City Council · July 25, 2023 · Item 6.4
Motion to refer the matter to staff for urgent consideration resulting in an emergency meeting of council in the coming weeks.
Main motion under the agenda item Home for Good Campaign - Supportive Housing
Carried (12 to 0)
12 in favour, 0 against — unanimous
This was one of 2 motions on the same item
In the order council took them. A vote makes sense next to the ones around it.
- 1/2Main motionThat, in alignment with the "Building Our Future" pillar of the Strategic Plan, staff be directed to partner with the Home for Good Campaign…no recorded vote
- 2/2Main motionMotion to refer the matter to staff for urgent consideration resulting in an emergency meeting of council in the coming weeks.you are hereCarried (12 to 0)
What was voted on
The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.
Motion to refer the matter to staff for urgent consideration resulting in an emergency meeting of council in the coming weeks.
Moved by Councillor O'Rourke, seconded by Councillor Busuttil.
How the room voted
In favour (12)
- Allt
- Busuttil
- Caron
- Caton
- Chew
- Downer
- Gibson
- Goller
- Guthrie
- Klassen
- O'Rourke
- Richardson
What council was given
The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item.
What was said
15,553 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.
Read the debate(click to open)
1:48:36I think what I'll do is I'll just ask for
1:48:38the motion to be at least tabled
1:48:42uh put up on the screen at least for council to consider
1:48:47And um, I was
1:48:49told in advance that councillor Goller and councillor Klassen would be willing to move in second
1:48:54What's in front of us as a starting point here?
1:48:57I will read it out loud and then if you just don't mind I I appreciate you you tabling it for for me
1:49:03Uh, I'll give a little preamble
1:49:05But that in alignment with the building our future pillar of the strategic plan staff be directed to partner with the home for good campaign
1:49:11to the satisfaction of the deputy CAO of corporate services
1:49:15to leverage up to 500 000 from the affordable housing reserve for a matching funds program
1:49:21alongside the home for good campaign with the start date of august 1st 2023 and an end date of march 31st 2024
1:49:28And that the city's contribution be frontended with the requirement for any matching funds not realized by march 31st
1:49:342024 to be paid back to the city by may 31st 2024
1:49:38And that staff report back in june 2024 on the results of the city's contribution to the campaign through 2022 to 2024
1:49:45Informing city council of the outcomes lessons learned or other relevant information. Okay, so thank you for that
1:49:52Let me read that so
1:49:54My preamble is this
1:49:56We have three supportive housing projects that are looking to open this year totaling about 72 units
1:50:03This city should be completely proud of that
1:50:06Okay, that is awesome
1:50:09There has been financial
1:50:12obligations
1:50:15Uh presented to each of these projects through multiple different funders one of the funders
1:50:21is the home for good campaign
1:50:24and
1:50:26that campaign is specifically set up
1:50:29as
1:50:30A campaign to directly help with supportive housing in the city of wealth
1:50:35They too have obligations just like other funders
1:50:39and I was made aware that there is
1:50:42There's some struggles in regards to getting some things together
1:50:47in regards to that those obligations
1:50:51and in speaking with
1:50:53the campaign members and also with the specific project, which is kindle
1:51:00there
1:51:01There was it was made known to me that
1:51:04uh
1:51:05There again, it's having some struggles and trying to get things to the finish line if I could call it that
1:51:10and so I
1:51:12felt like the success of the previous matching campaign
1:51:18was well was a success
1:51:21and
1:51:22I believe that
1:51:24Don't quote me. I think I saw
1:51:26About 539 thousand dollars was raised because of the matching 500 thousand dollars that we were able to do last year
1:51:35So I'm looking at a
1:51:37I'm looking at this campaign this group that has a track record
1:51:41of being able to fulfill to fulfill their obligations
1:51:45in regards to raising funds for supportive housing through that matching campaign
1:51:50and
1:51:51I will just acknowledge I want to you know
1:51:54Praise where praises is warranted here counselor galler at budget time made the case to all of us actually to say
1:52:00we we should probably keep that 500 thousand dollars for
1:52:05affordable housing supportive housing in that reserve
1:52:09uh, and
1:52:11You know council agreed to that which was was great
1:52:15So that 500 thousand dollars is just sitting there
1:52:20Just want to be really clear. It's just it's just sitting there since january the first that 500 thousand dollars has just been sitting there
1:52:27it's doing nothing
1:52:29and
1:52:30It is a 500 thousand dollars that's already sitting there earmarked for such projects as what we're just talking about right now
1:52:38and
1:52:39So I thought to myself well
1:52:42if we have the home for good campaign already
1:52:45Show us that they can turn 500 thousand dollars into a million dollars for supportive housing. Why don't we do it again?
1:52:52And then of course there was a time crunch and I've talked to all of council about this
1:52:55Like this is our last meeting before september and there's obligations that need to be made prior to that
1:53:02So I tried to reach out to everyone as much as possible and lay it out as
1:53:06Clearly as I could I thought this little preamble was at least good enough for everyone to try to understand
1:53:10Where things are coming from and I would say this just before we dive into this
1:53:15Like one of the best things about this team here
1:53:19Is we we we are all supportive of supportive housing. Okay, we come at it from maybe a little different angles or things like that
1:53:25But like we're we're gonna figure this out. I know I know we I feel very confident and positive about that
1:53:30um
1:53:31My idea is the one that I think is great, but hey, we're we're a team
1:53:37I'm not always the smartest one in the room
1:53:39So I'm very willing to hear what others have to say in trying to figure this out
1:53:44Uh, I think this is the best course of action
1:53:46But very open to having a respectful dialogue on what we can do here around
1:53:51Trying to house the homeless before specifically before the winter, right?
1:53:56So with that I I leave it up to to you, uh, my colleagues
1:54:00And I just wanted to say that I would like just to have a quick motion though
1:54:05um
1:54:07Sorry to the clerk's I was good to just ask counsel
1:54:10For a motion to allow people to answer any questions and answers, but we have the other motion on the floor right now
1:54:18um
1:54:19How how would you let me to to do that? Would you let me to?
1:54:22Withdraw all the other motion then is that the simplest way?
1:54:27Or can I just ask as the chair could I just make the decision without having to ask for a motion on the floor?
1:54:33Mr. Mary gives context for the discussion
1:54:35And I think as chair you you have the authority to sort of make that rule and I get I suppose if you're telling wishes to challenge
1:54:40I think they put all right. All right. Sorry. I was trying to go the correct way there
1:54:45But I kind of messed up a little bit there
1:54:46But so if you guys challenge me on it then I'll then so be it
1:54:50um, if you if it's okay with counsel, uh, Daria is here who is the exact she's available online
1:54:57Uh on camera. She's available for questions
1:55:00Uh and answers and glennah is here and chris is here
1:55:05From the home for good campaign again available for any questions and answers not as delegates
1:55:10But just here if there's any kind of uh questions. I'm going to allow them as the chair to
1:55:15Uh be available if there's any answers that that need to be forthcoming
1:55:20Everyone okay with that?
1:55:22Looks like we're looks like we're good. Okay. So thank you
1:55:25Uh, I'll turn it over to my colleagues
1:55:27And we'll start from uh from there if there's any
1:55:31uh questions uh for staff and or
1:55:34our guests
1:55:36Falsor Blusenthal
1:55:39Thank you. So first I want to thank everyone as a new counselor and new to this process
1:55:45I think I bring some fresh eyes
1:55:48And I'm not going to lie. I spent the entire weekend researching trying to get a handle on how things came to be
1:55:54And I want to thank the staff as well for helping me understand kind of
1:56:00The two sides of the house. I'm going to call the grant versus the you know, gif
1:56:05to to the fundraising campaign
1:56:07Um, and so for me, um, I I just wanted to uh, if you could for me
1:56:13Make sure that the chronology I have you know written out on all my papers is correct
1:56:18So, you know the one side of the house the chronology is we recognize and we've given authority to the county for housing
1:56:26For an rfp process and we put aside the housing reserve fund
1:56:31And the county and I've read all their materials as well very busy weekend. Um that they
1:56:38Granted and provided the recommendation council can choose what to do
1:56:42So on that side of the house is the grant to kindle for $1,364 and
1:56:50$50 I believe if you can just kind of just help me that is a grant
1:56:56Uh, yes through the marriage council pusatil so for um money
1:57:01Coming out of the affordable housing reserve a council a few years ago made the decision
1:57:05to ask the county of wellington
1:57:08In addition to their role as our cmsm to provide their expertise and advice on
1:57:13The issuing of rfps when we had money in the affordable housing reserve to be spent
1:57:19And so the county of wellington staff issue the rfp on our behalf
1:57:23They, uh, receive the applications in they vet them
1:57:26We have a staff member miss dana evan sits on that review panel with county staff
1:57:31And then that a collective group makes a recommendation back to you as council
1:57:36Regarding funding out of the affordable housing reserve. So in the first round under that rfp process
1:57:42Funding was recommended to the windham house project belview and to the stepping stone project grace gardens
1:57:47So that was the first two that were recommended and then subsequently in the next round that next rfp
1:57:53The recommendation was to fund kindle in the amount of just over 1.3 million dollars. That is through a grant program that the city provides
1:58:01um, so that money, um
1:58:04Uh, the first installment flowed to kindle already at the start of the project. Uh, the second installment, uh,
1:58:10They're at 50 completion. So the second installment is actually in process of being processed this week
1:58:18And so that is that grant
1:58:20program and we previously as you have indicated
1:58:25Have had the county of willing to put that rfp out for us
1:58:27That doesn't mean that is the only option us council have the option and last year
1:58:33um, their decision was made by council to spend uh to to uh contribute 500 000 and i think you're
1:58:41You know use of the word i mean gift it's to a donor campaign in essence that's being run
1:58:46Through the homes for good campaign
1:58:48That is entirely separate from the grant that it didn't change anything about the grant that we were giving to kindle
1:58:55It was entirely separate when kindle applied through on the rfp process
1:59:00They would have indicated on their application all of their funding sources and included in that would have been money from a donation campaign
1:59:06And that's not uncommon that donation campaign
1:59:10Is being run through the homes for good campaign and i think that's where some of maybe the confusion early on in this
1:59:16Came along because those are very very separate streams of funding to kindle
1:59:21And so certainly it is the intention moving forward that we will continue to use the county of wellington
1:59:27to issue rfps for future affordable housing fund
1:59:32Disbursement disbursements as the mayor is has said and is correct
1:59:36We had not yet entered into an rfp process in 2023
1:59:40partly because of
1:59:41Everything else going on in the world of housing and we were kind of waiting to get completed through the summer
1:59:46We weren't aware of a project sort of waiting in the wings ready to go
1:59:50And i will also say that we have historically sometimes let the fund get a bit bigger
1:59:56So that then the amount that we can give out would be greater
1:59:59So in conversation with the county staff we had not yet been in a position to recommend issuing an rfp
2:00:05Because some of the thinking had been that perhaps we wait until 2024 and have that fund build up to
2:00:11In theory a million
2:00:12Again not being presumptuous council has traditionally put a half million dollars a year in so I know that was kind of a long and rambly answer
2:00:19Hopefully that answered the question
2:00:21Yes, thank you and through through the mayor
2:00:24The first part is I think you answered it
2:00:28Is a question on whether or not the staff in evaluating the rfp process and the relationship with the county if there are any concerns
2:00:35About this that there are our considerations not being considered or things like that
2:00:40And also for me to better understand that that rfp process is a legal process with a an agreement and timelines and all those kinds of things
2:00:51Um, so through the mayor to council busitile our agreement with the county of wellington
2:00:55I would call it a service level agreement um that we uh went entered into with the county of wellington
2:01:01And so there isn't anything binding. We're not obligated to always issue the rfp through the county of wellington
2:01:07It was just direction from
2:01:09Council that that was the best approach because we as staff don't have the expertise
2:01:13But there is nothing that could preclude you from directing us not to enter into the rfp process
2:01:19And it wouldn't change anything about our relationship with the county of wellington
2:01:22They're kind of doing it over and above their work with us as the cmsm. Um, because we asked for that
2:01:28That that support city staff are still involved in that process
2:01:33And then the other thing that I just want to highlight is the funding decision still rests with council
2:01:38So through those two rfp processes the county of wellington simply sent you a report making a recommendation
2:01:44Which you can take or leave so the ultimate decision on how the money out of the affordable housing reserve gets spent
2:01:50Is always still resting with council and you have to vote on that
2:01:54And so if we're talking specifically to the kindle example the county of wellington evaluated the rfp with assistance from city staff
2:02:01The recommendation came back to council and then you voted to take the recommendation
2:02:06You could have sent it back and said no go back out to rfp again
2:02:10And so council maintains full control over the final disbursement of the funds out of the affordable housing reserve
2:02:17And so with the case of the kindle, um that funding was approved
2:02:22We then enter into a contribution agreement directly with kindle the money does not flow through the county
2:02:27The money flows directly between the city and kindle and the contribution agreement
2:02:31The county is not a signatory or a party to that funding agreement
2:02:35It is a grant agreement between the city and the third party which in this case is kindle
2:02:40And we have a legally binding contribution agreement with kindle
2:02:44And at this point there is nothing that has changed that contribution agreement is still fully in force
2:02:49And we are still continuing to honor the terms of that agreement
2:02:53Thank you just for clarification the terms of the agreement if you can give me the increments or what the steps are
2:02:58Sure through the mayor
2:03:00So the first installment to 50 percent and this is consistent across all of the projects
2:03:05I'm not just a kindle the first installment of 50 percent
2:03:08Is paid out at the start of the project the next installment of 40 percent is paid out when the architect or general contractor can demonstrate that they're halfway through
2:03:17That milestone was reached last week
2:03:19So we are due to pay out the next 40 percent
2:03:22And then the final 10 percent is not paid out until we have confirmed completion of the project an occupancy
2:03:28Permit has been issued and perhaps most importantly an updated capital cost statement has been provided to the satisfaction of the city
2:03:36So it's that last step that we have our opportunity to kind of evaluate the outcomes and so that in essence that 10 percent
2:03:43I'm not sure if this is the correct legal term dcao lee will correct me but hold back in essence
2:03:48So that we know that the project is fully completed. It's open
2:03:51They have occupancy and all of the obligations have been met
2:03:54So we do hold back that final 10 percent on all of our grant agreements
2:03:58Thank you
2:03:58So um
2:03:59I just first of all want to compliment council because I think the process of awarding
2:04:04Funding from the affordable housing reserve. I spent a lot of time looking at the documents and the policies and the process and at the other end from the county
2:04:12I thought was very solid. So kudos to council for that because I thought that was very tight
2:04:18The last question that I had for you was
2:04:21Around the affordable housing reserve and you know, I'm leaning towards leaving the money in the affordable housing reserve
2:04:28And you know just because I believe there is more coming from the community
2:04:33It is does it do we have to spend it? Do we have to clean out our bank account? You know by you know, December 31st
2:04:41Or is it something that can stay? I thought I heard you say it can stay and we can add to it for next year so that
2:04:46You know an rfp potentially in January 2024 or whatever might be for a larger amount. Is that correct?
2:04:53So through the mayor it is totally at council's discretion how much goes into that reserve and how fast it is spent out
2:04:59Currently the balance is at just over 575 thousand dollars
2:05:03Um, and so that is the 500 that was contributed coming out of the 2023 budget process as well as a small balance that was remaining
2:05:10In previous years council has sometimes put extra money into the reserve
2:05:14Which is what enabled us to fund kindle in the amount of 1.3 million dollars
2:05:19And so it has ebbed and flowed it has typically always been a minimum of 500 thousand dollars a year
2:05:26At least in my time in this role
2:05:28And so just as comparison a windham house the grant to windham house was 384 thousand dollars in the grant to grace gardens was
2:05:35884 thousand dollars
2:05:37So that kind of gives you a bit of a sense that those two combined plus the 1.3 for kindle
2:05:42We had a fairly sizable balance in the reserve and a lot of money was put in
2:05:45I I
2:05:47The clerk may have to help me or the mayor remember
2:05:49I know there was one time where there was actually an extra million dollars put in at
2:05:54Some point and i'm going to draw a blank on the year
2:05:58Yeah, so that so um, there is nothing there is nothing that requires
2:06:04council
2:06:05We as staff the money is in that reserve and we
2:06:09Might have initiated rfp process this year. Um, we had just opted not to
2:06:15Up until this point
2:06:16And so we wouldn't ever issue an rfp process
2:06:20For beyond what's sitting in the reserve
2:06:22But once it's in the reserve then it's kind of over to staff to issue that rfp process if we believe that there are projects that
2:06:28Are looking for that money
2:06:30Thank you very much for that and and you know through the lens someone new coming through here going through all the documents
2:06:35Reading all the policies and all the letters and correspondence
2:06:38I feel quite confident with the process on the left side of my ledger around the granting side of it the rfp solid
2:06:45extremely solid
2:06:47And then I went back and I read all the minutes and the documentation on the right side of my chart here
2:06:52Which is the homes for guelph and this is around the council process around that of how the recommendation came forward
2:06:59And so on and and I have to say for myself my processes
2:07:03I need to feel solid in my decision making
2:07:07I need to see staff reports and analyses and so on and so when I looked at that process there there was a lot of conversation
2:07:15around
2:07:16What would be included or not included in the five hundred thousand dollars given and so on I probably wouldn't have supported that I feel less
2:07:24comfortable in
2:07:25In a lack of structure and so that is my personal comfort. I am evidence-based. I need data. I need finances
2:07:32I need to know the governance. I know how
2:07:35Decisions are made all of those kinds of things. I do not give much. I don't gamble
2:07:40I don't I just I can't I don't feel secure about that
2:07:43So when I looked at that the process on the right side of my my documents
2:07:47I felt very uncomfortable about that and that uncomfortable is is where I'm sitting right now with this motion
2:07:55I cannot in good faith
2:07:58Support it
2:07:59I could support it if it's on the left side and that there's a formal transparent fair open
2:08:05Communicated process where everyone has a fair opportunities to put their hand up and say hey
2:08:10I want to I want some money for for something as well
2:08:14But I don't feel that and so I cannot support this and I I take very seriously my stewardship role
2:08:22And I work in poverty. I've
2:08:25Hosted people, you know on the streets, you know living in my home and and talk to people who are living in backyard sheds
2:08:32And so on so I'm very aware of this and the importance of this
2:08:36But I am also very concerned about
2:08:40How we go about this
2:08:42And and I really want to do this well. So, you know with with all due respect
2:08:47I I am deeply committed to the issue, but I cannot support this unless it's on the left side of my
2:08:54Chart here that goes through the county that has a transparent fair open process. Thank you
2:09:02Thank you
2:09:05So I'll have lots of comments
2:09:07About what was just said there later, but councillor Klassen is next
2:09:12Yes, thank you and through you mayor to um
2:09:15The uh the folks from the home for good campaign. Uh, thanks for being here. Um,
2:09:21I just want to start off by saying that
2:09:23We all agree that
2:09:26We're living in a housing crisis
2:09:28Um, and that also the economic changes that have happened in the last three years have thrown
2:09:36So many businesses organizations even our own city
2:09:41into many changes and
2:09:43Sometimes changes require, you know quick decision making and I just my question
2:09:49To the home for good campaign is just exactly how this 500 000 dollars could accelerate
2:09:57The number of people who can go into the support of housing units how how much faster it could happen
2:10:03Um, and and how will the funds be used to do that? Uh, thank you for the question
2:10:17Uh, we proved last year with uh council's generous support that we have the capability to leverage
2:10:26funding and successfully
2:10:29raised
2:10:30596 000 dollars
2:10:32Uh to match the 500 000 dollars that was available
2:10:37For the city match. So what the opportunity that is in front of us?
2:10:41We have an urgent opportunity to meet our funding commitments to the kindle property
2:10:48there are certain economic and situations that are impacting our current success that we do have rising concerns about our ability to
2:10:59Meet those targets and ensure that the doors get open this fall
2:11:04so this matching opportunity
2:11:06would help us engage the community and leverage
2:11:11That funding to meet the funding requirements ensure that the kindle project is open and able to
2:11:18Meet our full goal of housing 72 individuals this year in permanent supportive housing
2:11:32I think I think that answer is my question actually. Yeah, I really appreciate the response
2:11:37Maybe maybe just to clarify
2:11:39um
2:11:40What potentially would it mean for the those 72 individuals if we pushed back from the fall?
2:11:45What what where would they go? What would happen to them to clarify? Thank you kim
2:12:02um housing the 72 people brings them in from living rough living hard from
2:12:10uh
2:12:11unsupported
2:12:13permanent supportive housing includes counseling and supports 24 7
2:12:18um with the aim to improve their situation so that they can become self-sufficient
2:12:25um and ideally not just have a roof over their head but
2:12:30have a more
2:12:32life
2:12:35Thank you. I really appreciate that. Um
2:12:38We we know, you know, I don't know. Maybe I shouldn't make this comment
2:12:42but we know that there's so many people in our community right now who are suffering and
2:12:48And and this you know the the difference a few months can make, you know
2:12:52I don't want to put words into your mouth, but I think it's significant
2:12:55And and so I will certainly be supporting it
2:12:59And I just I really I am worried about you know, we heard about this last year as well
2:13:02there's more and more people who are unhoused and
2:13:06This is a perfect opportunity to make sure that this winter they they have a place to go. So thank you
2:13:12Thank you a counselor goalers next
2:13:16Thank you for your worship to the representatives from the home for good campaign
2:13:21um
2:13:22I wanted to ask why why are you taking this on?
2:13:26Um, because whenever we've had conversations about this in council
2:13:29I hear from my colleagues say well, this is a provincial responsibility
2:13:32The province should be responsible for building new social housing new supportive housing
2:13:38So why is the united way and why are our community organizations coming together to do this work?
2:13:43Instead of say the province
2:13:49Uh simply put somebody has to
2:13:52Um somebody has to address homelessness
2:13:56um
2:13:58a counselor
2:14:00once asked me
2:14:02How much people should give?
2:14:05and my answer is charities only exist
2:14:11to close gaps
2:14:13when a federal provincial
2:14:15provincial county or municipal government can't take care of everyone
2:14:21Somebody has to
2:14:23uh address needs in the community and we have started with the most
2:14:27Uh vulnerable those that are on the street and looking to make sure that they have supports and that they live to their full potential
2:14:36um, I
2:14:38also will say that
2:14:40um
2:14:41Well, I I think we also took the project on and tackled it because
2:14:47um
2:14:49Well, we have the absolute belief that somehow
2:14:53We will address the uh the campaign goal
2:14:57To see these projects through
2:15:01Thank you. Thank you very much. Um, and and as a follow-up
2:15:05speaking to to process
2:15:07This money was put into a fund and there was a process for
2:15:11For applications to be sent to the county to request these funds
2:15:15Could you help us understand why the home for good campaign had not applied to wellington county to access those 500 000 that was available?
2:15:23Uh by the in the city of guelves affordable housing reserve
2:15:30the process of a
2:15:32capital campaign uh, and especially in today's environment
2:15:37changes on a daily basis
2:15:39So we have from month to month week to week been monitoring progress and assessing our position
2:15:47and there's been certain factors that have uh impacted us
2:15:52Most notably I'll say the economic situation
2:15:56We recently an angus
2:15:59poll came out that said that 40 percent of canadians plan to reduce their charitable giving
2:16:05Of course, we had a recent
2:16:08inflation is continuing to go up
2:16:11We have stigma that is actually far worse than we expected it to be when we started this campaign
2:16:17There are many individuals that have said no
2:16:20To supporting the campaign. So there's factors that we continue to assess as the campaign
2:16:26continues and
2:16:28uh
2:16:29If you would have asked me two weeks ago
2:16:33If we needed this support, I actually would have said i'm not sure that we do
2:16:39Uh, but that's how quickly things can change in our process
2:16:42We actually had two
2:16:44Significant prospects that we've been working with uh for several months now
2:16:49one that started positively and
2:16:53You know, we were told that we were likely to get funding just not sure how much and it ended up being a no
2:16:59We found that out on thursday of last week
2:17:02And then we had another prospect that has decided to pause their decision
2:17:07so it's just really
2:17:09quickly changing and assessing the situation and so that's where
2:17:14sometimes timelines
2:17:16for applying for traditional
2:17:19RFP processes or other opportunities can be a challenge. We're doing our best to stay adaptable and on top of
2:17:26various opportunities, but things are changing on a rapid basis and we're doing our best to
2:17:32assess those challenges and respond to them and
2:17:35Also look at bridge funding. Uh, if it's necessary
2:17:40Thank you and one final question
2:17:42Your worship the the home for good campaign has selected to to support permanent supportive housing
2:17:49hearing wealth
2:17:50But we we do have a spectrum from the shelter system
2:17:54Another projects that have applied for this funding in the question of what if we were to leave the funds there?
2:17:59Maybe they go to affordable housing. Maybe they go to
2:18:03Um, a different type maybe affordable rental
2:18:06Why is permanent supportive a priority over say say supporting?
2:18:12affordable rental or affordable ownership
2:18:16If you can please let us know
2:18:21um, I would start by saying, um, I don't think people choose to be homeless
2:18:27um
2:18:30We have the data we have a really good idea what contributes to becoming homeless and it
2:18:37It's remarkable how many people are close to being homeless
2:18:41It's not just about being able to afford rent if you have addiction or deep mental health needs
2:18:49Um, I don't think you're going to maintain a rental place
2:18:54Um, that is reasonably priced. I don't think you're going to come through the process
2:19:00I'm not sure that you'll be the selected candidate
2:19:03permanent supportive housing
2:19:06addresses some of our most
2:19:08um
2:19:09people with great need
2:19:11and with housing
2:19:14They'll also have the supports to carry them through and so we have started at
2:19:22I want to say the bottom and I don't mean
2:19:25What I mean is at the most vulnerable and we are working our way up, but this is the starting point
2:19:33Thank you for that and uh your worship. Would you like comments afterwards or no?
2:19:40The last two speakers are giving comments, so I'll just allow comments. Thank you your worship
2:19:45But I do want to make sure we're just we're flowing questions comments questions
2:19:48I like to call the vote and keep moving so just if you've got the mic you can answer your or
2:19:53Ask questions, then you can give comments. Go ahead. Thank you your worship
2:19:57um, a few years ago that guelph Wellington poverty elimination task force identified that
2:20:02To help people
2:20:05Get out of homelessness
2:20:06We needed permanent supportive housing that is housing that provides the supports to deal with those issues that that unless they're provided
2:20:14It's it's difficult to get someone from a shelter system to to affordable rental or affordable ownership considering that
2:20:21um, for example, a habitat for humanity fantastic organization. They build
2:20:27Um attainable homes, but the minimum income for their building waterloo is
2:20:33$79,000 for someone to be able to find that affordable home ownership
2:20:38So for folks that are street involved, there is this huge divide
2:20:41And I think that it's important for us to know that sure we could live money
2:20:45In the affordable fund and wait for someone else to come to apply for that. It might be
2:20:51Affordable rental it could be affordable ownership
2:20:53But we have heard from from the experts in guelph that the best thing that we can do with our resources is provide
2:21:01The next step after the shelter system permanent supportive housing and then from there folks can move up the housing spectrum
2:21:08So I I ask my council colleagues to rely on the voice from from those community experts that are telling us
2:21:15This is what we need to do next we have the shelter system in place
2:21:19Now we need permanent supportive housing in guelph and then we can help people move along that spectrum. Thank you
2:21:26Okay, thank you and richards. I I do have you on my list alt. Yeah, uh, richardson next
2:21:30Yeah, thank you very much and through you mayor to our delegates or our guests. Sorry
2:21:37As a new counselor, I have lost hours of sleep over this as similar to councillor boost a toll over the weekend
2:21:43We find out on a friday afternoon
2:21:45That this is coming to us on tuesday. There's nobody to talk to saturday sunday. We have one day
2:21:51to decide um
2:21:53And and this is not our lane. This is not uh
2:21:56Where we're supposed to be we're not the experts on this our staff are not the experts on this
2:22:00And i'm really struggling as much as I support supportive housing and I know the need is there
2:22:05I have a responsibility as councillor boost a tell said as a stewardship to all the residents in guelph
2:22:11And I guess one of the biggest questions is because right now in good conscience. I can't support this because I feel
2:22:16Like I'm making a blind decision and I don't know I don't know if there's other groups out there that can use this money
2:22:22Is this the best use of our money? And I guess I'm wondering, you know, you said that
2:22:27Um two weeks ago if we asked you this question you would say I'm I don't know
2:22:31I'm not sure so if there was any inkling that you felt you weren't going to make your targets
2:22:35Why wouldn't have you have reached out and started an rfp process at that time to give people and especially
2:22:42councillors time to get this information and provide staff our staff time to review and
2:22:49Make the best decision possible
2:22:55so the
2:22:59The the final as I mentioned the one
2:23:02Final gift that we were expecting to come in we got the answer on that on thursday
2:23:09and
2:23:10It just so happened we have been transparent
2:23:14around the
2:23:16$770,000 that we have commit remaining our remaining commitment to the kindle project
2:23:22because of the size of the gifts that we were working on
2:23:27Raising over the last couple of weeks. We still felt confident about that
2:23:32It was really just thursday where that situation changed and was also the day that the opportunity was presented to us. So
2:23:43Had it been this week and the opportunity hadn't been presented to us and we would have talked to all of our
2:23:51funding partners
2:23:53including the city about opportunities for bridge funding and backups
2:23:58So it's just really changed within the last week
2:24:02So through you through you may or two I guess if you so have you asked others for
2:24:07A contribution to this deficit like have you gone to the county and asked them for
2:24:12If they're willing to join in and and donate anything
2:24:16Not we are actively fundraising for the $770,000 we had two meetings on monday with funding requests
2:24:27So it's an ongoing process where we are reaching out and actively fundraising for this campaign
2:24:33and it won't stop until we reach our five million dollars and
2:24:38Put us on the strong path to solving homelessness at this point. We have not specifically reached out for additional
2:24:46funding from the county of wellington
2:24:49We just thought we would seize this opportunity when it presented itself
2:24:54So seize this opportunity that presented itself. Can you tell me what that means?
2:25:02When the opportunity to explore another matching opportunity was mentioned to us by mayor guthrie
2:25:10We uh continued in conversations on that that was on thursday
2:25:16Okay, thank you
2:25:18And donor
2:25:22Thank you
2:25:25Through you to our guests
2:25:28I guess one of the questions I have so I just want to clarify it. I think that's what counselor classom was saying too that
2:25:35so if
2:25:36There's there's was some funding targets that the home for good couldn't make the 200 and some thousand and then the
2:25:43The 500,000 coming up
2:25:46If there if there is
2:25:48No funding
2:25:50Coming does this delay the project and i'm not sure whether
2:25:55um, if ron answers add or it are without the funding if
2:26:00A home for good does not
2:26:02Um, keep that commitment
2:26:05Will is still will you still be able to open in october?
2:26:12Did you want to answer that or did daria want to daria? Do you mind jumping in on that?
2:26:17Yeah, I can jump in on that. Good evening everyone. Um, I can't really see everyone on the screen
2:26:21But thanks for having us here this evening. Um, the kindle project right now is on time and on budget
2:26:30We are reliant on all
2:26:34Funding contributions that have been made as part of the project in order to complete the project
2:26:40In the time frame that's allocated for that
2:26:46Okay, so if there's a delay and if there is no funding does that delay the project was my question
2:26:52So you're reliant on it. I understand
2:26:54But if the funding doesn't come through from the home for good, is that going to delay the project finishing the project?
2:27:02We would certainly have to enter into negotiations with the home for good campaign if they weren't able to meet their funding contribution
2:27:10commitments, um
2:27:12and you know regroup and you know
2:27:15Look at what our options would be at that point because the entire
2:27:19project was scoped and based on the contribution agreements that
2:27:24the various contribution agreements that um, you know, provincially federally and municipally and with the home for good campaign that they've made
2:27:33That still doesn't answer my question
2:27:36The funding isn't there. Are you going to be late opening up?
2:27:40I think the question uh, councillor is is a challenging question because we don't want to be delayed in opening up
2:27:47and we do believe that the home for good campaign is actively working to meet their
2:27:52funding commitments and requirements, uh, and
2:27:56I think as glennon has explained this has been a bit of a changing and evolving situation
2:28:02Um, I would want to come back together with the funders to see if there was any other options
2:28:07Um, that would that we could look at that would not cause a delay to the opening of the project
2:28:13Which I think would directly impact
2:28:16The community and those 32 individuals that we could have housed
2:28:22And is there any reason why the funding couldn't go directly to kindle?
2:28:28Rather than going through the home. Oh, sorry. Is there any reason why the funding?
2:28:36I don't know why you were turning off my
2:28:39Why the funding couldn't go directly through kindle? Um
2:28:43I like I'm just thinking of increasing the grant that we have right so the 1.3 increasing it
2:28:48by 500 thousand and just making it clean going right there to cover off that
2:28:54um, the anticipated
2:28:57495 thousand that's that's due
2:29:00In august
2:29:01Is there any reason why that can't be done and just like rather than going through and having the administrative costs and going through then
2:29:10and all that process
2:29:12It gives it just puts it back
2:29:15From my perspective sort of more in our lane, which is part of the granting that we've done every year. It just
2:29:22Moves the granting up
2:29:24A year a year like our grants up a year. We wouldn't go through an rfp process. It would be added on to this project
2:29:31Um, so that I'm just that that's another consideration that I'm thinking about
2:29:40There is one risk
2:29:43with that option
2:29:45in that
2:29:47There is other funding that is contingent on our ability as home for good to deliver on our two million dollar commitment
2:29:58So if the funding isn't part of our
2:30:02770 thousand dollar remaining commitment
2:30:06We'd have to ensure that that doesn't put the other funder at risk
2:30:11So that's just one important
2:30:13Thing that I wanted to highlight
2:30:15um, and then the other
2:30:17Two items just because I just like
2:30:20So I don't understand that so then you just have the 270
2:30:25Which is in the situation you're in now like if we didn't give you the 500 thousand to leverage or do anything with
2:30:32Your situation wouldn't be changing. You'd still need to get that extra funding
2:30:36To keep your commitment. We provided a letter stating that we would provide two million dollars
2:30:43to the kindle project which turned
2:30:46uh, I believe approximately two million dollars of funding
2:30:50from a
2:30:53loan into a grant
2:30:55and
2:30:56That staying that way is contingent on us
2:30:59delivering our two million dollar commitments. So I'm just unsure
2:31:04of
2:31:05If the funding goes directly to kindle
2:31:10Um having not explored that prior to today. I'm not sure what position that leaves that other funding in
2:31:17so I just want to be transparent on that because
2:31:21It's something that we were not able to explore previous to tonight
2:31:26um, the other piece is just with the
2:31:30uh, and I understand your comments on the
2:31:33Bringing it over to that lane that you're comfortable with
2:31:36But then it does
2:31:38lose out on that opportunity
2:31:40Which we have proven to be successful to mobilize the community
2:31:45Would leave us in a position where we are still required to raise the remaining
2:31:50220,000 dollars without the extra boost from the matching opportunity
2:31:56Many people chose to donate during the last period because the matching was available
2:32:03And um, it is something that we could continue to present
2:32:06What it really helped us with last time was not only giving but
2:32:10urgency and timelines of giving
2:32:13Because it was available. It really helped us
2:32:17accelerate our fundraising which has been a challenge with the campaign timeline. So
2:32:22Uh, yes, it would meet the budgetary requirements
2:32:27Of the 770 but we would lose out of that opportunity
2:32:31To really accelerate and emphasize the importance in the community
2:32:38Chris, is there anything you wanted to add on that? If if I may
2:32:42um
2:32:43Our partners all committed to using the home for good campaign as the fundraising platform
2:32:49We've been a unified team delivering consistent messaging
2:32:54giving through home for good ensures
2:32:57That both the golf community foundation and the united way recover costs
2:33:03I know that you're looking to minimize costs
2:33:06But the home for good goal was intentional with our roles within that team
2:33:13The fundraisers are fundraising which allows the three project partners to focus on their builds
2:33:20And on service delivery
2:33:23It keeps all of us doing what we're best at
2:33:27It really wouldn't have ever been helpful to have six organizations out there
2:33:33campaigning independently and trying to fundraise
2:33:37Donors would have had multiple asks
2:33:39We wouldn't have had unified messaging. It really would have been
2:33:44well organized chaos
2:33:48um
2:33:50so far
2:33:52A grand total of 82 141 dollars from all funds raised has gone towards administration costs
2:34:01And that includes things like
2:34:04um, the uh campaign planning uh planning the feasibility study
2:34:10The branding the case for support the website marketing blog entries adds to generate interest and to
2:34:18Help to educate our public
2:34:22By sidestepping the home for good campaign and the platform
2:34:27Sends a strong message to our community that you don't value the work that's happening and the expertise
2:34:34That's being used to lead the campaign
2:34:37So I I appreciate that though. There wasn't so much around cost, but that you know that that's in there, but it it's just around
2:34:47So without this 500,000 you're going to be in that position anyway
2:34:52So like for me it was like is there a more direct way for us to fund
2:34:58The kindle as we have before by increasing our grant because we've given the money to kindle as well 1.2 million
2:35:05As well as what we've given and so this is how do can we increase our grant?
2:35:10But by the sounds of it, so it's not it's not saying anything negative about
2:35:15What you're doing it's about
2:35:18The comfort level of this council being in a process
2:35:23Um rather than this the the and as you see a lot of people are shaking their head rather than being in a process where we're
2:35:30We're giving money to for a donation to
2:35:34To to to leverage again, and this is the second year in a row in the second year. We've gotten it last minute
2:35:41I mean that's the other problem for us, right and we have a fiduciary responsibility to our constituents
2:35:47so that that sort of
2:35:50Some councils are just much more comfortable giving directly the kindle which is our lane which is part of our granting
2:35:57System because they've already put in an rfp and this would just be increasing that grant
2:36:02So it's not about i'm sorry if it sounded like I was undermining what you were doing to us
2:36:08It needs to we need to find a way to make this
2:36:11um
2:36:13A better scenario for us, but I understand what you're doing and and it sounds like you you don't know
2:36:19And I've just this this came up late today
2:36:21So it was um, and I spoke to you and thank you
2:36:24runner for talking to me earlier today and Daria
2:36:27But it's it's I didn't hadn't really that issue hadn't come up about funding it directly
2:36:32So I can see that if that two million was contingent upon
2:36:37another don't another
2:36:39Funding source then that complicates
2:36:43the whole thing
2:36:47Okay, oh sorry
2:36:48so um
2:36:52So yeah, so that just so you've you've answered
2:36:57That that question
2:37:04Yeah, yeah, so I you know my comments
2:37:07You know just comments I might come back. I might have put my hand up again
2:37:10But my comments are like I want to give like the money right so I just because I don't want
2:37:18Use 30 rooms to be sitting there waiting any longer while the community tries to find this funding
2:37:25um
2:37:26And we're gonna be it's funding that is that is there and it just means that we don't do an rfp. It's it's
2:37:34That giving it to the homes for good is a bit is more outside of the lane, but
2:37:40It certainly was in our lane to give it to to kindle. So it's sort of I'm I'm sort of thinking I just don't want to see delay
2:37:47I want these rooms open in october
2:37:50You know in october we're coming into winter. There's 30 people that could have a place to sleep in october
2:37:57So I'm just trying to find a way that we can do this that that works for everybody
2:38:03and
2:38:05Mediation is sort of
2:38:07It's like is there another way of doing this, but it doesn't sound like that's possible. So I'm just
2:38:13Yeah
2:38:14Let's keep going around and and what we can come I can come back to you then alt and then Gibson
2:38:20Thank you very much mayor, uh, guthrie. Um, I have a few questions for a few people actually
2:38:25Um, first one. I think I'll just ask to you mayor guthrie. When when were you made aware of this?
2:38:30Uh, well, I guess I had a
2:38:34Daria, when did I meet with you last week? Was that thursday or wednesday or?
2:38:41Thursday, so there's no prior knowledge. Okay. Thanks. Um, and then and then after that
2:38:46I'll just just so you know then after that I called I called glenna
2:38:50Yeah, thank you. Um, ms ebron. I was wondering if you could please provide me with
2:38:56Some cost information. What is the total cost of this project?
2:39:02It's approximately 12 million dollars
2:39:0412 million
2:39:05So at this point the city has invested approximately
2:39:10Depending upon how you look at it
2:39:1210% or possibly 15% into this project depending upon whether we identify 1.3 million as what's being provided or 1.3
2:39:22Plus the 500 000 is that correct? Those are the correct numbers. Yes. Yeah
2:39:28And we're looking possibly to provide another 500 000. Is that correct?
2:39:34As part of the matching campaign. Yes, so we would be probably getting up to about 20% then. Okay, uh, the next question
2:39:41I have actually is another money question. Um, this this relates
2:39:46To for whom is this housing? I've heard it. It stated that that it could be used for those who are
2:39:54Currently do not have housing
2:39:56And that they might be people who are suffering addictions and mental illness. Uh, am I right?
2:40:03Yes, the project is um, specifically permanent supportive housing for people who have experienced and are experiencing chronic homelessness
2:40:12Then the next question is what will the costs of the units be?
2:40:19That is an awesome question that I don't have the answer to for you this evening. Um
2:40:24We are working my team is working with the county around the process in relation to tenancy and uh,
2:40:33costs affiliated with that
2:40:35Okay, um
2:40:37I think what I want to do now
2:40:40Is maybe just turn to some questions for staff with regards to where we're at now. What I understand is we're looking at
2:40:47Um, putting ultimately 2.3 million dollars into this project. Is that correct?
2:40:55So through the mayor, um, what we are granting is just over 1.3 million. That's the city's grant
2:41:02500,000 has gone to the homes for good campaign and how that has been allocated
2:41:05I don't mean to deflect but how that has been allocated and i'm not sure that it's reasonable
2:41:10For me to comment on of the first 500,000 which of those dollars went to which project
2:41:16I think that's more granular than I can comment on I think
2:41:19Each of the projects we've we've contributed
2:41:23300 and changed to one 800 and changed to another in 1.3 and changed to kindle
2:41:28And 500,000 to the homes for good campaign that they have chosen then how to allocate out to those three
2:41:33What is being considered before you is an additional 500 if
2:41:38Depending how you want to allocate those dollars
2:41:40You want to assume that all of the original 500 was what went to kindle and I'm again
2:41:45I'm not sure that that's I think that math is overly simplistic, but I'll turn to glennon and chris
2:41:51But the city's contribution to kindle through the grant remains at the 1.3 million dollars to date
2:41:59Then where does that other 500?
2:42:01Well, the other 500,000 went to the homes for good campaign
2:42:04So that they could honor their commitments to all three projects. I can't comment of the 500
2:42:10How it was split because that was money that was handled at the homes for good campaign end of things
2:42:15But then and then I will get to the homes for good
2:42:18This 500,000 I just need clarification probably both the staff and from guests
2:42:24Where is it going? So through the mayor my understanding is that the current deficit is
2:42:30owed that the money is currently to kindle so that that windham and
2:42:36Grace gardens are not in a deficit position
2:42:40But that kindle is who is in the deficit position of just over 770 000
2:42:45So my understanding is that this 500 would go
2:42:50Through the homes for good campaign to then be able to honor their commitment that they have made to the kindle project
2:42:56Okay, so ultimately we would be looking at 1.8 million plus a proportion of the money that was given
2:43:05A year ago that is yes, and we don't know what that is
2:43:08I fly will turn over to the guests
2:43:11Of the funding provided in the previous matching
2:43:15205 000 of that was provided to the windham house belview project
2:43:21And the remainder was provided to kindle so
2:43:26There was support for to supportive housing projects at that time
2:43:31And Colleen was correct that the current funding would all go to the kindle project
2:43:36So then that would make it approximately a total of 2.1 million total to kindle is that correct? Okay, that helps a ton
2:43:44What happened to the
2:43:49Grace gardens
2:43:53It was not funded through the city of gulf funding. We provided funding to it through community donations. Great. Thank that helps a ton
2:44:04Now
2:44:05The question I have now is a governance question and and it really is
2:44:09I'm struggling with the issue of rfps and I was wondering if staff could please tell me
2:44:15What is the point of the rfp process if we
2:44:19Then are called on on very short notice
2:44:23To actually allocate money
2:44:25In some senses, I think we're doing a disservice both the governance and possibly to other projects in the community
2:44:31And i'm just hoping I can hear from staff on that
2:44:33Through the mayor to council all so certainly just backing up prior to us going through the rfp process and deciding to have the county of
2:44:41Wellington or council directing we had previously funded st
2:44:44Joe's they had a shortfall they came back and that ass came directly to council
2:44:48It was actually as a result of that that led council to say we need expertise in in
2:44:54Evaluating because at that time staff were asked
2:44:57Well on what basis should we evaluate the additional ask from st. Joe's and we as staff had to say
2:45:02We don't really have the expertise so we're struggling to give you that advice and guidance
2:45:05And so at that point that's when council made the decision that having been said council always has the right to work outside of that rfp process
2:45:15if
2:45:16Unlimited time was available to us and this is Colleen's opinion now
2:45:21I think that the ideal situation would have been that the homes for good campaign might have notified kindle that they were not going to be
2:45:27able to honor their funding commitment and then kindle could have chosen to approach any of their funders and said we have
2:45:35a shortfall
2:45:36and then we as the city could have
2:45:39reissued issued an rfp and kindle could have
2:45:44Submitted a second time and we would have seen if there was anyone else out there
2:45:47Or maybe kindle would have been the only one who submitted in which case we could have been considering funding of this shortfall through another rfp process
2:45:56However, that would have taken time both for the homes for good campaign to provide that notice to kindle if they weren't going to be able to honor their
2:46:04contribution agreement and then
2:46:06For the city to respond and make a decision about issuing an rfp and those rfp process like that takes
2:46:13That takes time
2:46:15so I think that um
2:46:18It I think I completely appreciate the dilemma that you are being faced with because we do have an rfp process
2:46:25And I can't tell you if I think there's anyone else out there that might respond
2:46:31We also I have not had an opportunity to speak with the county of wellington housing services. So I I don't know
2:46:39It's been indicated that an approach hasn't gone to the county of wellington
2:46:42We have not had that conversation with them either. There are other funders of all of these projects, of course
2:46:46It's a 12 million dollar project. Um, there are other funders and so my my dilemma tonight is I
2:46:53I haven't had the time
2:46:55Um, and nor do I have the expertise to really give you a good answer as to what are the other options
2:47:01If time was on our side
2:47:03Then we would have much preferred as staff to be sitting down and having the conversation and mapping out how we might bring a
2:47:08Recommendation to council on this
2:47:10But there is a time pressure and I think that's what everyone is struggling with is
2:47:15I don't think there's any doubt that we are all committed to the fact that we want people
2:47:20Who are living in homelessness to have a roof over their head wherever possible?
2:47:24So what I'm hearing you say?
2:47:27Uh, you didn't have the time to either recommend or
2:47:32Suggest that we do not support this that you you're in the same time constraint that we are
2:47:39Uh through the mayor. Yes, that is correct. Um, we also uh first learned of this thursday late in the day
2:47:46And we simply had opportunity to work with clerks and the mayor on the on the wording of the motion
2:47:52But not on any we didn't have any further conversations
2:47:55I did have the opportunity to speak to miss banda on friday morning when she reached out to me
2:48:00But that was that was the extent of the conversations that we've been able to have on this just because of the time constraints
2:48:06Two further questions for staff and then one for kindle
2:48:10Am I correct then to understand that we don't have any documentation on this right now?
2:48:17Through the mayor to council all not that has come in through staff simply the letter that was submitted
2:48:22Um, I believe cosigned by miss banda and mr. Whaler that came in on friday afternoon
2:48:26But that you we received that when you did okay through the clerk's office
2:48:30Um, the other question perhaps it's um, I don't know whether it's for you miss clack bush or somebody else
2:48:36Um, because we have social services and housing coming from the county and we're doing part two of our housing issue in september
2:48:43what i'm struggling with is
2:48:46Why are we actually entertaining this before september?
2:48:49I've heard some points that there there might be some time urgency and I will ask the same to uh to miss ebron as well
2:48:55But why are we doing this before september?
2:48:58So through the mayor to council alt I I would i'm not trying to defer but I think um
2:49:04If i've understood there is a time pressure
2:49:07Uh a deadline of august that has potential in terms of the jeffrey the project being in jeffrey
2:49:12But i'm likely not the best person to ask that question. Okay miss ebron. Um, I was wondering if you could
2:49:18Perhaps provide some highlights of that
2:49:21Glad and chris do you want to speak to the time constraint issue?
2:49:27Yes, it's actually our time constraint we have funding commitments, uh based on timelines that are
2:49:34related to
2:49:36That other funding is contingent upon
2:49:40and uh, we had a
2:49:43Funding deadline of june 15th and an upcoming one of august 15th. So that's where the urgency lies
2:49:50And the august the august 13th thing you said, uh
2:49:54The funding urgency there, um
2:49:58I don't know whether it's appropriate to ask it, but uh with whom would that be and how does this alleviate that?
2:50:05So our uh commitment to raise two million dollars, uh locally
2:50:11Uh
2:50:12unlocked funding from cmhc
2:50:14And we have commitments to deliver on our local fundraising to be able to ensure that funding is
2:50:22available for the remainder of the expenses for the project
2:50:29I think I only have one last question. It's really uh to miss ebron about the the future
2:50:34And and I do want to thank you with regards to this uh this project in so many ways because it is vital housing
2:50:40Um when this project is finally done
2:50:43Are we able to confirm that there will be 24 hour wraparound service or is that still to come?
2:50:50Just trying to unmute. I'm sorry about that. Um
2:50:58The home for good campaign is supporting the capital costs of the project and we are working in partnership
2:51:04While the golf community health center and stonehenge are working to secure
2:51:08Um the permanent supportive housing programming aspects of the project
2:51:15Thank you. Thank you mayor go through
2:51:18Councillor Gibson, please
2:51:20Yeah, thank you through mr. Mayor. I'm just going to go back to some first principles of my understanding here
2:51:24And it was through you in discussion, but maybe you can clarify
2:51:28The 500 000 dollars that's being asked that's
2:51:32Is it going to just simply be given or is it is it being given as a is a matching campaign?
2:51:38So it's being leveraged to
2:51:40To drive more giving to the program. Is that right mr. Mayor?
2:51:47Are you asking me or the guests the guests or or you it's your motion, but yeah, I can ask the guests as well sure
2:51:54Miss a bren. Okay, sure. Go ahead
2:51:58I'll okay. I'll go first and I'll just jump it over to them. Okay
2:52:02So, yeah, the entire
2:52:04intent of this
2:52:06Is to mirror
2:52:08Exactly what we did last year
2:52:11And they turned 500 000 dollars
2:52:14into 1 million and 96 000 dollars
2:52:17And amplified the importance and urgency of supportive housing in our community
2:52:24That's it
2:52:26The fundamental principles of this is to turn 500 000 dollars
2:52:31Into a million
2:52:32For 500 000 dollars that is currently sitting in an account
2:52:36Earmarked for these types of projects
2:52:39And there's no projects earmarked for it at all
2:52:42So I'll stop there and go to the guests to see if they need to add anything
2:52:50Nothing to add
2:52:53Okay, I'll end with my I'll end with my comments then mr. Mayor
2:52:56So based on the success of the first go around listen, this is short notice. Yes
2:53:02I'm slightly out of my comfort zone. However, um, you know, I
2:53:07I don't I don't mean to play on emotions here, but for the first time
2:53:11Ever I received an email from a constituent in the the furthest east end
2:53:17Neighborhood we have saying that the police and fire were in the backfield
2:53:21Just over the weekend
2:53:23Tending to someone in a tent and you know, that's that's on people's front door now
2:53:28Throughout the city and this is an opportunity to really to really finish off. What is a great project?
2:53:34again, not to pull on heartstrings, but the
2:53:37The intent here is to if I understand it and I think you've just clarified is that
2:53:42If there's five dollars in the community
2:53:45That is willing to spend is willing to give to this cause the city's willing to give five dollars to
2:53:50And so if there's ten dollars in the community that is willing to give this cause the city will give ten dollars to
2:53:54up to five hundred thousand dollars so
2:53:57Um, I really see it as a two for one here. Um, I know that it's five hundred thousand dollars
2:54:03I know I know that but when we're able to leverage it the way that we have and demonstrated
2:54:08I really just I just fix my eyes on on the finished product on that on that project and getting 30 people housed
2:54:15So I do have questions about the operations of the facility
2:54:19I'd like to have peace of mind that the operations costs are
2:54:22Taking care of in the future, but in terms of the capital investment
2:54:25Um, I I just see it as a must. I don't see it as a as a as a maybe I see it as a must
2:54:32Okay, thank you and katyn
2:54:36Thank you. Mr. Mayor, I'll spare you to our guests. Um, so
2:54:41like
2:54:42councillor Richardson and councillor Bustel I am struggling with the timeline and the process
2:54:47of having to make this decision so quickly
2:54:50and without
2:54:52all of the needed supports of the county
2:54:56And as councillor Allt said
2:54:58September 12th is when the county is supposed to come back to us with a full report on the low income housing
2:55:04and
2:55:05I would really have appreciated them 1.5 months for a more full temperature of where and how we might need to put this money
2:55:13um
2:55:14But I was wondering
2:55:17How would waiting until that meeting or applying for an RFP in that timeline impact the development schedule?
2:55:32So the question the question is
2:55:34How would waiting in basically if you if they if we if we wait till september to get more information from the county
2:55:40How could that?
2:55:43always how is waiting until september for more information going to affect your
2:55:48Your obligations the development schedule. I have a separate question for and the development schedule. Yeah
2:55:57so from my perspective the contribution agreements that we have, um
2:56:04The sorry the home for good campaign is connected to the contribution agreements that we have
2:56:09uh and
2:56:11We're reliant on the money that we get from the contribution agreements the multi-level contribution agreements as well as the home for good campaign
2:56:20to
2:56:21pay for the costs of our project
2:56:23and we anticipate and expect given that our project is months from completion that we will be continue to receive
2:56:32quite costly
2:56:34invoices
2:56:36To us that will be required to be paid in the upcoming months
2:56:41And so I think that is a bit of a difficult question
2:56:45Without the funds there's an impact to our cash flow
2:56:50And so there potentially is a timing issue
2:56:53If we wait until the september day. Thanks. Okay. Thank you
2:57:04And how's councillor Caton back to you?
2:57:06Yeah to the uh to glenna and um the home for good folks
2:57:12Have you spoken to the cmhc to see if the funding day is movable because that seems to be
2:57:17the risk
2:57:19more than anything, right?
2:57:25we uh the
2:57:28We have not directly we do not have a direct relationship with the cmhc
2:57:33So we provided the letter of support and our commitment
2:57:37Dates
2:57:38So that is not a conversation we have had at this point
2:57:42for the june 15th
2:57:45Delivery date that we had for funding there was some flexibility the importance is ensuring that
2:57:53construction and our development remains on schedule
2:57:56So the ultimate factor is ensuring that that cash flow is there
2:58:02So it's all reliant on each other like really their flexibility will only depend on the development schedule
2:58:13So it's possible that
2:58:15They would be okay with the funding coming in september
2:58:19If you had that conversation
2:58:23if it didn't negatively impact the development and
2:58:28invoices and
2:58:29being received by the kindle project
2:58:34because they would want to ensure their ultimate goal is to ensure that
2:58:40construction continues
2:58:44okay
2:58:45and through the mayor to
2:58:48lana
2:58:50so
2:58:51because this is a matching fund and
2:58:54it would
2:58:55presumably be given after the matching amounts have been
2:59:00received isn't it possible that
2:59:03You wouldn't be getting the money until about september anyway
2:59:14So through the mayor to councillor Caton just for clarification the motion
2:59:18Specifies the motion that's different this year than last year is that it specifies the pain out of the $500,000 now
2:59:25That the city would directly pay out the $500,000 and then that that would be
2:59:30repaid if the matching dollars weren't raised by a certain deadline
2:59:34I'll look to see if dc le wants to comment further if I got it correct
2:59:50Okay, councillor Caton you're good then those are your questions. Yeah, okay, sorry. I understand
2:59:55So I only got I only got
2:59:58Two more and then I'd like I'd like to I think we're
3:00:02More informed because of the questions and I think we need to get get to calling the vote here, please
3:00:07So I'm going to go or orc and then uh, coran
3:00:12And then I know richardson. I think maybe just had a quick follow-up as well
3:00:15But then I'd like to I'd like to I'd like to call the vote. Okay
3:00:20Um, thank you margothry
3:00:23Um
3:00:25I'm thinking many things
3:00:27Everyone sitting around this table wants to see this project completed, right?
3:00:32And we've already demonstrated a significant commitment with the 1.3
3:00:37There will be the waving of development charges as per bill 23, which actually takes a significant cost
3:00:43off that construction
3:00:46project
3:00:47Um, and really last year's $500,000 was was to create momentum
3:00:54Um
3:00:55So I am
3:00:58I'm struggling because we're hearing about cmhc. We're hearing about other things
3:01:02But we have we don't have the documentation on that
3:01:05So in three years if somebody comes to say on what basis did you make that decision?
3:01:12There's just the letter
3:01:14So I've got some questions about the letter
3:01:17But really in terms of a $500,000 decision
3:01:21This is light in terms of governance
3:01:24In terms of timing and in terms of government governance
3:01:28The the other thing before I I get into my questions is
3:01:33With all due respect, I've served on both your boards, right? So uh, three omega three
3:01:39We need to be cautious that the expectation is not that
3:01:43That taxpayer funds and and civic funds
3:01:48Need to make up a shortfall at a campaign
3:01:51It could be regardless of the organization could be lots of other organizations could be the same
3:01:56issue
3:01:57But that is that's a really dangerous thing that we are considering. So I these are things I'm struggling with
3:02:05So I just want to get into some of the the questions I have about the letter and some general things
3:02:10Um, but there's no question that everybody wants to see these
3:02:14Affordable supportive housing units built. We're just trying to understand and we're trying to understand
3:02:20on just not a lot of
3:02:22data submitted
3:02:24to file and and
3:02:26keep
3:02:27so, um through america 3 2
3:02:31Uh, I think miss uh miss ebron
3:02:34The letter says our $2 million funding commitment to the kindle 10 shelledale project is connected other funding. So we understand that now
3:02:42And includes target dates aligned with construction milestones. We are behind on these timelines
3:02:49But I heard you say you're on time and you're on budget
3:02:53So can you help me understand
3:02:57How how the construction is behind? I understand the home for good campaign is behind
3:03:03But is the construction behind?
3:03:06The construction is not behind the project is on target
3:03:11Okay, the fall completion
3:03:13Okay, maybe the clarifying the clarifying part that I could add counselor is that
3:03:19The home for good campaign is connected to the contribution agreement
3:03:24And the home for good campaign and and please glennon and chris speak to this
3:03:28Had um specific dates the contributions were required to be made by
3:03:35Okay, no, I I understand that
3:03:37um
3:03:39And then the paragraph through america 3 goes on to say, you know, there's a there's a
3:03:44There's a funding gap
3:03:46From the home for good campaign
3:03:48To kindle
3:03:50Um and that those fundraising activities can continue. So that's great
3:03:55So why would it not be helpful?
3:03:58for the city to just
3:04:00Open up its existing 1.3 million dollar agreement
3:04:05And increase it as we did for
3:04:08st. jose
3:04:09So wouldn't that mean that the home for good campaign just has to make up a shortfall of
3:04:15$270,000 which seems like a good thing to me
3:04:18So so why not a fully appreciating what it cost to fundraise etc?
3:04:23You would actually have a smaller gap if we could use an existing vehicle and fund it that way
3:04:29Why not?
3:04:32I'm just not sure how that impacts the other
3:04:36funding condition
3:04:38unfortunately because
3:04:41Even though that funding is being provided directly to
3:04:45Kindle we're not meeting our
3:04:48$2 million commitment then
3:04:51That we committed to
3:04:53which
3:04:54turned alone
3:04:56into a grant
3:04:58It actually reminds me of the
3:05:02last matching opportunity where we inquired with staff
3:05:06If funding that was received directly
3:05:10To the windham house project could be part of the match
3:05:14And the answer was no because
3:05:17The funding needed to flow through
3:05:19the home for good campaign
3:05:21So there are commitments with funders where if funding goes directly to a project it could
3:05:28impact other funding
3:05:31So i'm just cautious
3:05:33That if it was to go direct and I I do totally understand your point
3:05:38I just don't know how it would impact that other funding and I wouldn't want to put kindle in a
3:05:44tricky position
3:05:47Through america 3 to miss ebron
3:05:51Um, I'm assuming I've talked to some folks who do lots of construction
3:05:56Um
3:06:01Should there be a funding shortfall?
3:06:04Do you have construction financing in place to be able to just continue to build and then it allows a longer timeline to fund
3:06:11Raise to fill that gap. It's my understanding most most construction projects. Do you have kind of a backup plan?
3:06:21We
3:06:23Again counselor, I think that our I don't think I know that the
3:06:28We have contribution agreements in place with multiple funders as we've already mentioned here this evening
3:06:34um
3:06:35our
3:06:36Draws from those contribution agreements are based on timelines
3:06:41um
3:06:41The home for good campaign as we indicated is connected to the contribution agreement
3:06:49And I think that if any one of those pieces of funding were not available
3:06:55And we were in a situation where we needed to
3:06:58Consider not being able to meet
3:07:01The outcomes of the project then we would have to get together with our
3:07:04Funders and we would have to have a conversation about what that meant and how we would move forward
3:07:13So through mega 3 to to miss ebron. I'm just trying to understand like
3:07:18Most construction projects will have a secured line of credit or they will have some kind of
3:07:23Of backup in case there's like lots of inflation or or whatever disruption, right?
3:07:29so
3:07:30Can can kindle not borrow
3:07:34To fill the gap because there's a reference to well, we're seeking bridge funding
3:07:40But
3:07:41Do you have deck capacity
3:07:44That would create more time
3:07:46So that we could go through the right process so that home for good campaign could raise more funds
3:07:52And and meet their obligations like i'm trying to think of ways we're trying to get to yes
3:07:57um as as partners and i'm curious to know if that's been explored
3:08:03Kindle would certainly have to go back and look at what our options are in terms of how we would cover that gap
3:08:12Um, and I think that that would have a straight
3:08:16That would have a significant impact on kindle and strain on kindle and and we would have to look at that
3:08:21Um, you know, we have been very confident in the campaign that has been put forward by home for good
3:08:27Um, and we have been you know working in and through a process that considered all levels of commitment that have been given
3:08:36By all levels of government to complete this project
3:08:41Thanks margaret three. Um, so thanks for the answer
3:08:45Okay, um
3:08:48So similar question then to the home for good campaign
3:08:52Why not continue your fundraising activities over a longer period of time because if you're looking at making up that shortfall by august 15th
3:09:00Like is that is that a reasonable expectation?
3:09:08um
3:09:09In a perfect situation
3:09:12The home for good campaign
3:09:14Would have been a five-year campaign
3:09:17Rather a five-year campaign has been delivered so far in 15 months
3:09:23And in 15 months
3:09:25We have seen
3:09:261.7 million dollars
3:09:29Provided two projects that are open and one remaining
3:09:35At this point for the home for good campaign
3:09:38There is no plan b in the sense that if there were dollars that were easily accessible
3:09:46To address homelessness. I can assure you we would have wrapped our arms around them and we'd have addressed homelessness already
3:09:54um
3:09:55and really this is why we are
3:09:59um championing and working so hard to raise funds
3:10:05Um so that we can make sure that guelph is one of the first communities to end homelessness
3:10:10So through you merga 3 there's there's no argument from anybody about that at all
3:10:17um
3:10:18And in that vein in terms of you know exploring turning over every rock
3:10:23Is there a plan to go talk to the county which is this housing service provider?
3:10:34I mean we're we're running we're in the middle of an active fundraising campaign
3:10:39Toward our five million goal. We will be reaching out to all of our funding partners and prospects
3:10:47To achieve that
3:10:49um, so through america 3 couples question questions for staff
3:10:54Is there a path? Oh, sorry. I I do have a last question for the home for good campaign merga 3 through you to um miss bandha
3:11:04Yep
3:11:06um
3:11:08So I asked you this question a year ago in terms of the admin fees
3:11:12If we wanted to stay strictly in the capital lane, right to strictly fund the capital which
3:11:19Is sort of aligned with where we need to be
3:11:22um
3:11:23Would you waive the admin fees?
3:11:26So that we can have the funds going strictly to capital and you can fund them through
3:11:32The matched community donations as as you said you did for grace gardens
3:11:43Sorry, I don't understand the comment about grace gardens
3:11:46So through you my god three earlier you said, uh, the city's matching contribution funded
3:11:54Get the kindle project and bell view
3:11:58But that uh grace gardens was funded through other community donations, right? So you can earmark stuff
3:12:05Is it possible to earmark this city funding should the vote be
3:12:10go through
3:12:12To to not cover the admin fees because those are going to be is it five or 10 percent
3:12:18administration fee
3:12:19If there's this funds transfer
3:12:22Yeah, so
3:12:26Five it is a minimal five percent administration fee for all contributions through the home for good campaign
3:12:34That are made which have been agreed upon by all partners
3:12:37Those fees are to this date strictly being used to cover direct expenses as chris mentioned earlier
3:12:47That's 82 thousand dollars
3:12:49for outside support
3:12:52Currently the community foundation in united way have received zero
3:12:57dollars of fees to support the time and efforts that we have put into this campaign
3:13:02It's
3:13:05Unreasonable to expect that we will get to a five million dollar goal and solve homelessness if we don't have the capacity
3:13:13To support the expertise required to make this campaign successful
3:13:17I appreciate that. Thank you. So through you my god three of staff. I'd like to hear from staff if there is a path forward
3:13:27Either through the county. I'd like to hear what their concerns are
3:13:32Um
3:13:35And I'm I'm a little troubled that were the people who are trying to get to yes to just say listen
3:13:40We here's 500 000 dollars that we'd be willing to give directly to kindle to get it done
3:13:45Um, that seems to be really problematic on a on documentation. We got friday
3:13:51Right, so we're working hard here and unless somebody in the future comes back to watch the video to get all the details
3:13:59This is this is tough to do on
3:14:03On just this conversation. So I'd like to hear from staff what the
3:14:07Concerns are and if there is a path forward what that might look like
3:14:13So through you mr. Mayor is the ceo so listen in here tonight. Um, I I think
3:14:18And and before I make any comments, there is no reflection of the campaign
3:14:23That's not in doubt, but I think what's missing here is the lack of conversations with city staff
3:14:29This board it's used to operate with reports that come from city staff. In fact, you had that with st
3:14:35Joe's they had it they had a
3:14:38An issue with funding
3:14:40They came to us we wrote a report you got to a positive vote
3:14:44That's how it works and and I I would say that for our three correct guess
3:14:49If we were sitting down to do that, that's what this board is looking for. So from a fiduciary responsibility
3:14:55So I'm not talking about community here. I'm talking about this board. You as a council
3:14:59That's what's missing here. There hasn't been any discussion. I mean, I look at I was reading the the
3:15:06The letter that came in too with everybody else
3:15:08The cash flow issue is can we work on that? Is this a loan that you need to get from here to there?
3:15:14What is this thing with the loan turning into a grant?
3:15:18We are out of the loop. So we can't give you good advice and that's off
3:15:21That is not a place that we normally operate
3:15:23We normally have a position for from staff's perspective. We think you can do this
3:15:29So I think maybe there's an oppen depends what you want to do tonight as a council as a whole
3:15:34But let me sort of speak from the sort of this chair
3:15:36Is what if we were to sit down with the the three guests tonight so that we can understand these things so that we can document it
3:15:44And call an emergency meeting. I have no idea the the ripples of august
3:15:4913 14th or 50th. I I'm just drawn up and so there it is
3:15:53I shouldn't even have to think about that
3:15:55And then we just get that done so that we can bring you options that you might get to that positive place and it might be simply as
3:16:03Let us understand the ripple into sort of
3:16:06What does it do to the two million dollar campaign? I I cannot give you an answer to that tonight because I'm we've not we have not been engaged in that
3:16:12And that's not a good place for you. I think
3:16:16And yet we're all committed to it. So I I think that's the that's a rub we've got
3:16:20Maybe the the issue here is sit down with city staff so that we can get it sit down with county staff
3:16:27But you know, we were just we were just on the phone today with with with county staff
3:16:31It doesn't matter who a senior county staff and we could bring something back that says we think this is the clearest path forward
3:16:38And it doesn't upset any of the other apple carts
3:16:41Or there's an agreement that you can discuss in camera because these things are in camera material if it had to be
3:16:48So I think perhaps what's missing is the opportunity here for
3:16:52You know, I I'm watching
3:16:54DCL click bush sort of try to answer things and and we're doing it the simple answer is we're not involved
3:16:59So we don't have answers
3:17:01And I don't think that's appropriate for you to hear that from us, but it is tonight. So I think the opportunity is perhaps
3:17:08If we want to keep our powder dry with deadlines in place
3:17:11There should be a meeting that we just do immediately
3:17:14And then staff can get at this if that would be helpful for what you need on the documentation side because at some point
3:17:22You do not want so let me say this and you're not suggesting that
3:17:25At some point you do not want to be the backstop for all other campaigns that also might have issues
3:17:30You need to have a reason that you've done this so that you can see yes or no the next time
3:17:35If if you just do it tonight this way, I think it is a bit of a heartstrings and we're struggling with that
3:17:42But as a board that's not you
3:17:44That's not your lane your lane is to make decisions differently
3:17:48and so
3:17:49If with the opportunity tonight mr. Mayor through the councillor, I think that might be an opportunity for us to
3:17:55Clear this track. So, you know, we're in a couple hours here and it's good stuff
3:17:59But let's document it for you so that
3:18:02In the future there's a reason that we can get behind it
3:18:04You can get behind it because you have cleared it from our perspective
3:18:08You know our finance staff have looked at it just from a risk a quick risk
3:18:11Because there's no due diligence here respectfully. You've probably done lots. So I am not talking about the campaign
3:18:18But from this table if you're looking for due diligence, you're not voting on it tonight with due diligence
3:18:24It doesn't mean it's bad. It just means it's not there for you
3:18:27Perhaps we can come back with a is it better to open up the existing rfp?
3:18:32Maybe maybe not because we don't know the details of how does that impact the campaign and the other
3:18:38contributions, but but we would have serious questions around
3:18:42A donor backed out last thursday and we're in this pickle three days later
3:18:47How can we help you with that because I just can't get my head around it here tonight to help you with that
3:18:52So I think that's the opportunity
3:18:54And we've got lots of examples to try to get through that. You know, I love getting to yes
3:18:58But sometimes policy on on distribution of public funds is is likely important as a board
3:19:04Not likely as important is important as a board and that will give you comfort when you say yes to this
3:19:11You know, I can't imagine we're likely coming back with a report that says no after all the discussions tonight
3:19:16But we might come back with a report that says this is how you get there
3:19:20And you take these steps that are not
3:19:23Clear enough for everybody tonight versus a complete deferral all those sort of things
3:19:27I I let us understand the deadlines a little more
3:19:30That's the value added that I would say to the three community guests that staff bring to it as well respectfully
3:19:36And that's what you're looking for from
3:19:38Your staff to help you with this and we're not being helpful because we're out of loop and we need to get in the loop
3:19:44to walk you through it so mr. Mayor that's just
3:19:47Observations for this chair might help us move on a little faster as we're getting near the end
3:19:52Or you might just want to fund it anyway, but I'll just leave that as an alternative option for you as decision makers
3:19:59Thank you
3:20:00So councillor roerich still has the floor
3:20:03um, you know from my vantage point both looking at my colleagues on screen and in the room there seem to be um
3:20:11Some some positive lives if I could call it that as to potential referral on the matter
3:20:19um
3:20:20with exactly the sort of process as you
3:20:25Laid out for us
3:20:26So I will I can't move a motion of referral
3:20:30But councillor a work does have um the floor so up up to you to consider
3:20:36How we move forward. Thanks margoth re through you
3:20:39To council I would like to move a motion to refer the recommendation to staff
3:20:45for their consideration
3:20:47And asking them to come back with um an emergency meeting
3:20:52for consideration. Yep, and and seconded by uh councillor boost until
3:20:58Yeah, uh, and going to order your worship. Sure. Just the timeline
3:21:03Of when it when it needs to come back
3:21:06um, well
3:21:08I think
3:21:11I think it's implied that an august 15th is a is an urgent matter
3:21:16And it's implied that our staff want to work with the three that are here as guests tonight
3:21:22And I think some sort of information would come back to me as the chair and then maybe a
3:21:26um a doodle
3:21:28Calendar request can glow to all of us. I think
3:21:31I I think it's implied that it would be before this august 15th deadline. Am I correct to staff on that?
3:21:38Mr. Mayor, you're correct. We will operate with the sense of urgency you've given it this evening
3:21:42We'll look to you to do the same when we pick a date and we'll work with the the three guests so that we completely understand
3:21:50We also don't want to put you in a predicament the night before our decision that really so we likely will try to find a couple of days
3:21:56Before and so that there's a breathing space for you to question lots of things, but we have to understand
3:22:03What is this deadline? Maybe there's a solution to the deadline. That's helpful that we could
3:22:08Yeah, we get the sense of urgency and we'll operate that way
3:22:12yep
3:22:13All right, I'm gonna call the vote on
3:22:16Councillor Downer first
3:22:18Can I just clarify one issue now the letter calls these
3:22:22dates
3:22:22Targets not deadlines. Is that the case?
3:22:25The targets is not hard fast deadline. So
3:22:29We've got breathing breathing space for a few days that
3:22:32Yes, they are targets that we outlined in our letter of commitment to cmhc. Okay, great. Thanks
3:22:41So so they are deadlines
3:22:44Because that's part of your obligation for financial contributions or no
3:22:52I'm not trying to ask that
3:22:54like like I'm not trying to ask that
3:22:57Underhanded by any means I'm actually I'm actually
3:23:00serious like
3:23:01Is it a target meaning you have a
3:23:04week
3:23:05Plus or minus or or because it's actually embedded in your financial obligations to see
3:23:12cmhc that it is something that has to be met by august 15th
3:23:17Or is that something you have to just discuss with staff?
3:23:20Yeah, and oh okay, Colleen
3:23:23Um to the mayor if maybe I can jump in I think that's part of the conversation that we're gonna have probably tomorrow morning
3:23:28Heads up to those of you our guests
3:23:31Because we need to understand because the relationship between cmhc is not through homes for good the legal relationship with cmhc sits with kindle
3:23:39So that's part of like I've you know to be clear. I've literally not had a conversation with miss ebron
3:23:45So we're gonna have that conversation tomorrow morning. So I can try to get clarity on that and bring you that report back
3:23:51Okay, thank you. Thank you very much
3:23:55um, okay
3:23:57Let's call the vote on this and before I just call the vote
3:24:01I I started I started by saying I know that we are all trying to figure out how to get to yes
3:24:06I just heard
3:24:08Our c. A. O. Say the same thing right the very end here of this conversation
3:24:12And I've heard it many times through through people my colleagues here too. So that's that's good
3:24:17That's a good position to start with right and uh, so let's see what happens
3:24:23it's
3:24:24in my in my
3:24:25Point of view. It's it's better than a no
3:24:28so
3:24:29So it's a we'll see
3:24:31And we'll we'll we'll see what happens and see if uh, we require an emergency meeting
3:24:37To help with the supportive housing needs. Okay, so
3:24:40Is anyone against the referral?
3:24:44Okay in favor mr. Mayor on the phone. I did favor
3:24:48Okay, thank you councillor gibson. And can you just throw it up on the screen just so everyone at home can see it to the clerks
3:24:54Apologies, mr. Mayor. We've not received anything in writing
3:24:57Yeah, okay
3:24:59But the motion um, the motion is to refer can you say it again a councillor
3:25:05Oror this for audio to do you marigot three. I think this is part of our procedural bylaw
3:25:10Wording and so I have to provide it in writing. That's right as opposed to saying it out loud. Okay. Okay, so if I could have just
3:25:17Yeah, I'm gonna give you 30 seconds. Yeah. Yeah, thanks
3:25:21Yeah, no problem. I always mistype when the clock is ticking
3:25:27While we're just waiting for that, um
3:25:31I will again call the vote as soon as it comes up on the screen because I kind of did because we just had a councillor
3:25:36Say yes, um to you, uh, councillor boosted. Yes. Thank you. I just want to say thank you to the cao and to the staff
3:25:44You know, I started off with process and and process and process and how I was feeling and I felt, you know
3:25:50Validated by the cao and this process of my calling. So thank you for that
3:25:56Thank you
3:25:58Okay, um, well just wait. Just wait a second everybody and we'll we'll get that done
3:26:11So through you marigot three if I can just say it out loud and then we can say yes, that's what we all heard
3:26:17Sure, uh motion to refer the matter to staff for urgent consideration
3:26:20resulting in an emergency meeting
3:26:23of council in the coming weeks
3:26:25That work
3:26:27Yep, and councillor boosted till was I think still okay with seconding that
3:26:32Councillor gallo, we've had audio and verbally stated. All right. Again, I'm just going to call the vote
3:26:36I know councillor Gibson said yes, but is anyone against the referral
3:26:41All right, so that's unanimous. Thank you to our our guests that have answered a lot of questions
3:26:46And I'm sure you'll be answering a lot more, but at least you'll know that there's a movement. Uh, we'll see what happens
3:26:52Okay, thank you very much for joining us
3:26:54and thank you very much for uh
3:26:56Leave the conversation about it appreciate that
Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.
Everything on this page comes from the City of Guelph’s published record. Nothing here is a summary or an interpretation.