City Council as Shareholder of GMHI
June 23, 2026 · 2 recorded decisions · 3,596 words of debate
Decisions
Routine business (1)adopting minutes, adjourning and similar
The whole meeting, as text
Transcribed automatically from the City’s recording. Times run from the start of the recording, which begins before the meeting is called to order.
Read the full transcript (3,596 words)
17:59We ready? So I'm going to call to order the meeting of City Council as the shareholder
18:06of Glow of Municipal Holdings Inc. And we have the agenda in front of us. So first of all,
18:13is there or are there any disclosure of pecuniary interest? Seeing none. Could I have confirmation
18:22of the open minutes from April 7th held 2026. I had to read look at that and make sure it
18:31was from last year. Councillor Busuttil. Any questions? Seeing none. I'm going to go to
18:41the vote. Is anyone opposed? No one opposed. Thank you. That passes. So the items for discussion
18:48then. We have the annual report and financial reporting to the shareholders in front of
18:54us. And we're going to have a presentation first with Stephen O'Brien, Justin Wee and
19:00Jane Armstrong. Thank you very much, Chair Downer. And good afternoon to members of Council.
19:10Thanks for having us and we appreciate the opportunity to share some updates on GMAIs
19:17at our AGM and also to hear from our colleagues at Electoral represented by Ms. Armstrong.
19:24Today, Council meets as representative of the city in its capacity as the shareholder
19:29of GMAI, Guelph Municipal Holdings. I'll use the GMAI acronym for short. My name is Stephen
19:36O'Brien. I'm the city's Deputy CEO of Corporate Services. I'm also a director on the GMAI
19:41board with me today. As you mentioned, Chair Downer is Justin Wee. Justin is the GMAI's
19:47Chief Financial Officer, but also the city's Deputy Treasurer and Manager of Financial
19:51Strategy and Reporting. You'll also hear from Ms. Jane Armstrong, Director and actually
19:57Board Chair of Electra and the city's appointee to Electra. For those in attendance today
20:05who may not be familiar with the corporate structure, GMAI is a municipal holding corporation.
20:10Its purpose is to hold an equity interest in the securities of other companies. Presently,
20:14GMAI owns 4.63% of the issued and outstanding shares of Electra Incorporated. GMAI creates
20:21financial value to the city through its equity holdings and dividend returns. As at December
20:2731st, 2025, GMAI's investment in Electra is valued at $115.7 million, an increase of
20:34$7.1 million over 2024. The increase in value represents GMAI's proportionate share of
20:41Electra's earnings, totaling $10.8 million, reduced, of course, by the dividends declared
20:46and paid to GMAI of approximately $3.6 million. GMAI's total comprehensive income in 2025
20:54was $10.1 million, compared with $7.5 million in 2024, an increase of $2.6 million year
21:01over year. The favorable change is a result of higher net comprehensive income of Electra
21:06in 2025. In 2025, GMAI received $3.6 million in dividends from Electra, which was a slight
21:13decrease compared to prior year dividends of $3.7 million. Overall, GMAI has continued
21:21to be a contributing asset for the city. The city's net income from GMAI in its 2025 financial
21:27statements totals $10.8 million, and the city recognized a gain of $7.1 million in its investments
21:34in GMAI for 2025, and as I said earlier, GMAI paid $3.7 million in dividends to the city.
21:42I will wrap there. It is a pretty brief presentation in terms of the GMAI side of things. Perhaps
21:49we'll hold questions until after Ms. Armstrong's presentation, but with that I will turn it
21:55over to Ms. Armstrong to deliver her remarks. And we have that presentation coming up as
22:02well.
22:07Thank you. Good afternoon. And thank you for inviting me to speak to you today. I'm happy
22:24to be here today to update you on another productive year of continued partnership. I'm pleased
22:30to provide a brief update on Electra's operational progress, investment priorities, and the work
22:35underway to support a reliable, affordable, and sustainable electricity system in Guelph.
22:42Electra's formation has provided dividends of 30% greater than forecast without the merger,
22:47with continued strong competitive metrics relating to reliability, affordability, and sustainability.
22:55We have been effective in providing our customers with much better electricity reliability than
22:59the sector average and other large utilities, including Toronto Hydro and Hydro One. Over
23:05the past year, we have continued to make disciplined investments in renewing aging infrastructure,
23:11strengthening system resiliency, and preparing for significant load growth driven by electrification,
23:17new development, and emerging industries. These efforts are central to ensuring that
23:21our customers continue to receive safe, dependable, and affordable service. Looking ahead, we
23:27are preparing for the decision of our recently filed rate application, which will support
23:32the investments required to renew deteriorated assets, expand system capacity, and modernize
23:38the grid. These investments are essential to meeting customer expectations, supporting
23:44economic growth, and ensuring that our infrastructure remains resilient in the face of increasingly
23:49severe weather. We are also advancing our sustainable financing strategy, which is designed to support
23:56long term capital needs while maintaining rate stability for our customers. This includes
24:01ongoing engagement with federal and provincial partners. Electra has been advocating federally
24:06and provincially for more than two years for tax relief in an effort to remove barriers
24:12for non-municipal financial options. This slide is a snapshot of our 2025 performance.
24:26Our 2025 results reflect from both operational strength and discipline financial management.
24:35Total revenue of $825 million was primarily driven by strong regulated operations, higher
24:42distribution revenue from the price cap index adjustment, and increased customer demand.
24:49Net income of $144 million was $24 million higher than budget and $5.2 million higher
24:57than 2024 net income. The principal drivers of our net income in 2025 are, for the regulated
25:04business, distributed distribution revenue in the regulated business increased due to
25:10the price cap index adjustment of 3.3 percent in 2025. This increase was partially offset
25:16by higher operating expenses, principally as a result of inflationary labor increases,
25:22third party support for reactive repairs, credit losses due to higher aged accounts principally
25:28from residential customers, and environmental expenses. On the competitive business side,
25:34net income was impacted by lower storm response revenue, which was partially offset by the
25:40one-time gain on the sale of our submetering operations of $3.7 million. Ibadah of $396 million,
25:49of which 99 percent came from the regulated business, continues to underscore the stability
25:54and scale of our regulated business model due to its predictability of cash flows. Historically,
26:01Ibadah from the regulated business has been 90 percent of total Ibadah. The change in
26:06ratio in 2025 reflects lower Ibadah from the competitive business, primarily due to lower
26:12HPS storm response activity in 2025. Capital investments of $391 million were primarily
26:21focused on system access expenditures, including new customer connections, major transit initiatives,
26:28and construction of distribution infrastructure for new subdivisions, as well as system renewal
26:34expenditures, to replace aging assets and system service expenditures to modernize the
26:40grid. Rate base at the end of 2025 was $4.1 billion. Rate base has increased by 5.1 percent
26:50on average per year since 2021, reflecting ongoing investment in our distribution system.
26:57Dividends on common shares of $85 million were $2 million higher than the prior year
27:03and continues our track record of attractive and growing returns for our shareholders.
27:08Electra's return on equity of 6.8 percent continues to reflect the shortfall related
27:14to the return earned on the utility's rate base, as the utility continues to make the
27:19necessary infrastructure investments, which exceed the amount supported in rates, where
27:24the amounts in rates have been adjusted to include annual inflation and improved incremental
27:31capital modules. At the end of the year, we had $800 million of unutilized short-term
27:37liquidity, providing flexibility to meet funding requirements. Electra continues to be the
27:42largest municipally owned local distribution company in Canada by customer count, with
27:49the number of customers totaling $1.1 million. In 2025, we added approximately 5,000 new
27:56customers. In summary, these results demonstrate Electra's continued ability to deliver stable
28:03earnings, invest for the future, and create value for shareholders, all while maintaining
28:09a strong financial foundation. In light of our major investment requirements, Electra's
28:18rate-rebasing application seeks to balance customer expectations, distribution system
28:24needs, and applicable public policy objectives. The three key themes are, first, renewing and
28:31replacing aging infrastructure, focusing on renewing, deteriorating, and obsolete equipment
28:37to help minimize the risk of outages, ensure safe operations, provide increased resiliency
28:43during severe storm events, and mitigate environmental hazards. Secondly, meeting growing electricity
28:50demand. Electra has a critical role to play in expanding the local electricity grid so
28:56that our customers can continue to explore and install new technologies for home heating
29:01and powering their vehicles. Electra's population across our service territory is projected
29:07to grow by 31 percent from 2021 to 2041. This growth is driving the need for new housing,
29:15public transit expansion, and new infrastructure. And finally, enabling resiliency and modernization.
29:23As more of our customers are installing electrified technologies, Electra must invest in building
29:28a more intelligent and resilient grid. We must integrate new smart technologies that
29:34can help us to restore power faster during outages. These investments are further to
29:38strengthen our grid against extreme weather and potential cyber attacks. Our application,
29:47our RAID application, was filed with the Ontario Energy Board in October of 2025. And I'm
29:52pleased to share that we recently reached a tentative settlement on all issues with
29:58interveners. As I'm sure you can appreciate, we are subject to obligations of confidentiality,
30:04mandated by the Ontario Energy Board, and at this time, I am unable to discuss any further
30:10the terms of the tentative settlement. Over the next month, we will work with interveners
30:14to finalize the settlement terms and submit the proposed agreement to the Ontario Energy
30:19Board for approval. We expect that the OEB will begin reviewing the proposal in mid-July.
30:25This is an extremely positive development in the process, and we will provide more information
30:30as we can. We are also advancing our sustainable financing strategy, which is designed to support
30:41long-term capital needs while maintaining rate stability for our customers. Electra
30:47has been advocating federally and provincially for more than two years for tax relief in an
30:52effort to remove barriers for non-municipal financing options in order to fund capital
30:56expenditures. Electra's rebasing application requests an increase to capital budgets to
31:02address load growth and aging assets. If approved, capital expenditures will reach levels comparable
31:08to Hydro 1 and Toronto Hydro by 2031. The sustainable financing consortium that is made
31:16up of representatives of all of our shareholders has been convened to explore a structured
31:21review of potential sustainable financing options and the associated governance implications
31:27to support Electra's strategy and growth plans. We have held several productive meetings
31:32with the Oversight Committee and the Finance and Governance Subcommittees over the last
31:36few months. At this point, we are pivoting to focus on direct outreach with individual
31:41shareholders, seeking feedback on the materials provided, the options presented, and addressing
31:47any questions or perspectives shareholders raise while planning to meet again with the
31:51Oversight Committee in July or August. I want to take this opportunity to thank and acknowledge
31:57the City of Boel's active involvement in this exercise. You play an important role through
32:04your representation on the consortium and financing and governance subcommittees. We
32:08appreciate the time taken by all of your representatives. Your participation and guidance continue
32:13to be invaluable as we navigate through this process. Through our Electra Cares Community
32:23Support Program, total 20-25 investments in Guelph were approximately $128,000. We put
32:32a priority on youth and families in disadvantaged communities, food security issues, access
32:38to healthcare, as well as equity, diversity, and inclusion. We commenced a new five-year
32:43commitment with the Guelph General Hospital Foundation of $300,000, $60,000 per year over
32:49five years, to support the new Women's Diagnostic Imaging Center. Our commitment is helping
32:55to purchase a second mammogram machine which is already up and running at the new community
33:00clinic. This investment has been renewed for 2026 as we continue to support frontline social
33:06service agencies in Guelph. In closing, many thanks for the opportunity to attend today,
33:13and I look forward to our continued engagement. Thank you.
33:23Is Mr. Weigel going to do a part of a presentation as well?
33:26No, through you, Chair Downer. No, that concludes the presentation, but we're more than happy
33:31myself, Mr. Weigel, and then obviously Ms. Armstrong to answer any questions you might
33:36have. Thank you.
33:37So, okay, we'll start. Are there any questions from Councillors? Councillor Boussatiel.
33:44Yes, thank you. Thank you very much for the presentation and for being here. Through the
33:51Chair, this is a question I think just open to whoever can answer it. I tend to get quite
33:56a few emails from residents who say they have 100 amp service in their home, and when I
34:03do a drive-by, often it's a split, so the neighbor has the other, and they're asking
34:09for 200. So, when you speak about expand local infrastructure, is there a plan to look at
34:17neighborhoods where the infrastructure is dated and those individuals that are moving
34:23in, the new individuals with electric cars that need the 200 amps? Is that something
34:28that Electra does? Is that something the city does? How does that happen?
34:32Well, it's Electra, but it's also depending upon where the location is, the city, it may
34:37also be capacity from Hydra 1. So, to the extent that Electra can deal with it, that
34:44would likely be part of our plan, but if it's certainly we continue to advocate for increased
34:50capacity, and I know that that is an issue that has been coming up, and I've certainly
34:55been speaking to management as advised that it is something that they're continuing to
34:59attempt to address. And through you, Chair Downer, to Councillor
35:02Boussatiel, I'll just add on to Ms. Armstrong's comments. That's definitely a service request
35:06that will reside with Electra. They would then be in a position to triage and support
35:10individual constituents that you might have, Councillor Boussatiel, in terms of managing
35:14that through the relationship that is, or I should say the delivery mechanism that is
35:18Hydra 1 to Electra, in terms of then actioning those service calls. And much, I believe,
35:24I don't want to speak too much from Ms. Armstrong, much of that is sort of what she had alluded
35:28to in her presentation in terms of we know that residents are demanding more of the electricity
35:34system and the grid for things like electric vehicles. And we know on an institutional
35:40and industrial side of things that there's more demand for things, increased data capacity,
35:45not necessarily just for data centres, but there's increased capacity demands across
35:50the Electra rate base. Thank you. Councillor Cressen.
35:56Yes. Thank you for the presentation. I have a quick question with regard to a couple of
36:03complaints that I've received from more to residents, but I think that it's something
36:07that is consistent probably across the city. And that's with regard to graffiti on electrical
36:13boxes. And I know in one case in particular, I have an email chain with some staff at Electra
36:19talking about what to do about this. And so my question is, do you work with your partners
36:28at the various cities that you work with to create sort of vandalism deterrent type
36:35programmes? In Toronto, I know that they have one called Outside the Box, where they hire
36:38artists to do wraps on electrical boxes and murals, for example. And a follow up to that is
36:48if that's something that we could think about working on together with the city.
36:53Thank you. I'm not aware of that, but that doesn't mean it's not happening. So what I'd like to do,
36:59if you don't mind, I'll take that away, make some enquiries and perhaps we can, through the
37:03clerk, we can get back to you as to the answer. That's all right.
37:09Sure. And then maybe then a question to the clerk, is this something then that we could
37:15provide direction on today for staff to work collaboratively with Electra on developing a
37:21programme like this? Because I know through, you know, electric cares, for example, that's
37:25something that gives back to the community. So I'm just curious if I need to provide that
37:30direction or if that will come back to us in a different way.
37:34Okay, CAO Baker would like to answer that.
37:36Yes, and thanks through you, Chair Downer. I would say that there's no direction required. I
37:42would say this is actually more of a city staff, not necessarily a GMHI question as it relates
37:50to the programme. And so we're happy to take that away and work with Ms Armstrong, as was discussed.
37:57Sure. Okay. Thank you.
37:59Councillor Gibson.
38:03Thank you. Through you, Chair Downer. I was wondering if I could hear a little bit more
38:09about the, I believe I heard the sale of the sub-meetering business that Electra was in.
38:15Can you just expand on that? I thought sub-meetering was good business, but maybe there's others
38:20that do it more efficiently. Would you mind just to help me understand that a little bit better?
38:23Well, I think it's probably like any, you know, if there's an opportunity, if there's an opportunity
38:30to make a good sale of benefit to the company, then it's an opportunity that is worth considering.
38:37So yes, I think it's a good business, but I think you also have to be aware, as you're, you know,
38:42a lot of the customers of this particular business would be condominiums, the sub-meetering, and
38:47there's obviously been a slowdown in the condominium business. So there's been a, so long term that may
38:54be something, and certainly in the past it's been a very successful business, but I think
39:00it was certainly an opportunity that I think management felt that it was appropriate to take.
39:06Okay, thank you. And one last question. It's more of a sort of a global question for Electra. When we
39:13merged with Electra a few years ago, one of the more attractive pieces of the merger was that it
39:18was municipally owned by a consortium of municipalities, but also that we were a consortium of rapidly
39:25growing municipalities, which is really the basis for the dividend and the return on investment.
39:31Are you still seeing, I think it's Mississauga, Brampton ourselves, is it very as well? I can't
39:37remember all of the families in the consortium, but are we still tracking well those, you know,
39:44rapidly growing municipalities? Well, I think in my presentation I indicated that
39:50our number of customers increased by 5,000 last year. So yes, I think we are very well positioned
39:56in a rapidly growing territory. Thanks very much. That's great. Thank you. Are there any other
40:07questions? Councillor Billings? Councillor Billings? Through you, Madam Chair. Jane, I just,
40:17I think I know the answer, but I just wanted to confirm it with you. With respect to
40:23the credit risk, was that incorporated into the capital business case? And if so, to what extent?
40:32So what's the percentage point premium? And because I was fearful that we would have then
40:39more costs in the future than what was accounted for if it wasn't in the business case.
40:44The business case for the capital? For the capital cost electrification, for borrowing,
40:51borrowing, and then we have a credit risk issue. Well, it's been something that has been highlighted
41:00and that's why we're looking at sustainable financing options. But we don't have that now,
41:10Dewey, those other options. The options are being considered, okay, but the shareholders have to
41:16approve them. Okay. And then I have one question for staff. So this was years ago, I had asked
41:30if we were complying, winding up GMHI and the answer was there was tax implications or
41:38potential tax implications. So the answer was no. And I was just wondering what's,
41:43what's the situation or the case now? Are we even considering that,
41:49winding it up and merging with the city or no? Through the chair, not at this moment.
42:01That being said, on the financial statements, you will see there's a deferred tax liability
42:06that has grown year over year. And in the case that there is a wind up of GMHI,
42:11that liability there would be used to help settle any potential costs.
42:17So you're saying we, we actually could look at merging or no? Financially speaking?
42:24Financially speaking, we haven't looked at it, but that is an option that's required for us
42:31under the accounting policy to keep that on our books just in the event that this scenario needs
42:39to be reviewed. Okay. Thanks for your help. Thank you, Councillor Allt.
42:45Thank you, Chair Downer. This is just a takeaway to staff, I believe. I was wondering,
42:50following up on Councillor Billings question, whether at some point we could look, have just
42:55a quick report, summary report on the advantages or disadvantages of winding up GMHI?
43:04Sure. Through the, through Chair Downer, yes, we will, we will consider that there's other
43:11kind of ongoing work related to, to the capital financing. And so we're happy to, to take a
43:18further look into that question as part of that work. Thank you very much.
43:22Are there any more questions? Okay. Would somebody like to move the recommendation
43:28in front of us to receive Councillor Allt, seconded by Council Coran?
43:36Any more questions or comments? Seeing none, I'll go to the question. Is anyone opposed?
43:43None. I think there's any other business on this agenda. So I would look for a motion to adjourn.
43:55Councillor Cousin and seconded by Councillor Caitlin. Anyone opposed? Seeing none. This meeting
44:03is adjourned. Thank you.