Skip to main content
Jon Christensen
Guelph Council Record

Committee of the Whole · May 05, 2026 · Item 9.1

Report titled ‘Building Permits Approvals and Inspections Value-for-Money Audit’ dated May 5, 2026 be received.

Main motion under the agenda item Building Permits Approvals and Inspections Value-for-Money Audit - 2026-203

Carried (11 to 0)

11 in favour, 0 against — unanimous

What was voted on

The motion in its exact words, as recorded in the minutes.

That the report titled ‘Building Permits Approvals and Inspections Value-for-Money Audit’ dated May 5, 2026 be received.

Moved by Councillor Allt, seconded by Councillor Klassen.

How the room voted

In favour (11)

  • Allt
  • Billings
  • Busuttil
  • Caron
  • Caton
  • Downer
  • Goller
  • Guthrie
  • Hauser
  • Klassen
  • Richardson

Who spoke to it

Robert Jelacic, General Manager, Internal Audit presented on the Building Permits Approvals and Inspections Value-for-Money Audit - 2026-203.

What council was given

The staff reports and correspondence attached to this item. The summaries are written automatically, so you can tell what a document is without opening a ninety-page PDF.

A summary is this site’s description of a document, not the City’s. Open the document before relying on one.

What was said

875 words from the meeting recording, transcribed automatically. Times are from the start of the recording.

Read the debate(click to open)

1:37:59on the agenda under items for discussion the building permits approvals and inspections

1:38:04value for money audit and I will turn things over to Mr. Robert Jellisek our general manager of

1:38:11internal audit please go ahead Robert. Thank you Councillor Goller I'm going to give you a quick

1:38:20verbal summary of the audit report building permit approvals and inspections value for money audit

1:38:29golf's building permit building permitting and inspection system is functioning very well

1:38:34from a development enablement perspective sorry I should stand in front of the mic with strong

1:38:40compliance predictable timelines and no evidence that building services are a bottleneck to housing

1:38:45delivery building services plays a critical role in the housing pipeline while it does not set

1:38:53planning policy or zoning permissions it does control how quickly approved housing can move

1:39:00from drawings to construction and ultimately to occupancy in 2025 the city issued 1,757 permits

1:39:09with a total construction value of 450 million dollars 29,700 inspections were completed across

1:39:18residential and non-residential projects given housing supply pressures the audit specifically

1:39:24examined whether building approvals and inspections are timely predictable and reliable because any

1:39:32delays here would directly undermine housing enabling enablement goals the audit confirmed

1:39:39that all tested permits met or exceeded Ontario building code legislative review timelines

1:39:46there were no deviations from mandated service standards inspection requests were completed

1:39:52on the dates requested by applicants with same-day inspection reports issued from a housing perspective

1:40:00this is critical it means that developers can reliably schedule construction activities

1:40:05builders are not experiencing unpredictable downtime waiting for inspections there is no

1:40:15systemic delay being introduced at the building permit stage in short building services is not

1:40:21slowing housing down secondly capacity workload management and continuity inspections are

1:40:28automatically routed by permit type manually balanced daily to ensure fair workload distribution

1:40:36typically assigned geographically so the same inspector follows a project end to end

1:40:42this continuity reduces rework misinterpretation and inconsistent application of code requirements

1:40:48all of which are key risks in large or multiple phase housing projects the audit also found all

1:40:56inspections and plan examiners are fully credentialed and compliant with provincial requirements

1:41:02deficiencies are clearly tied to building code provisions and tracked until resolution

1:41:08from an enabling standpoint this supports faster resolution of issues fewer disputes and predictable

1:41:15correction cycles for builders third digital systems and client experience

1:41:21Guelph's fully digital permitting system GPAS is functioning effectively all permit applications

1:41:28and inspection bookings are online automatic status updates keep applicants informed

1:41:36in-person and virtual support is available for applicants who need assistance for housing

1:41:42delivery this reduces friction particularly for small and mid-scale builders home builders adding

1:41:50secondary units or accessory dwelling units and repeat applicants navigating multiple permits

1:41:57the audit found that customer service practices to be strong and responsive

1:42:01with no systemic complaints about access or responsiveness importantly the audit did not

1:42:09identify failures to service delivery but it did flag two governance level opportunities that matter

1:42:15indirectly to housing enablement one complaint tracking while staff respond to concerns quickly

1:42:22there is no centralized way to track complaints or escalations limited ability to analyze trends

1:42:28such as recurring pain points for applicants for housing strategy this matters because without

1:42:33trend data it's harder to pinpoint systemic barriers experienced by builders issues may

1:42:39be resolved case by case but not structurally addressed the recommendation is to do is to

1:42:45introduce a risk-based centralized complaint tracking approach starting simply and potentially

1:42:51scaling citywide this would improve insight without adding red tape second performance

1:42:57reporting to council and leadership building services generate strong performance data but

1:43:03it is not regularly reported to council or the executive team housing relevant metrics like

1:43:09turnaround times and inspection performance are largely invisible at a strategic level

1:43:15the audit recommends regular kpi reporting to the executive team and council

1:43:20and annual public reporting to reinforce transparency and confidence in the housing pipeline

1:43:31for a housing enabling strategy it allows leadership to confidently say permitting is not

1:43:35the constraint or it if pressures emerge to identify them early and respond proactively

1:43:44the audit also highlights a structural revenue challenge in building services

1:43:49declines in large ici and high-rise permits are reducing fee revenue

1:43:54reserve balances have dropped significantly and a full fee study is underway to stabilize the

1:44:00program long-term again from a housing standpoint there is no evidence this has affected service

1:44:06levels to date but long-term sustainability matters to ensure consistent capacity as housing

1:44:13activity ramps up to summarize building permits and inspections are not a bottleneck to housing

1:44:18delivery and golf timeliness timelines are predictable compliant and consistently met

1:44:25inspections are timely coordinated and professionally executed digital systems

1:44:31and client supports reduce friction for builders the two improvement areas

1:44:36complaint tracking and performance reporting are about visibility and maturity not failure

1:44:41and can actually strengthen housing enablement by surfacing systemic issues earlier

1:44:47building services is a strong and reliable partner in enabling housing

1:44:50and the audit provides confidence that the regulatory back end of the housing pipeline is

1:44:56functioning as intended thank you so much for the report both yourself mr. jones i can't use

1:45:04yourself mr. kenn for for drafting this i really appreciate it i'll turn it over to my council

Automatic transcription is imperfect. Treat quotes as a guide and check the recording before relying on exact wording.

Check this against the City’s official minutes

The motion, the vote and the debate come from the City of Guelph’s published record, reproduced rather than interpreted. The document summaries above are the exception: those words were written for this site.

See the rest of this meeting