:13around financing, or not financing, funds,

6:29:16that would go directly to the very people

6:29:19that were talking about in this report.

6:29:21Can you give us just an update on how that's going?

6:29:27Through you, Chair, to Mayor Guthrie.

6:29:30So yeah, so we are approaching the end of year three

6:29:35of the four-year program with FCM.

6:29:39So the amount of funding for the low-end side of things

6:29:43was about $13.75 million,

6:29:47shared contribution between FCM and the city.

6:29:51So we're about fully subscribed on that side of things.

6:29:53However, there is a lot of work that still has to happen

6:29:56as people are doing their construction and whatnot.

6:29:58So as we get more cost certainty,

6:30:01as the budgets or the funding requests come in

6:30:04and they become actual costs,

6:30:06we'll get better ideas of that.

6:30:08So there may be some money that kind of frees up

6:30:11and then playing with some time,

6:30:12but as it stands, we're fully subscribed on that side.

6:30:16In terms of, as I mentioned at the opening remarks,

6:30:20there is the grant portion,

6:30:22the low income or the income eligible grant portion.

6:30:25So we are also fully subscribed to that.

6:30:27So putting that into dollars,

6:30:30we've allotted $1.3 million for that program.

6:30:36I'll say observations-wise,

6:30:39as we were kind of seeing through the work

6:30:41that we've done to access to that program

6:30:44was a little bit more challenging

6:30:45or getting the word out for that

6:30:46was a little bit more challenging.

6:30:48But we were able to get that fully subscribed.

6:30:52Same thing as kind of things kind of balance out.

6:30:57There may be some bits and bobs of money

6:30:59that can go further,

6:31:00but we intend to use every little drop of that.

6:31:04Oh, that's great.

6:31:05Thank you for that update.

6:31:07So do you think that there is a chance

6:31:12that it would not be fully subscribed

6:31:14on the non-grant side on the other side?

6:31:19And where I'm going on my question is

6:31:21if there is an allotment of money

6:31:23that is then not realized that's going out the door,

6:31:26and I'm just making this up,

6:31:27let's say it's half a million dollars or something.

6:31:32Could we earmark that to go directly towards this program?

6:31:38Because this program, not this program,

6:31:40but the grant program is fully subscribed.

6:31:44And we only did, I'm trying to remember,

6:31:48was it 10%?

6:31:50About 10%?

6:31:51Went to that grant program.

6:31:54But because of this report that's in front of us,

6:31:56we now all see the reality of what people are up against

6:32:00and these are the people that need the most help.

6:32:03So if there's any realized funding

6:32:05on the other side of that Greener Homes program,

6:32:09is there a way that you have the ability

6:32:11to shift that over to the program

6:32:13that this report specifically talks about

6:32:15so that there's more uptake on this side of it?

6:32:22I'd have to look into that further,

6:32:23but unfortunately my first impression is

6:32:26there are constraints from the FCM agreement

6:32:31so that the loan allotment was defined

6:32:34through the FCM program.

6:32:36And it was through the way that we were operating

6:32:41the program that we were doing it in a lean manner

6:32:43to maximize to get that 1.3 million on the grant side.

6:32:48Okay, well you're in luck.

6:32:50I'm going to FCM tomorrow.

6:32:52I'll just talk to them when I get there.

6:32:55See if we can get that changed.

6:32:58Okay, and so then my final question,

6:33:01and then Madam Chair, I do have an additional motion

6:33:05to table with my colleagues later,

6:33:08but is if there is more funding in the future

6:33:13for the Guelph Kind of Greener Homes program,

6:33:17would we or would staff be looking at targeting

6:33:23this report in front of us more so than in the future?

6:33:28Because to me this report speaks volumes

6:33:31as to why we do need to focus on this part

6:33:34of the equation maybe a little bit more

6:33:37than the other sort of regular stream

6:33:39of the financing stream, but in the grant part of it?

6:33:47Yes, so I mean I see it as an equity lens

6:33:50that we're going to be applying through all the design work

6:33:52that we do for any programs that we have.

6:33:55And hence that was the formation

6:33:59of the Guelph Kind of Homes program

6:34:01in the way that we've designed it.

6:34:04So just to be clear, FCM did not require a low income stream.

6:34:11It was Guelph's design to do this

6:34:14because we saw this as meeting the need in the community.

6:34:19Oh, I'm so sorry, one quick follow up.

6:34:21Do you have impacts to those that did get

6:34:24out of the one million and so dollars

6:34:26for the low income grants?

6:34:28Do you have impact of like a pre and post?

6:34:32Like so what they were paying versus what they are today

6:34:38because of those that took advantage of the program?

6:34:40And from a researcher's point of view,

6:34:43is there an ability for Guelph labs or other researchers

6:34:46to look into the non-monetary impacts that have occurred?

6:34:50Because the report that's in front of us

6:34:51speaks to like the anxiety, the stress,

6:34:54the health impacts because of the inequity

6:34:57issues around energy costs.

6:34:59Is there a way to capture what those people

6:35:02are experiencing today because they've had help with that?

6:35:08As part of the program, we are required

6:35:11to do a pre-energy audit and a post-energy audit.

6:35:16I am going to put the caveat that is modeled.

6:35:19It isn't actual utility bills and actual data,

6:35:22but it does give us some indication

6:35:24of what the energy savings could be or would be

6:35:27and what the associated energy cost savings would be.

6:35:31And similarly on a greenhouse gas emissions reduction.

6:35:35I think a bigger part too is the capital replacement.

6:35:40Anecdotally we are seeing there are folks

6:35:43that are coming to the program

6:35:45and have an emergency repair to do or replacement to do.

6:35:50And we've been able to support them through the program.

6:35:54So there's that aspect.

6:35:56Also as part of the FCM program,

6:35:59there is an exit survey when the program,

6:36:02when the participant has done their project.

6:36:05It is voluntary.

6:36:06And we do have actually in the previous report

6:36:10that we did share an update with the Guelph-Biener Homes.

6:36:12There was some information on that.

6:36:14There is some experience data, I'll call it,

6:36:19that the participants are witnessing with the change,

6:36:23both through the customer experience of the program,

6:36:26but also in terms of if the changes have enabled them to do.

6:36:32So I think there's value in sharing some of that data

6:36:36with the research team and seeing if there are things

6:36:38that can be extracted.

6:36:40But there may be a little bit of projection on some of them.

6:36:47That's okay.

6:36:48Thank you for your questions.

6:36:50I'm not gonna say again.

6:36:52Councillor Caron, please.

6:36:54I did that when I was cheering too.

6:36:56You're just looking around at your colleagues, it's natural.

6:36:59Again, great report.

6:37:01As most of you know,

6:37:02every time we have a new development application

6:37:04and I'm talking about NetZero,

6:37:05I always say that affordability and utilities

6:37:09are interconnected because we may be building affordable housing

6:37:13and but people can't afford their utilities.

6:37:15So I'm glad we've recognized that

6:37:18and made the link with this program.

6:37:21My question actually is just to quantify that a little bit.

6:37:24I have always heard that about 75% of renters

6:37:29have utility costs on top of their rent.

6:37:31Is that about the same in Guelph?

6:37:34Do we know what percentage of renters in Guelph

6:37:36are paying utilities on top of their rent?

6:37:47Through the chair?

6:37:48I don't know, that's okay too.

6:37:49And the answer is we don't know exactly in Guelph.

6:37:51So the data that we could find,

6:37:53we did look for spanned larger areas than that.

6:37:58So we couldn't figure out the exact breakdown precisely enough

6:38:02that we could do something like figure out

6:38:05the same calculation for renters using the census data.

6:38:11It is a large proportion of the renters though.

6:38:17It's not that have their rental or their energy costs

6:38:21included in their rent.

6:38:25So we're not talking only about, for example,

6:38:28social housing where it's included,

6:38:29but a significant number of private rental as well.

6:38:33Yeah, great, thank you.

6:38:36Thank you, Councillor Katelyn, please.

6:38:42Thank you.

6:38:44Through you, first off, I love it.

6:38:46I think it's great.

6:38:47I'm especially excited about the temperature bylaw

6:38:52that's gonna be upcoming.

6:38:52I had a resident reach out to me about that

6:38:55just a couple of weeks ago.

6:38:57And when Mr. Godfrey told me about it,

6:38:59I was so excited because that's gonna help so many people.

6:39:02It's gonna be quite huge.

6:39:05And I'm not planning on moving this right now

6:39:10because I think that we should chat back and forth

6:39:12on some of this, but I'm just wondering

6:39:13if we can consider an action for advocating

6:39:17for some changes or expansion to the Ontario energy program

6:39:26that offers discounts for disabled people

6:39:28because currently the salary expectations

6:39:31for getting discounts is quite low

6:39:37and doesn't really reflect the extra cost burden

6:39:42on disabled people.

6:39:43And there are devices such as dehumidifiers

6:39:49and air purifiers that for me make the difference

6:39:53between being able to be here and work and be a counsellor

6:39:57or being too disabled to get out of my bed.

6:39:59And those are not covered as necessary devices.

6:40:03And we have issues with CPAPs

6:40:05and everything else not being included.

6:40:06So there is a bit of an equity divide there.

6:40:09And I don't think it would cost us anything

6:40:11to advocate for this.

6:40:12So it would add to the plan costs,

6:40:15but I'll chat you up about that later.

6:40:17I'm just wondering if some of those are options for us.

6:40:24Does anybody wanna answer that now or is it a takeaway?

6:40:27Yeah, through you Madam Chair, the counsellor Kaden.

6:40:30This is something that consistently came up

6:40:33in the community working groups.

6:40:36I'm gonna paraphrase they said the low income cutoffs

6:40:41often are not conscious of what people call the working poor

6:40:48or is not sort of flexible enough for various situations.

6:40:54That's why the community working group members

6:40:56really emphasize stories and understanding the residents,

6:41:00each unique circumstances.

6:41:03And so that what you brought up,

6:41:06counsellor Kaden was reflected in the community working groups.

6:41:12I'll reach out to you for potentially

6:41:15have an emotion in there for the end of month.

6:41:17Thank you.

6:41:19Thank you counsellor Kaden, counsellor Boussatel please.

6:41:24It's hard to contain my excitement for this Brian.

6:41:27I really appreciate this.

6:41:29I remember a long time ago

6:41:30when you brought the greener homes program

6:41:33and I said what about the people who can't pay

6:41:35for those renovations and then send in their invoices afterwards.

6:41:39So I really, really appreciate all of this work

6:41:41and the designing in your greener homes program.

6:41:46So thank you for that.

6:41:48I have a question for the researchers.

6:41:51You talked about the energy and equity

6:41:53and wealth concentrated neighborhoods.

6:41:56Do you have a heat map of those neighborhoods

6:41:59for some of my colleagues like counsellor Gowler

6:42:02and counsellor Kaden and myself,

6:42:04we sit on public health as well.

6:42:05And so we're quite connected

6:42:06to the social determinants of health.

6:42:08And I can name the four neighborhoods

6:42:12in the city of Guelph that I would think

6:42:16have priority kind of needs here.

6:42:19So I'm curious and I'd like to see the heat map

6:42:22if you have something available

6:42:25and it can come back to us at the end of the month

6:42:27or through Brian later on in the community.

6:42:30That would be good as a counsellor

6:42:31as I'm going about and organizing events

6:42:34and having conversations with people.

6:42:37The second thing is about the budget

6:42:39and I kind of the question that I asked Evan was

6:42:43because there's two halves to the walnut, right?

6:42:45There's the technical knowledge

6:42:46and there's that community development,

6:42:47those connections, those trust.

6:42:49And many of our agencies do OESP,

6:42:52the Ontario Energy Support Program,

6:42:54do things like the community volunteer income tax program.

6:42:57So they're having conversations around property,

6:43:00seniors property tax grants

6:43:02and those kinds of things with people

6:43:05that perhaps in designing,

6:43:07because money is a concern,

6:43:09instead of having a big huge project

6:43:11that may be investing in the technical side

6:43:14and working with the social service agencies

6:43:17that when you're doing your backpack drive,

6:43:19when you're doing your Christmas hapers,

6:43:20when you're coming to the food hub,

6:43:22when you're doing these kinds of things,

6:43:23having the materials to have those conversations,

6:43:26because those agencies already have that information

6:43:29in front of them.

6:43:30So it's just more of a community development approach

6:43:33from the grassroots to bring in the trusted expert

6:43:37to work alongside them and say,

6:43:39here's someone who can help with your housing

6:43:42kind of draftiness and those kinds of things

6:43:45and your utility bills.

6:43:46So that's just a question

6:43:48because I didn't see a budget in here

6:43:50and I'm sure it'll come at some point,

6:43:52but some way to make it sustainable in your design.

6:43:57Happy to comment if you want to.

6:44:03Through you, Chair, to Councillor Bustill,

6:44:05I'm gonna start off the question

6:44:07or response to the question if that's okay.

6:44:11I do wanna just recognize

6:44:12this is the start of a conversation.

6:44:14There's been a lot of information

6:44:16that has come out of the discussions

6:44:19through the months of work that the research team

6:44:22and that we've done with coalition and the working group.

6:44:25So we will be looking at kind of implementation

6:44:28planning and then coming forward

6:44:29with associated budget requests

6:44:33or requirements if appropriate.

6:44:38I did wanna speak to, as you're saying,

6:44:42kind of the, I think your characterization

6:44:47was two sides of the nut.

6:44:50Yes, so in terms of the trust, the relationships,

6:44:53the networks that are out there,

6:44:55the technical side of it too.

6:44:57So those conversations did come up.

6:45:00We do have to recognize there are capacity constraints

6:45:02as well within other organizations.

6:45:05Even conversations, sorry, something to add to,

6:45:09conversations with the public, sorry,

6:45:11the Planning, Environment, and Water Advisory Committee.

6:45:15There was a comment about also looking at,

6:45:19not only looking at conventional so-called energy-minded NGOs,

6:45:24but also even looking at just NGOs that are out there.

6:45:27And then are having those touch points with people.

6:45:30And as you were alluding to,

6:45:33as having that opening to have that conversation

6:45:35and bringing that out there.

6:45:37So I think very much so that, at least from my perspective

6:45:41and participating in the working group discussions,

6:45:44there was just so much, as Darius said, expertise in the room

6:45:52and to not utilize that capacity

6:45:57and the interest and engagement, I think would be silly of us.

6:46:02The technical, as speaking as an engineer,

6:46:04is usually the easy part.

6:46:06So I'm gonna pass it over to Dr. Tozer

6:46:12and she can respond further.

6:46:15Yeah, sure.

6:46:16On the, through you, Madam Chair, to Councillor Pestil.

6:46:20We did prepare a number of maps, a package of maps,

6:46:23that include concentrations in particular areas

6:46:26in Guelph.

6:46:27And we recommended at one point in the action areas,

6:46:31some neighborhoods that could be a focus for

6:46:36place-specific areas of emphasis for outreach.

6:46:39So for example, St. George's, the Junction,

6:46:42Rickson Ridge, two rivers, downtown,

6:46:45Hanlon Creek and Onward Willow.

6:46:48And we have this package of maps that will be available.

6:46:54Brian and Tijo will have

6:46:55and can be used for policy making

6:46:57so that they can help to inform the design

6:46:59and implementation for many of these programs.

6:47:02We wanted to make sure, strike that balance

6:47:05between knowing where to focus efforts,

6:47:09if there's that emphasis that needs to take place

6:47:12and design and implementation,

6:47:14but also to avoid the stigmatization

6:47:19that might happen from the prominent map in the planet itself.

6:47:24And then yes, for the,

6:47:26I'll just add a little bit on the community connection.

6:47:29What you were suggesting was really heavily discussed

6:47:34and fleshed out as part of the coaching program,

6:47:37as something that the coaching program might do as a focus

6:47:41to work with organizations and agencies

6:47:44and outreach staff, people with expertise

6:47:48and existing relationships with these households

6:47:51so that we can, in a resource supportive way,

6:47:54not in a downloading way, make sure that there's some

6:47:57connections for these households

6:47:59to energy related supports in the same way

6:48:01that they're getting supports in other areas.

6:48:06Thank you, and through you Madam Chair,

6:48:08just a supplemental.

6:48:09I noticed that there was no neighborhood identified

6:48:12in Ward 4, which is a surprise

6:48:13since it's a priority neighborhood

6:48:15on the social determinants of health.

6:48:16And I'll follow up on that.

6:48:18And it's on the other side of the Hanlon.

6:48:20So Shelldale, Onward Willow, one side of the Hanlon,

6:48:23the other side.

6:48:25And I think I just wanted to clarify to Brian's comment.

6:48:29I'm not suggesting social service agencies take this on,

6:48:32but as a social service provider,

6:48:34you have a service on every plan.

6:48:36And you know when you've got those contact points

6:48:38with people, they're coming in for their holiday hampers.

6:48:41They're coming in for backpacks.

6:48:42They're coming.

6:48:43So this is another contact opportunity

6:48:45whether it's yourself or you're bridging to someone else.

6:48:49It's my suggestion in terms of efficiencies

6:48:51and being sustainable.

6:48:53Thank you.

6:48:57Thank you, counselors and Mayor Guthrie.

6:49:00That's the end of my speaker, my questions list.

6:49:04Mayor Guthrie, I do have your,

6:49:07I'm noting you for comments.

6:49:08And I also know that after we work through the recommendations

6:49:11that I've got a motion for you as well.

6:49:13I do have one question before I move on to comments

6:49:16and then I'll start my list.

6:49:20Brian, I reached out to you yesterday

6:49:24about the maximum temperature bylaw.

6:49:27And I was curious at that moment,

6:49:29if anybody was moving it and you gave me a response.

6:49:32And I just wanted to share that with the rest of council

6:49:35if that was okay and the public

6:49:38and what the plan is for that.

6:49:41Sorry, sorry, was there a question in that?

6:49:43Is the question that you, if you can share that?

6:49:46Or sorry.

6:49:47Oh, sorry.

6:49:48Would you please talk about the next steps

6:49:51for the maximum temperature bylaw?

6:49:56Brian and I are looking at each other

6:49:58because Doug Godfrey, who I said,

6:50:01didn't need to stick around tonight,

6:50:02I would answer the question.

6:50:03So I will answer on Doug's behalf

6:50:06because I think he's provided this answer

6:50:07to a few of you and through Brian.

6:50:09So Doug participates in the Rent Safe Initiative

6:50:11where representatives from municipal bylaw

6:50:14and public health associations get together

6:50:16along with other provincial stakeholders

6:50:18to work collaboratively on substandard housing issues.

6:50:21As an example, last year they developed a model bylaw

6:50:24that municipalities could consider

6:50:25that addressed mold concerns this year.

6:50:28The initiative that they're looking at

6:50:29is the maximum temperature bylaw.

6:50:31So under that Rent Safe Initiative,

6:50:33they are looking at a variety of bylaws and information,

6:50:36including the city of Toronto,

6:50:37which is the one you may have heard about,

6:50:39as well as recommendations from the

6:50:40Climate Action Partnership.

6:50:42And so it's Doug's intention that once that working group

6:50:45has sort of done their work, rather than us getting out ahead,

6:50:48we wanted to work with that provincial association.

6:50:50And then Doug will be bringing that back

6:50:53through the executive team for consideration about,

6:50:56and then we'll look at what potential next steps

6:50:57might be to bring that forward.

6:51:00Thank you, that's exactly the answer

6:51:02that I was looking for, so I appreciate that.

6:51:06I saw Mayor Kamgathri asking for comments

6:51:11and looking around to the side of the room

6:51:14are there comments from the side?

6:51:15No, and I don't see anyone else.

6:51:17So over to you.

6:51:19Great, thank you, Anthony,

6:51:20your chair, just very quick comments.

6:51:22Just to say thank you very much for this.

6:51:24I actually really, really enjoyed this.

6:51:26I also want to say thank you to the community group,

6:51:29those with lived experience and your team here as well,

6:51:32for what you did in providing this information.

6:51:35I also, it would be remiss if I didn't give

6:51:38a little bit of a thank you also

6:51:40to the Global Covenant of Mayors,

6:51:42which as you know I'm part of.

6:51:44My time is coming to an end there,

6:51:45but I remember that this was being talked about

6:51:49with the Global Covenant of Mayors Group

6:51:51for the last little while, probably over a year now.

6:51:55And this is the importance of sort of these types of groups

6:52:00because I remember, and I'm so sorry,

6:52:02I can't remember her name,

6:52:03but she's the mayor from a city in Argentina

6:52:06and she was talking about programs

6:52:08that she was doing there similar for,

6:52:11and she had a lot of data.

6:52:13And then it kind of became embedded

6:52:15into some of the strategic plan ideas

6:52:17under the Global Covenant of Mayors,

6:52:18which is now why it's kind of an ask

6:52:21all of the different cities

6:52:24that are a part of Global Covenant of Mayors.

6:52:27And when I go to that the last couple of years,

6:52:31I've been only really speaking

6:52:33about the Guelph-Greener Homes Initiative.

6:52:35Then I recently started talking to them

6:52:37about the grant portion.

6:52:41I have a meeting with Global Covenant of Mayors

6:52:43coming up really soon,

6:52:44and now I'm gonna be able to talk about

6:52:46the timing is amazing.

6:52:48I'm gonna be able to talk to them about this.

6:52:50And this is the kind of sort of sharing of stuff

6:52:52that what Guelph is doing is,

6:52:55and I'm just honored to be able to go

6:52:57and just tell everybody the good work that we're doing.

6:52:59And it's the sharing part with my colleagues

6:53:03across the world with Global Covenant of Mayors

6:53:06that I'm able to do,

6:53:07and then I learned from them too, it's reciprocal back,

6:53:10but this is a check mark under the requirements

6:53:14of what the city has signed on

6:53:15for under Global Covenant of Mayors.

6:53:17And so I'm actually really excited

6:53:20to be able to go and show them this work that you've done.

6:53:23I think it will make an impact actually

6:53:26with other cities around the world.

6:53:27I honestly believe that.

6:53:29So really, really great work.

6:53:31Thank you very much for what you've done.

6:53:35Thank you, Mayor Guthrie.

6:53:37And I will just wrap up by saying,

6:53:40I think that this is a really smart way

6:53:44to approach key problems in our community.

6:53:47I think that I'm hearing around the horseshoe

6:53:50from my colleagues.

6:53:51I think Councillor Caitlin said, I love it.

6:53:55And I have to echo that.

6:53:57This is a really great way for us to look at challenges.

6:54:00And thank you for all of the work from staff

6:54:04and from the research team putting this together for us.

6:54:07I know that it represents a lot of work.

6:54:10And I did wanna also mention one more thing

6:54:13that I heard from our delegate,

6:54:15which is that the least responsible people

6:54:17for climate change are the most vulnerable.

6:54:19And I just think that was an important takeaway

6:54:21for me from that conversation.

6:54:23So thank you for this work into energy equity

6:54:26and energy inequity.

6:54:27And I am going to call the vote on the recommendations.

6:54:32And first I'm going to ask Councillor Gibson

6:54:35if he's voting in favor or against?

6:54:39In favor.

6:54:41In favor, thank you.

6:54:42And for the rest of us in the room and online,

6:54:45is there anybody against the recommendations?

6:54:49No, I'm seeing no one.

6:54:51That pass is unanimously.

6:54:52Thank you everyone.

6:54:54Thank you for the presentation.

6:54:55Thank you for the conversation.

6:54:57And before I move on,

6:54:58thank you for putting your hand up Mayor Guthrie.

6:55:01We do have Mayor Guthrie who has a motion

6:55:04that he'd like to place on the floor.

6:55:06Mayor Guthrie, I'm gonna hand things over to you

6:55:08to talk a little bit about it.

6:55:09And also to find your seconder

6:55:12or tell me who your seconder is.

6:55:14There we go, Councillor Goller.

6:55:15Thank you.

6:55:16Councillor Goller agreed to do that.

6:55:18So I did send this in advance

6:55:20and I'll just read it out loud

6:55:22that through the RFP process

6:55:24to evaluate the city's role in affordable housing,

6:55:27that energy efficiency be included as a component

6:55:29for evaluation in future delivery models.

6:55:32Okay, what that means is as we are now stepping into

6:55:37the space of sort of home building units

6:55:40and the units that we're looking to try to do

6:55:42are in the affordable unit market space,

6:55:48that my thinking is that if we are going to be the ones

6:55:52that are stepping in to build these types of units,

6:55:55that we should also be looking to advance this energy equity

6:55:58in those very units that we are responsible for.

6:56:02So that the very tenants that are coming into these

6:56:04are gonna have those lower utility costs.

6:56:08And we're taking a little bit of a leadership role

6:56:11to show people how it can be done.

6:56:15So that's my pitch to my colleagues.

6:56:18It's as simple as that and that's it.

6:56:21So happy to take questions if need be

6:56:23but I hope I explained it well enough.

6:56:26Thank you.

6:56:27Are there any questions for the mover?

6:56:30Nope, I see none.

6:56:31So I will be calling the vote.

6:56:33Are there anyone, is anyone against the motion?

6:56:38Nope, there are no one and that passes unanimously.

6:56:42So thank you for bringing this idea forward, Mayor Guthrie.

6:56:47I appreciate it and I think all of us

6:56:49appreciate the effort there.

6:56:52Before we move on, I'm going to preempt something

6:56:58before we get past eight.

6:57:01So Dylan has let me know that the automatic time

6:57:06for adjournment for committee of the whole is 8 p.m.

6:57:09So I'd like to ask my colleagues

6:57:13if we're okay to go past 8 p.m.

6:57:16Is anyone against?

6:57:20Oh, thank you, sorry.

6:57:22Mayor Guthrie and Councillor Goller

6:57:23are moving and seconding anybody against?

6:57:26Call it again.

6:57:28No, I'm seeing no one and Councillor Gibson,

6:57:31could you just clarify?

6:57:32I think that you're fine.

6:57:34I'm fine.

6:57:35Thank you.

6:57:37So we've got staff switching over to our last item,

6:57:43which is a recommendation report for a new fee structure

6:57:47for our building permit applications.

6:57:53Just pulling up everybody who's...

6:57:59So this is a public meeting under section seven

6:58:01of the Building Code Act.

6:58:03Delegations are permitted a maximum of 10 minutes.

6:58:07We do have a presentation from our chief building officer,

6:58:10Jeremy Lorr, who is standing right in front of me already.

6:58:12So thank you.

6:58:14And we've also got Jim Bruzezi, did I get it right?

6:58:19BMA Management Consulting Inc. here as well.

6:58:22So thank you for being here.

6:58:24And I'm gonna hand things over to you, Mr. Lorr.

6:58:29Thank you.

6:58:30Great, thank you.

6:58:32Good evening.

6:58:34So I'm Jeremy Lorr, chief building official.

6:58:37And really I'm just here to introduce Jim Bruzeez,

6:58:42but first I just say we engage the services

6:58:46of BMA Management Consulting Inc.

6:58:50to carry out the building permit fees study.

6:58:53And Jim Bruzeez is here with a presentation on that for us.

6:58:59Thank you.

6:59:03Thank you and welcome, Mr. Bruzeez.

6:59:06Thank you, Madam Chairman, members of council.

6:59:25As Jeremy said, we've conducted a comprehensive review

6:59:30of the golf building permit fees.

6:59:34The last review was done a number of years ago.

6:59:37And since that last review, there's been a number of changes

6:59:41to the Building Code Act, which has in effect changed

6:59:44some of the processes required in the building operations

6:59:48that must be or should be reflected in the user fees.

6:59:53The objectives of the study was first of all,

6:59:57to ensure compliance with the Ontario Building Code Act.

7:00:01And under the act, it states that user fees must be based

7:00:07on the anticipated reasonable cost

7:00:10of providing the service.

7:00:12The next objective is to support full cost recovery

7:00:16and financial sustainability.

7:00:18And in that, we've included all of the direct cost

7:00:22and indirect costs associated with enforcement

7:00:25of the building code.

7:00:26And then maintain transparent, equitable,

7:00:30and defensible fees and fee structures.

7:00:33We provide a clear rationale for each of the fee calculations,

7:00:38alignment with best municipal practices.

7:00:43So we've also reflected some of the insights

7:00:45from some of the comparator municipalities

7:00:48that we undertook benchmarking with.

7:00:54So in terms of just a little bit of the background,

7:00:58in terms of the building services,

7:01:01it's quite a lot of workload involved.

7:01:06They process about 1,800 building permits annually.

7:01:11And these building permits obviously cover

7:01:14three different classes of properties,

7:01:16or four different classes of properties,

7:01:18essentially residential, multi-residential,

7:01:22industrial, and commercial.

7:01:24And some of the actions or activities,

7:01:29the building department conducts plan reviews,

7:01:32inspections, and enforcement.

7:01:34The building department operates under an enterprise fund,

7:01:38which means that the funding of the expenditures

7:01:43of the building department to enforce the building code

7:01:46is entirely met from user fees,

7:01:49and there's no taxation subsidy involved.

7:01:57Looked at the trends in terms of building construction,

7:02:01and you can see here,

7:02:03this is the construction activity in dollars

7:02:07from 2021 to 2025.

7:02:10You can see that there was a trend upwards from 21 to 23.

7:02:15It actually peaked in 23 at 892 million.

7:02:19And then from then, the last couple of years,

7:02:22there's been an economic downturn

7:02:25that you're all aware of.

7:02:27And then building activity dropped from the 892 million

7:02:31to 365 million, and then in 2025, 451 million.

7:02:36So you can see from this chart,

7:02:38building activity is very volatile.

7:02:42And the other thing that the chart did show

7:02:47is that, sorry, I think I'm going the right way now.

7:03:07Yeah, sorry.

7:03:08Yeah, so in terms of the construction activity

7:03:10on this chart also, you can see the color codes.

7:03:14The blue represents residential construction,

7:03:18and you can see that it's been relatively flat

7:03:22over the five-year period, slight reduction in 2025 from 2021.

7:03:29But the bigger construction activity involved

7:03:33the multi-residential sector, the red lines there,

7:03:36and you can see that it was quite extensive

7:03:38over the last five years.

7:03:39And then the other one is the ICI.

7:03:42There was a lot of ICI activity over the last five years.

7:03:49In terms of the volumes, the number of building permits,

7:03:53you can see from this chart,

7:03:55the construction activity was very volatile.

7:03:59But the number of permits, you can see it's pretty flat.

7:04:02And as I say, it averaged about 1,864 permits a year.

7:04:08So it's been relatively stable over the period.

7:04:12The thing, though, with the building permits,

7:04:17there's been a growing share of lower revenue,

7:04:20higher workload-type permits.

7:04:25So there's been, over the last couple of years,

7:04:29some of the multi-residential, for example,

7:04:31has decreased slightly,

7:04:33but that's been taken up from alterations and renovations.

7:04:40In terms of the revenue performance,

7:04:43the red line shows the budget, budgeted revenues.

7:04:48You can see that in 2024, in 2025,

7:04:54it's looking at the blue line,

7:04:56the actual revenues were a lot lower

7:05:01than the budgeted revenues.

7:05:03In 2024, the actual revenues were about 4.4 million

7:05:08lower than the budget.

7:05:09And in 2025, they were about 3.2 million lower

7:05:13than the budget.

7:05:19So the Building Code Act, as a result of that volatility

7:05:23that I talked about in terms of building construction

7:05:25and the types of construction,

7:05:28the Building Code Act allows municipalities

7:05:31to implement reserves.

7:05:35And that's a way of smoothing that volatility.

7:05:38And Guelph has obviously implemented a reserve fund.

7:05:43And this is the Building Reserve Fund,

7:05:45balances from 2021 to 2020, projected 2026.

7:05:50And you can see it was fairly healthy in 21, 22, 23.

7:05:54And then, as a result of that decline

7:05:57in the construction activity,

7:05:59you can see that there was draws

7:06:01from the Building Stabilization Reserve

7:06:03to fund the expenditures.

7:06:05And it dropped from 5.8 million at its peak

7:06:10to at the end of 2025, about 1.3 million.

7:06:14But it's projected to actually be in a negative

7:06:17by the end of 2026.

7:06:24Best practices in terms of reserve funds,

7:06:27what you should keep in reserve funds

7:06:29in terms of operating costs.

7:06:33And the leading practice is that

7:06:35what municipalities try to do

7:06:37is to have a building reserve balance

7:06:42that is about 100 to 300% of the operating costs.

7:06:46And again, that's to smooth that volatility

7:06:50that we looked at.

7:06:54So in terms of the methodology,

7:06:56we looked at all of the costs,

7:06:58the direct costs, the indirect costs.

7:07:00We did a process mapping exercise with staff

7:07:03where they identified all of the processes

7:07:07that are involved in the application review,

7:07:10the plan checks, the site inspections,

7:07:13and the issuance of the permit.

7:07:15And then they also identified the staff

7:07:19that were involved and the number of hours

7:07:21for each of the activities under each of those activities.

7:07:26The cost assignment, what we did is based

7:07:29on the full cost and the processing activities,

7:07:33we calculated hourly rates for the cost of services

7:07:37and we put those into buckets

7:07:40in terms of residential, commercial,

7:07:45and special project permits.

7:07:50So it was an activity-based costing exercise

7:07:52that we undertook, which in effect links the staff time

7:07:55and resources to the types of permits.

7:07:59We used the process maps and burden hourly rates.

7:08:03What I mean by burden hourly rates is that

7:08:06to calculate the hours of the individuals

7:08:08performing the services, we only use productive hours.

7:08:13So what we do is we reduce the total number

7:08:17of potential hours in a year and subtract things

7:08:21like vacation pay, sick time, that type of thing,

7:08:24to come up with the direct processing productive hours.

7:08:30So that provides a defensible evidence-based costing

7:08:34and improves equity across the permit types.

7:08:38So some of the key findings, the current fees

7:08:41do not recover the full fees, as we saw from the charges

7:08:46to the reserve.

7:08:47Renovations and alterations were significantly underpriced

7:08:51when we did our process mapping and costing.

7:08:53Non-residential projects involve greater complexity

7:08:59and that should be reflected in terms of

7:09:03renovation and alteration costs.

7:09:06What's happening now is your renovation

7:09:08and alteration permit fee is identical,

7:09:12regardless of the class of permit.

7:09:15So residential, commercial, industrial

7:09:17all pay the same fee currently.

7:09:20And what we're recommending is that there's different

7:09:23resource involvements in terms of commercial

7:09:26versus residential, industrial versus residential.

7:09:29So that renovation alteration fee should be adjusted

7:09:35accordingly and a different charge

7:09:37for each property class.

7:09:40So as a result of the current situation,

7:09:43there's some cross-subsidization between permit types.

7:09:46In fact, what's happening is the new development

7:09:49is supporting the renovations and alterations,

7:09:53subsidizing the renovations and alterations.

7:09:58So the current fees, you're employing

7:09:59a lot of the best, most of the best practices.

7:10:02You're charging a per square foot fee

7:10:04by building classification.

7:10:07You have flat fees for small projects,

7:10:09things like decks and pools.

7:10:11You have a minimum permit fee and there's annual updates

7:10:17that are done through a dedicated bylaw.

7:10:20And generally what's happening is you're inflating it

7:10:23by the salary and benefit increases,

7:10:27which is the majority of the cost of the building department.

7:10:30Some of the changes that we propose,

7:10:34as I talked about renovations and alterations,

7:10:36we're recommending an increase in renovation

7:10:39and alteration fees and also differentiating

7:10:43residential versus non-residential renovation

7:10:46and alteration fees.

7:10:49There's been more modest increases in new construction.

7:10:52As I said, right now, the new construction

7:10:55is essentially supporting the alterations and renovations

7:11:00and maintaining the flat fees for the smaller projects.

7:11:04So the outcome of that is improved cost recovery,

7:11:08better alignment between workload and fees,

7:11:11and reduced cross-up subsidization.

7:11:16Some of the things, as I say, we looked at

7:11:19best practices from other municipalities

7:11:22and these are items that we saw in other user fees

7:11:25of other municipalities that we are recommending

7:11:31that they be reviewed for implementation

7:11:33in the city of Guelph.

7:11:35Things like expedited permit review fees.

7:11:38So in a lot of municipalities,

7:11:40builders want an expedited permit.

7:11:43They want to close quickly.

7:11:46And some municipalities provide that service,

7:11:48but they charge a higher, obviously, higher fee for it.

7:11:51Stale permit maintenance fees.

7:11:55One of the issues is that there's a number of

7:11:58stale permits that are, for example, beyond a year

7:12:03and there's a cost to maintain those.

7:12:05So that should be a separate charge to the person

7:12:08that has the outstanding permit.

7:12:11And that's an incentive for the person

7:12:14to close on the permit.

7:12:16Transfer fees with ownership changes.

7:12:20Re-inspection fees.

7:12:23A lot of municipalities do a re-inspection charge

7:12:27after the second inspection.

7:12:30And again, it's an incentive to make sure

7:12:32that the work is done properly the first time.

7:12:35Additional plan review.

7:12:37And again, the same situation.

7:12:39A lot of municipalities charge for plan resubmissions

7:12:43after the second submission.

7:12:47And again, it's an incentive to put in appropriate plans.

7:12:55So in terms of the benchmarking,

7:12:56as they say, we conducted a benchmarking.

7:12:59The other classes are included in the report,

7:13:02but just to show you the residential class,

7:13:04you can see the municipalities that we compared against.

7:13:07The peer municipalities.

7:13:09Mostly municipalities in the surrounding area.

7:13:13And you can see the green dotted line.

7:13:17The average currently, the yellow,

7:13:21well fees are the current fees for residential.

7:13:25And you're just slightly below the average.

7:13:28And as a result of the recommended changes,

7:13:32you're just slightly above the average.

7:13:36But one of the things that I should note on this as well

7:13:39is that a number of these municipalities

7:13:42are facing the same situation as the city of Guelph

7:13:45and are currently undertaking planning fees.

7:13:47So again, this chart will change over the course of the year.

7:13:55So we did some scenario testing.

7:13:57As a result of the fee increases,

7:13:59what would happen across different scenarios?

7:14:02So we looked at the highest construction activity,

7:14:06which was in 2023.

7:14:09The construction value was about 892 million.

7:14:13Based on that, you collected about 4.6 million.

7:14:18Based on our fee recommendations,

7:14:21that would have been 5.8 million.

7:14:24So an increase of about 1.1 million.

7:14:27And it would have actually provided a surplus.

7:14:31Scenario two, the lowest.

7:14:33The lowest construction value was 451,000.

7:14:39The fees collected on that was about 2.2 million.

7:14:43Based on our fee calculation, recommended fees,

7:14:46that would equate to about 2.7 million.

7:14:49So an increase of 500,000.

7:14:52And then looking at the average over the five years,

7:14:56the current fees were 3.2 million.

7:14:59And based on the new fees, they would be about 4 million,

7:15:03which is an increase of about 751,000.

7:15:07So you can see from a couple of the scenarios,

7:15:10the fee increases alone don't eliminate the deficits.

7:15:14Construction activity has to also be increasing

7:15:19to reach a break-even situation.

7:15:23And the other thing that this shows is it reinforces

7:15:27the need to have a reserve fund.

7:15:31So we're recommending that you adopt the proposed 2026,

7:15:372027 fee schedule on an ongoing basis

7:15:42that you annually adjust the fees

7:15:44based on the salary and benefit increases.

7:15:49Maintain a reserve, try to maintain a reserve balance

7:15:51of about 100 to 300% of the operating expenditures

7:15:55and evaluate the implementation

7:15:58of those new administrative fees that I talked about.

7:16:02And that's the end of the presentation, Madam Chair,

7:16:05and be happy to answer any questions.

7:16:09Thank you very much for the presentation.

7:16:11I'd like to ask my colleagues if you have any questions.

7:16:17Councillor Goller.

7:16:19Thank you, I'm through you, Chair Klassen.

7:16:22Thank you very much for the presentation.

7:16:24My question is about the implementation

7:16:27and I'm not sure if that would go to,

7:16:28but we approve this at the end of the month.

7:16:31When do the new fees take place

7:16:33and how do we notify the people

7:16:36that are builders and whatnot about the new fees?

7:16:43Sorry, through you, sorry, through you, Chair.

7:16:47So the bylaw that is attached with recommendation number two,

7:16:55you would see in it that the 2026 changes would come

7:17:01and in fact, July 1st doesn't leave us a lot of time

7:17:06between when it's approved and but we have been notifying

7:17:11our regular customers of this.

7:17:14We did give this presentation

7:17:18to the Home Builders Association as an example.

7:17:21So they're aware that there's a potential

7:17:24for the fees to be increasing.

7:17:27So.

7:17:29Perfect, I appreciate that.

7:17:31And as a follow-up in the presentation through you,

7:17:35I guess it's a separate question.

7:17:37Sorry, it's getting late.

7:17:39In the presentation when we saw the rates

7:17:41for the different municipalities,

7:17:43I noticed that Kitchener was significant to lower

7:17:45than what we are proposing for Guelph now and what we have.

7:17:49Can you help me understand why our fees

7:17:52are comparatively quite a bit higher

7:17:54than Kitchener-Waterloo?

7:17:56Yeah, I'll just start off and I think Jeremy

7:18:00can respond more thoroughly with that.

7:18:05A lot of the construction activity in Kitchener

7:18:10and Waterloo revolves around a lot of higher construction

7:18:15properties, higher multi-residential properties,

7:18:20that type of thing, but I'll let Jeremy.

7:18:25Yeah, thank you.

7:18:27Through you, Chair.

7:18:28So I did touch on it a little bit in the report on page four

7:18:33and there I just indicated that it was important

7:18:36to recognize Guelph's unique context

7:18:38when compared to other municipalities.

7:18:41Several of the comparators with lower permit fees

7:18:44have similarly sized building departments

7:18:46but are able to generate higher revenue per permit

7:18:50because they allow taller buildings in greater density

Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.

Check this against the City’s official minutes

The motion, the vote and the debate come from the City of Guelph’s published record, reproduced rather than interpreted. The document summaries above are the exception: those words were written for this site.

See the rest of this meeting