Committee of the Whole · October 01, 2024 · Item 8.1
Staff to create a new permit-based fireworks by-law to replace and repeal Fireworks By-law (1993)-14362.
Main motion under the agenda item Fireworks By-law Review, 2024-355
Carried (7 to 5)
7 in favour, 5 against
What was voted on
The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.
That staff be directed to create a new permit-based fireworks by-law to replace and repeal Fireworks By-law (1993)-14362.
Moved by Councillor Caron, seconded by Councillor Goller.
How the room voted
In favour (7)
- Allt
- Busuttil
- Caron
- Caton
- Downer
- Goller
- O'Rourke
Against (5)
- Billings
- Chew
- Gibson
- Guthrie
- Richardson
Who spoke to it
Colleen Clack-Bush, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer, Public Services, discussed the timelines of bylaw reviews. Jamie Parr, Service Performance Development Analyst, introduced the Fireworks Bylaw Review. The following delegates spoke: Alex Ciccone Priyam Vyas Tom Jacobs, Rocket Fireworks Inc. Aleem Kanji, Canadian National Fireworks Association Harmin Gill, Phatboy Fireworks Bill Raynault, Mystical Distributing Company Ltd. Arthur Lam The following delegate did not speak: Jon Luff Mark Mathews Harpreet Singh Council recessed at 4:04 p.m. Council reconvened at 4:14 p.m. Councillor Caton raised a point of order, asking if she could move her motion as a substitution for the motion on the floor. Chair Downer ruled that an amendment by substitution was out of order.
What council was given
The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item. The summaries are written automatically, so you can tell what a document is without opening a ninety-page PDF.
- Fireworks By-law Review - 2024-355.pdf
Staff recommend replacing Guelph's 1993 fireworks by-law with a new one requiring permits. The review found fireworks bring enjoyment and community spirit but their noise and light can affect people, animals and nature. Residents' concerns and the practices of other municipalities support a permit system. A permit fee would be set through the 2025 budget process, with revenue helping cover enforcement costs.
- Attachment-1 What We Heard - Fireworks By-law Review.pdf
- Attachment-2 Presentation.pdf
A summary is this site’s description of a document, not the City’s. Open the document before relying on one.
What was said
19,668 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.
Read the debate(click to open)
44:39fireworks bylaw review, and we're going to hear from Deputy CAO Clark Bush first before we go
44:46to Mr. Parr, who will give a presentation. Thank you. Thank you, Chair Downer. Good afternoon,
44:53everyone. I just wanted to really quickly, before Jamie Jackson with the presentation,
44:57provide some clarity for Council and for the public, because we've had a number of questions,
45:02ironically, maybe perhaps connected to what Mayor Guthrie was just alluding to,
45:07questions about why are staff bringing bylaws forward and under what timelines. And so I just
45:12wanted to provide the clarity for Council on this fireworks bylaw in particular, but on all of our
45:16bylaw reviews, just for that reminder that back in July of 2023, we brought forward the draft
45:25schedule of bylaw reviews, and at that time, Council considered them, gave us some feedback,
45:30and in particular, passed a motion directing staff to consider how we could accelerate the
45:36schedule and the plan on this upcoming bylaw that you're about to hear about the fireworks bylaw.
45:40So Council, it was on for a later date, and Council gave specific direction to staff
45:45that we were to move this bylaw review earlier, specifically to regulate the display, sale,
45:50and setting off of fireworks. And so we then came back in October of 2023, and I will send the link
45:57out to all of Council, but for anyone listening online, that was on October the 20th, that report
46:02came back out with the final schedule for bylaws that are on the work plan for the Operations
46:07Department. So on that schedule, you would have seen then the revised date for the fireworks
46:12bylaw review, which was Q4 of 2024, as well as obviously the residential security cameras,
46:18which you've just voted on. So we did move the fireworks bylaw up at Council's request,
46:24but if anybody is interested in what bylaws are on the work plan for future, I will send the link
46:31out to members of Council, but it is available on the city's website, and that report was released
46:36on October 20th, 2023. And that is the work plan that we now follow moving forward in terms of those
46:43bylaw reviews. So with that, I will turn it over to Mr. Parr, who's going to do a presentation for
46:48you on our fireworks bylaw. Thank you very much DCAO Clark Bush for the introduction.
47:11Hello, Mayor and Councilors. My name is Jamie Parr, and I am the Service Performance Development
47:16Analyst for Operations. I am here today to present the fireworks bylaw review. The purpose of this
47:25report is to present the findings of the fireworks bylaw review that city staff conducted as directed
47:31by Council. Staff are also seeking Council's approval for the creation of a fireworks bylaw
47:37based on a permit system. Fireworks have historically been used to celebrate certain events in
47:45Guelph. Guelph allows the use of fireworks for Canada Day, Victoria Day, and Diwali. Fireworks
47:52light up the night sky and can provide enjoyment and a sense of community for those participating
47:58in or watching these displays. However, the noise, light, and pollution they generate can have a
48:08negative impact on people, animals, and nature. Noise pollution. Noise from fireworks can reach
48:15levels as high as 120 to 170 decibels. This sound can disrupt sleep, trigger PTSD,
48:23and disrupt plants and wildlife. Chemical and physical pollution. Fireworks can
48:31release many contaminants that may affect air quality, including carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide,
48:37nitrogen, sulfur dioxide, heavy metals, and particulate matter. Toxic hazes created by
48:44particulate matter from fireworks can be hazardous, can be a hazardous air pollution
48:49due to its ability to affect people's breathing. Debris from fireworks, casings, may fall into
48:56nearby properties posing a physical hazard. Additionally, leftover bases of fireworks may
49:02cause environmental pollution if not properly disposed of. Fire risks. In 2022, the Canadian
49:10Association of Fire Chiefs voted to pass resolution 2023.22.3 consumer fireworks. The resolution
49:20calls for fire chiefs to advocate for the banning of consumer fireworks. Guelph Fire Chiefs are a
49:28member of this association. Bottlely harm. A 2016 Consumer Project Safety Commission report
49:36noted that children under the age of 15 accounted for nearly one-third of fireworks-related injuries
49:42treated in emergency rooms in 2016. Young people, those 24 and younger,
49:49seem most at risk for injury. The potential harm from fireworks extends from minor burns to loss
49:54of fingers, damaged eyes, ears, and in very rare cases, death. Mental health and PTSD.
50:02Fireworks can be triggering for those individuals with PTSD. Even those without PTSD can be affected
50:09due to sleep disruptions and increased stress. Animals and pets. Fireworks can significantly
50:17impact animals, especially those with sensitive hearing, like cats, dogs, and birds. The loud
50:23noises and bright flashes can cause fear, panic, and anxiety in animals, leading to physical and
50:30emotional stress. Pets may try to run away or hide, causing them to get lost or injured.
50:37Wildlife can also be affected with birds and other animals abandoning their nests or habitat
50:43due to disturbances caused by fireworks. During this bylaw review, staff considered the following
50:53options. Option one. Keep existing days and improve safety measures. Option two. Increase the
51:02number of allowed days to include other culturally significant events and improve safety measures.
51:09Option three. Implement a permanent-based system for the current allowed days.
51:16And option four. A total ban. Community engagement. In adherence to Guelph's community engagement
51:27framework, we hosted two separate events in separate formats on different dates to create
51:32flexibility and options for those interested in participating. Along with this, we conducted an
51:38online survey. 1,327 communities participated in the survey.
51:50Staff found that 55% of respondents felt safe or very safe in relation to professional
51:56firework displays. Staff also found that 56% of respondents indicated they were supportive or
52:04very supportive of a total fireworks ban. Upon review of the comments provided throughout the
52:13survey, staff found several key themes emerge. The first theme was safety and environmental concerns.
52:21There is a widespread concern about the risk of fire, about, sorry, there's a
52:29widespread concern about the safety risks and environmental impacts of fireworks issues such
52:35as fire hazards, harm to wildlife and pollution were frequently mentioned. Noise and disturbances.
52:43Many respondents were troubled by the noise caused by fireworks, which can cause stress and
52:49anxiety for pets, wildlife and those who are neurodivergent or have PTSD. Regulation and improved
52:56enforcement. There was a strong call for better enforcement of existing bylaws and regulations
53:04suggestions included a permit system to ensure safety and limit disturbances.
53:12Preference for public versus private displays. A general preference of public professionally
53:18organized firework displays over private ones was expressed with alternatives such as drone shows
53:25or silent fireworks proposed. The last theme is cultural and community significance.
53:31While recognizing the traditional aspect of fireworks in celebration, there is a desire
53:36to balance this tradition with current safety and environmental concerns. So staff recommend
53:48a bylaw based on a permit system for large firework displays such as community, such
53:55sorry, staff recommend a bylaw based on a permit system for large firework displays such as community
54:01and special events. A permit would include a hundred dollar fee plus a fire inspection fee.
54:08A bylaw would include regulations such as a minimum safe distance from residences and
54:16vulnerable occupancies. Displays be discharged by a licensed display supervisor. Organizers
54:30have sufficient liability insurance. Inspections be conducted for safety. Fireworks be planned
54:37for acceptable times and locations. And organizers have a animal safety management plan.
54:45Staff feel that this strikes a balance between residents surveyed and cultural importance of
54:49fireworks for the communities. So the recommendation to counsel. Number one,
54:56that staff be directed to create a new permit based fireworks bylaw to replace and repeal
55:02fireworks bylaw 1993-14362. Thank you very much for giving me the opportunity to speak before you
55:11today about my fire boat staff fire works by law review. I'm happy to take questions now.
55:19Thank you, Mr. Parr. So as tradition will hold questions till after we listen to the delegates.
55:25So thank you. So we'll go right into the delegation list. And first off, we have Alex
55:36Shikoni and in the wings we have Priam Vias. Mr. Shikoni, you have up to five minutes to speak
55:50and there'll be a warning 30 seconds before that at that time. Perfect. Thank you very much, Chair.
55:56First of all, thank you for having me tonight and thank you to staff for putting together what I see
56:01is a really good and thorough review of this issue. For context, I'm an environmental and
56:06municipal lawyer and I do a lot of pro bono animal law work. I used to be a director of the
56:11Guelph Humane Society, although I'd recently retired after a few years and I just finished
56:15writing part of a textbook on fireworks and their impact on the environment, human and animal health
56:20for an environmental law textbook that is in its fourth edition. So this is an issue that's top of
56:25mind for me. I also just want to say it's not sort of a nimby issue for me. I'm sort of ashamed to
56:31say I actually used to love fireworks. I grew up nine hours north of here on 60 acres and I
56:36lit a lot of fireworks, like a lot of fireworks and other things that I probably shouldn't say
56:40publicly about playing with fire. But since then, of course, we've discovered that there are some big
56:46problems with fireworks that should lead to a different treatment of them. So in terms of
56:51environmental issues, as staff indicated, there are a number of chemicals that are emitted from
56:57fireworks that are known to cause spikes and asthma attacks afterward. And we know this from
57:02hospital reporting statistics. It's not an anecdote. In terms of the chemicals used, there are a
57:08number of chemicals that are used to produce different colors. So I think strontium use is
57:12used to produce red, copper is used to produce blue, etc. Some of these chemicals, oh sorry,
57:18I should just say perchlorate is added as an oxidizing agent. It gives you the boom in fireworks.
57:23These chemicals and some other ones are both persistent and bio-accumulative. So that means
57:29that they stay in the environment in water for a while or if an animal eats them, it sort of
57:33grows up the trophic levels and bio-accumulates. So that can be a problem. In addition, they're
57:40found to contribute significantly to microplastics in water. There was a recent study in the city of
57:45London, England, where 24 hours following fireworks display for New Year's, there was a 10 times
57:52increase in microplastics in the Thames River. So that's a pretty significant issue. And of course,
57:58as we know, the most direct issue is that fireworks can cause forest fires, which is why
58:04many police chiefs recommend a total ban. So not just a ban on consumer, but some are recommending
58:10a total ban. The primary issue when it comes to animal and human health is noise, of course,
58:17and we did hear that they can get up to 170 decibels, which for context is roughly the loudness of
58:24loud rifles, right? No coincidence that it triggers folks with PTSD because it's a similar volume
58:29and sound. This causes, and statistics tell us that a majority of cats and dogs experience fear
58:35and anxiety as a result of these, but also farm animals are known to jump out of their enclosures,
58:41sometimes hurting themselves on fences or running into traffic. What I think is one of the most
58:46significant issues though is migratory and large birds get disoriented by fireworks. So they often
58:51will fall into traffic and die. This isn't a hypothetical. It's a local issue. Local humane
58:58societies have in Wellington County found numerous Canada geese who are killed after fireworks
59:04displays and I'm talking public fireworks displays. So unfortunately, even letting
59:10these sort of sanctioned well controlled fireworks displays 100% will result in the death of
59:15migratory birds like Canada geese. This is why humane societies recommend alternatives to fireworks,
59:24such as drone shows, light displays, laser displays, or silent fireworks. I'll admit that I'm not an
59:31expert in human health, but I do know that folks with PTSD can be largely triggered by fireworks.
59:37I actually spoke at the City of Kitchener last night on this issue who coincidentally had their
59:41review of this issue on the agenda. And I'll say that one of the delegates who spoke was
59:47Alayne Kanji, who I understand might be speaking tonight. And in response to the alternatives
59:52said that folks can be triggered by drones as well. That might be true. I'm not sure, but if that
59:58spurious argument is brought up, I would ask Council to consider what is more significant in terms of
1:00:03triggering PTSD, the sound of explosives, or the software of drones, which again is just one of
1:00:09the many alternatives. So I'll close by saying that Section 121 of the Municipal Act does give
1:00:16very clear authority to municipalities to regulate fireworks in whatever way they want. They can
1:00:21allow them outright, they can regulate them, they can create a permitting system, or they can ban them.
1:00:27And I would respectfully suggest that the proposal by staff is good, but we can go further by enacting
1:00:34a future, sorry, a total ban, because to do otherwise will result in no one harm to humans
1:00:41and to animals. So with that, I'm happy to answer any questions. And I thank members for their time.
1:00:48Great. Thank you, Mr. Shikoni. Are there any questions? Mayor Guthrie?
1:00:54Thank you, Madam Chair, and through you to the delegate. Just I was just wondering, can you tell
1:01:00us what the, do you know what the outcome was of the Kitchener discussion in regards to whatever was
1:01:06proposed there? I do. So the City of Kitchener directed staff to come back with a more thorough
1:01:11review. Consider the City of Kitchener a few months behind Guelph in this regard. So they didn't come
1:01:16with a staff report like we've seen tonight. They're early in their stages of reviewing it.
1:01:22It's a great question. Apologies I sort of said through you, Chair. Okay, thank you so much. I
1:01:27appreciate that. Are there any other questions? Councillor Allt? Thank you, Chair. I hope you
1:01:39can hear me okay. My signal is not very good. Through you to Mr. Shikoni. Mr. Shikoni, thank
1:01:45you for your presentation. I've heard very clearly you're concerned about chemicals,
1:01:49noise, and safety and the endangerment of wildlife and other animals. I am wondering about the
1:01:58efficacy of fireworks with laser light shows such as what are being done in different localities.
1:02:07Can you comment on that? Through you, Chair. I think you cut out a little bit, but I think the
1:02:13question was about whether there are any impacts to these alternatives. Did I hear that correctly?
1:02:19No, I was somewhat. I'm wondering about whether fireworks can appropriately be replaced
1:02:27with laser light shows and music sound shows. Thank you for your question. And through you,
1:02:34Chair, I think it's a great question. I think the question is how do we balance cultural celebration
1:02:40with very real impacts to environment and animals? And that's a balance. I have an opinion on it,
1:02:46but Council will need to come to its own opinion. I think my goal tonight is just to make that
1:02:52decision a bit clearer. I want Council to know that if they do decide to allow some of these
1:02:56displays, it will result in known harm. It's not a hypothetical or a maybe. So will these
1:03:01sufficiently replace it? I'm not sure. I think it depends on who you ask. I know that they've been
1:03:06largely successful in the many municipalities across Canada that have done an outright ban,
1:03:11but of course not everyone feels that way, right? There are strong cultural ties with fireworks,
1:03:16but they do come at a cost. It's a great question. That's absolutely the core issue.
1:03:23Thank you. Are there any other questions of the day with it? Okay, seeing none. Thank you very
1:03:28much. Thank you. Priyanka Bias. Welcome. I have been here five minutes. Thank you.
1:03:44Good afternoon, everybody. I work with Fatwa fireworks in KWC and Wolf region.
1:03:50Today I want to address the city of Gualt's consideration of a change in fireworks by law
1:03:55with permit only and the other four option currently under review. While I understand
1:03:59the intention behind this discussions, I strongly believe that option one and two,
1:04:04keeping the existing days while improving safety and expanding allowed
1:04:08days to include other culturally significant celebration are the most beneficial parts forward.
1:04:15First of all, when any particular fireworks are brought to the country, they have to
1:04:20pass through an intense examination by the federal agents called ERD, Explosive and Regulatory
1:04:25Advice. And then and then after a fireworks can be decided whether it is a professional
1:04:30gate fireworks or a consumer gate fireworks, whatever fireworks we sell at our stands temporarily
1:04:37for the Victoria Day, Canada Day and Diwali. They are all consumer gate fireworks.
1:04:43Fireworks are more than just the colorful displays. They represent joy, tradition,
1:04:47and community spirit. By maintaining the existing days, we can celebrate our heritage while also
1:04:52focusing on enhancing safety measures. This could include better public education on safe practices
1:04:59and stronger enforcement against illegal sales. Moreover, option two offers an exciting opportunity
1:05:07to recognize the diverse culture of golf by allowing fireworks on additional culturally
1:05:12significant days. This not only fosters inclusivity, but also enriches our community celebration.
1:05:20To draw back with the option three, many people do not know about such procedures,
1:05:25how to get the permit and all the other stuff related to the permit. Some people,
1:05:30they might even not going to apply for the permit. By their actions, the rest of the people who
1:05:35applied for the permit and went through all the procedures, they're going to stop applying for
1:05:38the permits to. Rather than considering a total ban, which would extinguish the vibrant experience
1:05:44that fireworks bring, let's focus on how we can celebrate safely and responsibility
1:05:49by improving safety measures and expanding our celebration days.
1:05:54Ban of fireworks will create a complete black market of fireworks in the city.
1:06:00In the city like Vancouver, Surrey, Brampton, Woodstock, Milton, all of the cities who have
1:06:06banned the fireworks sale and everything, there are people still in those cities celebrating fireworks.
1:06:13There are people in the cities who are selling fires with their garages,
1:06:18no permits, no insurance, nothing. And they are working so silently that they are even selling
1:06:27the fireworks which are already banned like firecrackers, skyrockets. They're also selling
1:06:31those kind of fireworks from their houses, garages and everything. So that option four can create
1:06:38a complete black market in our own city. Lastly, many people like me rely on fireworks for their
1:06:46lively hurts. Hiro techniques, event organizers and local businessmen benefit from these celebrations.
1:06:53A ban would hurt these professions and local economies. Let's not extinguish the spark of
1:06:58fireworks. Instead, let's find a way to celebrate safely and responsibly. Thank you.
1:07:05Thank you, Mr. Byers. Are there any questions, Councillor Bruce?
1:07:10Thank you very much for your delegation. Just I might have missed it at the beginning, Mr.
1:07:14Byers. Do you sell fireworks? Is that your business? Through you. Yeah, I sell fireworks.
1:07:21Thank you. Are there any other questions? I see none. Thank you very much. Thank you.
1:07:29Okay, now we have Tom Jacobs from the Rocket Fireworks. Welcome. You have five minutes to.
1:07:43Thanks for having me speak. First, the number 170 decibels has been stated a few times. So just to
1:07:51be clear, that decibel number is only for professional fireworks. So it's for what's
1:07:56called display fires, which the public can't use. So the public decibel level allowed for consumer
1:08:03fireworks is 120 decibels at distance, so which at ground level, that is an effective decibel level
1:08:11of about 100, 100 to 110, which is the decibel level of, say, a drill. So it's not consumer
1:08:19fireworks do not have, they don't result in a rifle shot sound like professional fireworks may.
1:08:25And what I will be arguing for today is that consumer fireworks do not cause harm and should be
1:08:29allowed. Secondly, I understand that I didn't write a textbook, but I did go to law school and
1:08:35among various other higher institutions and I will be citing some facts today, which are
1:08:41contrary to some of the facts we heard. And I just wanted to be careful that the tendency to rely on
1:08:48the status of the speaker for credibility. The speaker may be credible, but there are contrary
1:08:55facts which are in resources and texts, which I'll be bringing to light. So with that, let me get
1:09:02into my presentation. So given that the current bylaw limits consumer fireworks usage to one's
1:09:09private property on only three occasions per year, Victoria Day, Canada Day, and Diwali,
1:09:16it's hard to see the sense in adding a permit requirement for personal use of fireworks.
1:09:21As a professional fire technician and someone who also works in fireworks product development,
1:09:25there's no doubt that consumer fireworks can be used safely by the public.
1:09:30Of the 4,000 legal fireworks products authorized in Canada, there are safe, suitable choices for
1:09:35just about any space. All products are tested rigorously by the federal government, which then
1:09:41certifies them or does not, for safe use by the public. And the rest comes down to education by
1:09:48specialized retailers to the clients and also by the municipality, as well as proper enforcement
1:09:55against misuse. I don't see a need for a cumbersome bureaucratic process for personal use
1:10:01when for those three days per year, we can accomplish the objectives of public safety,
1:10:05being a good neighbor, and adhering to best practices by more efficient means.
1:10:10It's important to remember that in the end, we are talking about three days per year
1:10:14of personal fireworks usage. If some people lack interest or perhaps even find a particular
1:10:19activity distasteful, can they not tolerate just three evenings per year? Clearly, a significant
1:10:25portion of our community enjoys and eerily looks forward to fireworks celebrations as an opportunity
1:10:31for family gathering, neighborhood or community building in the practice of age-old cultural
1:10:35traditions. I would suggest the cause for concern is not in fact about three days, but about illegal
1:10:41use. For example, use in public parks or after the 11 p.m. noise by-law cutoff or in days other
1:10:47than Victoria Day, Canada Day or D'O'Ali. To this, we need stricter legal measures against
1:10:52misuse, which include stronger fines for usage of fireworks during non-sanctioned periods.
1:10:57We also need better education from retailers on best practices, something which the CFNA can help
1:11:02to provide, and is done in other communities. Should we prohibit fireworks use altogether
1:11:09because misuse may lead to undesirable consequences? If this were the case, then we would not allow
1:11:15prescription medication, the sale of power tools or drinking alcohol. But what of the use of fireworks
1:11:21is not just distasteful for some people, but actually harmful? As the public and governments
1:11:25become more keenly aware of what impacts human behavior is having on our environment, fireworks
1:11:31too have been questioned on their environmental repercussions. According to Gary Wheeler,
1:11:35spokesperson for the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, consumer fireworks used by the
1:11:40public on an infrequent basis, for example, a few times per year, have no notable impact on the
1:11:45environment. The minerals they contain, this is consumer fireworks again, are not harmful to
1:11:51aquatic life or drinking water. The fact that most municipalities have laws in place limiting
1:11:55fireworks usage to the public to a few times per year makes them transient and therefore
1:12:00inconsequential environmentally speaking. Another frequent concern has to do with pets.
1:12:06For example, dog owners sometimes complain that their animals are distressed by fireworks. So,
1:12:12there are simple solutions to this, like walking your dog during the day before the displays,
1:12:18playing gentle music, or keeping your dog indoors. So, we all love pets and I have them
1:12:24myself, but I'd hate to think of small inconvenience to the pets a few times per year is going to
1:12:28dictate what's legal and illegal in the city. So, lastly, as far as wildlife goes, protection and
1:12:35preservation is one of my passions and naturally we should be concerned for the well-being. Studies
1:12:39have shown that just as in thunderstorms, wildlife will have a natural instinct to flee or scatter
1:12:44during fireworks displays. Mr. Jacob, that ends your five minutes. Okay, I take ten seconds to finish.
1:12:49Just one more sentence. One more sentence, please. It's normal for them to ski, for them to scatter
1:12:55or flee from loud noises like thunderstorms, but although they disperse, they do come back
1:13:00and they don't permanently leave their habitats or anything as he's been suggested.
1:13:05I cut myself short, but thank you very much for your time and I would welcome you.
1:13:08Are there any questions for Mr. Jacobs? Okay, seeing none. Thank you very much.
1:13:15Thank you. Okay, Mr. Aleem Kenji, please. Okay, you have five minutes to make your delegation.
1:13:43Good afternoon, Madam Chair, members of council. I did submit a presentation
1:13:48to the clerk. I understand that it's, I think there's some issues of getting it loaded, so I'm
1:13:53going to have it up on here and with your indulgence, I'm going to walk you through
1:13:58what I'm here to speak about and thank you for having me. I would just like to make a correction,
1:14:02so it wasn't that they had trouble loading it, it didn't come in in time at the deadline, so
1:14:07you're welcome to send that to council. I don't know if most of us won't see that, but that's fine.
1:14:12You might want to send it to council after the meeting, all of council and the mayor.
1:14:18The other thing too about your presentation, there is another meeting on this topic at the
1:14:22end of the month, October 29th, where you can do a presentation at that time. Thank you.
1:14:28With your indulgence, Madam Chair, I may ask to reset the time and I can start from the beginning.
1:14:33Thank you so much. So my name is Aleem Kenji. I am the Chief Advocacy Officer of the Canadian
1:14:38National Fireworks Association, representing importers, distributors, retailers,
1:14:44including about half a dozen in this community of Guelph. We promote the safe access to what is a
1:14:53very highly regulated and legal industry. Over 4,000 fireworks products are tested
1:14:59strenuously at the federal level. They're allowed to be sold and they're regulated through provincial
1:15:05bodies like the Ontario Fire Code. And there are many, obviously in this community, that enjoy
1:15:12fireworks. We work with regulators on our vendor certification employee training program,
1:15:19our Be a Good Neighbor program. I have provided copies of that to you prior to the meeting. You
1:15:25should have those pamphlets in front of you. And for those watching, all of our materials are at
1:15:31nationalfireworks.ca. We take the stance that industry and government must both accept the
1:15:37responsibility to create education, vendor certification. We've seen that embedded in
1:15:43bylaws across the country and some of the things that we do in training for users.
1:15:50This is our Be a Good Neighbor program. It reminds people under the federal rules to do
1:15:55what they need to do when using fireworks, prepare ahead of time, respect the environment,
1:16:00celebrate responsibly, inform your neighbors, be safe when using fireworks, and of course,
1:16:06clean up. And here are copies of our research publications. I'd like to turn our attention to
1:16:14the report that's in front of you today. I'm not sure there was any real consultation with the
1:16:20industry. I know one of the options obviously seeks to ban fireworks. Permit fees I know were
1:16:26addressed earlier. Unfortunately, they will be a hindrance. I think they may be appropriate for
1:16:32larger scale events for personal use as we heard earlier. People will not apply for them. And that's
1:16:38been our experience in cities across the country. We heard earlier about Diwali and Lunar New Year
1:16:46of obviously, you know, where permits can be used and Diwali, of course, being a day where fireworks
1:16:53can be used. As we all know, Guelph, Wellington County, and other communities are not islands.
1:16:58People will proceed to purchase fireworks if this community supports a ban from other places. They'll
1:17:05buy them online. They may resort to even making them themselves. That could create even greater
1:17:11catastrophic risk for the residents and people of this community. And I think that's really important
1:17:16to point out from what is a very legal and regulated industry. The environmental impacts I know were
1:17:22mentioned earlier, but it's really important. I think as the mayor mentioned in the previous item,
1:17:27to separate the disinformation from the real facts. And I'd like to share those with you.
1:17:33A consumer fireworks display of about $1,000, which is a good community event,
1:17:40emits 1.25 kilograms of CO2. Take that to $500, which is also a pretty good size event. We're
1:17:48looking at 0.625 kilograms of CO2. A one hour car trip from Mississauga, just east of here,
1:17:56of course, to downtown Toronto, 19 kilograms of CO2. A propane gas tank for a backyard barbecue,
1:18:042.4 kilograms of CO2 per hour. So it's really important. These are a couple of examples
1:18:12where we look holistically at what the environmental impacts are. We're very proud
1:18:18that we have reduced our carbon footprint. In fact, one of our vendors reduced the carbon
1:18:24footprint by 70 metric tons per year and 200 metric tons in 2022. On the air quality impact,
1:18:31again, it's really important to look at the facts. And when you look at the facts, and I'm happy to
1:18:36share this with you in a report to the City of London from the Ontario Ministry of the Environment
1:18:41when looking at air quality and particulate matter, according to the Ministry of Environment
1:18:50of the Government of Ontario, there's no statistical proof that backyard fireworks are,
1:18:54for that matter, even commercial fireworks degrade our air quality index. We take our cues from the
1:19:03humane societies I know was mentioned earlier to follow the direction and to keep your pets
1:19:08indoors or perhaps take them for a walk before fireworks are used on the three permissible days.
1:19:14Coming to the ask, we would suggest that option one, keep the existing fire days be supported.
1:19:22Total ban, unfortunately, will not be enforced. I know it was mentioned earlier that the Canadian,
1:19:27that the fire chiefs have asked for that federally. Unfortunately, what is not in the report
1:19:32is that the federal government has turned that down three times. I'd be happy to take any of your
1:19:36questions. Right, thank you. Are there any questions? Councillor Awerk?
1:19:43Thank you, Chair Downer. Through you to Mr. Kanji. I'm just curious,
1:19:47how do you promote your education campaigns? Absolutely. And through you, Madam Chair, and
1:19:53it's a great question, Councillor Awerk. We take a lot of pride in using traditional media,
1:20:01social media to promote our Be a Good Neighbor program. You should have a copy of that in front
1:20:06of you. I spoke about it earlier. We've taken out billboards on the side of the 401. We pay for that
1:20:12ourselves. We come at no cost to communities. And you know, in successful communities that
1:20:17we've worked in, in London, Ontario, just down the highway from here is a great example of that.
1:20:23We've partnered with them. So they've looked at how they can use our education to inform the end
1:20:28user because ultimately, people in this community are still going to continue to use fireworks.
1:20:35And so the education aspect is really important. I will say this, though, if I may,
1:20:41to the Councillor, it will be extremely difficult to be able to work in a community
1:20:47to promote our education and the work that we do at no cost, wherein that community has taken
1:20:53the position to support a ban, which we know won't be enforced or adhered to by your residents.
1:21:00It'll be hard to do that because we're working at counter purposes. Our thinking really is,
1:21:06let's find ways to work together. I want to answer one other question, if I may, and that is around
1:21:11silent fireworks, which I think was brought up by the previous deputant. Unfortunately, the federal
1:21:17government doesn't define silent fireworks. They're actually not in the classification of
1:21:24how the federal government classifies fireworks. It's important to distill that,
1:21:28some of that disinformation that was shared earlier.
1:21:31Mr. Kanji, you just need to answer the question of the...
1:21:34Thank you. I hope that answers your question, Councillor.
1:21:36Thank you.
1:21:36Councillor Downer, I have a few more. Okay. So through you to Mr. Kanji, our proposal says you
1:21:42have to be a licensed display supervisor to be able to discharge the fireworks. And so what does
1:21:48that entail? So I know some folks who are pyrotechnic people who have all their licenses, but what's
1:21:54a licensed display supervisor? So look, there are regulations for the use of larger events for
1:22:04commercial grade fireworks to institute something like that on individual use of personal fireworks
1:22:15is something I will say respectfully that based on our experience in other cities across the
1:22:20country is not going to get adhered to. People are not going to be able to get that. We take
1:22:26pride of saying let's put the education at the point of sale, right? Through our programming
1:22:31and through our education, let that interaction happen through our retailers at the point of
1:22:36sale so that when someone from the public comes in to purchase fireworks, they are told, they are
1:22:42asked, what are you using it for? What's the celebration? How big is the area? And here are
1:22:47the products that we recommend. Not doing that will give people the ability to go to First Nations,
1:22:55go to the United States, try to make them at home, which again provides a bigger risk. But
1:23:01for certification on commercial grade events, that is I think a bit different than the personal
1:23:09use of fireworks. Again, the 4,000 products of which are approved for sale by the federal government
1:23:15through NRC and tested by the explosives regulatory division in the government of Canada.
1:23:21And Chair Downer, just the last one. So I understand you defending the model. I'm just curious
1:23:29why you think then there's a rash of communities that are either bringing forward an outright ban
1:23:36or restricting significantly the fireworks displays. Like what is the driving force
1:23:41behind this? Because we are seeing a number of Ontario municipalities moving to actually full bans.
1:23:48Through you, Madam Chair, and thank you for the question. It's an important one to be able to
1:23:53address. I will say this. I believe when looking at the evidence and when you look at communities
1:24:01that have banded, and I'm happy to talk about them based on our experience, what we've seen is
1:24:07which was alluded to earlier underground illegal enterprises rise through communities that have
1:24:20chosen to ban. And in fact, if we look to Western Canada, where they have had bans in place,
1:24:27what we've seen is actually communities enter back in and say, we can't police this, we can't
1:24:32enforce this. It's very hard to put that on to the chief and to bylaw because in a infraction
1:24:39and a fine can only be issued when you see somebody igniting the firework. And so by the time
1:24:44301 gets the call, by the time city officials arise, the delinquent user, if it is a delinquent
1:24:49user has left the scene. And so I think we need to be really careful when we talk about a rash
1:24:55of communities. We've seen Chatham Kent increase their bylaw to include additional days. London
1:25:01Ontario, Windsor, these are examples of communities, Ajax, that have increased the amount of days
1:25:07for fireworks and that know that by instituting a ban on something that is legal on a set of
1:25:14products that are legal only makes it more enticing to the public to try to make it themselves,
1:25:21create more community risk, and quite frankly, cause more disturbance to the communities. And
1:25:28I think that's the issue at play here is that, you know, regulations are meant to protect the public.
1:25:35We've seen what happened respectfully during COVID when we institute regulations
1:25:40on the public and some of the pushback that we get around that COVID is long and done and obviously
1:25:46over with. But I think we need to be really careful with promising things to the community by saying,
1:25:53we're going to protect you by having a ban. And again, our experience in communities, countless
1:25:58communities across this country is the enforceability of that ban. This is what communities
1:26:04are grappling with and why so many of them are saying, we can't actually enforce the ban.
1:26:10We're going to trust the public through regulations and we're actually going to
1:26:14have regulations that make sense. No fireworks in environmental areas, time curfews, and
1:26:20regulations that really speak to how the public should engage. Okay, thanks.
1:26:25Council Coran was next and then Council Boussatil.
1:26:30Thank you, through you, Madam Chair. What percentage, you represent a national association.
1:26:37What percentage of the sales of your association, and you may not have the figures at hand,
1:26:42what percentage are large commercial event fireworks versus what we'll call backyard
1:26:49personal fireworks? Through you, Madam Chair, and thank you for the question.
1:26:56While I don't have that number off hand, I will say, and I think it's important to say that
1:27:05the tradition of fireworks, be that on Canada Day, where that is allowed of course in this
1:27:12community and other days, sees a mix of individuals using them through smaller community events or
1:27:22in some cases through larger sanctioned events by municipalities. And we see a good mix of that.
1:27:30We see communities where there are permits that must be taken, for example, if you own a golf course.
1:27:35A few of them, of course, in this neighborhood, in this city rather, where you would need a permit
1:27:40in order to celebrate your your festivation. So while I don't have the numbers off hand,
1:27:47I think there's a dynamic mix between those that use it for personal reasons. And in fact,
1:27:54the ones that use it for personal reasons, it's important to point out that they actually have
1:27:59an ability to bring people together. It may be personal, but they may be bringing 15, 18,
1:28:0520 people together in their community. That's about building community as much as
1:28:10Guelph's Canada Day fireworks event brings larger people together. And in some cases,
1:28:18in the post COVID world, some people are interested in going to the larger events. Others want to do
1:28:24things in a little bit more of a quiet way. And I think there's got to be a balance for both.
1:28:29Sorry, it was what percentage of sales, not what percentage of use? Like you would have
1:28:35national sales figures in dollars, what percentage of sales, not how they're not how they're used.
1:28:43So thank you. Thank you. Can you could you confine your comment to just the answers to the
1:28:48questions and not expanding into other areas of conversation around this issue?
1:28:54Through you, Madam Chair, to the question.
1:29:00So you said that there are different classifications when they come into the country. As I understand
1:29:04it, they're classified for large events, the Canada Day kind of organizational fireworks,
1:29:10or personal backyard fireworks. Would you have statistics on your sales figures?
1:29:15On the top of-
1:29:16And if not, I can look-
1:29:18On the top of my tongue, I don't. And that is something I'd be happy to come back to you with
1:29:23as it pertains to this community and on a more macro level, if that's helpful.
1:29:27Okay. That would be really helpful before we meet again on the 29th.
1:29:30Sure.
1:29:30One last question and it's more about the regulation. Is a sparkler
1:29:34considered a fireworks by the government regulation?
1:29:38Thank you for the question, Councillor, and through you, Madam Chair, this is a very
1:29:42important question. It's really important and I want to just reference Councillor O'Rourke's
1:29:47question earlier about bands. The context is very key if you would allow me.
1:29:52Sorry, just is a sparkler considered a regulated fireworks?
1:29:56Yes, it is. In the case of Brampton, because I know questions were asked earlier about what
1:30:00other communities are doing, they actually lifted their ban on fireworks to allow for
1:30:05sparklers to be used. This is one of the most popular products of fireworks. It is regulated.
1:30:11And the ban in Brampton that many talk about has been lifted very quietly to now allow
1:30:18sparklers to be used.
1:30:19Great. Thank you.
1:30:20You're welcome.
1:30:20Okay, great. Thank you.
1:30:21Councillor Busuttil.
1:30:24Are there any other questions, Mr. Kanji?
1:30:29Mayor Guthrie.
1:30:33Is it me, Madam Chair, or Councillor Busuttil?
1:30:37Oh, no. Sorry. Mayor Guthrie, it's you.
1:30:40She doesn't want to ask a question.
1:30:42Okay. Thank you.
1:30:43Through you, do you know of any other cities that require permits
1:30:52and is the way our proposed bylaw is being presented a similar way to other cities that
1:31:02have permits in place?
1:31:05Through you, Madam Chair, to the question from Mayor Guthrie, I think it's really important to
1:31:13look at what we're recommending today, which we're actually okay with permits for commercial
1:31:20great events. I think there are a number of examples, Mr. Mayor, where we see the issuance
1:31:28of permits being a requirement for commercial great events. I think that makes sense for
1:31:33larger events. Absolutely. Our experience in working in this industry is that permits for
1:31:41individual use, while there may be examples of that, they don't get followed. It is incredibly
1:31:50cumbersome to put that on the back of a resident to say you need to come and get a permit. I'll
1:31:56give you an example of one that doesn't work, and that is in the case of West Vancouver.
1:32:03So they've introduced a nominal $5 permit fee to use fireworks, and it didn't stop
1:32:10anybody to buy online, buy from other towns, and use them. They found another way, basically,
1:32:19to doing that. So the issuance of permits for personal use, it's been our experience,
1:32:26or it's just something that really is, we believe residents will find untenable in this community
1:32:34as they have in others across the country.
1:32:39Mayor Guthrie, do you have any other questions?
1:32:41No, I'm sorry. I forgot to unmute. I just said thank you very much.
1:32:43Okay. Are there any other questions?
1:32:47Councillor Chew? Remember, we were asking questions of clarification.
1:32:54Yeah, through you, Madam Chair. I'm just wondering from your perspective, you talked about
1:33:00permits for individual use and West Vancouver. Why do you think that that example didn't work?
1:33:08Sorry, I couldn't hear you. Could you repeat the question?
1:33:10So you mentioned that West Vancouver is an example of how it's not working for regulating
1:33:18personal use. Why is that, in your opinion?
1:33:22Through you, Madam Chair, again, a really good question. The reason it doesn't work,
1:33:29you know, to the councillor is that once again, where there is a ban in place, people will resort
1:33:36to finding another way to buy the products. Vancouver's proximity to the United States,
1:33:43not dissimilar, to be honest, from this community. When you look at the driving distance,
1:33:48you know, we'll allow people to think about bringing them in.
1:33:51We talked about this last night in Kitchener as well. It'll happen. People will buy them at Walmart,
1:33:58buy them at other stores, and I will remind folks in the room that it's a different rate of
1:34:02classification of fireworks in the United States. Very different. There's a reason Canada has the
1:34:07tightest testing regulations in the world on fireworks. But to the question, again, people will
1:34:14seek to buy them. They will seek to make them themselves. They may go to First Nations reserves
1:34:20where those products are not tested. They're not part of the 4,000 fireworks that the federal
1:34:26government through ERD approves. And I think therein lies the community risk of why the ban
1:34:32simply does not work. I hope that answers your question, councillor.
1:34:38Okay, thank you. Are there any other questions? Okay. Thank you, Mr. Kenji.
1:34:46Moving on to Harping Gill. Harping Gill, sorry. Right, you have five minutes.
1:35:04Good afternoon. My name is Harping Gill. I'm a local retailer in Guelph for the last 14 years
1:35:11on York and Victoria Road and most recently at Stone Road Mall.
1:35:16So I just want to, a lot has already been said today. I want to thank everybody for speaking.
1:35:21I don't want to repeat too much, but I'm going to try to try not to repeat, but we'll be going
1:35:25over just a couple of things. One thing I want to go over is cultural importance of
1:35:32the fireworks in some things, especially with the Diwali community. And you know, in Guelph,
1:35:39we have a big community from like all different backgrounds from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh,
1:35:44Sri Lankan, Nepal, and Bhutan, Fiji, which has grown rapidly in the last few years. And I've noticed
1:35:51big increase in fireworks usage over the last few years, especially for Diwali.
1:35:57You know, like banning it, I'm all for safety regulation changes,
1:36:03permits for the commercial use of fireworks, because the commercial fireworks grades
1:36:08are much, much worse, or much, much higher, or stronger, louder, etc., and impact on the
1:36:17city as a whole. But as Canada, we're like one of the most diverse communities. We have
1:36:23most diverse populations around in the world. And taking it away from people, the newcomers to Canada,
1:36:32just like having it there shows the community as a whole that we're a diverse group. We're not
1:36:39sheltering some communities and others. We're shouting them. We're allowing them to be involved
1:36:44together, brings community together. I've noticed since we started the Wali in Guelph,
1:36:48communities from all over, different backgrounds, different races, are embracing the Wali now,
1:36:54is becoming similar as the Canada Day celebration. Like last year was probably
1:37:00almost, if not just as busy as Canada Day was for me personally in sales. And like, you know,
1:37:06all, oh, ban would, increasingly I have six full-time employees that we use when we're open
1:37:10yearly. It's a local impact on you. You know, people are going to start buying from other
1:37:16communities like the online, online usage. You can go to Push Lynch. You can purchase some. You
1:37:22can go to Georgetown, Allora. They're all within quick driving rate distance. But then that's taking
1:37:27money away from our economy, jobs losses in our community. Just in general, and then you go into
1:37:33the, as people have already, some speakers already touched base on the underground element, which
1:37:39is huge, which I don't think the city of Guelph has experienced yet, what fireworks really are,
1:37:44and what fireworks or firecrackers are. The two difference distinguish which firecrackers are
1:37:49legal in America and banned in Canada for obvious reasons. But with the ban that happened in, you
1:37:56could, in relation to the West Coast there in British Columbia, it brought the craziest fire
1:38:03crackers back into Canada, which we grew up with in the 90s and the 80s. And those are all back now,
1:38:09because they've banned it in so many communities. That's all you're getting now. So now you got
1:38:12underage kids using firecrackers, which are going to blow off their fingers and it happens,
1:38:17right? Now you've got more risk to children, no regulations, more calls for police, hospital,
1:38:23ambulances, other services that were taken away from our community that could be put somewhere
1:38:28else by banning these. If we just put that towards more safety, more regulations, which we, as
1:38:34retailers, we do a lot. Like everybody comes in to buy fireworks. We have, half the people don't
1:38:38know what they're buying. You have to sit there and explain. They ask a lot of questions. We're very,
1:38:43we're very open to help. We help every customer, you know, like, I'm not sure if anybody's ever
1:38:47been into one of our stores, but we're super busy. And like people, they come back every year, never
1:38:53had any issues where anybody's been injured, not from us, and anything about any safety, like any
1:38:58fires or something preventable. And I think that stuff happens is because it's under regulated
1:39:03and children or underage kids are purchasing it from other communities or something,
1:39:08or through the black market, which I'm telling you what happened in BC, you don't want that
1:39:13happening here. It's just, it's a great risk. And it's just something that I would stem away from
1:39:19if we can, like just more safety, more regulations, as I would say is the best way to go. And like,
1:39:24if you have any other questions, I can help you. Okay. Thank you very much. Are there any questions
1:39:31Councillor Kerron and then Councillor Chew? Yeah, two quick questions. You mentioned that you can,
1:39:39and I may have misinterpreted, you haven't had any injuries traced to fireworks that you sell,
1:39:44are fireworks traceable? Like they're, uh,
1:39:49No, like, sorry, I must have, I must have said that wrong. I meant to say like related to any,
1:39:54like anybody coming back to us saying we've some underage kids took them from us or
1:39:58something like that to happen, right? Because if that was the case, if something happened,
1:40:02where the fireworks came from, they're all labeled, all the fireworks are labeled,
1:40:05tells you where you bought them from, like our stickers and brands are on there, right?
1:40:08So I've, I haven't had anybody come in and say that, hey, we use your fireworks and this happened
1:40:14to us or my neighbor's house caught a fire. The fireworks, they blow off, but the packaging
1:40:20still there says our name says our company name and all that, although it goes on it. Okay. So they
1:40:25are some traceable by the label on the product. And they all have a bar scan on it. So you can
1:40:32scan it, it goes to our website or whatnot. Okay. And you mentioned specifically, my second and
1:40:37final question, you mentioned specifically that Diwali is very much a cultural event that are
1:40:41tied to fireworks and my understanding and correct me if I'm wrong, I don't know if you're
1:40:45a member of the community celebrating Diwali, but the festival of lights, we've had drone shows in
1:40:50Caledon, Langley, BC in Bolton, like a lot of communities are going to the drone light shows
1:40:59to celebrate Diwali. I just wondered if that is something that I'm hearing you say that
1:41:06community celebration of that event is tied to fireworks, but a lot of communities are moving
1:41:13away from fireworks. Yeah. So it is, it's tied to the fireworks for sure. So that, like that being
1:41:21said, October, November is usually when Diwali happens. It's a cold time of year. Families usually
1:41:26celebrate Diwali together, like in big groups, they come over, it's feasting, eating, enjoying
1:41:32company with each other at home and home setting as opposed to getting together and going out to
1:41:38watch a laser show, getting all your family members, kids, elderly, everybody together and taking
1:41:43them out in the cold, in the rain, Diwali mostly usually raining or super cold every year as, and
1:41:49so taking people out to go do that, you know, it takes, it's hard to get everybody together and
1:41:55people just can stop getting together to do that. People rather sit at home in a nice home setting,
1:41:59rate celebrating it together. Councillor Chew? Through you, Madam Chair, just to delegate,
1:42:10I just really want to lead in on the public education component. So I'm curious to see,
1:42:15like, how you're doing it as a retailer and if you have any relationship with Guelphire or any,
1:42:21like, city officials at the moment and it, just falling up on that as well, do you, can you foresee
1:42:27a relationship with Guelphire and the city to kind of help with the public education because
1:42:34where our demographics are shifting and there's definitely more emphasis on public safety,
1:42:40so this is why we're here, at the same time we also recognize the cultural significance of
1:42:45your industry. So can you, in your, from your perspective, help us paint a picture of how we can
1:42:53better the public education component of this? Well, I think you could do, like, for example,
1:42:59a community like the City of Vaughn, you have a, you have a community, like they have a thing
1:43:04set together with the city councillors, the fire department, the fire safety committee or what
1:43:09not, and they get together every year and they bring in the vendors and they speak and they go
1:43:14over things and, you know, have discussions of what they can do together, like we give impact,
1:43:18input, they give input to each other and it helps everybody figure out what needs to be done,
1:43:23right, they'll ask us, we can ask them questions and stuff, right, and like, as we're seeing people
1:43:27come into the stores, we have pamphlets there that explain, first off, the Guelph guidelines,
1:43:32city regulations, where and when they can do it, explaining to them parks and all that is off limits,
1:43:38and then they ask us questions about the fireworks usage, like a lot of people don't know how to
1:43:41actually use it, we have labels and stuff on them, but we still give an in-depth, like, idea to
1:43:47everybody how to safely use it, what not to do, what to do, and all that, right, and I think overall,
1:43:53it just, we just need a better community engagement between the city, fire, and maybe the vendors,
1:43:59which will help explain to the rest of the population what's, what we can do to make it safer, right,
1:44:05because at the end of the day, that's what you want, a safe, safe regulation, safe safety of
1:44:11everything, right, and if we don't, if we push away from not doing that first and go straight to
1:44:17banning or something, it's going to be pushed into the black market. And just a follow-up,
1:44:24do you have any personal, like, relationship with any city officials to make sure that the
1:44:30public education has some alignment with our bylaws are currently standing? I personally don't,
1:44:36I haven't had the opportunity to, but I have, like, fire personnel come into our stores, we speak,
1:44:42they come in throughout the years when we're open and stuff, they just stop by, come say hi,
1:44:47the bylaw, people come by, they'll come in the store, check out stuff, but as an engagement as a
1:44:53community, not yet, personally, I have not, but I'm not sure if behind me there, some of the speakers
1:44:58may have already a CFNA and a rocket and a special. Sorry, are there any other questions for this
1:45:13Thank you. Okay, seeing none, thank you very much. Thank you for having me. Now we have Mr.
1:45:19John Luff, who's supposed to be here in person. Mr. Luff, hey, he doesn't appear to be here,
1:45:29so if we're checked later at the end, and we have a Bill Renault from a mystical distributing
1:45:37company joining us by video. Yes, we can. Thank you. Okay, Mr. Renault, you've got five minutes.
1:46:01Good afternoon, Council members. My name is Bill Renault. I represent mystical distributing,
1:46:07which manufactures, imports, and distributes fireworks across Canada. Today, I'm asking you
1:46:13to keep the sale and use of consumer fireworks within Guelph. Fireworks are not just about the
1:46:19flashes of the light in the sky. They're deeply rooted in Canadian and global cultural celebrations.
1:46:26I grew up celebrating Canada Day and Victoria Day, and now they're new cultural events like
1:46:31the Valley and Lunar New Year that are celebrated with fireworks. Fireworks bring people together,
1:46:38foster community spirit, and highlight Guelph's diversity. Safety is our top priority. And using
1:46:45the CNFA's Be A Good Neighbor program, which focuses on educating consumers about responsible
1:46:52fire usage, safety fires are distributed at the retail level, and our products feature QR codes
1:46:59that are linked to safety videos on the packaging, such as that. Safety is our, sorry, let's keep,
1:47:10let's look at real Canadian stats, not American stats like the reports spoke about.
1:47:16Can the Canada Stringent Regulation have resulted in an outstanding safety record? Over the last
1:47:2225 years, there's been zero deaths related to consumer fireworks. In terms of injuries,
1:47:30the data reinforces the relative safety of fireworks. According to the Canadian Hospital
1:47:36Injury Reporting Prevention Program, there have been only 210 firework related injuries
1:47:42in the past 12 years. By contrast, items like wax candles, which are unregulated, kill at least
1:47:51eight Canadians annually, and have caused more fires and injuries, yet we aren't considering them
1:47:58for a ban. There are concerns about fireworks environmental impact. However, recent studies
1:48:06show that fireworks do not contribute significantly to air Canada degradation. A recent independent
1:48:13study conducted by Atkins Reels in Quebec has provided positive news about the environmental
1:48:20impact of fireworks on air quality. The study reveals that the increase in fine particle
1:48:26emissions during firework displays is highly localized and short lived, lasting only a few
1:48:32minutes, and consistently complies with stringent environmental standards. Even the large pyrotechnic
1:48:40shows contribute minimally to greenhouse gas emissions with CO2 emissions from an average
1:48:46show comparable to a bus trip between Guelph and Toronto. This data reassures that firework displays
1:48:53while creating moments of joy and wonder have limited and manageable impact on the environment,
1:48:59supporting their continued use in celebrations across Canada. While noise is a common concern,
1:49:06statistics show that fireworks are not a top noise complaint in cities. Parties, construction,
1:49:12and loud music rank higher. Moreover, bylaw enforcement of a total fireworks ban would be
1:49:17costly and ineffective, driving residents to purchase fireworks in neighboring cities or online,
1:49:24leaving Guelph with no control. Here's an interesting fact that Tom brought up earlier.
1:49:30A consumer firework approved in Canada can have a maximum sound level of 120 decibels. However,
1:49:36with a legal spectator distance of at least 50 meters, that sound level drops significantly
1:49:42to around 86 decibels, comparable to the noise of heavy traffic, a snow blower,
1:49:49or even a vacuum cleaner running nearby. This means that fireworks are not as loud as you may
1:49:54think from a safe viewing distance. As a responsible pet owner, I followed advice from
1:50:00organizations like the Humane Society to keep my pets safe indoors during firework displays.
1:50:07The same goes for thunderstorms, and let's be honest, even the vacuum, yes, I vacuum a chalking,
1:50:13if my pets can handle the daily terror of the vacuum cleaner, I can definitely manage their
1:50:19distress during fireworks. It's all about taking the same common sense precautions we use for
1:50:25everyday noises. In conclusion, fireworks are a cherished tradition that brings communities
1:50:30together, and with Canada's stringent regulations, they remain a safe and responsible form of
1:50:35celebration. The data shows fireworks have an excellent safety record, minimal environmental
1:50:41impact, and a manageable noise level when enjoyed at proper distances. Rather than forcing a complete
1:50:47ban, we urge you to consider option one, which preserves the tradition on key holidays while
1:50:53enhancing safety measures. Thank you for your time. Thank you. Are there any questions of Mr. Reno?
1:51:03Okay, seeing none, thank you very much. Next, we have Arthur Lam, who will be joining us on the phone.
1:51:20Is Mr. Lam here? Hi, I'm here. Can you hear me? Yes, we can hear you. Thank you. You have five
1:51:27minutes. Please go ahead. Thank you, Madam Chair, esteemed members of the Council and fellow citizens.
1:51:36The Lunar New Year is a cornerstone of Chinese cultural identity, symbolizing renewal,
1:51:43family reunion, and hope for future prosperity. Its significance extends beyond the Chinese
1:51:48community, enriching Canada's multicultural tapestry and reflecting our nation's commitment
1:51:54to diversity and inclusion. In Guelph, the Chinese Canadian community has adapted their
1:52:01celebrations to align with local regulations, demonstrating flexibility and respect for our
1:52:07shared environments. Their galas are mostly indoors and celebrated without fireworks and
1:52:14firecrackers. However, the absence of firecrackers, a millennia old tradition intrinsically linked
1:52:22to our heritage, leaves a void in these festivities. Fireworks and firecrackers in Chinese culture are
1:52:30not mere spectacles. They are rooted in our history and beliefs. Originating over a thousand years
1:52:38ago with the invention of gunpowder, fireworks and firecrackers have evolved into a symbolic
1:52:44language of joy, prosperity, and cultural continuity. They serve to ward off negative
1:52:51energies and usher in good fortunes for the coming year. Fireworks and firecrackers are also set off
1:52:57for weddings and other joyous occasions for the same reason. The current exclusion of the Lunar
1:53:04New Year from Guelph's list of approved fireworks dates sends a message of cultural oversight,
1:53:11and it undermines the city's reputation for inclusivity. I propose that we rectify this by
1:53:19extending the same considerations granted to Duwali to the Lunar New Year celebrations.
1:53:26More importantly, this is not merely about preserving tradition. Fireworks display have
1:53:33transcend their origins to become an art form, celebrated in festivals across Canada, including
1:53:40Ottawa, Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver, and other major cities. By embracing this aspect of Chinese
1:53:47culture, Guelph has an opportunity to enrich its cultural offerings and potentially boost tourism
1:53:53and community engagement. In considering this proposal, we must balance cultural significance
1:54:01with safety and environmental concerns. I'm confident that our community can work collaboratively
1:54:08to implement responsible guidelines that reflect both our traditions and our shared spaces.
1:54:17This decision before the council is more than a matter of policy. It is an affirmation of Guelph's
1:54:24commitment to be a truly inclusive city that values and celebrates diverse cultural heritage
1:54:32for all its residences. Thank you for your attention. I'm prepared to address any questions
1:54:38or concerns regarding cultural importance of fireworks in Chinese traditions and how we
1:54:44might integrate them responsibly into our city's celebrations.
1:54:51Okay, thank you, Mr. Lam. Councillor Bousetail has a question, and if anybody else, and Councillor
1:54:57Wark. Thank you very much, Mr. Lam. Can you hear me okay?
1:55:02Yes, I can. Thank you. Thank you. I may have missed it at the very beginning, but can you tell me
1:55:07who you're representing? We did have a consultation with the Guelph Chinese Canadian
1:55:14Cultural Group. Are you speaking as an individual or are you representing an organisation?
1:55:20I'm speaking as an individual. I went to the University of Waterloo and I was
1:55:28frequented Guelph at Kitchener as well as Waterloo. And I'm just speaking, I've also worked with
1:55:35Chinese Canadian organisations across the country. Thank you. Sorry, through the chair,
1:55:43just clarification. So you're a resident of Guelph. Is that correct? Sorry, I missed the beginning.
1:55:49No, I was a resident of Waterloo many years ago, but I have been to Guelph on many occasions.
1:55:58I'm speaking as an individual. Thank you very much.
1:56:03Okay, thank you. Councillor Wark. Thank you, Chair Downer. Through you to the delegate.
1:56:10I'm just curious. What is proposed would allow for a community fireworks display
1:56:18as long as a qualified person managed that display? And so would that not also be what
1:56:24you're describing in Ottawa and Vancouver large cities that would drive tourism, like you're
1:56:30talking about a big community display that would probably have to be executed by a professional
1:56:35anyway? So doesn't this proposal correspond to what you say would be helpful?
1:56:46Yes, I think that is a good step. I would just say that it prevents more private impromptu
1:57:02celebrations such as weddings and small gatherings of a few people.
1:57:08That's really what my concern is that it would prevent their ability to
1:57:17celebrate their traditions. Right, so through you, Chair Downer,
1:57:23sir, are you aware that that's currently not permitted under the existing by-law that
1:57:28you're only allowed to issue to use the fireworks Canada Day, Diwali and Victoria Day unless you
1:57:34have a permit? Yes, and what I'm saying is that the exclusion of Lunar New Year seems to
1:57:44unfairly, may have unfairly targeted Chinese Canadians who would like to
1:57:54celebrate their holidays with the use of fireworks and firecrackers.
1:57:59I see. Okay, thank you. Okay, thank you. Are there any other questions? Councillor Chew.
1:58:06Thank you, Madam Chair. Just to the delegate, I'm just wondering if you personally or on behalf
1:58:13of any other Chinese organizations have put in an expression of interest to our city staff to
1:58:20permit Lunar New Year because right now I'm not even sure if there has been an expression of interest
1:58:30and I think that's an important starting point before we jump to any conclusions.
1:58:37Yeah, I think that's a really good point and I think one of the issues that we
1:58:46faced in terms of representation for the Chinese Canadian community is the fear of
1:58:52governments or involvement with governments. So even the step of applying for a license
1:59:03scares people off from actually doing it. And what we are saying is that from an
1:59:15equality perspective, it would be more equitable to include Lunar New Year as one of the holidays
1:59:24where people can use fireworks and firecrackers. Thank you. Okay, thank you. Are there any other
1:59:38questions with this delegate? Thank you, Mr. Lam. So going to in person, is there a Mark Matthews here?
1:59:52Okay, I don't see you, Mr. Matthews. How about Harpreet Singh? Okay, I don't see anyone here.
2:00:05Can we go back? Did John Lough show up? No, okay, so we're missing those three delegations.
2:00:15Okay, we're going to go back to the council discussion. Would somebody put the staff recommendation
2:00:22on the floor before we go to questions of staff? Councillor Kerrion, seconded by Councillor Goller.
2:00:29Okay, questions of staff? I'll start my list. Okay, Councillor Kerrion.
2:00:35Yeah, thank you. Great discussion. Just as a follow-up to staff, I know that all we're really
2:00:42voting on today is to kind of send you off to do the work based on the engagement so far.
2:00:47As part of the work, it would be your normal process to engage our equity diversity inclusion,
2:00:55our staff in diversity, given that cultural celebrations are part of the exemptions that
2:01:04we're identifying. So would you be including our staff in that development of the bylaw to ensure
2:01:11that we have that lens? Through the chair, Councillor Kerrion, unfortunately, Mr. Parse stepped
2:01:17away briefly, but I can advise that we did speak to our engagement staff and part of that staff is
2:01:26cultural items and stuff. Okay, I figured you had, it just wasn't identified specifically in the
2:01:31report. And then as you go forward in the bylaw, that that would be part of it. I think on the last
2:01:37page of the report, you indicated that a potential $100 application fee would be part of it. Can you
2:01:48speak to whether that covers, is that covering staff time? Is it covering potential cleanup? I'm
2:01:57just thinking for some charity organizations or nonprofits or cultural organizations,
2:02:05I wonder whether we might consider the $100 fee as a refundable fee, more of a deposit. So
2:02:15you know, we do it with our signage for running for council. If you follow the law,
2:02:20if there's no cleanup of signs, if there's no damage to city property, you get your $100 back.
2:02:28Is that a consideration? Through the chair to Councillor Kerrion,
2:02:33any will of council, however, they direct staff on that fee. The fee was developed as a cost recovery
2:02:41for staff's time in processing the applications and beginning the process. I just want to note
2:02:48that there is another fee that is the inspection fee for fire to actually complete the inspections
2:02:55currently for 2024. That's $108. So in total, the application would be $100 and then the inspection
2:03:00would be another $108. How council wishes us to direct on that fee? It could be the will of council.
2:03:08Thanks. That's good to know because I think we wouldn't want two different fees. We would
2:03:12want a one-stop shop for this. So putting the two fees together makes more sense if you could
2:03:16would consider that in developing the bylaw. Is there additional, if there were damage to
2:03:21public property, if there was cleanup of materials left behind, is that billed separately and is
2:03:30it part of the agreement that we enter into with the application? Through the chair to Councillor
2:03:39Cron, I looked to Mr. Parfey as any more information out, but part of the permit system would be that
2:03:47any damages or cleanup costs or anything that the permit holder would be responsible for that.
2:03:52I believe that's correct. Okay. Are you entertaining comments now or do you would like us to
2:03:59say? No, let's stay with the questions. This is going to be a longer topic, so let's be clear on
2:04:04the questions. Did you have another question? No. Okay. So I've got Councillor Gibson,
2:04:11Alt and Guthrie on my list. Okay. We'll go to Councillor Gibson for questions.
2:04:19You chair Downer. So thanks to staff and the delegates. Good conversation and a good report,
2:04:25quite frankly, a lot of public engagement. I guess I just want to make very clear distinctions here
2:04:31for the public to be aware. And again, for myself, this is just sort of confirming what I believe I'm
2:04:36reading. Sale of home fireworks, sale of home fireworks are would be prohibited under this
2:04:45bylaw. So no more individual backyard displays of fireworks and only where permitted through this
2:04:54upwards of $200 and plus dollar fee would fireworks be permitted in the city. And in that
2:05:00regulation, there would be safe distance requirements, a licensed display supervisor,
2:05:07sufficient liability insurance, safety inspections for safety and animal safety plan.
2:05:15Can we confirm that that's all that would be allowed through this bylaw if struck in past?
2:05:24Through the chair, to Councillor Gibson, you are correct that consumer fireworks would not be
2:05:32permitted. Larger scale displays would be, permit would be acquired and it would have to be
2:05:43discharged by an authorized individual. I think I've captured it correctly under the proposed.
2:05:48No problem. So follow up question. What is a licensed authorized individual? Maybe I'll ask
2:05:57a second question. What is the animal safety management plan? So I'll turn it over to Mr.
2:06:03Parding and answer this question. It would be something that would have to be put together
2:06:11with the event organizer. A Guelph Humane Society in the past has worked with other
2:06:17celebrations and organizations to ensure that animals were shoot away or moved from the site prior
2:06:25to discourage the initial terror from the fireworks. So it's about having more of a
2:06:32preemptive plan about ensuring that there's no birds by scaring them away either through
2:06:39existing means. I think there was another part to that question. Was there Councillor Gibson?
2:06:49Well, it just sounds a little bit,
2:06:55I don't understand. It seems a little cloudy. It's not very definitive at this point.
2:07:03Is there a specific type of education or certification? This licensed display supervisor
2:07:10is going to be requiring. And secondly, an animal safety management plan cannot just be left up to
2:07:18staff to think of the best things they can think of in the moment. We would need some bar,
2:07:23right? Some measure of performance saying, here's a templated safety plan here, the steps you should
2:07:29do before you discharge the fireworks. Thanks very much. Or are we going to have to go through a
2:07:33committee approach where I have a license, I have a license to do this barring approval by some
2:07:40committee on the animal acceptance plan. I just want to know what this process is going to look like.
2:07:46And again, going through the, quite frankly, going through the process of the short-term
2:07:53accommodation licensing in other counties, this becomes not just a simple on paper exercise,
2:07:58it becomes committee to committee to committee approach where I am looking for approval for
2:08:03four or five different people simply to obtain a license. Through the chair to Councillor Gibson,
2:08:11as part of the application process, we would provide the forms and the documentations that
2:08:17would be required for the individual to show that they're authorized or licensed to discharge that
2:08:23type of fireworks, as well as the animal mitigation plan. This is currently done with the
2:08:31assistance of the Gulf Humane Society who kind of give kind of. Yeah, I'll reiterate, it does say
2:09:09licensed display supervisors that that entails some measure of qualification. I'm sorry, Chair,
2:09:25Donna, we cannot hear you. We're going to take a three to five minute break. Yep.
2:09:43We heard that. And through you, Madam Chair, I'm not sure if remote members can hear us,
2:09:53but regardless if you can or not, we'll just take a three to five minute break to make sure
2:09:57we understand what caused that before we continue and just risk it happening again. So just bear
2:10:01with us for just a couple of minutes here. Testing, testing, just testing the broadcasting of a
2:15:58live stream of the City of Guelph Council. One, two, three. We can hear you well out here.
2:16:22All of that just so everyone knows. Okay, we're just going to wait till the clerk comes back
2:16:27in the room and then continue. Thank you. Welcome back, everyone. I'm going to resume the meeting.
2:17:19And Councillor Gibson, we were at you and you were asking a question that we got cut off. Yeah,
2:17:24thank you. Through you, Chair, Donna, just respectfully, the term licensed operating
2:17:33instructor, and I just wanted to understand what the license is. I'm not aware of a license. So
2:17:37is there a bar or a accreditation that someone would have to have? Through the Chair to Councillor,
2:17:45yes, licensed pyrotechnic is a currently federally recognized license.
2:17:54And I can provide you more details on that after this if you want. No, that's okay. I'm just trying
2:17:58to get an appreciation for the full cost of sort of the administration of a permit like this. So you'd
2:18:05have a permit fee, you'd have a safety inspection fee, and then you would also be paying for a
2:18:10licensed instructor to attend. I'll finish with my questions. I'll leave for comments later. Thank you,
2:18:17Chair, Donna. Okay, thank you, Councillor Gibson. Councillor Allt. Chair, Donna, can you hear me okay?
2:18:27Yes, I can. And Councillor Gowder, I do see your hand. My questions are, I have a couple of
2:18:33questions for staff. The first one, I believe, is for bylaw enforcement, but it could be for others.
2:18:41I understand that drone and laser shows are federally controlled, and I wonder whether there is
2:18:50any potential for including those in consideration of this bylaw or whether this should wait for
2:18:58another day. Through the Chair to Councillor Allt, as you're aware, we don't have any direction
2:19:06right now to look at that. The second thing I cautioned Council about is the staff time that
2:19:11would be required to add that to the bylaw. We have a number of items underway right now,
2:19:18as you're aware, as well as drones currently are regulated federally. Therefore, information
2:19:27on the permissions, on how to apply for a permit and all that are done through transportation Canada,
2:19:35so anyone wishing to have a drone display could look at those regulations first.
2:19:42Thank you. It sounds like it's a fairly lengthy process that we would have to go through. I believe
2:19:48that the next question is for fire prevention staff, who I think are present. I'm wondering if fire
2:19:55prevention could comment on what the impact of fireworks is on the deployment of fire prevention
2:20:03staff during a fireworks display. There surely must be a cost and also a deployment of a number
2:20:14of people that are required to be in attendance at large fireworks displays. Through Chair Downer,
2:20:24to Councillor All, thank you for the question. Are fire prevention staff, when they receive
2:20:34a request to put on pyrotechnics or large fireworks display, it is very time-consuming for staff
2:20:45up front in terms of reviewing licensing of those who are going to be discharging the fireworks,
2:20:54their safety plans, reviewing the sites. All those details are taken into consideration
2:21:02as part of that review. In terms of attendance at those fireworks displays, I'd have to get back to
2:21:15you, Councillor All, in terms of I don't believe it's a requirement that we attend, but we often do
2:21:20attend just to ensure that those safety measures are taking place. And we also work in cooperation
2:21:31with our bylaw officials to also make sure that those large-skill events go off without a hitch.
2:21:39Thank you very much. Just to follow up on that then, when you say time-consuming and safety plans,
2:21:45are you able to provide any estimate of the amount of time that is required?
2:21:56Any estimate at this point would just be off the top of my head. Would it be fair to yourself
2:22:01or to my fire prevention staff to try to get a estimate at this time? I can provide the
2:22:06information for you though. Thanks. The next question related to this actually is, in comparison
2:22:14to the large public displays of fireworks, what are some of the challenges that fire prevention
2:22:21staff might find when it comes to issues associated with people setting off home fireworks and even
2:22:30illegal fireworks within the city? Can you comment on that at all?
2:22:37Chair Downer, to Councillor All, thank you for the question. The time involved with
2:22:44illegal or improper discharge of fireworks is not so much attributed to our fire prevention
2:22:53staff as opposed to our fire suppression staff. And they will respond to emergency events as they
2:23:00are called in to dispatch through 9-1-1. And we have a history within the municipality of
2:23:10of improper discharge and disposal fireworks causing property damage or injury to individuals.
2:23:23I can give you the exact numbers for the last three years. I think we had 29 reported
2:23:30incidents that our fire staff had to respond in with multiple vehicles, multiple personnel.
2:23:37Fortunately, in those three years, there were no resultant injuries. I also am aware beyond that,
2:23:44in the last 10 years approximately, there has been, that I know of at least one significant
2:23:49house fire as a result of improper discharge of those fireworks. Councillor All, you're muted.
2:24:01Thank you very much. And without being too glib, clearly no safety plans have been presented ahead
2:24:07on any of those. I'll have my comments later, Chair Downer.
2:24:10Thank you. Mayor Guthrie, do you have any questions?
2:24:16Yeah, thanks Madam Chair and through you, I think Councillor Gibson was kind of hovering around
2:24:23where I was trying to go. So maybe I'll just ask this and if you don't have the answer,
2:24:27it could be a takeaway. But I guess what I'm just trying to figure out is what would the cost be
2:24:35for me. I've never done it before. Don't have to, don't ever intend to, but for me to put on a fireworks
2:24:42thing. And because I can imagine the liability isn't cheap. I would imagine the supervisor isn't
2:24:52cheap. You know, the permit's a hundred bucks. I know that much. So I just, I just wouldn't mind,
2:24:58like, what am I up against here as someone that wants to actually do it and someone wants to do it
2:25:04proper? What am I up against? And so that's something that if you have an answer, that'd be great
2:25:11if you, if you don't maybe just let me know if it's a takeaway. Through the Chair,
2:25:18to Mayor Guthrie, obviously the cost would obviously be based on the amount of fireworks
2:25:24and the length of the display and the type of the display. We don't have that number with us today
2:25:30examples, but it's something we can take away. Okay. And so my last question right now is just a
2:25:37clarity question. I'm just trying to understand basically, is what the bylaw presenting today
2:25:49basically a ban, basically a ban of people like me and my own neighborhood just trying to do something
2:25:55with a couple neighbors versus an actual show, like, like candidate a show or Diwali show,
2:26:07where it's a big, a big deal. You're allowed those to happen. But if I'm trying to just do
2:26:13something in my neighborhood to celebrate with like four neighbors or something like that,
2:26:18this just, this, this bylaw is basically saying that it won't happen.
2:26:25Through the Chair and Mayor Guthrie, as the as the recommendation is presented,
2:26:29it would be a permit only for larger displays. So consumer fireworks would not be permitted.
2:26:37Now, neighbors could get together and or for special events, get a permit and do it. But
2:26:46for the smaller consumer, just charging the fireworks that would be prohibited.
2:26:54Okay. And my final question on that then is, how do you determine what,
2:27:01what meets the threshold of small versus large? So I'm thinking like,
2:27:11you know, the Westminster Woods in the South End, I mean, they have their neighborhood group,
2:27:17I would consider that to be large. I would consider it a Diwali event to be large.
2:27:22But is five of my neighbors getting together not allowed? Do I need to have 10?
2:27:31Like what, what, what, how do you determine what, what is allowed, what's not?
2:27:36So through the Chair and the Mayor Guthrie, anyone that wishes to discharge fireworks
2:27:42could apply for a permit, have it inspected and have a licensed person discharge on event.
2:27:49So you could have a group of four people if they still choose to do that, or you could have a
2:27:54community club also do it. It would, it would be on the application, it would be on the person to
2:28:02apply and go through that process. Okay. Okay. Yeah, I think that's all my questions right now.
2:28:15Thank you Madam Chair. Okay, thank you, Councillor Bousetil. Thank you. I'm through the Chair. Thank
2:28:23you very much for the presentation. I just have two questions in the recommendations. It makes
2:28:30reference to school boards. And I was curious about, was there any consultation or conversation with
2:28:37school boards? Obviously school boards, there will not be fireworks set off during the daytime,
2:28:44although it has happened. Just a question because if we're talking about the site, the property,
2:28:51school boards themselves have community use and property requirements around if I'm setting off
2:28:58fireworks in the evening on school board property. So I was wondering if there was any kind of
2:29:03conversation with the school boards, if there was a conversation, if their preference is to ban,
2:29:07knowing of, you know, the repercussions the day after fireworks on school board property with
2:29:13kids setting them off in the playgrounds and so on. Just that's my first question.
2:29:22During our community consultation that was partake, we did not do one-on-one consultation
2:29:28with the school boards, but we did engage members of the communities who did have children in school.
2:29:38Thank you, and I'll make a comment later on. So my second question is, I do have the benefit of
2:29:43over a dozen years of organizing special events in the community. So similar to what the Mayor
2:29:49was discussing, if it's a neighborhood event, there is a special event application. So tell me if
2:29:56I'm picturing this wrong. So, you know, the food, the safety plan, fire plan, emergency plan, lost
2:30:03child plan, and even the inflatables, the bouncy castles that come, there is the company submits
2:30:11an insurance, the company comes on site, the site supervisor, and provides training to all of us
2:30:18volunteers that are watching the kids bouncy, and I wear a lanyard that says I completed the
2:30:23training and so on. Now if I want to add on, because we're going to stay there until midnight and do
2:30:30fireworks, I will now submit a safety plan and a animal plan as well. And I want to be clear,
2:30:38I'm happy to do that because I know that I'm creating a safe event. Is that kind of capturing
2:30:45kind of the extension of, and as a community group, you know, we provide those kinds of services to
2:30:54the neighborhood and to those individuals. Is that about fair?
2:31:00Through the chair to Councillor Boussadil, that is correct. So you would, if you were to add fireworks
2:31:05to an event and an application, and those plans would be required. Thank you, that's all.
2:31:13Thank you. Councillor Awerk.
2:31:16Thank you Chair Downer. Through you to staff, can you just recenter me? What is the problem that
2:31:24we're trying to solve with this change in the bylaw? Is it fires? Is it people setting them off in
2:31:33parks when they're not supposed to? What is this conversation in response to and what's the scope
2:31:38of that problem? So through chair Downer, I want to start simply and not being overly simplistic,
2:31:45but simply by saying because Council gave us direction to bring this bylaw forward.
2:31:50So that is part of the reason why we undertook this. That having been said, it is predominantly,
2:31:55I would say, based on community feedback and complaints that both we and members of Council
2:31:58were receiving. So that is the more simplistic answer. I'll turn to my right because I'm sure
2:32:04others will have comments that they want to make specific to managing safety concerns.
2:32:09And so certainly the fire chief is here for that reason, but it is by and large, I mean,
2:32:15this was originally scheduled for 2027 and at Council's direction, we moved it back to this year.
2:32:21And I believe that was in response to feedback that members of Council were receiving regarding
2:32:25fireworks, but I'll let Mr. God for your chief, Arnold, jump in. Through you, Chair Downer,
2:32:34to Councillor O'Rourke. Thank you for the question. I can speak predominantly from a fire
2:32:39life safety perspective. We had a previous delegate talk about how the Canadian Association
2:32:47of Fire Chiefs had us advocated for a number of years to the federal government to ban
2:32:56the use and discharge of consumer fireworks. And to his point, it has been turned down
2:33:04three times by the federal government. And the CAFC continues, however, to advocate
2:33:11for the total ban. And the CAFC does this for two reasons. First, we did a survey of fire
2:33:24departments across the nation. And of the number of respondents, 580 someone responded,
2:33:3024% of fire departments responded that in 2022, they had at least one, at least maybe more,
2:33:37but at least one fire incident in their community in that particular year. The second reason,
2:33:45so we're trying to eliminate, if not reduce, the fire risk. The second reason are the number of
2:33:52injuries. And the Canadian Hospital's Injury Prevention Program, Injury, Injury Reporting
2:33:58and Prevention Program, states that the most common types of injuries that youth and young
2:34:05adults are facing are burns, representing 61% of the cases followed closely by eye injuries.
2:34:14And of all the burns, the most effective body region was the upper extremities,
2:34:18being the hands, the forearms, and the fingers. So we're trying to eliminate the fire risk and
2:34:26injury risk, if not completely, then reduce it substantially. We, if I turn to provincial data,
2:34:39and according to figures provided by the Office of the Fire Marshal in Ontario,
2:34:45fireworks were the cause of 129 fires in almost $2.5 million in damage in Ontario between
2:34:53the years 2009, 2013. I don't have any more current data to provide you other than that.
2:35:00And I've already stated that we have a history here in the city of Guelph, locally. So while
2:35:08council and staff have received numerous complaints over various issues to residents,
2:35:16whether it's noise or nuisance or fire risk or endangerment of animals,
2:35:25my focus is on the fire and life safety element. And that's predominantly what I'm here for.
2:35:32Okay, thank you. So through you, Chair Downer, I don't like bylaws that are really hard or
2:35:40impossible to enforce. So I'm asked, Mr. Godfrey, currently, the restrictions do not allow for
2:35:48fireworks displays in public parks. And yet, we have them in public parks. We have them on a number
2:35:55of days on either side of the allowable days, right, which is I think the irritant for people.
2:36:00They can kind of get over Victoria Day Canada. But it's when it's two weeks on either side,
2:36:05right, because people have bought their their fireworks. So we can't currently get people
2:36:11to comply with the minimal restrictions. How would we enforce this, this new regime on fireworks?
2:36:21I'm asking in a very candid way, right? Because the intent is good. And I just want to know what
2:36:26the mechanics would be for enforcement. Through the chair, Councillor Roark currently,
2:36:34enforcement is centered around the days. So if it's outside of those days or outside of those
2:36:39hours, with respect to discharging on private lands or school board lands, bylaw have no authority
2:36:47on that. It would have to be up to that property owner to say this isn't permitted on my property.
2:36:53So it becomes very difficult to enforce the current bylaw outside of the days that were
2:37:00hours in which fireworks are able to be discharged. And we do do it. As you know, we do get a lot of
2:37:05calls. With respect to the new program, the discharging of fireworks would be prohibited
2:37:14unless there's a permit. So even on Canada Day or Victoria Day, they would be prohibited.
2:37:22Therefore, if your discharging fireworks from your own property or your discharging fireworks
2:37:28from a school property, staff would be able to enforce that because it would not be permitted
2:37:36no matter where. So that makes, clarifies it. I assume we're still going to get a lot of calls.
2:37:42And I assume that we're going to spend a staff time doing that. But we would be able to address
2:37:49some of the issues that we're receiving now that we're unable to address. That makes sense.
2:37:55Okay, that's helpful. Thank you. Okay, thank you. Councillor Goller has another question. And then
2:38:03Mayor Guthrie has a question. And through you, Chair Downer. Thank you, Mr. Guthrie, for going over
2:38:12the enforcement. I just wanted to clarify. The staff recommendation was for a
2:38:21the ban of personal use fireworks and a permissive way to have community fireworks.
2:38:33The last number of complaints that I get from my constituents is about people
2:38:38charging though that personal use fireworks at parks and in backyards and not just on the dates
2:38:47that is permitted, you know, a week before, a week after. How would highlight go about enforcing
2:38:55that? I mean, are we basing a bulk of the enforcement and the fact that they won't be
2:38:59available locally? So most people would just not be able to purchase them. And that will be a
2:39:04significant factor. Or will there be other tools to enforce that people are not as was suggested
2:39:10by the delegates going over to other communities and coming back and discharging fireworks in
2:39:15the backyards? Through the chair to Councillor Goller. With regards to just I just want to
2:39:23clarify something that what is proposed before council is a permit based system. So therefore,
2:39:31you would need to get a permit and the fireworks that you discharged would be up to you to decide.
2:39:36Then the fire department would inspect to make sure that they're being discharged properly.
2:39:41And that there's a license. The person that do that is not clear for that with respect to the sales
2:39:44as part of the next step of council was to direct us. We would work with our legal staff to
2:39:51determine the appropriate means in which to regulate sales because there would still be
2:39:56certain sales that were permitted for those that are actually doing it under the permit.
2:40:01So we would have to look at that with respect to fireworks being purchased at other municipalities
2:40:07and brought into Guelph. I suspect that is happening now. Like for other days in months
2:40:14of the year that fireworks aren't permitted to be sold in Guelph. So I'm not sure if that answers
2:40:20your question or if that clarifies it. Yeah, that does clarify it. And thank you. Thank you for that.
2:40:28So going back to the enforcement, will there be any additional tools or methods used to prevent
2:40:36people from discharging fireworks that are purchased outside of Guelph in city parks or
2:40:42in backyards without permits? Through the chair of councillor Goller, it would be part of the
2:40:48staff patrolling or responding to concerns about fireworks being discharged. Where the fireworks
2:40:54were actually purchased wouldn't impact the enforcement of the regulation. The regulation
2:41:02would be that fireworks was being discharged without a permit. Where those fireworks were
2:41:07purchased wouldn't have an impact. And then to discourage people from doing that, would there
2:41:14be fines associated with the illegal use of personal use fireworks in the city of Guelph?
2:41:24Through the chair of councillor Goller, as currently under our existing fireworks bylaw,
2:41:28there would be fines and opportunities for staff to issue penalties.
2:41:32Okay, okay. I really appreciate that. With regards to the first delegate, he spoke about
2:41:39the health hazards and the environmental impacts. And that was reported in the staff
2:41:47report that was mentioned. I'm trying to understand how that was evaluated with the health concern
2:41:53to humans and to animals. And that the survey responses, you know, 65% of Guelph either
2:42:01didn't care or was supportive of a total fireworks ban. So could you help me understand
2:42:07when we have 65% of our community that says I don't care or ban it all together,
2:42:12why is the staff recommendation to have this permissive system?
2:42:22Through the chair to the councillor, the staff recommendation was to strike a balance between
2:42:28the survey responses that you did note that did call for an overall ban. But in the same survey
2:42:34that we did see that a large number of respondents were comfortable with professional
2:42:40and organized show. So seeing that there was a trend in the data between, yes, there was a ban,
2:42:46but also people were supportive of or felt safe with professionally organized show.
2:42:56The proposed bylaw proposed recommendation is a balance between the two.
2:43:01Okay. Okay. I appreciate that. Thank you, chair Downer.
2:43:05Hey, thank you. Mr. Gretzler has another question and then councillor Chew and then
2:43:09councillor Bilbis. Well, thank you. Thank you, ma'am. George, just a quick one. What is the
2:43:15current fine for setting off fireworks outside of the allowable times and days?
2:43:28Through the chair to America, three will get that for you in a minute.
2:43:32Okay. Let's just pretend it's a hundred bucks. I don't care. Can we make it a thousand?
2:43:41Through the chair to mayor Guthrie, all set fines are based on
2:43:47our when set fines are created, they're based on other existing bylaws, both within our
2:43:53municipality and neighboring municipalities. So they look when we said it, it looks at
2:44:00the fine. I would suspect a thousand dollars for a set fine would ultimately be too high.
2:44:11I would imagine and we're going to confirm the amount that it's more in line with our noise
2:44:15bylaw or nuisance bylaw fine amount. That being said, if there is an issue in which
2:44:22staff believe that the situation goes beyond a set fine, that it's a repeat concern or repeat
2:44:31violation or it's the situation warrants it, staff do have the option to issue a summons to the
2:44:39individuals involved and ask that they appear in court and upon conviction of the violation
2:44:46can seek a higher fine than that of the set fund. Okay. I'm just trying to get to the deterrent issue
2:44:57for those outside the scope of what is allowed. I think there's an educational part here,
2:45:03but I think there's a disciplinary part here as well that maybe can be helped
2:45:09for those that are just not playing by the rules as well. So I'll leave that with you to take away.
2:45:15It would just be interesting if there was a more harsher fine that that might be
2:45:20that might be a part of the solution on this as well. So thank you.
2:45:27Okay. I have Councillor Chew and then Councillor Billings for questions.
2:45:33Thank you, Madam Chair. Just the staff, I just wanted to understand if we do choose the
2:45:39direction of the permitting system. Like is the intention to have a streamlined system kind of
2:45:44like our parks booking or is it going to be quite extensive? Like obviously you guys have to decide
2:45:50and discern, but I'm just trying to understand where our intentions are going to be stemming from
2:45:55if this does pass. Through the chair to Councillor Chew, obviously if we were to put in the permit
2:46:03system, we would have to to create it. However, based on some of the work that we're doing on the
2:46:09business licensing side of things where we're trying to streamline the process and make it easier for
2:46:16residents to apply, we'd be looking the same way for that, make it a simplified form that
2:46:21is easy to apply for and easy for staff to process. Okay. And just a follow-up, I don't want to put
2:46:27any words in your mouth, but just so you understand my intention here, but what would the turnaround be
2:46:32for like a permit? Because I just want to bring some context here. There are a lot of individuals
2:46:39in our communities that do not identify with any community groups. Right? So,
2:46:45but yeah, like to the mayor's point about, you know, three or four or five residents that want to
2:46:52do something, like that's that's the gap here that I want to see us address.
2:47:00Just so our bylaw does work properly and it's not just nice on paper, right? So
2:47:08through the chair to Councillor Chew, unfortunately at this time, I wouldn't be able to give
2:47:13numbers as to what the turnaround time for a for a permit would be, but that would be something
2:47:18that we would explore and determine and that would be communicated to residents so that
2:47:24they're aware as the timelines that is required to process. As indicated earlier, we would be
2:47:31hoping to streamline it to make it a quick turnaround for both the resident and for staff,
2:47:38but there would be compounding factors like the number of permits that all came in at the same
2:47:43time. Right? So if everyone applied for a permit the day that they wanted to discharge fireworks,
2:47:48I would say that it will be almost impossible for staff to turn that around. What is a week,
2:47:55you know, in advance that that may be possible. But again, if it's if it's before Canada Day and
2:48:01we have a large number of permits coming at the same time, then there might be an impact. So we
2:48:05would have to take that away and determine it, but we would provide that information to residents so
2:48:13that they know in advance how soon they would have to apply. Okay. And this final thought,
2:48:20if you could even provide some comparators from other places and what the administrative task
2:48:27entails, that would be really insightful for us. You don't know, you don't have to answer that just
2:48:36to take away. Thanks. Okay, thank you. Councillor Billings. And then we'll go to comments.
2:48:43Through you, Madam Chair, I just wanted to go back to and understand this
2:48:47proposed animal safety management plan. So the response was to spooch them away. So
2:48:54this is really meant for more wildlife, birds, geese. Is that why you're placing this
2:49:01this management plan as a requirement? Through the chair to Councillor Billings.
2:49:08Yes, it would be more for wildlife as as you may be aware, we've had issues in the past where we've
2:49:14had some events at Riverside Park and that there were some some geese that were injured. From that,
2:49:24we've been working with the Humane Society on creating this for the larger events and some of
2:49:30the the ideas that we clear the area first of the geese so that they're not impacted by
2:49:38fireworks. That's the sort of thing that we'd be looking at. And obviously we would be
2:49:42relying on the our partner, the Guelph Humane Society, to provide us some some of that information.
2:49:49Okay, but I'm okay through you, Madam Chair, but I'm still not quite understanding with respect
2:49:56to wildlife how to swoosh them away and how onerous this would be with respect to birds.
2:50:03For example, they fly away, they come back and even geese. So are we proposing to like set off a
2:50:11firework to swoosh them away for the birds in the trees? And then they just come back? I really
2:50:16don't understand the process that would be accomplished and how you're going to do it
2:50:22and how onerous it would be. So through the Chair to Council Billings, as indicated Guelph Humane
2:50:30Society obviously would provide some feedback on that. In the past, it's been the discharge of one
2:50:34firework beforehand to get the the geese to move rather than having a lot of fireworks discharged
2:50:42all at the same time. So depending on the length of the show and the fireworks being used, Guelph
2:50:49Humane Society may provide some other information. In other cases, they've had a dog that's been,
2:50:54they've walked around the dog and around Riverside Park to get the geese to fly away
2:51:00before the start of the fireworks. I'll look to Mr. Parr to see if he has any other comments.
2:51:05So I was just going to add on to that. So then what you're saying the responsibility of this
2:51:15process would be up to then the license display supervisor to do this? Through the Chair to
2:51:24Council Billings, it would be identified as part of the application process, whether it's the,
2:51:28if it's a discharge of an initial fireworks, then yes, it would have to be that individual. If it's
2:51:36someone walking around with a dog in advance, that may be somebody else, but the plan would help
2:51:43would help be designed by the Guelph Humane Society or recommended by the Guelph Humane Society.
2:51:47And then potentially would there be another cost getting to the mayor? Like how much is this going
2:51:52to cost me? So potentially could there be another cost to have that done? Walking dogs around?
2:52:02Through the Chair to Council Billings, that would be up to the event organizer. If there's
2:52:08a, like I would know the cost for that without that, with respect to the application process,
2:52:13that would be part of the $100 fee. Okay. And then so now we're on cost, the cost of the insurance.
2:52:19So staff at this time, present time, no idea with respect to how much the fireworks insurance
2:52:26would cost for a professional display. Through the Chair to Council Billings, that's information
2:52:35we can get back, but again, it would depend on the type of display, the length of display,
2:52:39where it's being held, the number of people in attendance. But we can get some information based
2:52:45on Canada Day and some other events. We can look at that. Okay. So in the past then with the Canada
2:52:53Day fireworks display, say even Rotary, they didn't have then fireworks insurance then.
2:53:01Through the Chair to Council Billings, with respect to the display set of gone in the past,
2:53:07with Canada Day, a lot of these conversations that we're having about mitigation for animals
2:53:13and insurance and having a licensed person discharge them are already in effect.
2:53:18All right. So the idea is that we're just making it more formal than it was before,
2:53:23but we can get you those numbers to give you an idea. And then what's missing is the proposed,
2:53:28through you Madam Chair, the proposed separation distance in feet, because I think there's going
2:53:35to be large. So therefore, of course, again, so backyards because we talked about, well,
2:53:41it wouldn't be allowed in backyards. So I'm assuming that it would be quite a lot of footage.
2:53:51If directed by Council to make the, to issue a permit based fireworks system, we can come up
2:53:58with best practices used by other cities. I can provide prior to next Council what best practices
2:54:06are done in other cities in terms of discharge distance. Okay. And then the last question,
2:54:12Madam Chair, is the safety inspection that's done and it would be paid for just for clarity. So
2:54:19that safety inspection would be done and paid for by the 108 dollar fee? Yes or no? That is correct.
2:54:30Through the chair. That is correct. Okay. Thank you. Okay. Thank you. Are there any more questions
2:54:38before we go to comments? Okay. Order? Yes. We're going to go to comments now. Yes, Councillor
2:54:48Kaden? My point of order is would I be able to move my motion as a motion of substitution?
2:54:55No, I don't believe that's the case. So we have a motion on the floor now. If that,
2:55:03well, what depending on the outcome of that, then you can move a subsequent motion.
2:55:07Unless you have an actual amendment that's not contrary to the original move to their staff
2:55:13recommendation. So I can't move a motion of substitution, an amendment by substitution?
2:55:20No, I don't believe you can. Can you confirm that? City Clerk. Through you, Madam Chair,
2:55:26that's correct. Our procedure valid is not contemplate amendments by constitution by
2:55:30replacement. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. So who wants to make some comments?
2:55:39Councillor O'Rourke? Thank you. Chair Downer. I'm just going to make a
2:55:45boost until I just want to make my list here. Kaden, Karon. Okay. I don't see any more for now.
2:55:53Okay. Go ahead. Thank you. Thank you, Chair Downer. So clearly there's lots of pros and cons.
2:55:59I'm going to support the recommendation today because I want a couple more weeks to hear from
2:56:05the public and to kind of weigh this out in my own mind. So that's why I'm going to support the
2:56:12bylaw or the recommendation. But I think that there's some time for folks to weigh in between now and then.
2:56:19Okay. Thank you. Councillor Boussa. Yes. Thank you, and through you, Madam Chair, I too will be
2:56:25supporting the permit system. I think that identifying where and when and really putting down
2:56:33on to pen on to paper considerations about safety is a good practice to do. And that, you know,
2:56:42the city is going to be a partner in this and communicating that there will be, you know,
2:56:46fireworks in your neighborhood park or whatever. So I'm not worried about the cost. I think,
2:56:52I think everything is reasonable. And I think in working with my experience with inflatable
2:56:57companies, bouncy councils, there's training, there's information, there is a partnership
2:57:03in making sure things happen. So I will be supporting the permit system.
2:57:07Okay. Thank you. Councillor Caton. Thank you. Through you. I think that
2:57:14the advance towards injury, the support for bands for the fire community and
2:57:26on behalf of those with environmental sensitivities and neurodivergence,
2:57:30that I think that a total ban is what we really need to go for. But I will support this for now,
2:57:37because I think it is a nice compromise and potentially bring forward a motion
2:57:45for a total ban at the end of the month, if this fails.
2:57:50Okay. Thank you. Councillor Kerron and then Councillor Gibson, who is now joining us by phone.
2:57:56Councillor Kerron. Thank you. Through you, Chair Downer. This is a good balance. I do,
2:58:01you know, Councillor Katelyn indicated a total ban. I don't think we're there yet. I think at some
2:58:06point in our city's future, there will be a total ban. I think the world is changing and the impact
2:58:15has changed and we will get there eventually. But this is a nice balance. I think that when
2:58:20Guelph experiences its first drone light show that there'll be an aha moment where we will realize
2:58:27that fireworks aren't the be all and end all of celebrating these cultural events and activities.
2:58:34But we're not there yet. So I think that at some point we will be, but I'll be supporting
2:58:39moving forward on the bylaw. What would the timing be? One last question. I don't see it in the report
2:58:46off the top. So wondering when this would potentially be coming back once Council
2:58:52at the end of the month has approved it. Through the Chair, to Councillor Kerron, if
2:58:58direction is given by Council to proceed, we will work with legal services to help develop that.
2:59:02I can get a timeline on that for the end of the month. Okay, great. And I think of all the bylaws
2:59:09and how they evolved over the years, everything from animal control to solid waste to bylaws evolve.
2:59:16And I think this is the next evolution. Thanks. Okay. Thank you. Councillor Gibson.
2:59:25Thank you. Through your Chair, Daner, can you hear me okay? Yes, I can. Okay. Terrific. Thank you.
2:59:31Great conversation, everyone. Thank you to staff for answering all of our questions.
2:59:35My deep fear here is that the actions of small few consumers
2:59:45going to end up penalizing the majority of consumers, those good neighbors that set off
2:59:49peaceful and tactful fireworks to celebrate their events. And I'm scared that this bylaw
2:59:55is not going to remove those bad consumers. I still believe we're going to have those 1130
3:00:00fireworks going off on on civic holidays unsanctioned. And so I'm not sure I want to penalize the
3:00:08majority of good citizens when it comes to fireworks. And I fear that this bylaw is going
3:00:14to unfairly target the good citizens of our city. So I want to support a bylaw. I want to support
3:00:22some form of regulation. But I'm going to just sit down and perhaps grab some time with staff
3:00:28over the next few weeks and perhaps bring forward some motions at the end of the month,
3:00:33talking about best management practices, talking about guidelines, talking about sort of authorized
3:00:39use of fireworks rather than outright prohibitions against consumer uses. So I won't be supporting
3:00:47it today, but I hope to bring forward some reasonable motions by the end of the month
3:00:52that will help me get to a place where I support it then. I hope that's clear. Thanks very much for
3:00:57the conversation. Okay, thank you, Councillor Gibson. Are there any other comments? Councillor Allt
3:01:03and Councillor Douner. I will be supporting the recommendations. I would love to have drone
3:01:10shows. I think that they are ultimately the answer, but the reality is that we're not there yet.
3:01:16But I do think about how Guelph has been progressive on smoking bans, on pesticide bans,
3:01:22sorting waste, and all of these are safety or health hazards that we have addressed in the past.
3:01:28Guelph's taken a leadership on these issues. In many ways, we're not taking leadership here,
3:01:32we're in the middle of the pack. Fireworks, we need to recognize our explosives, and there's been
3:01:36some compelling arguments that have been made. I think we need to be mindful of the arguments that
3:01:41have been made by fire prevention. This is a public safety issue, and it's also one that we need to
3:01:48recognize furthers, Guelph's initiatives on the environmental front. We've heard very well that
3:01:55there are a number of pollutants that are in fireworks, and we should be mindful of those no
3:02:00matter how miniscule they are. Thank you, Councillor Chew. Thank you, Madam Chair.
3:02:12For me, I'm very passionate about the public education component tied to this. So,
3:02:17similar to Councillor Gibson, I would like us to be able to move forward with something at the
3:02:23month, but for me, I really need to take some time to evaluate how this permit system is going to work,
3:02:29and how we're going to be able to work with stakeholders, because there are a lot of
3:02:34individuals in our community that, again, do not affiliate themselves with any community groups or
3:02:41neighborhood associations, and for me, I don't want there to be a communications gap, because
3:02:47at the end of the day, we have to deal with a lot of casework as councillors, dealing with
3:02:51these sorts of issues, and I would like to see some kind of resolution, but at the same time,
3:02:56we need to make sure that it's very clear across the board what we're doing. So, again, we don't have
3:03:02a bylaw in place that is very hard for us to manage administratively. So, I'll support this
3:03:10today, but at the same time, I would like to see us people have some conversations before the end of
3:03:15the month. So, thank you. Councillor Goller and then Mayor Guthrie. Thank you, and through you,
3:03:24Chair Daunert, I get a lot of complaints about fireworks from my constituents, and I would
3:03:33like to see a total ban on fireworks altogether, that I think that I will be supporting this today,
3:03:41and I will be looking to listen from constituents as we move forward to the end of the month.
3:03:47I've never heard from anyone that supports the fireworks in backyards in parks. So, this is an
3:03:59opportunity for those community members that have that perspective, and to what Councillor Gibson
3:04:06or Chu have spoken to. Maybe this is your opportunity to let us know why we should have a more
3:04:11permissive system, but as of this point, based on what I've heard, I would like to see a total ban,
3:04:16and failing that, I will be supporting this complete ban on personal use fireworks so that
3:04:23are only large organized groups that can make sure that their safety involved are the ones that are
3:04:30setting off fireworks. Thank you.
3:04:35Mayor Guthrie.
3:04:37Chair, so I'm not going to support it right now only because I think like a couple others,
3:04:47I just need to maybe just get some more information about this before the end of the month,
3:04:51but I will state upfront the status quo cannot remain. That part of the loan I think is known.
3:05:02You know, I just, I get probably 50-50, so it might be very similar to what the engagement was
3:05:10every year, you know, 10 years now. The next few days after, it's always the same. And you know,
3:05:19I think in some of these neighborhood areas, there's like legitimate complaints. I'll just say
3:05:25one story is, you know, somebody wakes up and they look aside in the morning, and there's holes
3:05:35that have been burned through their pool cover because of all the debris in the neighborhood
3:05:41coming down on them, and now they've got hundreds of dollars of damage to their pool cover. Yes,
3:05:47there's pets, and yes, there's like waste. I'm not just saying the pool cover issue is the only one,
3:05:52but that just gives a little bit of an example of some of the impacts that are happening. And so
3:05:59there has to be some form of, I think, regulations around this and safety perspectives around it,
3:06:07but I am not heavy on the administrative side. I think everyone knows that of me. I'm not a
3:06:13heavy administrative guy. And so that's what I want to work on between now and the end of the month
3:06:19to see where we can just try to make something a little bit easier to have that have the different
3:06:27tools that people are going to use in maybe a different way. And so I just want to thank,
3:06:33through you, Madam Chair, the delegations, but I actually do want to thank staff. I think they've
3:06:39landed on sort of a meet in the middle perspective, and it has isn't, you know, the pendulum isn't
3:06:45swung both ways too far. So we'll see what happens between now and the end of the month.
3:06:51Thank you very much. Okay. And just my brief, I'll be supporting the bylaw. I would say,
3:06:59due to what many have said that I think this is sort of a logical next step. And between now and
3:07:05the end of the month, I will have some legal liability questions for our staff regarding
3:07:13the city given the information that we've been given around injuries. So I will now call the vote.
3:07:20First, I'll call on Councillor Gibson. You've already stated that you won't be you'll be voting
3:07:27against. Is that the case? Yes. Okay. Thank you, Chair Downer, against today. Yes. Okay. So is there
3:07:33anyone else opposed? That's Mayor. Okay, we have Councillor Richardson, Mayor Guthrie, and Councillor
3:07:41Billings, and Councillor Chew. So is that's five? Through you, Madam Chair, that's five against
3:07:50there's 12 in person. So that would carry seven to five. Okay. Okay. So that passes. And we will
3:07:59continue this conversation at the end of the month. So thank you staff for bringing that forward. I
Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.
The motion, the vote and the debate come from the City of Guelph’s published record, reproduced rather than interpreted. The document summaries above are the exception: those words were written for this site.