City Council · December 11, 2024 · Item 4.1
Guelph City Council urges the Ontario government to continue to permit the operation and funding of the Guelph consumption and treatment site beyond the proposed termination…
Main motion under the agenda item Impact from Closure of Guelph Consumption and Treatment Services Site - 2024-407
Defeated (4 to 7)
4 in favour, 7 against
This was one of 6 motions on the same item
In the order council took them. A vote makes sense next to the ones around it.
- 1/6Main motionGuelph City Council urges the Ontario government to continue to permit the operation and funding of the Guelph consumption and treatment site beyond the proposed termination…Differs here: …proposed termination date in March 2025. That Guelph City Council encourages the Ontario government to maintain, if not expand, funding for the…no recorded vote
- 2/6Main motionGuelph City Council urges the Ontario government to continue to permit the operation and funding of the Guelph consumption and treatment site beyond the proposed termination…you are hereDiffers here: …proposed termination date in March 2025, at least until the HART hub is fully operational. That Guelph City Council encourages the Ontario government to maintain, if not expand, funding for the…Defeated (4 to 7)
- 3/6Main motionGuelph City Council urges the Ontario government to continue to permit the operation and funding of the Guelph consumption and treatment site beyond the proposed termination…Differs here: …proposed termination date in March 2025.Carried (9 to 2)
- 4/6Main motionGuelph City Council encourages the Ontario government to maintain, if not expand, funding for the proposed Homelessness and Addiction Recovery Treatment (HART) hubs.Carried (11 to 0)
- 5/6Main motionGuelph City Council encourages the Ontario Government to not take steps to prohibit the establishment of supervised consumption sites, including urgent public health needs sites (UPHNS).Carried (7 to 4)
- 6/6Main motionThis resolution be forwarded to the Premier of Ontario, the Minister of Finance, the Health Minister…Carried (11 to 0)
What was voted on
The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.
That Guelph City Council urges the Ontario government to continue to permit the operation and funding of the Guelph consumption and treatment site beyond the proposed termination date in March 2025, at least until the HART hub is fully operational. That Guelph City Council encourages the Ontario government to maintain, if not expand, funding for the proposed Homelessness and Addiction Recovery Treatment (HART) hubs. That Guelph City Council encourages the Ontario Government to not take steps to prohibit the establishment of supervised consumption sites, including urgent public health needs sites (UPHNS). That this resolution be forwarded to the Premier of Ontario, the Minister of Finance, the Health Minister, AMO and to municipalities that currently have an operating consumption and treatment service and/or supervised consumption site(s).
Moved by Councillor O'Rourke, seconded by Councillor Richardson.
How the room voted
In favour (4)
- Billings
- Guthrie
- O'Rourke
- Richardson
Against (7)
- Allt
- Busuttil
- Caron
- Caton
- Downer
- Goller
- Klassen
Who spoke to it
Councillor Allt introduced Impact from Closure of Guelph Consumption and Treatment Services Site. The following delegates spoke: Brad Evoy Amelia Meister Mars Russell on behalf of Sarah Bayliss Melissa Kwiatkowski Mars Russell Jean Hopkins The following delegates did not speak: Sarah Bayliss Paige Hutchinson Andrea Baker Jill Francis
What council was given
The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item. The summaries are written automatically, so you can tell what a document is without opening a ninety-page PDF.
- Impact from closure of Consumption and Treatment Services Guelph site - 2024-407.pdf
An information report answering committee questions about what the closing of Guelph's supervised drug consumption site means for emergency services. The province is banning such sites within 200 metres of schools and childcare centres, closing Guelph's by March 31, 2025. Since 2018 the site recorded more than 41,000 visits and reversed 311 drug poisonings. Paramedics say they will keep responding and cannot yet estimate cost impacts.
- Attachment-1 Consumption and Treatment Services Fact Sheet.pdf
- Correspondence - Amelia Meister.pdf
- Correspondence - Jen Britton.pdf
- Correspondence - Jill Francis.pdf
- Correspondence - Jess Metropolyt(1).pdf
- Correspondence - Nix(1).pdf
- Correspondence - Shelby Law.pdf
- Correspondence - Nico Newton.pdf
- Correspondence - Maeve Brennagh-Mackie.pdf
- Correspondence - Rachel Lowenberg.pdf
- Correspondence - Christine Dulal.pdf
A summary is this site’s description of a document, not the City’s. Open the document before relying on one.
What was said
8,219 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.
Read the debate(click to open)
7:45Guelph Consumption and Treatment Services site. Then we will get to the support of Charter
7:51Rights and Freedoms and then after that a motion for the solve the crisis campaign. In regards to
7:58the impact, the closure of the Guelph Consumption and Treatment Services site, this was asked to
8:03be extracted from Councillor Allt. Councillor Allt, I think maybe I'll just turn it over to you if
8:09you don't mind just because I think it's important for you to set the stage before the delegates
8:13come up. Thank you very much Mayor Guthrie. Do you wish me to read out the four motions in front
8:19of us that are on the paper? No, don't. I'm so sorry I interrupted you but no, Councillor Allt. But
8:24maybe just, I'll let you table them as soon as the delegations are done. Absolutely. You can
8:29just be high level right now as to why it's here. Very well. Thank you very much. The reason that
8:34I brought this forward is that I believe it's very important for this Council to reaffirm
8:38its support for safe injection sites similar to the unanimous motion that was passed here a time ago.
8:46Quoting from Guelph's own overdose prevention site, the Guelph Overdose Prevention Site offers
8:52consumption and treatment services to ensure supports are available long term. This was launched
8:57in 2019 and from all reports has been tremendously successful. I think it's really important that
9:05we also acknowledge that most opioids here and elsewhere and other life threatening substances
9:11are taken within a home setting. The safe injection sites admittedly do not dampen consumption.
9:18Only more money for mental health, support, addiction services and treatment can do that.
9:23But regrettably within the province there's far more words than there is action or money being
9:29put toward this similar to what is being done in housing. What concerns me is that by removing
9:35safe injection sites we are giving health care workers an opportunity to go into a battle
9:40with only half the tools. The example that I use, a metaphor, is it's like putting a boxer into a
9:46boxing match with one hand tied behind the individual's match as much as I dislike boxing.
9:53Though I do not agree all the time with John Tory, I think his points about the need for a value
9:58for money audit and to actually embrace evidence-based decision making is really important.
10:05And I liken this to how we dealt with HIV and we dealt with COVID and even earlier on how we dealt
10:12with reproductive choice and the dangers associated with that not so long ago. I also point out that
10:19Toronto Board of Health has made a recommendation to Toronto that despite what the province is doing
10:24Toronto Board of Health should continue to support financially safe injection sites.
10:32So really what I'm stating is that we need to listen to the experts. We need to listen to
10:36frontline staff. We need to listen to the police. We need to recognize that this will have short
10:42and long-term financial and human resource implications if we do not reaffirm this and if
10:48we do not continue on safe injection sites. And this is clearly evident from such things that
10:54we could actually do which have not been done by the provincial government which is provide
10:59for money audits to determine how effective these are. I worry that Guelph could become
11:06an unsafe injection site if we remove a safe injection site. Right now there are people who
11:13choose to go to safe injection sites for many reasons. We have university students who wish to
11:18check the safety of their drugs. That's a fact. We have people on the street who use safe injection
11:26sites and dispose of sharps and other dangerous appliances safely. We have medical staff standing
11:36by. Our challenge is that we are going to raise our costs for paramedics, for police, for on-street
11:42social workers and increase workload stress significantly. It's imperative to me that we
11:50send a message that we need to put money into mental health, put money into housing, put it into
11:54the economy and security and well-being of people and that includes continuing to fund safe injection
12:00sites. The problem is not going to go away. It will go underground. We will have many individuals,
12:08good caring individuals who will set up what they consider to be safe injection sites and these
12:14will be not only dangerous, they will be illegal. This is something that needs to be left to medical
12:19practitioners so that we ensure that we are doing our damnedest to make certain that the fentanyl
12:28and the opioid crisis is dealt with effectively with all the tools at our disposal and all the
12:34tools that the provincial government should finance. Thank you for setting the stage of why
12:41you wanted this forward. We will go to delegations. We have a few, some in video, some in person so
12:48thank you for coming and just so everyone knows it's no more than five minutes and at the four
12:56minute and thirty second mark you'll hear a chime and that gives you the thirty second warning
13:01that your time is almost up. The microphone does get shut off at five minutes so just don't get there
13:07because we want to hear what you have to say in that allotted time. Brad, Evoi is here from
13:14Disability Justice Network of Ontario. Come on down Brad and Emilia, my story is going to join
13:23us after that on video. Yes, thanks Brad and yep the green light is on so you are ready to go.
13:33I'll turn it over to you and are you ready? All right thank you very much folks. My name as
13:40mentioned is Brad Evoi. I'm a member of the Hallaboo McMah nation and I'm the Executive Director
13:48with Disability Justice Network of Ontario. Some of you may remember me from when I was a Guelph
13:54resident a number of years ago and worked around the Ontario Public Interest Research Group so it's
14:00lovely to be back here in Guelph again today a place that I still consider very close to my heart
14:06and home. So I want to first start this by thanking Councillor Allt for bringing forward this motion.
14:13I think it's really important to continue the broad support of overdose prevention sites here in
14:20Guelph. The folks who run the Guelph OPS have been valiant in serving this community for so many years.
14:27I knew them when I lived here and their lives and the lives of the wider community are being
14:34upended to satisfy the anti-evidence and ideological positions of our conservative premier.
14:42Moving the violence and precarity of our systems then out of sight might temporarily
14:48appease some in business or in nimby crowds but it won't last. For those opposed to community
14:57supports in their neighborhoods it might be uncomfortable to see local police violence
15:03and violently arrest unhoused and folks and drug users to observe drug use in public due to closed
15:11or distant supervised consumption sites or you know all of the related pieces of violence
15:18that come from those realities. But this discomfort pales in comparison to the actual dangers faced
15:27by living through these conditions and for folks who are at higher risks for both structural
15:33and interpersonal violence. I'll remind folks that no one has ever died from an overdose
15:40at a supervised consumption site. That people in Ontario instead are dying alone from the toxic
15:48drug crisis and toxic drug supply in their homes all over this province. Further claims that these
15:57sorts of things will benefit children don't address the reality that children have loved
16:02ones who use substances and thus are putting their lives in health at greater risk as well.
16:09Aside from the fact that the unregulated drug supply also directly affects teens and young adults.
16:17The alternative then to these systems that's often being suggested by some a minority I would say
16:25is that a forced treatment. Harkening back to the days of the regional centers and asylum system
16:32where so many disabled folks have suffered throughout this province. And if you think that
16:39this is hyperbole or based in a distant past in another province, Manitoba, the last of these
16:46institutions closed literally yesterday. And this is to say nothing of sheltered workshops and
16:55questionable group homes that are targeting and exploiting disabled communities that are still alive
17:01and well here in Ontario. Ultimately friends the closure of the Guelph OPS is an open form
17:10of social murder. We know what's going to happen here. We know our friends and neighbors will die
17:21without these services. Instead we need expanded broad support for overdose prevention
17:29and social action. We need raising social assistance rates. We need building real accessible
17:37affordable housing. We need rent control. These are the things that will instead improve the lives
17:44of everyone including drug users and their families. The actions of this province again
17:51are open social murder. And I hope that Guelph continues in its long tradition of progressivism
18:00to take a firm stand against all fronts of Doug Ford's war on the poor and marginalized in this
18:07province. Thank you Brad for coming and thank you for your presentation. Is there any follow-up
18:13questions? There isn't so thank you again for coming and starting us off today. Amelia
18:20Meister is going to join us by video and then after that Sarah Bailes is Sarah here? No okay.
18:33Amelia we see you can you just check your mic for us. Yep can you hear me okay?
18:37Yep you're coming through perfect. I'll turn it over to you go ahead. Thank you council.
18:43I want to tell you a story about a friend of mine who died on November 8th because of tainted
18:49supply. This was a death that could have been prevented if he had had adequate access to a
18:54CTS site at the time of using. My friend's name is Miles. He was 20 years old when he died.
19:01He was an incredibly caring person, a brilliant visual artist and he often talked about his
19:06dreams to make art for a living or to become a social worker so he could help people who were
19:11in the same position he once was. He was so silly and he could always make me laugh. He would send
19:17me silly selfies and nonsense memes and videos and joke around all the time. I always found this
19:22incredible because his life had been so hard. People don't just fall into addiction because
19:27they want to. They do so because life feels so hard that the only escape, excuse me, feels through
19:34that brief moment of getting high and he was no exception. On the street at 14 living in shelters,
19:41vulnerable without a consistent loving adult to guide him to ensure he had food, shelter or education.
19:48It's no wonder when someone offered him meth he accepted. Despite that he wanted to get sober. In
19:54the 18 months that I knew him he had gotten sober countless times. Sometimes for a week, sometimes
19:59for over a month but without proper housing, mental health and community support needed it was
20:04nearly impossible to stick to it. I tell you all of this because I want you to understand
20:10that people who use drugs are people with loved ones, friends and community who care deeply about
20:17them. They are people with hopes and dreams. Many of them want to get sober but a lack the
20:22ability to do so because there aren't social systems in place to properly support them and even
20:28if they didn't want to get sober they should still have access to safe supply. It may feel easy to
20:36think of folks using drugs as numbers or some far removed idea from your life but they are all humans
20:42and I urge you to see their humanity today. I also want to remind you that we already have tons
20:49of safe consumption sites downtown. One right next to the CTS site that is being shut down.
20:56Alcohol is a drug and bars are safe consumption sites. They are staffed by people who are legally
21:03mandated to be trained in identifying the signs of alcohol poisoning and refusing service to anyone
21:09who exhibits it and yet we allow and even celebrate the existence of these safe consumption sites
21:16despite alcohol abuse being a major cause of health issues and death in this country and community.
21:22A 24-hour accessible CTS site would have saved my friend Miles' life. I often think of what his
21:30life could have been had he been able to access this life-saving service. I don't want any L1Ls to
21:38die because of lack of access to safe supply. I want to see those who use drugs in our community
21:45to be treated with respect and care and their lives valued. I urge you to vote for this motion
21:52to protect people like my friend Miles as I see any vote against it as a vote for death
21:59of our community members. Thank you. Thank you, Amelia, for your presentation. Is there any follow-up?
22:07There isn't so thank you again for joining us today. Now is Sarah Bayless here? No? Okay and
22:15what about Paige Hutchinson? Okay come on down Paige. Yep, I'll allow it. This is Paige but Paige
22:33is going to read Sarah's message and then we'll count to two and then Paige will do their own
22:42presentation okay? So I'll just... Pardon? This is Mars. I'm so sorry. I'm a different person.
22:49No, it's okay. There's no pushback so you're here on behalf of Sarah Bayless. So go ahead and we'll
22:54listen and go... We might not have any questions just because it's not Sarah but we'll let you do
23:01your talk. Okay go ahead. So thank you. My name is Mars Russell and I'm reading on behalf of Sarah.
23:08Dear Mayor Guthrie and Council, I'd like to start by expressing my sincere gratitude to
23:12Councillor Phil Alt for this motion. I'm consistently impressed by his ability to speak to truth to
23:17power, to engage with us in earnest, and to show what is to be an advocate in his community.
23:23For maybe the first time in my life I feel completely speechless. I don't know what to
23:27say to make those with power withhold another blow to our community. Closing the CTS sites is
23:31an act of social order, labeling its ineffective replacement a heart hub is rubbing our noses in
23:36it. Every individual on this council knows that the war on drugs is ineffective and a waste of
23:41our money and time. If it was effective we wouldn't be having the same conversation that we had during
23:45the Reagan administration. To quote Dr. Carl Hart, it is impossible to talk about drugs without
23:50addressing the elephant in the room or more aptly the albatross around the necks of the vulnerable,
23:55the war on drugs. As we as with previous drug crises the opioid problem is not really about
24:00opioids. It's mainly about cultural, social, and environmental factors such as racism, draconian
24:07drug laws, defunded police, apologies, defunded public health and social services, resistance to
24:12evidence-based practices, and a grossly bloated police budget. I, Sarah, have met with multiple
24:18of you, shown you the data, given you academic and personal stories, and begged for municipal aid.
24:23I know this is a provincial decision and that you're sending a letter that you're hoping to get a
24:27few scraps for the heart hub that you think you're doing the most you can, but you must do more.
24:33We are still in chambers discussing the threat looming over our community as if it is a far away
24:37notion. Those of us who have known the pain of an overdose begged to higher power when resuscitating
24:42a community member or had a loved one killed by the drug poisoning crisis knows that we are
24:46staring down the barrel of a gun. In essence, the war on drugs is not a war on drugs. It is a war
24:51on all of us. Instead of following the science of fiction and evidence-based practices of harm
24:55reduction, we seem dedicated to burying our young, our pained, and our vulnerable. The politicians who
25:00wax poetic about heart hubs fail to speak to the graves that we will dig, the families who will
25:04lose, and the lives that will be stolen. On November 18th, 2024, I attended a memorial vigil
25:09for not one, not two, but six people who died in a two-week period. I didn't see any counselor,
25:14except for Councillor Kate in there. I didn't see any of you helping folks pack their few belongings
25:18in the biting cold day of the St. George's Square eviction either. Similar to the law passing,
25:23council seems to be fine with dishing out destructive policies as long as they don't
25:26have to see the aftershock. Given our collective history, I ask you all to rise above. Not only
25:31do I beg for you to sign these letters and resist the violence from the Ford administration, I beg
25:36you to go further. Be creative in your resistance. Fund grassroots organizing, fund a harm reduction
25:41coalition of local folks to distribute gear, take naloxone courses and carry some on your
25:46person at all times. Offer your time and institutional power to folks who are already doing these things
25:51on a smaller budget. There is so much more to be done here and you are more than just a letter
25:55asking Ford to put the gun down. Be creative and be courageous. You never let a serious crisis go
26:00to waste, Ramamanyu once remarked, and what I mean by that is it's an opportunity to do things you
26:05think could not be done before. Thank you. Thank you, Sarah. Yeah, appreciate it. So I'm so sorry
26:14when I didn't have my glasses on. I should, I thought that you were Paige, but you are not
26:18Paige. Okay, is Paige here then? No. Okay, so Melissa, you are our next. Melissa Karkowski
26:29is from the Guelph Community Health Center. Now, Mars, you are here. So you will be after Melissa,
26:36okay? Thank you. Hi, Melissa. Welcome. Go ahead. Good morning, Mayor Guthrie, counselors,
26:44and staff. Thank you for the opportunity to speak today. My name is Melissa Kouaykeski. I'm the CEO
26:50at Guelph Community Health Center and I'm here to advocate for the motions under 4.1, urging the
26:56province to continue funding and permitting the Guelph Consumption and Treatment Service site.
27:01Today, I'll share why this facility is indispensable to our community's health,
27:06safety, and financial stability. The Auditor General's report makes it clear
27:12closing CTS sites will have dire consequences. The ministry's own analysis predicts more drug
27:19poisoning deaths, increased emergency room visits, a rise in public drug use, and more discarded drug
27:27supplies in our streets. This is not speculation. It is what happens when proven solutions are removed.
27:36Since opening in 2018, the Guelph CTS has hosted over 41,000 visits offering supervised
27:44compassionate care. We've made nearly 1,000 referrals to addiction treatment and primary care,
27:51reversed 311 overdoses with only 12 requiring hospital transfer. Most notably, there have been
27:59zero fatalities. These are lives saved, families kept whole, and resources preserved for other
28:07critical needs. In addition, the work that CTS staff do to prevent drug poisonings from happening in
28:13the first place also diverts from emergency services. Health teaching and education by staff
28:19and our drug checking program give clients the information they need to stay safe.
28:24For example, almost 20% of people made a different decision about their substance use after receiving
28:30testing data from the drug checking program. They either lowered their dose or did not use the substance.
28:39CTS facilities don't just save lives, they save money as well. Calgary's SafeWorks program saved
28:452.3 million in health care costs by reducing ambulance trips and emergency room visits.
28:51If CTS services are discontinued, these costs will shift back to hospitals, paramedics, and
28:57taxpayers, all while worsening outcomes for people who use substances and the broader community.
29:04Supervised consumption sites are essential to community well-being. A U.S. study found that
29:0976% of individuals using CTS services would otherwise consume substances in public.
29:16By offering a safe and supervised alternative, these facilities reduce public drug use and
29:21syringe litter making our streets safer for everyone. While the province's Hearthub's proposal is a
29:28step in addressing addiction, it is not a direct replacement for CTS. I need to make that point
29:35again. It is not a direct replacement for CTS. The AG's report highlights that the hubs lack the
29:43scale, planning, and comprehensive services required to meet the needs of vulnerable populations.
29:49Without harm reduction services like those at CTS, the continuum of care is incomplete,
29:55leaving gaps that put lives at risk. By supporting these motions, Council can deliver a powerful
30:03message to the province. In a public health crisis, we must prioritize evidence-based solutions that
30:10save lives, reduce costs, and strengthen community safety. This is about more than health policy.
30:18It's about who we are as a community. The data is clear, the evidence is compelling, and the stakes
30:25couldn't be higher. Let us stand together to protect what works and to ensure that no more
30:31lives are needlessly lost in Guelph. Thank you for your time and consideration.
30:38Thank you, Melissa. I have a question from Councillor Cawson.
30:42Yes, thank you for your presentation. I had a question with regard to some of the partners in
30:51the community, social services, and local boards like the hospital, the police, the library.
30:57I was wondering if you have had a chance to connect with some of these partners and talk
31:01about what potentially some of the consequences could be if and when the CTS site closes next year.
31:10Thank you for your question through you, Mayor. This is happening on a few different fronts.
31:16Some of this work is happening at the Wellington Guelph Drug Strategy table. Some of this work
31:22is happening at the OHT. I was just on a call yesterday with EMS, Public Health, the hospital,
31:31et cetera. We are working on a work plan for trying to mitigate the harms that will happen.
31:39This includes trying to get supplies and things out to people. We're also hosting a training
31:45today, Welcoming Streets. Part of what we will be doing over the coming weeks and months is really
31:52ensuring that the community is equipped because businesses and community members will now have
31:56the responsibility for managing overdoses in public spaces. We'll continue to offer training
32:04for community and resources as well. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. And then last is O'Rourke.
32:15Go ahead. Thank you, Mayor Guthrie, through you to Ms. Koukowski. Speaking to the second clause
32:23of the motion to expand the heart hubs, I'm wondering if you can describe the expectation
32:29around those heart hubs. They've been described as housing and wraparound services. And first of
32:37all, is there any possibility that the heart hubs will be open in time to align with the closure of
32:42the CTS? And second, will the heart hubs really provide housing and wraparound services?
32:51Thank you for your question through you, Mayor. So the first question about the timelines is not
32:58really within our control. We submitted our application for a heart hub for this community,
33:03the Guelph-Wallington Heart Hub. So it served both Guelph and Wellington counties.
33:09We submitted that the third week of October. We have yet to hear back about the status of
33:14our application. So the timelines for when we can implement really depend on when we have
33:20approval to move forward and then when we have a funding letter that says, you know, we're receiving
33:26the funding. So right now we're waiting. We hope we'll hear in a timely way that we can have services
33:34up and running or at least some of the services up and running on April 1st. And Councillor O'Rourke,
33:42can you remind me your second question? Yeah, the second question is, I think people have an
33:47expectation that the heart hub is housing and wraparound services, which sounds like a much
33:52better model. But I'm wondering, like, is that a fair expectation? What the heart hubs will offer
34:01and what ours will offer here is access to wraparound support teams to support people with housing
34:08and their health needs. It will also offer some bedded services, specifically crisis
34:14stabilization beds and detox beds in this community, as well as increasing supportive housing capacity.
34:22What it is taking away from community is a really important part of the comprehensive
34:29continuum of care for addiction services, which is all of the harm reduction. So no needle exchange,
34:36no supervised consumption, and no safer supply. And I just want to really highlight the importance
34:43of a full robust continuum. If you think about any chronic condition, like take heart disease,
34:48for example, you wouldn't say, well, we're removing cardiac bypass surgery, but we're going to increase
34:54the number of medications that are available to treat heart disease. You just wouldn't do that.
34:58You need a full continuum of prevention, harm reduction, and then also really
35:04high level interventions like surgery, for example. So those are life saving interventions. We need the
35:09same full continuum. So what we're saying is we definitely need the heart hub resources. We need
35:14more housing. We need more detox beds, crisis stabilization, and we need consumption and
35:20treatment services. Because for many people, that service is the only doorway into the more
35:26formal health care system and addiction treatment services. And we're essentially closing that door
35:32into the system. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Richard Richardson, sorry, has a question as well.
35:41Thank you, through you, Mayor, to the delegate. My understanding is part of the reason or the
35:46main reason for closing the Guelph site was proximity to school or daycare. So would there
35:52be an opportunity to move the site or relocate it to a more suitable location? Thank you,
36:00thank you, through you, Mayor. I think we have to be clear. This was never about proximity to
36:06childcare facilities. If it were, we would have been given the option to move our site,
36:11which we have clearly not been given. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. Thank you, Melissa. Thank you very
36:20much. Yeah. Mars, you are coming back down. And then Andrea Baker will join us by video.
36:37And you can begin whenever you're ready. Mayor Guthrie and council, I'm here today to voice
36:45my support for all motions brought forward at this meeting from both Councillor Caton and
36:49Councillor Allt, specifically the first agenda item 4.1. The impending closure of consumption and
36:54treatment sites across the province weighs heavy on my heart and the hearts of those aware of the
36:58dangers of bill 223. Yes, this bill was passed by our provincial government, but I'm standing here
37:03before my council asking that you condemn this decision and do more to care for our community.
37:08Removing CTS sites will lead to more drug poisonings and overdose deaths, increased drug use and
37:12dependency are direct results of rising rates of poverty, lack of mental health supports,
37:17gaps in accessible housing options, toxic supply and many other issues within the province.
37:21If this bill was truly about the location of CTS sites, the part of said bill prohibiting future
37:26sites from being built anywhere would cease to exist. Assuming many of us within this room have
37:31entered bars and consumed alcohol, we have utilized safe consumption sites. Liquor laws exist to limit
37:36alcohol poisonings. They are clear examples of harm reduction. Regulations surrounding the quality
37:40of alcohol sold to the public are in place to ensure safe supply. Both work in tandem to keep
37:45members of the public safe. As shown in numerous studies, the closures of CTS sites will lead to
37:50more preventable deaths. There have been zero reported overdose related deaths at CTS sites in
37:54the country, according to Health Canada. This finding alone shows their effectiveness in providing
38:00safety for some of the most vulnerable members of our community and in turn safety for all of us.
38:05Alongside an increase in fatalities, instances of non-fatal overdoses will rise.
38:09The province's proposed heart hub recovery model ignores the root of many drug poisoning,
38:13which is an increasingly toxic drug supply. Heart failure to provide safe supply, drug testing
38:18options or needle exchange programs will have impacts that will ripple throughout our healthcare
38:22system, which we know is already struggling following numerous budget cuts, staffing shortages
38:26and an active pandemic. Scrapping needle programs will aid in the transmission of
38:30blood-borne infections such as HIV or hepatitis, both of which CTS sites have been proven to
38:36reduce the spread of yet another role the sites play in public safety. Drug overdoses can cause
38:40a slew of complications following instances of bradypneia, a lower breathing rate which can lead
38:45to hypoxia, lowered oxygen levels in the blood base tissue. Lengthen periods of hypoxia will
38:50harm vital organs with the heart and brain being exceptionally vulnerable to damage or acute failure.
38:55Further complications following an overdose can include neurological damage which can
38:58impact memory, coordination, mobility and lead to abnormalities that can negatively impact one's
39:03quality of life on a day-to-day basis. When these poisonings happen outdoors specifically during
39:07the winter months where overdoses have been shown to increase, victims run a higher risk of hypothermia
39:12and other health issues following prolonged cold exposure. Survivors of overdoses face an increased
39:17risk of developing depression, anxiety disorders and PTSD. The same can also be said for those in
39:22the position of witnessing an overdose, especially members of the public who are untrained and
39:26unprepared to assist in responding to one. Work that was once in the hand of trained nurses all
39:31equipped with naloxone to reverse overdoses that may occur at CTS sites will fall on community
39:36members who will be far more likely to find folks using substances in public spaces and using a
39:40loan. Solo or unsupervised substance use is a leading risk factor in drug poisonings becoming
39:45fatal. We will see an increase in 911 calls for overdose responses, more ambulances, therefore
39:50longer wait time for emergency services and when it comes to responding to an overdose or any emergency
39:55second counts. Hospital beds risk filling with those who relied on CTS sites to survive
40:00and access to safe supply which is an often overlooked step of recovery for many who are
40:04unable for a plethora of reasons to simply stop using. I recall the early days of lockdown in 2020
40:10and I remember the liquor stores remaining open and I asked why. I learned that our hospitals
40:14could not handle the results of those who were dependent on alcohol losing access to it. Our
40:18hospitals were and remain unprepared for a surge in patients. Why would we support a bill that will
40:23inevitably lead to more strain on an already unstable healthcare system? We simply do not
40:27have the resources, the beds, the budget or the staff to handle the crisis that will follow these
40:31closures. Yes recovery models sound great of course we want those who are struggling to receive
40:35treatment but you cannot put a dead person into rehab. No recovery program will bring back anyone
40:41lost to drug poisoning from unsafe supply. As it is so often said each overdose death represents
40:46a policy failure. CTS sites and their impact exist as proof that there are tangible ways to prevent
40:51overdose deaths and to care for our community. The promises of increased housing alongside
40:55heart hubs is a wonderful promise but the facts we are being presented with are too powerful to
40:59ignore. Bill 223 will have a body count. Increased funding and housing options need to be explored
41:05alongside CTS sites remaining open and properly funded to continue saving lives and assisting in
41:09community safety. Thank you for your time and I welcome any questions. Thank you Mars. Let me just
41:15see if there's any follow-up for you. There is not so again thank you for coming down.
41:21Andrea Baker is going to join us by video. No okay. Is Jill Francis here? No okay and what
41:31about Jean Hopkins? I know I see Jean yes. Thanks Jean and whenever you're ready go right ahead.
41:46Thank you. Good morning my name is Jean Hopkins. I'm the manager of the Wellington Wealth Drug
41:50Strategy. Thank you for having me here today to speak about the impacts of the CTS closures.
41:57And what our response is. The Wellington Wealth Drug Strategy is a coalition of partner agencies
42:02and members of the lived experience community who are working to implement a four pillar drug
42:06strategy in the in Gwelfin Wellington County. The four pillars are prevention, harm reduction,
42:11treatment and recovery and community safety. The reason that we have these four pillars is
42:17really to recognize that substance use and addiction is complex and no single tool is enough.
42:22Each of these pillars is necessary to support our community through the drug poisoning crisis we
42:26continue to experience. I'm delegating in support of this motion. While many other delegates have
42:32spoken to the devastating impacts of the CTS closures that will happen to public health and
42:37safety, I also want to speak to the economic impacts of the closures as well and some of the
42:41recent activities that we've been involved in provincially over the past week. So as we've
42:47heard today, CTS sites offer specialized medical supports and treatment with dignity and care,
42:52even amidst the grief and loss being experienced by those most impacted. Drug poisonings claim the
42:57life of someone in Ontario every two and a half hours. In Gwelfin Wellington, we lost 62 people
43:04last year and so far data shows that we've lost 41 members of our community this year
43:09and we anticipate these confirmed cases will grow as more data becomes available.
43:14We know that drug poisonings are driven by the unregulated drug supply that is increasingly toxic
43:19and increasingly unpredictable and we know that the closures will not improve the supply and won't
43:24prevent people from using substances. The substance use landscape both provincially and locally
43:30is changing rapidly and I just want to provide a bit of an overview about some of the key events
43:35that took place last week. So last Monday, December 2nd, as expected legislation was pushed through
43:40that effectively banned CTS sites within 200 metres of schools or daycares. Bill 223 forces sites to
43:47close and makes it nearly impossible to open new sites. The following day on Tuesday, December 3rd,
43:54the Auditor General released their annual report including information about the opioid crisis.
43:59The report confirmed that CTS sites work. Sites prevented over 1500 overdoses in the past year
44:05that could have occurred in the community. They reduced the risk of hep C and HIV transmission,
44:10which increased overall costs to the health care system and they're cost effective. They reduced
44:15the overall burden on emergency services by providing specialized care on site. The report
44:21also notes that the internal their internal government documents stating that the ministry
44:25recognized that there would be impacts on our health system including financial and operational
44:29burden on emergency departments and states quote the decision was made without proper planning,
44:34risk analysis or public consultations. In response to this on the following day, Wednesday, December
44:404th, the Wellington Guelph Drug Strategy and Ingrid Oles, who's a staff member with the Guelph CTS
44:45site, attended a press conference at Queens Park along with the Drug Strategy Network of Ontario
44:50and Guelph MPP Mike Shreiner. We called on the Auditor General to take on a value for money
44:56audit to further assess the financial implications of these closures on communities across Ontario,
45:01including our own. A fulsome audit will add it to the evidence base and will ensure that we have a
45:07comprehensive picture of the impacts. So now what? Now we must prepare for an increased strain on our
45:17health care system with reduced ambulance availability and more people competing for
45:21life-saving care in the emergency room. Wound care needs which are currently provided at the CTS
45:27will get more severe. We can expect to find more discarded equipment in our public spaces.
45:33We know that there is irrefutable evidence that CTS sites save lives and connect people to the
45:38dignified care they need and deserve. We know this and we now need to anticipate the health and safety
45:45and financial impacts and consider what we can be doing collectively to mitigate those risks.
45:52How can we as a community, as council, prepare to respond in ways that are rooted in compassion
45:58and evidence? And I'd like to close with a quote from Ingrid Oles who spoke at the press conference
46:04last week. Ingrid states, the CTS is a place where people can come to feel safe and accepted
46:10and that is a huge step on the path to creating trusting relationships. For a lot of people,
46:15it's the first step to feeling safe enough to seek health care. CTS workers are grieving every
46:20day but we work hard to provide the most accessible supports possible. Thank you.
46:27Thank you. Any follow-up for this delegate? Seeing none, thank you, Jean. Thank you very much.
46:33Councillor Allt, I'd like to ask you to table your motions, please.
46:40Thank you very much, Mayor Guthrie. In tabling these motions at this point, I have nothing further
46:45to express. I will have including remarks. There are four motions in front of us. They are on the
46:51order sheet for the day. Would you like me to read them? Yes. The seconder, Councillor Goller.
47:00And reading the motions. Number one, that Guelph City Council urges the Ontario Government to
47:05continue to permit the operation and funding of the Guelph Consumption and Treatment Site
47:10beyond the proposed termination date in March 2025. Number two, that Guelph City Council encourages
47:18the Ontario Government to maintain, if not expand, funding for the proposed homeless and addiction
47:24recovery treatment heart hubs. Number three, that Guelph City Council encourages the Ontario Government
47:33to not take steps to prohibit the establishment of supervised consumption sites, including urgent
47:40public health needs sites, otherwise known as UPHNS. Number four, that this resolution be forwarded
47:47to the Premier of Ontario, to the Minister of Finance, the Minister of Health, the Association
47:53of Municipalities of Ontario, and to municipalities that currently have an operating consumption
47:58and treatment service and or supervised consumption sites. Moved, all seconded, Gowler.
48:04Great. Thank you. Now, and just so you know, I would just want to state that much of these three
48:12motions that are these three different items that are in front of us today, our staff have made it
48:17pretty clear this is a council decision. These are support motions. They're not wanting to really
48:22wade into this. This is more political, right? So this is an opportunity for questions of staff,
48:28if need be, but really these are these are council statements. We agree or disagree,
48:34and we should probably treat them as such. So this is an opportunity for questions to staff,
48:38if you if need be. Okay, Councillor Klosson. Thank you for you, Mr. Mayor. I just have a question.
48:46I did ask it during budget, and it's related to a question I asked to the delegate as well. So
48:53we've we've budgeted in the contingency reserve about $500,000, I think, for paramedics.
49:02We don't know what the unintended consequences of the closure of the safe injection site will be.
49:08I know that we have that set aside. You know, that said, have we been having discussions with
49:14our local boards and partners like the hospital to monitor and and keep track of what will happen
49:21after the closure of the CTS site? Through the Mayor, yes, Chief Dewer participates in those
49:27meetings that I think Ms. Kowalski referred to involving the drug strategy and the hospital
49:32and public health, and they are having conversations about how to monitor it. As you indicated,
49:37there was money set aside in the reserve because we don't know whether there will be an impact
49:41on paramedic services. Our commitment to the Joint Social Services and Land Ambulance Committee
49:46was that we would monitor and track the data. As a paramedic service, we will always respond
49:51to whatever the needs of the community are, but until we get further along, we won't know what
49:56the actual impact is. And so that's why the decision was made to put that money aside. It's not in the
50:02base paramedic services budget, it's simply set aside in a reserve in case it's needed. Thank you.
50:11Thank you. Councillor O'Rourke, I believe you have an amendment.
50:20I do, Mayor Guthrie. I just sent the amendment to clerks and its amendment to clause one.
50:27And so it's just to add to the end of clause one, at least until the Hart Hub is fully operational.
50:34I think the data is clear that there'll be definitely a gap, notwithstanding the information
50:41that we've heard about truly the good work that's happening at the CTS site right now.
50:48But there's likely to be a gap between the opening of the Hart Hub and the closure of the CTS.
50:53And so I am proposing we add the words at least until the Hart Hub is fully operational to the
50:58end of clause one. Okay, thank you. And is that seconded by somebody? Councillor Richardson?
51:05Okay. I'll look to call the vote. Okay, Councillor Allt, before I call the vote, go ahead.
51:12Well, as well intended as this might be, I have to speak against this because I have heard from
51:18experts today that we must have a comprehensive support system in place that includes safe
51:24injection sites and Hart Hubs to remove safe injection sites at the advent of Hart Hubs actually
51:34continues the same problem only in another guise. Consequently, I can't support this.
51:40I believe we need to support the continuance of safe injection sites, recognizing that Hart Hubs
51:47are another tool in the box to address this social malaise. Okay, thank you. And then back to the
51:55... sorry, Boussatil, Kate, and then I'll go back to the mover. Thank you. And thank you to
52:01Councillor O'Rourke for raising this. In listening to the delegations, I will not be supporting the
52:06amendment. I think it's very clear that there's a continuum here and the Hart Hub does not support
52:13the continuum, the prevention, the harm reduction process there. So I agree with Councillor Allt.
52:19I will not be supporting the amendment. Thank you, Councillor Caton, please.
52:27Thank you. Through you, Mayor. So similarly to Councillors Busuttil and Ault, I will not be
52:34supporting the amendment. I know it's well intentioned, but it will not meet the needs
52:39of the community. And I think that without the services that are not going to be offered at
52:44the Hart Hubs, that we will see more community deaths. Thank you. And to the mover, and then
52:53I'll call the vote. Thank you, Mayor Guthrie. Just to say the motion says at least until the opening
52:58of the Hart Hub and doesn't preclude it being open past that date. I'm just trying. We know that in
53:04the immediate there could be a gap and I am just trying to create a bridge so that at least there
53:11is less of a gap. And clause 3 asks the province to maintain those supervised consumption sites. So
53:22I'm more comfortable with clause 1 with that amendment and it is really about trying to
53:27not have a gap. Okay. And now I'm over to Councillor Downer.
53:34And I just say this respectfully, but the gap is endless because there is no,
53:42the Hart Hub does not replicate the safe consumption site. So it's a bridge to nowhere
53:50because it doesn't include that as part of what we heard is to continue. So the Hart Hub we heard
53:57does not replicate or replace the consumption site. So I won't support it, but I understand the intent.
54:06Okay. Thank you. I'll call the vote. But before I do that, just if the clerks could put it back
54:12up on the screen for me. Don't quite remember the wording. Okay. I'll call the vote. All those
54:35against please raise your hand. So that would be Keaton and Alt and Bousatil and Glosson and
54:45Downer and Guller and Caron. So that fails. Okay. So we're back to the main motions. I would like to
54:58personally just ask them to be split if you don't mind. We'll just do one at a time if that's okay.
55:03Perfect. So I'll call the vote on. Yeah, I've got final remarks. Okay, go ahead. Yeah. Thank you very
55:10much, Mayor Guthrie, because this is an issue of policy and an issue of principles. I do want to
55:16provide some closing remarks. Nobody wants to be an addict and I don't want drugs on the street.
55:23Nobody ever put on their resume that their career goal was to be homeless,
55:27to be on the streets and to be addicted to anything. But in every family and in every friendship,
55:33I am sure that we have seen people suffering from either mental illness or addiction.
55:39My father was an alcoholic and I can tell you that that was not pleasant. He was also addicted
55:44to cigarettes, which is one of the most addictive nicotine being one of the most addictive substances
55:48on earth. This was not fun to live in. I do not want to see this replicated. I do not want to see
55:56stop the campaign to end the misuse of fentanyl and other opioids, but I want safety.
56:05Many people use safe injection sites as the first step toward assistance. Many people have, for the
56:13first time ever, the medical care that they need that is a result of addictions and the use of
56:20street drugs. Safe injection sites I do not believe will disappear, but I do fear that they will go
56:27underground. They could be run by churches, earnest citizens, or as in BC, outside hospitals by doctors
56:34and other healthcare workers. They won't be as effective and I do believe they will be characterized
56:40as criminal behavior, which is something that I do not wish to see. What we end up doing by abolishing
56:47safe injection sites is lead to an underground, much like we had many, many years ago when, as I said
56:54earlier, we were addressing issues of reproductive choice. Cost effectiveness is another problem.
57:00Policing paramedics on street social workers currently have rapport with these sites. They will
57:06see workload increased and I worry about burnout. Workload stress already is extreme. We know that
57:11we should continue to support the experts and support safe injection sites and what we have
57:18here in Guelph. Thank you very much to all the delegates who spoke. Okay, thank you. Okay, so
57:24we'll just move through the motions one by one. If you don't mind, clerk's just putting it up
57:33there. Okay, so I'll look to call the vote on the first one. I'll do that now. Is anyone against?
57:40Please raise your hand. All right, so that's Richardson and Guthrie. So that passes.
57:49And then this, if you could put it back up on the screen for me. The second one, the expansion and
57:59funding for the proposed heart hubs. Okay, so I'll look to call the vote on that. If anyone is against,
58:06raise your hand on that one. Okay, so that's unanimous. And then the third one is encouraging
58:16the Ontario government to not take steps to prohibit consumption sites. So I'll call the vote
58:22on that. If anyone is against that, please raise your hand. Okay, that's Richardson and Guthrie
58:33and Billings and O'Rourke. And then on the fourth one is to send this resolution to the Premier,
58:42the Minister of Finance, Minister of Health, AMO municipalities currently that have consumption
58:46treatment sites. So I'll call the vote on that. Is anyone against that? Okay, and that one's
58:53unanimous. All right, thank you very much. And we'll move on. Next, Councillor Caton, just similar
59:01to what I did with Councillor Allt, if you want to sort of set the stage just a little bit about
59:06what will be introduced and then I'll have the delegations come up and then you can table the
59:09motions after that. Okay, so I'll turn it over to you. So we've heard a lot about
59:18the notwithstanding clause and the notwithstanding clause has been called out
59:25as an option by the Premier of the province and a call was made to the Ontario Big City mayors
59:33to come forward and say whether or not you as a mayor would like to have this used in terms of
59:41encampments and for many other requests that were outside of the vote of the Ontario Big City
Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.
The motion, the vote and the debate come from the City of Guelph’s published record, reproduced rather than interpreted. The document summaries above are the exception: those words were written for this site.